Poor Saddam thought he had the blessing of America, only to realise too late, that they’re lying sacks who can never be trusted. Saddam’s oil Euro pitch at the end, if only he’d known that the Euro-peons were as subservient and feckless as he.
this comment has been flagged as of little/no value (possibly troll) by the saker
It remains true that all revolutions are anglosaxon revolutions.
If there is an exception I would like to be reminded about that.
Although I see no reason to polemise against Iran which has legitimate interests to develop an industry and with it prosperity, just like Iran had when the anglosaxons ousted the shah.
And due to that anglosaxon revolution the very cooperative Khomeini closed the nuclear power projects.
And it still isnt obvious to me that the rumours about his father being a british spy from Bristol would necessarily be false.
That spy worked in the oil business and ‘went native’ ie lived like a muslim.
I know the official story is about Khomeini having grown up in India or something but his son has confirmed in 2011, that there are doubts about his fathers origin.
When it became clear the rule of the Shah was coming to an end, the worst scenario for the US would be a communist regime. So they utilized their influence to prevent that from happening.
West and Stalin were allies. The Bolsheviks lost power in the 1953 coup, where Lavrentiy Beria was executed. From then on Russia, i.e. the Slav Russia, was lethal enemy of West. West and Communism is the same.
In China Chinese was defined as “enemy” by Mao Zedong. Mao Mao Zedong is West?
CIA is Maoism. Maoist guerilla was not run by China, but rather by CIA, like Al Qaida is run by CIA, and Boko Haram is run by France.
please stop posting stuff like “CIA is Maoism”.
First, that is an unsubstantiated statement.
Second, it conflates an organization with an ideology.
Third, it serves absolutely no useful purpose for a discussion.
And it is off topic.
kjell108 – please cool it, ok?
Andrei
These guys troll massively on MoA. A waste of precious reading time. Sad really. This supports my previous statement, the west hates youth and success. To claim it is only whites that have done anything … well, I could second that but it wouldn’t be flattering. Impugning our friends in the world is a zero sum game.
this comment has been flagged as of little/no value (possibly troll) by the saker
Hi, Peter. After the defeat of Napoleon, all the revolutions and wars were concocted by the Jewish banksters of the City of London, the bunker from which the Jewish banking interests were managed under the guise of the British Empire. Since WW2 the armed brand changed from British to USA.
They hate Iran with the same amount vitriol hatred that is also directed at Cuba. I think the main reason is that both governments disrupted the American’s “backyard”. Cuba was the playground of the American mafia and Iran was to a certain degree the US/Israel “playground” for controlling the Middle East via the despicable Shah.
The Americans like their Israeli partners never forget nor forgive . . .
Iran is one of only 3 major countries with no Rothschild Central Bank. DPRK, Cuba, who’d a guessed, round up the usual suspects?
As Zone B flourishes, so too will Iran, whose energy reserves, unlike Saudi’s (dwindling) are virtually untapped, and with the 2nd largest proven gas reserves after Russia. Having survived America’s illegal sanctions and still kept its head above water, Iran’s future looks rosy.
Remember, Success for Iran = Failure for Israel, who are baulking, spitting feathers, at Russian Iranian strengthening relations.
A complex system, like the nations of earth, that is beset by a multitude of problems existing across it’s many systems is a very thorny thing to sort out. A daunting list of problems that threaten to entirely derail the system (earth), while continuing to cause it to run in crisis mode, cannot be handled simply by ticking off a comprehensive problem to-do list. The problem list must be converted into an interrelational grid which exposes where some problems lend their synergy to other problems. Using this decision grid to determine the specific problems in the problem network that enable and lend power to other lesser problems allows the problem solvers to bring down the interrelational problem grid more strategically and efficiently. This approach is opposed to running around like a headless chicken with a fire extinguisher perpetually outing crisis fires everywhere. I wonder what it is that has made you use the term Anglo-Zionist so often. Obviously everyone has participated in the problems that has beset this planet over the ages. But some have participated longer, better organized, more efficiently, and with greater effect.
Befree: You write: “I wonder what it is that has made you use the term Anglo-Zionist so often. Obviously everyone has participated in the problems that has beset this planet over the ages. But some have participated longer, better organized, more efficiently, and with greater effect.”
It seems to me that you have answered your own question. The term Anglo-Zionist is applicable because it describes the cultural formation that has evolved the highest manifestation of the power of mental ego. It operates via the appellation of “modernity” and looks down on all others (East of the English Channel) as primitives. The more culturally developed the mental ego the greater is the power for both good and evil.
Hence the ego maniacs that rule the Anglo Zionist empire have at their fingertips are greater capacity for evil and a greater ego driven inclination to practice it than civilizations less encumbered with hyper developed patriarchal egoism. One not so small example being the impulse to invent and practice aggressive atomic warfare is Anglo-Zionist in origin. As is the enormous power of media driven propaganda.
Andrei: I totally agree. A good move on your part. It is far too easy to fall for the simple explanation that appears to explain everything. It attracts mental laziness. However I can see the current cultural confusion pushing people into this “post truth” atmosphere.
Hi, Peter. After the defeat of Napoleon, all the revolutions and wars were concocted by the Jewish banksters of the City of London, the bunker from which the Jewish banking interests were managed under the guise of the British Empire. Since WW2 the armed brand changed from British to USA.
Well they said it was b/c they could not compete, and once out competed, you lose the right to reenter the arena with a substantial argument.
But in the end its not actually about competition, its about fairness and the lack of it on the western side for a long period of time, this is what the war is all about.
The Satanists are very skilled at turning potential brothers against each other and shaping the ensuing carnage to their designs. And during this they remain in the shadows out of the fray they engineered. But this is the information age and light is seeping into those shadows. Potential brothers who were maneuvered to kill one another will be seeking a reconning, at a time and place of their choosing.
@nietzsche1510
Sorry you have swallowed the usual british illusion about the bankers being independent and ‘international’ .
Instead they are chained to the empire.
They are in a firm symbiosis.
Do you think the british, after having run the ‘french’ revolution and facilitated Napoleons march to power would allow Napoleon to obtain equally favourable loans as those given to Britain?
The fact is Britain needed to spend money to win money like some other anglosaxon said – I dont remember who.
Thus in order to set in motion a profitable war there was a need to wet the apetite of every partaker.
If the Rothschilds had acted like some German bankers did in the period 1975-1991 they would have been given the same treatment. Death. Those german bankers had the temerity to suggest that the poor nations should receive debt cancellation and in the case of Rohwedder it was about a milder treatment of the east germans in connection with the unification. The Rothschilds however when asked about whether they had any moral qualms in connection with the human suffering sometimes following with their investments they said no it is just business or something like that.
That is why they survive.
Although I noted that three of the five sons of the Forefather died in 1855.
But I still think that was natural deaths since they were old.
However recently I have come to believe that the Jack the Ripper affaire in 1888 – which took the form of five masonic ritual murders of prostitutes – was meant to be understood as a death threat to the whole Rothschild clan, should they embark on any ambitious collaboration with Bismarck.
I won’t elaborate now. But you can safely forget everything you ever read about those powerful ‘private’ bankers.
We are dealing with an empire!
And the americans largely have failed to understand their own history with regard to the early leaders and national banks.
Partly because they have no real political parties to choose among.
They confuse the traitors with the patriots and viceversa.
And that confused nation may now push us all over the cliff!
Both the Iranian and Chinese revolutions were youth revolutions. In spite of help from their western colleagues they are still successful. The west hates nothing more than youth and success. That’s why we can’t have nice things.
Iran’s 1979 Revolution was blow to the control of the price & money flows from oil, and future potential takeover of then USSR (Russia) and nearby CIS states around the Caspian Sea where there was a lot more oil. Control and power by bankers and commercial elites in the west.
If any solid part of the oil mkt is not under their control it was the threat to the $US (and GBP and EU currencies). Iraq got invaded in 1991 & 2003 because of the same issue.
WW2 made UK & US realize how important Iran was geographically as they had to invade it in 1942 to get a supply route to USSR to help them defeat the Axis invasion there.
Same would apply to any other commodity being traded in US$.
Iran could alleviate a lot of this by negotiating a long lasting peace with Israel over religious etc… issues.
And Russia and Putin could assist with that.
The same people attacking Iran today because of monetary issues are the same ones behind the Jewish Holocaust between 1933-45. Its just the target has changed.
Given ancient Persia, along with India, was a key part of the origin of western civilization its a sad situation.
As the Bible’s Old Testament clearly cites the source of humanity being in Iran 5000-8000 years ago it further justifies the need to be respectful of Iran and what it wants to do.
Iran, nor any other country, exists to comply with the wishes of elites elsewhere.
So I say maintain your stance Iran and Russia otherwise the forces of evil will prevail.
An Iranian friend told me the roads were built by Shah Sr. expressly to aid the Nazi troops to reach Russia. After the war Shah Sr. bragged about all the good he’d done for the Iranian people.
If I recall correctly, the Old Testament doesn’t recognize anything earlier than 5700something, the date of the ‘Creation’.
Hello friends. I lived and went to school in the heart of Tehran from 1965 to 1973. This was the peak of the power of the CIA/Anglo-zionist puppet regime commonly known as ‘the Shah.’
The reason why they hate Iran- and they will continue to hate Iran- is well founded. Not only did the people of Iran overthrow the puppet regime in 1979 but they b**** slapped, and continue to b**** slap the arrogant Anglo-zionist colonialists.
@ALI
However the anglosaxons were behind the 1979 revolution as well.
They wanted to prevent Iran and several other countries from having nuclear power and industrialisation so there was a lot more going on than in the official narrative.
The US/UK actually assaulted both Iran and Europe the USSR Japan and OPECs joint project for development of poor countries.
The shah had said that Iran would become the fifth economy in the world and he collaborated with both east and west while Carter was told to go along with removing the shah in order to counter Soviet advances.
The shah confirmed that it was the US who was behind his removal.
The British using BBC helped Khomeini to influence the protests.
The CIA have no problem exposing what happened when the shah was helped to power by the anglosaxons but they are dead silent about the removal of the shah 25 years later.
Further the anglosaxons have a long legacy of support for radical islam.
The current King of England Charles III is known to have been flirting with islam since the 1980s. The intention was declared in the 19th century and concerned the use of radical islamists to cause unrest in Russia
Poor Saddam thought he had the blessing of America, only to realise too late, that they’re lying sacks who can never be trusted. Saddam’s oil Euro pitch at the end, if only he’d known that the Euro-peons were as subservient and feckless as he.
Drones for s400’s is a great barter,
Love It!
this comment has been flagged as of little/no value (possibly troll) by the saker
It remains true that all revolutions are anglosaxon revolutions.
If there is an exception I would like to be reminded about that.
Although I see no reason to polemise against Iran which has legitimate interests to develop an industry and with it prosperity, just like Iran had when the anglosaxons ousted the shah.
And due to that anglosaxon revolution the very cooperative Khomeini closed the nuclear power projects.
And it still isnt obvious to me that the rumours about his father being a british spy from Bristol would necessarily be false.
That spy worked in the oil business and ‘went native’ ie lived like a muslim.
I know the official story is about Khomeini having grown up in India or something but his son has confirmed in 2011, that there are doubts about his fathers origin.
When it became clear the rule of the Shah was coming to an end, the worst scenario for the US would be a communist regime. So they utilized their influence to prevent that from happening.
West and Stalin were allies. The Bolsheviks lost power in the 1953 coup, where Lavrentiy Beria was executed. From then on Russia, i.e. the Slav Russia, was lethal enemy of West. West and Communism is the same.
In China Chinese was defined as “enemy” by Mao Zedong. Mao Mao Zedong is West?
CIA is Maoism. Maoist guerilla was not run by China, but rather by CIA, like Al Qaida is run by CIA, and Boko Haram is run by France.
Vietnam war: In all Vietnam / Laos / Cambodia we find ethnic minorities groups who were armed by CIA.
Who was Pol Pot then? A Maoist.
please stop posting stuff like “CIA is Maoism”.
First, that is an unsubstantiated statement.
Second, it conflates an organization with an ideology.
Third, it serves absolutely no useful purpose for a discussion.
And it is off topic.
kjell108 – please cool it, ok?
Andrei
These guys troll massively on MoA. A waste of precious reading time. Sad really. This supports my previous statement, the west hates youth and success. To claim it is only whites that have done anything … well, I could second that but it wouldn’t be flattering. Impugning our friends in the world is a zero sum game.
this comment has been flagged as of little/no value (possibly troll) by the saker
Hi, Peter. After the defeat of Napoleon, all the revolutions and wars were concocted by the Jewish banksters of the City of London, the bunker from which the Jewish banking interests were managed under the guise of the British Empire. Since WW2 the armed brand changed from British to USA.
They hate Iran with the same amount vitriol hatred that is also directed at Cuba. I think the main reason is that both governments disrupted the American’s “backyard”. Cuba was the playground of the American mafia and Iran was to a certain degree the US/Israel “playground” for controlling the Middle East via the despicable Shah.
The Americans like their Israeli partners never forget nor forgive . . .
Too true Sam.
Iran is one of only 3 major countries with no Rothschild Central Bank. DPRK, Cuba, who’d a guessed, round up the usual suspects?
As Zone B flourishes, so too will Iran, whose energy reserves, unlike Saudi’s (dwindling) are virtually untapped, and with the 2nd largest proven gas reserves after Russia. Having survived America’s illegal sanctions and still kept its head above water, Iran’s future looks rosy.
Remember, Success for Iran = Failure for Israel, who are baulking, spitting feathers, at Russian Iranian strengthening relations.
Of course, they’re butt-hurt!
WTFUD….did Syrian president Dr.Al Assad purge Rothschild central bank from Syria ???????
@EVERYBODY (who needs to hear this)
Blaming all events in history on one person or group is simply a sign of crass ignorance, lack of education and plain old stupidity.
Next smart-ass which tries next this will be banned and sent back to the playpen, Clacy book or Idiot Box.
Andrei
A complex system, like the nations of earth, that is beset by a multitude of problems existing across it’s many systems is a very thorny thing to sort out. A daunting list of problems that threaten to entirely derail the system (earth), while continuing to cause it to run in crisis mode, cannot be handled simply by ticking off a comprehensive problem to-do list. The problem list must be converted into an interrelational grid which exposes where some problems lend their synergy to other problems. Using this decision grid to determine the specific problems in the problem network that enable and lend power to other lesser problems allows the problem solvers to bring down the interrelational problem grid more strategically and efficiently. This approach is opposed to running around like a headless chicken with a fire extinguisher perpetually outing crisis fires everywhere. I wonder what it is that has made you use the term Anglo-Zionist so often. Obviously everyone has participated in the problems that has beset this planet over the ages. But some have participated longer, better organized, more efficiently, and with greater effect.
Befree: You write: “I wonder what it is that has made you use the term Anglo-Zionist so often. Obviously everyone has participated in the problems that has beset this planet over the ages. But some have participated longer, better organized, more efficiently, and with greater effect.”
It seems to me that you have answered your own question. The term Anglo-Zionist is applicable because it describes the cultural formation that has evolved the highest manifestation of the power of mental ego. It operates via the appellation of “modernity” and looks down on all others (East of the English Channel) as primitives. The more culturally developed the mental ego the greater is the power for both good and evil.
Hence the ego maniacs that rule the Anglo Zionist empire have at their fingertips are greater capacity for evil and a greater ego driven inclination to practice it than civilizations less encumbered with hyper developed patriarchal egoism. One not so small example being the impulse to invent and practice aggressive atomic warfare is Anglo-Zionist in origin. As is the enormous power of media driven propaganda.
He who holds the gold, makes the rules.
Andrei: I totally agree. A good move on your part. It is far too easy to fall for the simple explanation that appears to explain everything. It attracts mental laziness. However I can see the current cultural confusion pushing people into this “post truth” atmosphere.
Hi, Peter. After the defeat of Napoleon, all the revolutions and wars were concocted by the Jewish banksters of the City of London, the bunker from which the Jewish banking interests were managed under the guise of the British Empire. Since WW2 the armed brand changed from British to USA.
Who are these “nazis” according to you?
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/08/23/nazi-german-american-bund-rally-madison-square-garden-215522/
Well they said it was b/c they could not compete, and once out competed, you lose the right to reenter the arena with a substantial argument.
But in the end its not actually about competition, its about fairness and the lack of it on the western side for a long period of time, this is what the war is all about.
The Satanists are very skilled at turning potential brothers against each other and shaping the ensuing carnage to their designs. And during this they remain in the shadows out of the fray they engineered. But this is the information age and light is seeping into those shadows. Potential brothers who were maneuvered to kill one another will be seeking a reconning, at a time and place of their choosing.
@nietzsche1510
Sorry you have swallowed the usual british illusion about the bankers being independent and ‘international’ .
Instead they are chained to the empire.
They are in a firm symbiosis.
Do you think the british, after having run the ‘french’ revolution and facilitated Napoleons march to power would allow Napoleon to obtain equally favourable loans as those given to Britain?
The fact is Britain needed to spend money to win money like some other anglosaxon said – I dont remember who.
Thus in order to set in motion a profitable war there was a need to wet the apetite of every partaker.
If the Rothschilds had acted like some German bankers did in the period 1975-1991 they would have been given the same treatment. Death. Those german bankers had the temerity to suggest that the poor nations should receive debt cancellation and in the case of Rohwedder it was about a milder treatment of the east germans in connection with the unification. The Rothschilds however when asked about whether they had any moral qualms in connection with the human suffering sometimes following with their investments they said no it is just business or something like that.
That is why they survive.
Although I noted that three of the five sons of the Forefather died in 1855.
But I still think that was natural deaths since they were old.
However recently I have come to believe that the Jack the Ripper affaire in 1888 – which took the form of five masonic ritual murders of prostitutes – was meant to be understood as a death threat to the whole Rothschild clan, should they embark on any ambitious collaboration with Bismarck.
I won’t elaborate now. But you can safely forget everything you ever read about those powerful ‘private’ bankers.
We are dealing with an empire!
And the americans largely have failed to understand their own history with regard to the early leaders and national banks.
Partly because they have no real political parties to choose among.
They confuse the traitors with the patriots and viceversa.
And that confused nation may now push us all over the cliff!
Mankind wants to be God and control God’s creation. There is only one God and it is t mankind.
Both the Iranian and Chinese revolutions were youth revolutions. In spite of help from their western colleagues they are still successful. The west hates nothing more than youth and success. That’s why we can’t have nice things.
Well said and true.
Iran’s 1979 Revolution was blow to the control of the price & money flows from oil, and future potential takeover of then USSR (Russia) and nearby CIS states around the Caspian Sea where there was a lot more oil. Control and power by bankers and commercial elites in the west.
If any solid part of the oil mkt is not under their control it was the threat to the $US (and GBP and EU currencies). Iraq got invaded in 1991 & 2003 because of the same issue.
WW2 made UK & US realize how important Iran was geographically as they had to invade it in 1942 to get a supply route to USSR to help them defeat the Axis invasion there.
Same would apply to any other commodity being traded in US$.
Iran could alleviate a lot of this by negotiating a long lasting peace with Israel over religious etc… issues.
And Russia and Putin could assist with that.
The same people attacking Iran today because of monetary issues are the same ones behind the Jewish Holocaust between 1933-45. Its just the target has changed.
Given ancient Persia, along with India, was a key part of the origin of western civilization its a sad situation.
As the Bible’s Old Testament clearly cites the source of humanity being in Iran 5000-8000 years ago it further justifies the need to be respectful of Iran and what it wants to do.
Iran, nor any other country, exists to comply with the wishes of elites elsewhere.
So I say maintain your stance Iran and Russia otherwise the forces of evil will prevail.
An Iranian friend told me the roads were built by Shah Sr. expressly to aid the Nazi troops to reach Russia. After the war Shah Sr. bragged about all the good he’d done for the Iranian people.
If I recall correctly, the Old Testament doesn’t recognize anything earlier than 5700something, the date of the ‘Creation’.
Hello friends. I lived and went to school in the heart of Tehran from 1965 to 1973. This was the peak of the power of the CIA/Anglo-zionist puppet regime commonly known as ‘the Shah.’
The reason why they hate Iran- and they will continue to hate Iran- is well founded. Not only did the people of Iran overthrow the puppet regime in 1979 but they b**** slapped, and continue to b**** slap the arrogant Anglo-zionist colonialists.
@ALI
However the anglosaxons were behind the 1979 revolution as well.
They wanted to prevent Iran and several other countries from having nuclear power and industrialisation so there was a lot more going on than in the official narrative.
The US/UK actually assaulted both Iran and Europe the USSR Japan and OPECs joint project for development of poor countries.
The shah had said that Iran would become the fifth economy in the world and he collaborated with both east and west while Carter was told to go along with removing the shah in order to counter Soviet advances.
The shah confirmed that it was the US who was behind his removal.
The British using BBC helped Khomeini to influence the protests.
The CIA have no problem exposing what happened when the shah was helped to power by the anglosaxons but they are dead silent about the removal of the shah 25 years later.
Further the anglosaxons have a long legacy of support for radical islam.
The current King of England Charles III is known to have been flirting with islam since the 1980s. The intention was declared in the 19th century and concerned the use of radical islamists to cause unrest in Russia