- The situation in the city of Donetsk is becoming unstable again. The local people have elected a “people’s governor”, but the local police forces seem to be loyal to the oligarch appointed as governor by the insurgents. The local people had been occupying the local governor’s offices and parliament building until this morning when the police told them that there was a bomb threat and that they needed to evacuate. The people did evacuate but apparently no bomb was found. The Russian flag on the building was replaced with Ukrainian one.
- Demonstrations have continued in the city of Odessa where the local population wants to follow the examples of Crimea, Donetsk and Kharkov and have a referendum on the future of the region.
- There are also unconfirmed reports of pro-Russian demonstrations in the city of Nikolaev. Should this city also break away the Ukraine would lose its last major port on the Black Sea and, if the anti-insurgent movement gains strength in the south, the rump Ukraine could become a landlocked country.
- Contrary to earlier Russian reports, some military units in Crimea seemed to have remained loyal to the authorities Kiev. They present no military threat to the peninsula.
- The OSCE has announced that it will be sending military monitors to Crimea. Considering the role these so-called “monitors” have played in Chechnia and South Ossetia, this is bad news for Russia.
- Russia has announced that it will built a bridge between the Taman peninsula and the Crimean peninsula thereby providing a high speed communications node between the Crimean cities of Kerch and Fedosiia and the Russian cites of Novorossiisk and Krasnodar (see map).
- The US State Department has announced that it plans to give one billion dollars to the Ukraine. The EU and the IMF are talking about a 600 million dollars. Total: 1,6 billion dollars. Just to remind: Russia had promised 15 billion dollars plus another 5 billion or so in gas price cuts, for an approximate total of about 20 billion dollars. The Ukrainian insurgents claim that they need 35 billion dollars while the total debt of the country is estimated 170 billion dollars. Let’s do some math: + 1,6 – 20 = – 18.4. Now add to that the Crimea will stop paying federal taxes staring in March, the costs of the burning down of the city center in Kiev, the breakdown of the economy (there are shortages in all insurgent controlled areas), the very real risk that all of the rich eastern Ukraine could follow the example of the Crimea, the free fall of the Hrivna, and the effect on the economy of the stopping of payment of pensions and salaries and you will immediately see that the West’s 1,6 billion is but a tiny fraction of what the Ukraine needs.
- Putin had hour long press conference yesterday which was one of the best ones he ever made. As soon as I can get it, I will post either a subtitled video or a full transcript.
- The President of Tatarstan has visited the Crimea and two regions have signed a number of economic cooperation agreements. He also met with local Tatar leaders. Me feeling is that thanks to the immediate and wise intervention of the Parliament in Tatarstan, the President of Tatarstan and the Tatar World Congress the Tatar issue in the Ukraine will be peacefully solved to the satisfaction of all parties. Kudos to the Tatars and the wisdom of their leaders!
Stay tuned.
The Saker
Putin had hour long press conference yesterday which was one of the best ones he ever made.
http://eng.kremlin.ru/transcripts/6763
Ciao
There is full transcript on Kremlin site here:
http://eng.kremlin.ru/transcripts/6763
( http://kremlin.ru/news/20366 for Russian version )
A huge problem for Russia and the Ukrainian people is the oligarchs. They can certainly buy media and police. So what can the Russian side do? Are the Berkut now on the Russian payroll?
Paul
Saker, I have some questions. What do you think is Putin’s preferred outcome in the Ukraine? Does he want the Ukraine to be reorganized via regional referendums into a loose confederation or would he prefer the southeastern regions to join Russia instead?
I’m guessing that if the southeastern regions vote to stay in the Ukraine, but as an autonomous republic or republics, independent from the rest of Ukraine in all but name, Kiev will not accept that. How would that situation be preferable to simply having them vote to join Russia?
What would you prefer? What do you think Putin would prefer? What do you think will happen?
Situation in Odessa is probably much worse than you describe.
http://www.chelemendik.sk/Utecenci_z_Odessy_prosia_o_pomoc_VIDEO_305539917.html
(There are refugees from Odessa pleading for help and describing Musychko´s nacionalists arrived in the city…)
Here is the english transcript of Putins press conference: http://www.sott.net/article/275038-A-true-statesman-Vladimir-Putin-press-conference-March-4-2014-video-and-transcript
So called western media are mute regarding this speech by Vladimir the hammer.
If Pussy Riot gives a statement, then on Google will be a couple of thousand links produced by the so called western media.
Will a rational campaign to the Russian speaking border regions go something like this?
1. You speak Russian.
2. You ARE Russian.
3. Russia has a higher per capita income than Ukraine and more natural resources and stronger growth.
4. With Russian speaking Crimeans out of the Ukraine you are no longer in a see-saw 50-50 battle with your cousins, the Ukrainians, for control you are a minority.
5. Vote to join Mother Russia
With the Ukraine bifurcated and the West assured that Russian gains are exhausted, they will grow tired of subsidizing them and the Ukrainians will be left holding the bag. Maybe then they will actually throw off their corrupt overlords. We shall see.
I guess one of the immediate outcomes of Moscow’s actions in Crimea was that it stopped the nationalist from spreading mindlessly eastwards.
Now they have to plan and think before they act. If we move further, will Putin send troops?
There are consequences to their actions, immediate, painful, humiliating, physical ones. The financial ones they may have been too stupid to fathom immediately.
mindfriedo
Indeed with Crimea out now, the South-Eastern vote is bound to be a minority now all the time (by a small margin) which might act as a strong stimulus for the other SE regions to be autonomous or simply quit the Ukraine, the BIG problem are the oligarchs from the East who are now being given entire Oblast(!) as fiefdoms by the new regime, the worst is when the dual Ukrainian-Israeli billionaire Kolomoyskij is now governor of Dnepropetrovsk Oblast, with his bank (Privatbank)close to bankrupcy, same story in Donetsk where oligarch Taruta is the new governor. But there things look much better a grassroots resistance movement incarnated by Pavel Gubarev has taken over and IS HOLDING some key administrative buildings and they are pushing for a self-determination REFERENDUM, I suspect he has strong russian covert support, he was on russian TV recently (like Chalyj had in Sevastopol)and unless the oligarchs like Akhmetov or Taruta assasinate him, Donetsk Oblast could very well be the next one to fall out of Kiev’s control and that would be a fatal blow to the regime after the loss of Crimea and its tax revenues from tourism (Donetsk Oblast is the richest of the Ukraine). I also suspect this movement has the support of many medium to big businesses who know that any “association” with the EU means death to them and their industries. The oligarchs have opposite interests, they’d like to legalize their wealth in the West. Just my 2 cents…
@Paul:A huge problem for Russia and the Ukrainian people is the oligarchs. They can certainly buy media and police. So what can the Russian side do? Are the Berkut now on the Russian payroll?
In Russia the oligarchs are more or less under financial control and they are under 100% political control. So they are still there, but they behave. In the Ukraine, they don’t have a Putin, that is THE big tragedy which really caused it all. So there it is a disaster. About the Berkut: the insurgents have officially dissolved it. But it still exists in Crimea where they are controlled and paid by the local authorities which, in turn, are supported by Russia. Also, Russia has offered each Berkut member a Russian passport and a job in the Russian police, so a lot of them are trying to get to Russia, but they get stopped and, when identified, murdered by the insurgents.
HTH. Cheers,
The Saker
@mindfriedo:I guess one of the immediate outcomes of Moscow’s actions in Crimea was that it stopped the nationalist from spreading mindlessly eastwards. Now they have to plan and think before they act. If we move further, will Putin send troops?
Yes, most definitely. But you are correct, the simple fact that Putin said that he will do that if the insurgents begin killing the the east will probably stop them. The insurgents are basically stopped, at least for the time being.
Many thanks and kind regards,
The Saker
Saker, to what extent do pipeline politics play a role in all this?
@Nora: to what extent do pipeline politics play a role in all this?
A minor one. They are not irrelevant, but there are pipelines going around the Ukraine through the north and the south. Besides, the EU will put even more pressure on the insurgents than Russia.
No, the real reason behind that all is the obsession of the US to cut the Ukraine off Russia. That’s all. The rest is all empty rhetoric.
Cheers,
The Saker