by Ghassan Kadi
The story of refugees flocking into Europe, and the avalanche of repercussions that followed, remains to be a conundrum that many involved individuals, including some seasoned analysts, are at pains to unravel.
Any denial that those refugees had brought with them very bad elements is a denial of a truth that is so loud and clear. And when some highly competent authors wrote about this and were attacked and called Fascists and racists, those who made those accusations must be living in a dungeon that lives by rules that do not exist anywhere on this planet. Not that I wish any harm to anyone, but I would just wonder what would those critics do or say if it was their own sisters, girlfriends, daughters and mothers getting ganged raped in the streets!
Many theories have been put forward to explain what is really happening in Europe, but with all due respect to many authors whom I greatly respect and admire, I find that none of those theories add up in a manner that is convincing and complete.
Apart from politics and political analysis, the influx of refugees was either a natural consequence of many wars and economic difficulties that have adversely affected millions of people, or it was something that has been orchestrated by an invisible plotter.
The former possibility seems remote because even though the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Libya have indeed disadvantaged millions of people, one would expect a steady trickle of refugees, not a sudden human tsunami.
This points towards the direction of having an invisible hand behind this, but whose hand is it?
Unless theories that attempt to explain what is happening are able to connect the dots in a manner that explains what made all of those refugees move in such huge numbers all at the same time, who is the plotter behind this, and what benefits the plotter gets out of it, then that theory is incomplete and therefore inaccurate. This of course excludes that other possibility and that is case of a plot-gone-wrong. Of course such a possibility cannot be zeroed out, but once again we are back to square one; who was the original plotter and how did his plot fail?
Many are quick to accuse the USA and the CIA for anything that goes wrong at any time and everywhere. I am the last person to defend “The Empire”, but we should not be blinded to facts and rationality. I can see how the USA can benefit from partially destabilizing Europe in order to keep it under the American yoke of submission especially in regard to the anti-Russian stand. But I cannot see how the USA can benefit from the influx of thousands, and possibly tens of thousands, of Jihadists infiltrating into Europe and threatening its peace and wellbeing! Any such accusations are totally absurd and do not make any sense at all.
Then there are those accusing Merkel, and she is not a saint to be defended either. However, for Merkel to welcome in migrants knowing that Jihadists were hiding within them is not something that anyone would expect a German leader to do no matter how corrupt or stupid he/she is. With all of her downfalls, Angela Merkel would not deliberately welcome in Jihadists. Let us be rational.
Other theories have accused George Soros, Nuland, NATO, and even the EU itself. But in all of those instances, the pieces of the puzzle do not fit in a manner that shows a clear beneficiary in all of this. So is this a plot that has gone wrong? Perhaps not, or at least not yet.
Thus far, the only beneficiaries out of this whole kerfuffle are the European ultra-right wing parties, and we haven’t seen anything yet. European elections in the next few years will clearly see a huge surge in their support, and this will only be a normal reaction to the trauma that Europe is now suffering from and the fear and xenophobia it is creating. That said, we cannot in our wildest of imagination think that it was the far right in Europe that has plotted, orchestrated and executed this whole ordeal.
This really leaves us with Turkey, or should we say Erdogan.
Perhaps we will never know what is really happening in Europe, but an analysis of all of the events surely and clearly points at one and only one potential plotter and beneficiary, and this is none other than Erdogan.
To understand this, we must rewind the clock here and go back to the early days of the Ottoman Empire.
After the Ottomans established their rule in Asia Minor (Anatolia), their next step was to control the Bosphorus and to put a foot on European soil. This eventuated in 1453 with the fall of Constantinople (renamed Istanbul). This was followed by the capture of the Balkans and most of Eastern Europe. The Ottomans wanted to avenge Europe for the Crusader era in a big sweeping manner and move into Europe and declare the whole of Europe an Ottoman territory.
On the Southern front, it was rather easy for the Ottomans to move to conquer Syria and Mesopotamia. The Arab/Muslim World was at the beginning of its nadir that it hasn’t yet pulled out of, and the ill-organized Levantine troops could not face the well-organized Ottoman invaders and the battle of Marj Dabek in 1516 was decisively won by the invading Turks. Soon after, the Ottomans took control of Mecca, the trophy of all Muslim conquerors, given that whoever is in control of Mecca becomes inadvertently in control of Islam and Muslims.
Not too many years later, in 1529 to be exact, the Ottomans made their first attempt to capture Vienna. The second attempt was made in 1683, and both attempts failed. Land topography was paramount those days when troops were powered by horses and mules, and the location of Vienna would have created a passage for Ottoman troops to easily move into the rest of Western Europe, but this was not to happen.
Back to the present.
What many observers fail to see and remember is that Erdogan is both an Islamist and a nationalist, but first and foremost an Islamist. That said, Islamism and Nationalism in Turkey take a peculiar twist; they come hand-in-gloves. To Turkish Islamists, the Ottoman Empire provided the perfect model; a vast Muslim empire headed by Turkey.
Ideally for them, this empire should be restored and expanded as much as possible breaking old barriers that the Ottoman predecessors were unable to surpass.
The pain of the humiliating defeat virtually at the gates of Vienna in 1683 is still alive in the hearts and minds of Islamist-Nationalist-Turkish zealots, and no one embodies those passions more than his “eminence” himself; President Erdogan.
So leaving Syria behind for a moment, Erdogan feels he has a score to settle with the Christian infidel Europe.
Plan A for Erdogan was to keep the refugees in Turkey, dislocate Syrian Kurds from northern Syria, and then relocate the refugees in the newly-created Kurd-free buffer zone and thereby separating the rest of Syrian and Iraqi Kurds from Turkish Kurds and putting an end to their hopes of forming a state that can eventually encroach into Turkish territory.
His plot was refused by Turkey’s best allies; the USA, NATO and the EU. This left a very bad taste in Erdogan’s mouth, and with the EU having the soft underbelly in this triangle of allies that stabbed Erdogan in the back, it was revenge time for Erdogan; and the best revenge he could think of was to send those hundreds of thousands of Muslim refugees into Europe. After all, they became useless for him in light of the latest developments and especially after the Russian intervention.
In the EU itself, left-wingers and humanitarians, well-meaning as they may be, often live in total darkness of all sorts of wheeling and dealing that go on around them. They stood up and coerced their governments to welcome in refugees, and Erdogan knew they would, and he banked on this too.
On the other hand, Merkel might have been tempted by the idea of bringing in a massive cheap labour force that is badly needed for German manufacturing industries, and feeling supported by the calls of the home-grown humanitarians, she considered that a mandate strong enough to enable her to take daring steps.
If there was a plot-gone-wrong, it was that of Merkel and the EU in general. Their plot however was restricted to killing two birds with one stone; bringing in cheap labour, all the while cloaking themselves with the guise of caring for refugees. The EU plot could not have been to inundate Europe with Jihadi terrorists and rapists.
Only Syria and Russia understand Erdogan’s mind and what agendas he is hiding, and this is why they know where to hit him where it hurts the most, and right now, Syrian troops, supported by Russian air power, are moving on the ground and approaching Turkish borders in both of the Lattakia and Aleppo provinces.
The West on the other hand is, generally speaking, often short-sighted and even stupid. What adds to the short-sightedness and stupidity of its politicians is that section of humanitarians who are noisy and who do not know the difference between a true refugee in need and a rascals taking advantage of their lofty principles.
Thus far, it is all plot-gone-wrong for Erdogan in Syria, but his contingency plan B in Europe, if there is one indeed, is going pretty well. However, there is a big twist here. In the case of the “War On Syria” there were thousands of Syrians and their friends who knew exactly what the enemies of Syria were up to. They took upon themselves to stand up to tell the rest of the world the true untold story of Syria. Europeans and their supporters on the other hand seem to be none-the-wiser and totally unaware of the new Turkish plot. They have no idea at all that the Sultan is revamping old Islamist-Nationalist Turkish dreams. This spells grave danger.
It is possible that EU leaders are waking up, but we cannot be sure. The bribe funds given to Erdogan on the surface seem to have no justification at all. If anything, they look like rewarding bad behavior, but it is possible that those payments are made for Erdogan to stop further human flow , because he is the one in control of who leaves for Europe, when and how many.
Erdogan would not care if those Islamists flocking into Europe are pro-Saudi Wahhabists or whether they are under his control or not. As a matter of fact, he seems to have learnt from the mistake of Bandar Bin Sultan who was delusional enough to think that he could control what became ISIS. Erdogan simply wants to flood Europe with Muslims, radical Sunni Muslims of any persuasion.
I stand to be corrected, but I cannot see any other explanation of the truth of the sudden rush of Muslim refugees into Europe, who would or could plot such a rush, and who would benefit from it other than Erdogan.
To be fair to Erdogan, his dreams are not any better or worse than the dreams of an American hegemony, or any other national, racial, religious, sectarian empire-building dreams. It’s the sad story of human greed that can be blind and boundless. One would wonder if humanity would ever learn.
Best guest posting on the refugee issue. Thanks saker for getting this.
I agree with Mr. Kadi to a certain extent but we shouldn’t forget that West Europeans in the past sided with Turkey against the Russian Empire. I doubt that Germany which is awash with more or less qualified immigrants from all over Europe is in dire need of cheap labor from dubious unidentifiable refugees. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that Europe is thinking of organizing an expendable army to fight her future wars. Of course this is just a wild guess but I still think there is more to welcoming the refugee hordes than meets the eye. As an East European I remember how hard it was for even a single qualified individual to get a residential permit to say, Germany. It just doesn’t add up. European elites might be in on it with the purpose of destroying any resemblance of national identity and pride. Welcome NWO.
@East European:
I agree much more with your point of view than with that one of Ghassan Kadi.
It’s much greater wheel being turned than just the desire to get some cheap labor and yes I do think, it’s in the interest of the elite that runs the US and with it of course the EU.
In a broader sense, there is no bigger wheel than the desire to get some cheap labour. The entire point of modern elite-driven political economy is to get cheap labour and make sure it stays that way.
Even the oil wars are ultimately about cheap labour. They weren’t, after all, about getting access to the oil–they already had access to the oil. The point was getting control of the oil, so that it could be wielded as a weapon. And the point of wielding it as a weapon is so that the United States can remain hegemon. But the point for US and international elites of the United States remaining hegemon is so that pro-corporate, anti-labour policies can continue to be enforced worldwide. Oil is mainly one more weapon for enforcing the politics of ensuring that labour is cheap and elites get to rake off the difference, whether directly by producing stuff in sweatshops and selling it for more, or indirectly by ensuring the proles aren’t in a position to object to financial shenanigans like printing tons of money and making sure only financiers can have it, or by indebting them and charging them interest et cetera.
Given that, I think people are both too quick to dismiss the German elite interest in getting cheap labour and too quick to assume that German elites care whether there are a few thugs and/or terrorists among the refugees that cause some short term chaos and hurt, rape or kill a few people. If anything, German elites are probably happy that there are some thugs and terrorists among the refugees.
This is also where right wing cultural analyses are dead wrong: German and other European elites are in no way interested in creating a homogenized society in which the immigrants and existing population blend together and lose their respective cultures. To the contrary. This is also where East European makes his mistake: “I remember how hard it was for even a single qualified individual to get a residential permit to say, Germany” . . . well, yes, of course. A single qualified individual. From a non-demonized group. In short, someone who might expect to come in and make a good wage in a real job on an equal basis with middle class Germans. What use is that to elites? They want immigrants, sure–but they want them impoverished, isolated, scared, and ideally constituting a brand new social division to be exploited. If there were no thugs among them to help create a backlash, elites would have to bring some in. If anything what German elites would really love is to create US blacks: A permanent underemployed underclass which will stay separate and create divisions in the electorate forever, bringing down average wages, swelling the army of hungry poor that would take any crap job, making unionization and working class politics far harder both because of that reserve army willing to accept worse conditions and because of the social division.
For that dream, Angela Merkel’s political career is a very small price to pay, and even some risk of breakthroughs by hard-right parties who don’t threaten white bankers or factory-owners in the first place isn’t a huge deal. If anything, with the current popular dissatisfaction with austerity policies that has tended to build grassroots leftism, elites may actually feel that they benefit from the rise of the hard right because it sucks political energy from the left. They’re quite likely using the populist right, just like they used Hitler–although they may be miscalculating, just like they did with Hitler.
All that analysis aside, I’m not sure I really buy the idea that there’s anything too grand in the acceleration of refugee arrivals. Erdogan is certainly an Islamist, but I doubt he wants to take Vienna. It’s true he may have concluded he can no longer really use the huge camps of refugees for anything . . . but if they’re not useful, that means they’re a cost, and the Turkish economy isn’t doing so great. Not running camps full of gajillions of refugees is cheaper than running those camps. But also, it may just be the rhythm of things . . . Syrians may be avoiding going through Turkey and getting caught in camps because they’ve heard that if you go through Turkey you get caught in camps. Syrian refugees may have stopped in other places in the Middle East a lot at the beginning, like Lebanon, Jordan, even Iraq, but are now moving past them because there’s no room or the welcome has soured. The rate of refugees from other places like Libya, even Yemen, may be accelerating. The “business” of refugee transport may have gotten bigger and better organized and has simply been better able to move people than it was at the beginning. It’s inevitable that there’s a lot of fairly wild speculation about it all because frankly it would take a big expensive investigative effort to really get much of a handle on just how all these people are flowing and why rates of arrival are changing.
One thing that there can be no dispute about though: The bottom line is that ultimately all these refugees are a form of blowback. If the EU were to stop helping the US attack and destabilize these countries and refuse to give them diplomatic cover for such actions, they would ultimately see far fewer refugees.
All this analysis based on “cheap labour” is wrong, wrong, and wrong.
You tell me the kind of job these migrants could possibly do in Germany?!
There are not enough jobs for all the unskilled labour that we already have in Germany. And that is unskilled people who, unlike the migrants, do speak German.
“Cheap labour” is just nonsense. The influx of migrants has nothing to do with “cheap labour”. Nothing at all.
You are naive. You think because de-skilling Germany’s economy would be bad for productivity and prosperity, nobody would want to do it. The neoliberals don’t care about that stuff, why do you think they’ve been deliberately triggering recessions with all this “austerity”? It’s class war from above, pure and simple. They don’t care if the pie is smaller as long as they’ve got more and we’ve got less. It’s a negative-sum game, but they don’t mind as long as they’re winning it. Germany has had the luxury of an industrially oriented economy with strong labour for a long time, it’s maintained up until recently an economic outlook devoted to production such as lots of other places lost in the 80s and 90s. But the bankers are in the ascendant now and the Germans are going to get the same shaft as the rest of us.
In Canada, we’ve for years had lots of immigrants. We haven’t had nearly as many from this sudden influx just now, but we’ve had a lot for a long time. And, unemployment is fairly high, so you would figure your point about not enough jobs etc. would apply here. And, despite this our Conservative government was, at the very express bidding of big corporations active in Canada (and a couple of actual Canadian corporations, a quite different thing), putting policies in place to allow and encourage the import of large numbers of unskilled short-term labourers, to the point where for a while until there was a huge outcry we had twice as many of these “temporary foreign workers” as actual immigrants, and it was continuing to increase. Why? Because they’d arranged to exempt these people from the minimum wage, and they had no bargaining power whatsoever–their only legal basis to be in the country was the specific job they’d signed on for. They knew nobody, they could be dumped out of the country the moment they refused to sleep with their boss let alone squawked about their rights, and they worked for pennies. They were not only the perfect employees from an elite standpoint, helping corporate bottom lines directly, the real bonus was that they helped make things more precarious for everyone else in the country. Everyone knew that if they refused to do that overtime for free, someone could be brought in from Indonesia or wherever who would do it, and the original employee would be on the bread line–which of course has mighty little bread these days.
Bigwigs have had a hard-on for a big reserve army of labour that’s hungry and desperate since the 19th century, and it’s been a big theme in modern right-wing economics in elite service since they popularized the notion of the NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment, AKA excuse for not fighting unemployment because if you do the inflation will get ya). If you imagine that they have suddenly stopped thinking in those terms you are deeply mistaken.
Obviously that’s not why the refugees are travelling, but it probably has a lot to do with why Merkel wanted them welcomed rather than kept out. And the importance of keeping the balance, where they’re in but as powerless and marginal as possible, may have something to do with these oh-so-well-publicized Attacks On Our Womenfolk, although I’m not committed to that last claim.
Hello Purple, thanks for your answer.
It sounds like Canada is governered a lot in the cynical way the U.S. is governed. Pitting groups against each other to force a race for minimum standards. I used to think Canada was much better than the U.S. in this regard. I’ve only been there once, in Vancouver (and Whistler), about ten years ago. (Looked much better and much more European than Seattle, despite the crappy drug zone in Chinatown.) What do I know? You’re probably right, you live there.
But I don’t see the same thing happening in Germany. Should there be steps to give a work permit to migrants, which I do not believe will happen (because there’ll be a lot of opposition to that), I’d have to concede you are right. But I don’t believe it’ll come to that. “De-skilling Germany’s economy” is the Jewish Morgenthau plan and it’s not popular in Germany.
lumi, it’ll be many moons before the would be unskilled workers beating a minimum wage are employable in the first place, meaning they would need to manage basic german, be housed and provided for healthcare etc..in other words, it would cost an arm and a leg to nurture viable unskilled work force, surplus that is. why would german government want to do this? to create more resentment among the existing unskilled workers, many of which come from poor european countries? to further fuel ethnic and racial frictions?
in the uk, majority of racial/ ethnic hate incidents do not involve white population at all. we get: brown against black, black against the blacker, brown against the other brown etc. sounds absurd, nevertheless true.
Blame NAFTA. Canada is not Germany. Since German companies are not investing in Germany and are shedding labour, I doubt that is the root cause of this influx. Firstly, Germans are naive. They have no understanding of Arabs or Pakistanis unlike Britain or France and live in a world where they project their good feelings onto others, like Swedes.
Germans do not consider consequences. They have tunnel vision. They cannot conceive that much of the world is at WAR with The West even if the West doesn’t think it is necessary to fight. When women throw themselves at trainloads of young Muslim men there is only one interpretation; the Victorious Soldiers of Allah are being greeted by their Nubile Slaves. What happened on 31 Dec in Cologne is a logical consequence.
German Authorities have behaved as if an Occupying Army has arrived and must be appeased.
@”Erdogan is certainly an Islamist, but I doubt he wants to take Vienna.”
Perhaps that is too literal.
Maybe not Vienna directly as in the past, but it is very possible that he wants to “take back” areas of the Balkans that were part of the Ottoman Empire, where I believe quite a few Muslims already live. Jihad cells in Bulgaria, Macedonia, Romania, Albania, Bosnia, etc. could well become nuclei for increased political and social pressure in those countries. I believe that a lot of the Muslim Bosnians and other Muslims in Yugo, historically, were South Slavs who converted when the Ottomans took over. When I lived in NYC my super and her familiy—ethinic Albanians from of Montenegro originally, were Muslims, and it took a long time for me to figure it out because she and her sister looked more or less like Keira Knightly. In other words, there is a history of conversion to iiIslam in teh Balkans. Not all Muslims in the ME are either Turks or Arabs. Many are originally Slavs or what have you. khazarians. And not all Arabs are Muslims.
Nb: THere are quite a few American Muslim converts who are not of ME extraction (some of my best freinds are Muslims . . .). We need to be careful to distinguish between Islamic nationalism and Arab or Turkish nationalism. Unfortunately, as has occurred with Judaism, religion has been confounded with ethnic terms. I think it is unlikely that Arabs will ever again accept the Turks as the carriers and protectors of Islam. That was the reason for the Arab revolt against the Turks, when the West totally betrayed the Arabs and opened up the pandora’s box that is still open in the ME. But that doesn’t mean the Turks won’t keep trying. And quite apart from the Kurds, Erdogan might be playing some kind of payback game against Syria and Iraq as the centers of Arab nationalism and in particular secular Arab nationalism. And if it came to that, would the Wahhabist Saudis sit back and let Turkey re-don the mantle of Protector of Islam, after all it was I think Abdulazliz who captured and liberated Mecca from the Sharifs of Mecca who were clients of the Ottoman Turks, in ca. 1926? . . . Maybe if the Turks became “more Islamist than the Wahhabs” with the imposition of Sharia etc. But it seems very unlikely that “normal” Turks would go for this.
Katherine
There is definitely a deliberate plot behind all of this.
Analysing that all of it is Erdogan’s grand scheme is not what it “feels” like – at least not for me.
It’s more a plot inside a greater hell-game. The dogs fighting for the biggest junk of poor rabbit – not mind feeding themselfs of a weaker comrade.
Everyone can see that Merkel is playing along with it and a 15 minutes Obama talk makes her all the more forget about any German national agendas (not saying there ever were some).
So as “cheap labor” seems to be an incentive, it’s no more than a tool. Clearly the forces behind are destabilzing everything they can lay their hands on. Destroying structure and solidarity.
Not clear this is the great plan of hellish minds or rather the outcome of the ill blood-poison that’s adherent to them.
It was a cornerstone of British policy since 1774 to prop up the Ottoman Empire and prevent Russia expanding or building a Mediterranean fleet. The geopolitics are different today in that The Raj is no more and Russia is different, but the USA is a global imperial power treating Russia as a rebel colony and that has sours everything.
Ultimately European Peoples are incandescent at the Invasion and Rapes committed by the Invaders invited in by Merkel and a shadowy elite. It is more likely Western Europe will revolt and seek help from Russia. This situation is very dangerous for US interests. People will not tolerate being kept in a zoo with the cages open as these degenerates rape women and defecate over civil society. The outlook for established political parties and media in Western Europe is grim; they have unleashed the Thirty Years War by destroying the integrity of nation states
Just like the shooting down of the Su-24, Erdogan’s Ottoman revenge-fantasy agenda of flooding Europe with jihadi chaos makers is doomed to backfire, and anyone with any sense in the political realm would put Turkey in it’s place. All this muck-making will do is bring about the right-wing parties in Europe that the US/NATO power elite definitely don’t want.
Sometimes the view becomes difficult to see because there are competing agendas and sometimes they contradict. Also, what happened to all the migrant “children”? (as reported by RT) Now thousands missing….doesn’t make sense.
Yes, that is true, the “far right” is almost universally the anti-NATO, anti-US, anti-EU element in W.Europe.
The opposite is true in E.Europe where the “far right” is almost universally pro-NATO, pro-US, pro-EU, instead in the E.Europe the far left is the anti-NATO, anti-US, anti-EU.
Yes well Liz, on the circle of politics, Far Right meets Far Left and in reality there isn’t much to separate them.
One thing can be sure in Europe, the current Political system has failed the people of Europe miserably. Be it France or Moldova or anything in between. The problem I see all too often, regardless of espoused political ideology is that most politicians are in it for themselves and not for the countries and people they are meant to represent. The only real exception to this is in Russia and to an extent Belarus (given my limited knowledge of Belarus as a country).
The systems throughout Europe and the Western World are corrupt to the core and there is a gross lack of transparency and accountability. Couple that with the age of Finance as we are subjected to with everyone bowing down to the “Markets” aka “Mammon” and we have a new Dark Ages in the making.
Ask yourself who hates Germans (as well as most Euro-gentiles) and whether they have any influence on policy formation in the United States. The policy of demographically displacing the European descended gentiles is being promoted across the Western world.
In America, the neoconservatives have played a definitive role in promoting unrestrained, demography changing immigration:
http://www.vdare.com/articles/thinking-about-neoconservatism
Jewish intellectual and political movements have typically had ready access to prestigious mainstream media channels, and this is certainly true for the neocons. The anchoring by the Washington Post of the columns of Charles Krauthammer and Robert Kagan and by the New York Times of William Safire`s illustrates this. But probably more important recently has been the invariable summoning of neoconservatives to represent the “conservative” line on the TV Networks. Is it unreasonable to suppose that this may be somewhat influenced by the famously heavy Jewish role in these operations?
Immigration policy provides a valuable acid test for the proposition that neoconservatism is actually a vehicle for perceived Jewish ethnic interests. I believe I have been able to demonstrate that pro-immigration elements in American public life have, for over a century, been largely led, funded, energized and organized by the Jewish community [PDF file]. American Jews have taken this line, with a few isolated exceptions, because they have believed, as Leonard S. Glickman, president and CEO of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, has bluntly stated, “The more diverse American society is the safer [Jews] are.” Having run out of Russian Jews, the HIAS is now deeply involved in recruiting refugees from Africa.
When, in the middle 1990s an immigration reform movement arose amongst American conservatives, the reaction of the neoconservatives ranged from cold to hostile. No positive voice was permitted on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal, by then a neoconservative domain. (Perhaps significantly, a more recent exception has been a relatively favorable review of the anti-illegal immigration book Mexifornia— whose author, the military historian Victor Davis Hanson, has distinguished himself by the extreme hawkishness of his views on the Middle East.) The main vehicle of immigration reform sentiment, National Review, once a bastion of traditional conservative thought, was quite quickly captured by neoconservatives and its opposition to immigration reduced to nominal.
Prior to the post-9/11 U.S. invasion of the Middle East, this suppression of the immigration reform impulse among conservatives was probably the single most important contribution of the neoconservatives to the course of U.S. history.
If our depth of knowledge is based on false premises and false history rarely will truth be discovered and one can easily get lost in the actions on the field, losing sight of the game going on beyond what one is ‘allowed’ to know.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/181857243/Aleksandr-Solzhenitsyn-200-Years-Together-almost-full-translation-pdf
Chapter 16 and 18 essentially lay out the strategy. (Notice the lack of English-translation of the complete work why is that?).
Most of the immigration in the US is from Mexico. How it fits in with this Jewish conspiracy theory is beyond me.
Interestingly, my bride and I had this same conversation with some friends in early September, that Erdogan was indeed the perpetrator of the massive waves of illegal migrants to EU. How could it be anyone else?
Our reasoning in the discussions was Turkey was tired of EU promises of inclusion in their little club for years plus the funds to feed and house the vast hordes of displaced persons residing in Turkey were drying to a trickle. Another frustration sticking in Erdogan’s craw was the inability of Turkey and USNATO to put an end to Assad’s rule of Syria, although at the time of the discussion Assad was in our estimate two weeks from complete and utter defeat.
Russian assistance to Assad and Syria had commenced if memory serves about a week before our discussion but to this day my conviction is Erdogan was and is behind the tidal wave of illegal migrants. The subtle reasonings behind his motive for sending them to EU don’t really matter that much, the fact is in my opinion he did it and EU is now stuck with well over a million illegals that will never become a part of EU mainstream culture and economies and with as many more coming.
The EU, read mainly German government, reaction to the massive influx has shown very clearly the inability of the various governments do in any way handle the untold masses of people who demand everything from their new ‘masters’ and in return give confusion and mayhem and violence as a thank you to them.
In one fell swoop, whether it was planned or not, Erdogan has clearly shown the EU, and in particular Germany, France and UK, are dead and rotting on the vine.
Auslander
Author, Never The Last One, http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ZGCY8KK
Auslander
If it was erdogan/turkey orchestrating this “refugee crisis” against zpc/nwo interests, they would be in the same hitler catagory as Assad/Syria. Since turkey is now playing the ukraine quisling role, its a no brainer the sods are simply tools.
Historically, the turks have been from the 19th century on essentially fascist europe’s jailhouse sukas. Now they don kneepads to service israeli/american power. No real change here.
Yes Vot Tak but also remember the lack of funds with the UNHCR for refugees. Who are the main contributors to this funding whereby refugee camps in Turkey were failing to cover the cost of sanitation and food.
Erdogan might not have had a choice hence the flood gates but that would not account for why near 90% of these EU bound “refugees” are male between the ages of supposedly 15 to 45. I say supposedly as I know that in Finland the “refugees” refuse to be DNA tested and have no documentation and one can not take their word for the details pertaining to themselves.
For me there seem to be many actors behind the curtain but they all lead to Finance and the main benefit of this is the disunity or EU populations causing more so natives to be infighting between the bleeding hearts and those who see the lack of political and policing of the refugees and so take up action themselves. That with the State of Emergencies in both Brussels and France with the UK being a brute squad state for quite some time. This seems to be for me more a means of an excuse to the clamping down on the native’s descent within the EU in lew of the economic mess and debt wall fast approaching.
My worry is how to rise the people above their divide and focus them on the real problems aka Global Debt Based Finance and Private Money Creation aka Neo Feudalism.
Vot Tak “Historically, the turks have been from the 19th century on essentially fascist europe’s jailhouse sukas. Now they don kneepads to service israeli/american power. No real change here.”
Can you unpack this statement?
A. What is a suka?
B. In the runup to WW1 the western powers (and Greece, and Armenia) were slavering over the predicted breakup of the Ottoman empire so that they could snap up bits and pieces. Much policy in the ME, inlcuding Britain’s use of and then (planned) betrayal of Arab nationalist aspirations, was geared to this outcome (break and grab). So, not sure what you are saying regarding the Turks/Ottomans as fascist Europe’s jailhouse sukas. Means what???? Examples????
Thanks,
Katherine
“In the EU itself, left-wingers and humanitarians, well-meaning as they may be, often live in total darkness of all sorts of wheeling and dealing that go on around them. They stood up and coerced their governments to welcome in refugees..”
As if the deep state is coerced. No, I’m sorry, but there are other players who benefit besides the right wing nationalists and Erdogan’s alleged neo-Ottoman Empire fantasies.
“Let us be rational.” As if to contradict the author one must be irrational. Pfhht.
You did not address who gave them the travelling papers, tickets and money for the journey.. Refugees after a few months would be broke and desperate. A million people would require like a billion bucks to even approach any kind of travel.
Not all ‘refugees’ are dirt poor and starving. As for travel documents, since the vast majority of them were in Turkei, who do you think gave them documents or provided them with contacts to obtain same?
“But I cannot see how the USA can benefit from the influx of thousands, and possibly tens of thousands, of Jihadists infiltrating into Europe and threatening its (assume latter, not USA) peace and wellbeing!…Thus far, the only beneficiaries out of this whole kerfuffle are the European ultra-right wing parties, and we haven’t seen anything yet”.
It’s not called the Empire of Chaos for nothing; the fascist-lite USA thrives on it and a destabilised EU along with the rise of Right Wing fascists hurts economic and security links with Russia and empowers the USA’s NATO and the MIC’s pocketbook.
So I disagree that the USA doesn’t benefit and I suspect that the USA has guided Turkey on every move. The UK/USA/NATO trifecta of evil are panting for war with Russia and Turkey is the current conduit.
Can one name a European disaster of the last 300 years that didn’t benefit the US? Irish Genocide, a plus. WWI and II, big wins. The revolutions of 1848 or thereabouts? All good news. Besides, it is quite naive to think that the Libyan refugee crisis wasn’t planned. These crises keep countries like Greece from having a functional policy, in the unlikely event that they could get their act together to that extent.
Think of two countries who helped American gain her independence and prevent foreign meddling during the American Civil War. What happened to the ruling click of those countries as a result?
Who would have been the beneficiaries of that? Where did they set up shop and run a state within a state?
Follow the Money
“In Germany live white people. Among those white people are bad elements who sometimes rape and murder. Some people criticise me for blaming white people in general. If your wife or girlfriend is raped by one of those white people then what do those critics say then? ”
seem incongrous to you? – that’s why blaming refugees in general is racist
Right now there are two narratives. In the north of Europe, the image one gets from the media is that refugees are mostly young men, seen as invaders, rapists and petty thieves rolled into one. If you see a refugees you should keep an eye on your daughter and your mobile phone.
In the south of Europe, the media talk of the refugees as mothers and children running away from war and hunger. The image painted is that of a small kitten which has fallen in the water, waiting for you to pick it up, put it on a soft towel and blow it with your hair-dryer until it’s all fluffy.
Sometimes I wonder if
what we are fed is truth or a wilderness of mirrors;
A disparaging reality or
The Devils’ concoction;
But in the end life is a frail attempt
At understanding; forever quaking
In the darkness of life.
well thousands of Turkish hotels are up for sale due to loss of Rus tourist trade-EU gives Turkey 3b euros, ah yes Erdogan can give the refugees nice hotel rooms-everyone benefits, they remain closer to home to return when Syria is stabilised for example.
“Other theories have accused George Soros, Nuland, NATO, and even the EU itself.”
-It is actually the stated goal of EU and its sole function. To quote the founder of EU : “Richard Nikolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi
“The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. ”
“Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi#Views_on_race_and_religion
Why is everyone, save Liz, missing out on Kalergi. Every two years, the European elite honour him by awarding the Coudenhove- Kalergi Prize to “those who have excelled in promoting European integration.” In 2008 Merkel received the Kalergi prize.
This is a fascinating piece of analysis as always and definitely a big piece of the puzzle, thank you so much for highlighting it. I would just like to ask you what then is the purpose of the discussions in London around Jordan’s threats to direct all its refugees into Europe..is this just a ploy to receive funding from the EU?? I think its very dangerous to marginalise or downplay the Soros role in what is happening or to not mention the very real and ugly [something many are afraid to confront] issue of the paedophile rings and child trafficking/illegal adoption processes. I have started to investigate this and it is a massive issue, with connection up to the highest eschelons of our society and institutions. Open borders and all associated ramifications play handsomely into the child stream managers agenda…the main beneficiary being the US. With love, respect and admiration always, Vanessa xx
OT. Interesting song with lyrics in English subtitles
Mashani – the Ruble – dollar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-DxQi1X76c&feature=youtu.be
Interesting view, however it doesn’t take into account the apparent involvement of western nations in promoting the influx of refugees. See this article analysing the origin of pro-refugee social media: http://orientalreview.org/2015/09/21/who-is-twitter-luring-refugees-to-germany/
Also worth a view is Gearóid Ó Colmáin’s excellent analysis ‘Coercive Engineered Migration’: http://dissidentvoice.org/2016/01/rothschilds-slaughter-ships/
(4 parts published so far).
Always worth asking ‘cui bono.’
RBK-500U dispensing BETAB-M rocket accelerated concrete piercing submunitions for use against airfields.
https://twitter.com/vpkivimaki/status/688728792156758016
” Thus far, the only beneficiaries out of this whole kerfuffle are the European ultra-right wing parties”
What do you mean by ‘only’, Gassan? Building-up strong, Intelligence-controlled, right-wing opposition parties is the whole point.
Europe will crash badly in the coming years. Pre-emtying public mass dissent by installing Police States from Portugal to Poland is the glorious plan of the Parasites.
Merkel and her gang are fully on with this agenda. They are all crypto-Fascists, after all.
SEems to me like the refugees/migrants/whatever have also profited—the ones who made it and didn’t end up at the bottom of the ocean. They are now living in Europe, the dream of millions the world over.
Katherine
” Thus far, the only beneficiaries out of this whole kerfuffle are the European ultra-right wing parties”
What do you mean by ‘only’, Gassan? Building-up strong, Intelligence-controlled, right-wing opposition parties is the whole point.
Exactly
The author really doesnt get what all this is about.
“Ridiculously naïve” is about the kindest thing I could say abut him.
Many theories have been put forward to explain what is really happening in Europe, but with all due respect to many authors whom I greatly respect and admire, I find that none of those theories add up in a manner that is convincing and complete.
Apart from politics and political analysis, (…) it was something that has been orchestrated by an invisible plotter.
To conspire any plan with obvious political consequences refraining from making a political analysis can only remain incomplete. But my curiosity is aroused…
To summarise what is otherwise a fine enumeration of those cui bono:
– USA in order to submit EU under vassalage
– European Right Wing Parties in order to cater support in approaching elections
– Turkey’s Erdogan in order to reestabilish a neo-Ottoman Empire in score settling with Christianity
– EU’s Merkel attempt at bringing in massive cheap labour force while scoring some humanitarian PR points
Where Kadi refuses to wonder is the degree of perversity implied by the same beneficiaries if the consequences we observe where planned and including for terrorists infiltrated among the refugees.
I wish my characterization of the humanity of those above influencing the current world events was as hopeful as the author’s. Of course the analysis must be political! The reasons for my skepticism as follows:
– This hard to conceive perversity has Historic precedents (see The Weaponization of the Refugees. Artificial Mass Migration as Imperial policy has a Long History)
– These western leaders have regularly unleashed beasts while deluded they would be able to control. And specially under the last resort chaos which culminates in the system they serve, the deluge of unintended consequences can surprise on instance but is nothing to be shocked with.
– This is the perversity to expect during War which is what we are observing, despite unconventional, proxied and undeclared. Bomb terrorism is not exclusive of the MENA countries anymore, western countries populations have also become a target. The fact that bombs are not dropping from planes in western cities does not preclude the other fact that against all international order drones are dropping bombs in a multitude of other countries be it the Middle East or Africa… making western elites’ devious cowardice rhyme with the purpose of avarice.
– Capitalist hegemonic system is in deep financial, economic, democratic and cultural crisis, and presents its historical solution once again, War. This perversity is not that of particular powerful individuals, though they become instrumental. The crisis stems from the impossibility of the system in sustaining the diverging inter-capitalist interests be those self-aware or not, there being a level of inherent self reproducing instability of the system with an acutely perverse character, which some individuals are prone to represent.
Hence, the denials:
– USA and CIA because they worry about peace in Europe and its wellbeing
– Merkel because corruption or stupidity can’t rationaly explain such perversity in a politician
– George Soros, Nuland, NATO and EU because there must be “clear a beneficiary”
– Right Wing parties because it is just too wild an imagination
… have a very weak traction on me:
– See Operation Gladio
– If corruption or stupidity can’t explain it, what other reasons can?
– As if a clear beneficiary alone was a requirement and any research pointing to many beneficiaries was impossible
– Neo-Nazis of the Breivik caliber, which roam, influence and are influenced by european right wing parties political ideology and actions, couldn’t possibly be instrumentalized in such a devious plan
Consisting of badly employed disbelief in face of the context consistent with the information currently available and the historical precedent which unfortunately also serves to disqualify very plausible courses of investigation.
The whole thing could be an excellent example of “overdetermination.”
All the named parties profit in some way. Even if short term they seem to have conflicting interests, they still ahve the option to try to fight things out on future fields.
Don’t underestimate opportunism and piggybacking. In fact, not only long-range planning but also opportunistic piggybacking are features of protean capitalism.
Katherine
“overdetermination” as the result of an underestimation at the planning stage of the actual combined effects of the multiple, seamingly independent but, contributing actors towards a certain end likely to be overshot? (expound if otherwise)
Certainly could be, but in any case, that possibility does not clear in any way the responsibility of those instrumentalised much less those instrumenting for the serious consequences.
MOSCOW (Sputnik) – If Turkish aircraft operate over Syria, they must fully honor the Russian-US flight safety memorandum, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said Friday.
“These assurances have been received from the United States,” Antonov told journalists.
He said that in order to avoid a repeat of Turkey’s downing of a Russian fighter jet in November of last year, Russia has deployed an air defense system in the region.
“This will enable to discover threats to Russian planes in a timely manner that are completing military tasks in Syria and if necessary, take appropriate measures to provide security of their flights,” Antonov added.
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160205/1034259647/turkey-us-russia-safety-memorandum.html#ixzz3zHxrWNTX
or we will shoot you down………………………….
MOSCOW, February 5. /TASS/. Turkey’s systematic violations of the Open Skies Treaty create a precedent when the control over military activity of one of the signatories is impossible, Deputy Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said on Friday.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/854715
and
MOSCOW (Sputnik) – Turkey refused to conform with a flight safety memorandum on flights over Syria even before it downed a Russian bomber jet in November, Russian Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov said Friday.
In 2015, the military from Russia and the United States signed a document to curtail possible air incidents over Syrian skies. Turkey is a participant of the US-led coalition in Syria and Iraq.
“The Americans were obliged within the framework of the memorandum to not only inform all of the coalition participants on the essence of the agreements, but also guarantee that all of its participants strictly followed the contents of the document. We have a written confirmation from the United States that Washington has fulfilled all of the formalities on cooperation with its partners,” Antonov told journalists.
He said, however, that Turkey refused to confirm its compliance with the memorandum.
“But the Turkish military that is formally part of the US coalition refused to confirm their compliance with the memorandum, stating that this given issue is the responsibility of the foreign ministry. Moreover, they unilaterally blocked the hotline and didn’t answer our immediate requests. In the end, the Turkish Air Force knowingly downed the Russian bomber jet on November 24, killing Russian servicemen,” Antonov said.
According to Antonov, Russia has deployed an air defense system in the region in order to avoid a repeat of such scenario.
Read more: http://sputniknews.com/world/20160205/1034260113/turkey-ignored-russian-us-flight-safety-memorandum.html#ixzz3zHzCGcNy
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/why-sultan-chaos-freaking-out/ri12659
Pepe Escabar article
Roach motel Turkey.. You can always check in but when it comes time to leave..
Turkey is asking for $1,000 from fleeing “rebels” & their families in order to allow them entry into Turkey!
Which is the plot that went wrong?
Let’s have a look on the facts and turn the clock back to when the strategic plans for the current U.S. administration where made (2007-08):
– A vast presence of U.S. troops in Iraq and Saudi Arabia kept the Middle East under control
– The containment policy against the progressive movements in Latin America seemed to work fine, constantly threatening Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador
– Europe was the same little cuddly toy as always with the U.K. and the Eastern States producing chaos on command. The unholy axis Paris-Berlin-Moscow had been defeated and CIA-puppet Angela had consolidated her colonial government.
– Russia seemed under control and caught between the interests of the different cliques, credit debts and its backwardness
– India and Pakistan as always distracted by each other
Anybody left? Of course, China!
Then the idea behind the so called “Pivot to Asia” was born. Those strategists perfectly knew that the Empire could not turn the rest of the world adrift in order to fully concentrate on China and that some continuous distraction was needed (e.g. Cuddly Europe had to be prevented from gravitating towards Russia).
Obviously something went wrong as more and more regional powers like France, Turkey, Brazil, Saudi Arabia, etc. began to believe that a multipolar world was possible, at least at a sandbox game level. Washington had to partly postpone its Asian activities in order to make it clear that none of its “Allies” was allowed to play on its own accord – the “Arab Spring” e.g. was launched to set an end to the French charm offensive in Northern Africa – Daesh was created to avoid a power vacuum exploited by Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria or Iran after the withdrawal of the U.S. troops – Turks and Kurds were expected to neutralize each other – Brazil was threatened economically and internally-. In conclusion: “Our game, our rules, and our command!”
Things could have worked if Russia hadn’t entered the ring to rock and China opened the purse.
Obama failed to immediately identify Russia as the diabolic villain, the Anti-Christ, and to close the ranks against the evil foe of mankind. Ridiculing Russia as a Regional Power made other Regional Powers aware of the poor state of the Empire. That was the point of no return when the “One Empire-One Plan-Doctrine” failed. Since then, each of the Regional Powers started to make their own little plans and this is why it has become so extremely difficult to understand the plot and what went wrong.
Coming back to the “tsunami of refugees”: Erdogan has a plan, Soros has a plan, the Saudis have a plan, and Washington has one, and so on – except Merkel who never has a plan but to wait for instructions from Langley. Each of those tiny plans occasionally works but generally fails. However, there is no master plan any more.
” except Merkel who never has a plan but to wait for instructions from Langley”
Not true. Everybody is underestimating the Germans. At the moment the right-wingers in Merkel’s shadow are planing feverishly for the post-NATO, post-EU times while playing very efficiently the role of the hapless, ridiculed underdog on the world media stage. Don’t be fooled.
No idea why so much people expect the Germans to act in some way. The vast majority of German citizens are so zombified and short-sighted meanwhile the self-declared elites are completely compromised with the Empire’s purpose in such a way that they will comply with any request under any circumstances. For the small rest of them there is still a well working state security able to limit any ganging up that could seriously threaten the peace of the flock.
Regarding Angela, her dad was a “faithful” churchman who used to work for STASI, KGB and CIA simultaneously and his daughter joined the family business from her very first step (or even before). The same CIA positioned her close to Mr. Kohl and later on cleared her way from any rival. Do not expect her to leave the yellow brick road.
Excellent comment. But hopefully, from the Multi-polar side (which millions of non-stupified Americans are supportive of…..”win-win-win”, rather than “winner take all”— and make everyone else slaves…….) there is an opportunity for a counter-chaos master plan for rationality and order that can leave some sort of escape route for the weakened and divided natoists to reluctantly accept, rather than allowing their neocon Anglo-Zionist crazies to blow everything up. What’s your take on that possibility?
We need to learn that we never learn,
Greece has for many years a huge problem with illegal immigration through Turkey (mainly afghans, pakis, africans, middle easterners). The role of the greek oligarchic elites seems to be supportive for the massive illegal immigration. They want cheap labour and to dilute the ethnic homogeneity of greek people so as to better control them.
Besides Erdogan, there is another guy that has responsibility either by stupidity, criminal intentions or both. This is the greek puppet PM Alexis Tsipras.
It is no coincidence that the massive increase in illegal immigrant flows started after the election of Tsipras in March 2015. During 2014, about 40,000 illegals entered Greece. After Tsipras election in 2015, 50,000 started to come every month !
Tsipras and SYRIZA had for many years a party policy of open borders and allowing unlimited immigration into Greece from around the world.
Tsipras announced in March 2015 that all “Refugees” are welcome, he will suspend border patrols, and all detention centers will be opened and all illegal immigrants will be released.
After that, the flows increased rapidly. His immigration minister, an elderly and deranged woman named Tasia Christodoulopoulou blamed greek people as “nazis” (!) for not accepting the hundreds thousands of refugees. This woman also called for employers to fire greek people and hire refugees !
Does Tsipras came into agreement with Erdogan ? I dont know.
Tsipras and his SYRIZA party are extremely corrupt, inefficient, and plain speaking stupid.
The ideology of SYRIZA is on the one hand fanatically pro-EU and on the other hand they really hate ethnic greek culture, greek people and the concept of nation state. They proclaim that they want a “European state” and that they work for EU interests (not Greek national interests !) , and for their ideology the concept of ethnicity is fake and needs to be abolished !
SYRIZA has also formed many “anti-racist” (sic) NGOs that get funds from the greek state and EU coffers to supposedly “help” refugees.
The aegean islands tourist industry is destroyed and no tourists would come back.
Every day, thousands muslims (many criminals or impoverished) are unloaded in the port of Peiraias. All these happen in a country under political and economic occupation by Brussels, with severe recession, and massive unemployment and poverty.
And the puppet Tsipras after betraying greek people, now continues with the same policy of transferring greek public assets and property to foreign german multinational corporations (such as all greek airports) and further impoverishing Greek people…..
Dear Ghassan,
your assumption
which leads to your conclusion (Erdogan) is wrong.
Instead, not only the german people but the whole … administration department of the still (since late 1918!) occupied rest of former Germany is in deep, deep slavery – nothing else.
There is not only evidence but proof over proof (most often by AngloSaxons). The symbolic turning point of german history happened to be August 1878, i.e. right after the Berliner Kongress (Congress of Berlin, Juli 1878). All incredients of nowadays migrants avalanche have been assembled (at Berliner Kongress):
– the (falling) Ottoman Empire,
– the (after Crimean War 1853-56) strength regaining Russian Empire
– already struggling Austrian-Hungarian Empire
– the, economically declining (sic!) eastern angloSaxon empire, nowadays UK
– for whatever reason the would-be and longing for revanche empire France
– and some minor important others.
Bismarck’s fault has been to successfully … backtracking Russia from Konstantinopel (Istanbul) after Russia conquered (Russo-Turkish War, 1877/78) almost all of south eastern Balkan right to the entrance of Konstantinopel (some 20, 30km), i.e. very, very next to Sea of Marmara – you got the point?
If Russia wouldn’t have been backtracked then, southern border of Russia as of now would be the Aegean Sea. So what’s been the problem for the eastern angloSaxon empire?
The problem has been (and in a way (consider nowadays socalled chancellor Merkel and Putin) still is), Bismarck managed to convince his teachers (sic!), russian diplomates, to draw back to Bessarabia. And, he managed to do so as chancellor of an only continental empire without opressing colonies (please read Naill Ferguson, “The pity of war”, 1998 – Germany never took out/got more of it’s later short-time colonies than investing (may be even wasting money).) And even more so, Germany didn’t need to be any kind of a sea power (which could be wiped out by the only allowed angloSaxon sea power). Bismarck instead just used friendly words to convince (his teachers from) Russia. [Remark: Who is doing the angloSaxon job in Minsk II?]
The then already economically declining eastern angloSaxon empire always used terror (war for terror) to backtrack any country anywhere in the world. If neccessary they completed their conquests with some kind of genocide (remember the invention of concentration camps in 1830th in (nowadays) Oregon, remeber industrialized genocide using concentration camps in First Boer War (1880/81) and Second Anglo Boer War, 1899-1902). And please remember nowadys angloSaxon war for terror (and not for victory), e.g. twice Irak, Vietnam (including Laos), Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, … Never ending terror story.
Thus, in 1878 the (then) eastern angloSaxon empire decided to destroy this only landbased but then economically and politically most successfull country (Germany 1870-1900 400% growth of GDP, UK 1870-1900 5%, [USA: 1870-1900 300%, France: 1870-1900: 250%]). You may use Google to look for “Germania esse delendam”, three articles of newspaper Sunday Review in 1890th.
The strategie to destroy Germany already has been invented by Oliver Cromwell in 17th century and even then was called (even by himself) Zionism, i.e. bring terror to the country/region you want to reign – if you as an (only) sea power cannot conquer that region/country (listen to Michael Friedman, Stratfor):
1.) try to destroy the ecomical base of the choosen victim (Germany). They started with simple methods (please refer to history of “Made in Germany”) but soon switched to war using France and, and Russia to do the dirty job. This war has been successful (not only in terms of destroying the economical base of Germany). You know this war as 1st World War – but this phrase is nonsense! It’s only the beginning of the second 30years War (1914/15-1944/45), same victim: Germany. In a way the 1st 30years War has been the master plan for the second one.
After successfully destroying the economical base of Germany (please refer to socalled Treaty of Versailles and it’s complete history) in such a way, that only between November 1918 and Juliy 1919 (ceasefire) at least (and confirmed by everyone) 1,200,000 germans died of starvation. The angloSaxon already knew how to orchestrate genocide and whom to blame: of course and you already guessed: Germany! So from then on (1919) they stepped to
2.) The world was in need for somebody like Hitler because without a german Hitler you wouldn’t be able to call Saddam Hussein or Vladimir Putin or Muhamar Gaddafi or whom ever you want to – being Hitler again. Therefore Hitler must be guilty in a way that all germans and any kind of Germany will be guilty for ever. The elected Hitler, i.e. the angloSaxon empire, must orchestrate a bigger genocide than all genocides before – and maybe even thereafter.
In 1923 J.P. Morgan started financing Hitler (then in prison). He startet financing Mussolini in 1920. Financing almost never stopped until 1942 and even thereafter (refer to BIS – Bank for International Settlements, and more important than Hitler, Hjalmar Schacht) the western AngloSaxons managed to keep the elected Hitler-for-ever running to finish his duty: fight, kill as much of Russia(ns) as possible and, and make Germany and all germans guilty for ever. [Remark: i’m not telling you, Nazis haven’t killed hundreds of thousands. No, they did the job much to well! E.g. more than 25millions of russian people and, btw., more than eight or nine millions germans, what a luck!]
Of course you know the history, the AngloSaxons succeeded.
The real aim always has been the same, from the very beginning (Crimean War, Russo-Turkish War, 1st, 2nd and 3rd Anglo-Afghan War (1839-1919, remember the Durand Line from 1893, the real reason why there is still nowadas war in Afghanistan) …) – all this sometimes refered to as The Great Game (1813-1917/1947). The aim has been and still is to let others conquer and destroy Russia so the sea power AngloSaxon empire (from both sides of the Atlantic) may rule the world.
After the 2nd World War (as last part of 2nd 30years War) ended (just ceasefire again, no peace ’til now!) the AngloSaxons implemented an administration department for occupied Germany and founded an allied institution constituionally (§53, §106?) nameing Germany until nowadays as enemy, better know as United Nations, UN. Exactly this enemy nameing institution (ENI) released (2000-2010) multiple documents regarding migration of millions of african and arabian … migrants to Europe, espacially Germany (more than 20 millions). I.e. socalled chancellor Merkel is exactly doing what she has been instructed to – nothing else.
P.S.
Turkey/Erdogan (selfproclaimed reincarnation of the Ottoman Empire) has been choosen to be the Germany of the 21st century, i.e. economically destruction first, and thereafter trying to kill as many russians as possible, to bring terror to Russia – that’s what and why Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin in the name of the Russian Federation is fighting in Syria and more and more forced to do so in Turkey. If neccessary the guiltiness of Turkey (for ever, see above) already is available – genocide of the armenian people (1915, 1,500,000) at the very beginning of nowadays Turkey, i.e. guiltiness of Turkey is somewhat genetic.
You know your history, Raven. Very good post. Somewhat depressing past, unless the present can learn from it and make a happier future. Surely there are flanking opportunities to avert the same divide and conquer tactics from succeeding yet again?
“The West on the other hand is, generally speaking, often short-sighted and even stupid. What adds to the short-sightedness and stupidity of its politicians is that section of humanitarians who are noisy and who do not know the difference between a true refugee in need and a rascals taking advantage of their lofty principles.”
Haha, what an utterly preposterous pronunciamento. As if the West’s entire neoliberal, terminal rot were a matter of, well, undeserved bad luck. It sounds just like the doltish platitudes about poor little innocent Europe “sleepwalking” right into the hellfire of WW1.
All right: Wanna blame Erdogan for the refugee torrents? Sure, he is a proud complicit and a total scum, yes, but the endless mayhem and rampaging around the Middle East and beyond are not at his discretion. Erdogan is a cynical opportunist with an all but infallible political instinct. Erdogan knows only too well that his ‘enlightened’ Western colleagues are just as rotten ripe, only with much more blood, filth, and squalor to show for them. The refugee torrents are his beautiful little way of saying: “OK, dear Western liberal philanthropists: put your money where your mouth is. I’ve got some people here who would be very happy to settle ‘elsewhere’ — agreed?”
Whitey throws pity parties that keep on screaming to High Heaven. Does Whitey really believe it helps?
N, your hard-edged comments are always worth reading and thinking about. Even when slightly bent. This time, I agree 100% with your comment. (Not that either agreement or disagreement would ever influence you.)
I’d say you know the western elites more than Mr Kadi does, hence his softness on them, which a lot of comments are objecting to..
It looks like Erdogan may be used to finally compel Putin to respond with military force, but I agree that the actual source of the problem is further west, not In Ankara. He’s playing the dangerous hand he has been dealt. But he’s not the dealer.
Behind all the religious and secular neo-liberal posturing in the West, the core religion of the inner elites is Satanism. https://youtu.be/w1WQhKSFP58 Those that they rule over, in the NATO countries are complicit in their crimes, unless they recognize this fact and resist their satanic elites in some manner. And unless they are still children, those who do not resist in some manner deserve no pity, if they are ever made conscious of this reality, since they make the wrong choice, to remain ignorant in order to avoid responsibility. Fake-ass Christian Morons https://youtu.be/dWXGo7Qkr2w
Thank you! And, needless to say, you’re spot on about Satanism being the West’s core religion. As for Erdogan, he is simply attracted by their smell of sulphur.
There is an infamous video of a female Hungarian TV reporter deliberately tripping over a ‘refugee’ running towards her. It turns out this ‘refugee’ is a known jihadist fleeing the carnage in Syria.
Another brilliant article by Kadi that makes sense from the refugee situation as I have heard it from friends who have made the trek. There is a spectrum within that tsunami of good and bad of course but a truly fearful percentage of Islamists determined to believe that robbing and raping the non-believers is a gift from God and that thier mission is to over-breed the existing populations. There are many in the refugee group that need to help educate the liberals in their adopting countries to this genuine threat. But its all probably too late. Whether Erdogan was this smart I don’t knoe but it is certainly possible. Whether EU leaders are this stupid seems obvious. It could very well be that the Syrian war was the match that lit the fire under this movement of people from so many war torn countries (and Iranians being a big part of the mix might back up that theory) but my gut thinks Ghassan is right. Adding the reality that Turks already are the 2nd largest people group in Germany and that is was Germany really opening the floodgates…well…God have mercy on us all.
Ghassan Kadi
“Thus far, it is all plot-gone-wrong for Erdogan in Syria, but his contingency plan B in Europe, if there is one indeed, is going pretty well.”
Mr. Kadi implies, without clearly stating, that Turkey’s leader, Erdogan, is, all by himself (and his local supporters), orchestrating the mass movement of a million civilians from the Middle East, to Europe.
Let us number the objections:
1. In order to implicate Erdogan, Kadi exculpates the major imperialist power blocs from any role in this cynical crime.
2. He paints Erdogan as an independent, or quasi independent force, representing the Sovereign Nation of Turkey. Even France, England, and Germany are not sovereign nations, but Turkey is?
3. The beneficiaries of this terrorist act of forcing a huge wave of people from their homes, which is one of the goals of those who forged the ISIS (Zionist American Terrorists), are misidentified. Mr Kadi attempts to cover-deny the actual (and Obvious) beneficiaries, of “Turkey’s Gates To Europe.”
a. The campaign for a Greater Zionist Nation-State requires the depopulation of Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, and Egypt (at least up to the Nile). This in an old imperialist goal, extending through history, from the Crusades, to Balfour, all the way to 2016.
[The Russians and Syrians and Hezbollah and Iran have place a ‘monkey wrench’ into this land-Empire grabbing imperialist effort, and they are driving the Zionist Americans, Mad. Just peruse their propaganda organ, the “NY Times.”]
b. The subsequent destabilization of the European peoples, through the weakening of their national identities, by the massive reverse colonization of dispersed millions from the Middle East – to Europe, is the second part of the (Highly Obvious) goal. The aim of weakening the European peoples will facilitate their continued rule/domination by the Zionist American World Order.
In Summary:
Erdogan is a Puppet. Turkey is a subject Nation. He may have delusions of grandeur, and hope to establish a new Ottoman Empire (gleaned from the pieces of the wreckage of the Arab nations), but he does not retire to the restroom, without specific instructions, and permission from his masters. And the Zionists will not allow Erdogan to expand his borders, not so much as one inch.
Mr Kadi has it (as we say), almost exactly in reverse. He exculpates the guilty, and magnifies the puppets.
For the Democratic Republics!
Very true, PJA. Sure Erdogan is an all-out Zionazi Arschlecker, but unlike the Euro-trash, he possesses a perfectly functioning brain and he knows it. The joke is entirely on Merkel’s deluded EU subjects. They try to pose as blameless little people only asking humbly for being left alone, but can’t get through their thick skulls that peoples abroad have a much stronger case against them. To their deep chagrin, Western imperialism asks them to put up or shut up. Hence, Whitey is really suffering appallingly as of late (not).
Thanks. Your analysis is an Occam’s razor type and just might be true as far as it goes.
However, in this scenario the Anglo-Zionist chess masters have a handy scapegoat turkey in hand and an invisibility cloak to boot.
The AZ crazies know how to hide their invisible hand and plan several moves ahead.
If we vineyarders know what’s good for Rus we’ve got to think even further and go where angels fear to tread. Otherwise we’ll end up dead in our heads while our bodies seem safe in our beds, and we’ll be check-mated once again.
Can anyone point me to some video evidence that the alleged sexual-assault events on Sylvestre(NYE) in Koln, Hamburg, Finland etc actually happened?
I don’t mean alleged statements made to the media etc
I mean actual video evidence recorded on the evening of the alleged events showing at least ONE person being sexually assaulted.
Or failing that actual video evidence recorded on the evening of the alleged events showing the immediate aftermath of one such event (eg: video of hysterical/distressed persons recorded shortly after she/they/he was/were allegedly sexually assaulted)
Try as I might I have yet to find so much as one video fitting those descriptions. The complete and utter absence of such video is highly suspect. Indeed, in this day and age of ubiquitous inner-city cctv surveillance, Phone-cameras etc, the absence of such video evidence is frankly impossible to believe.
It is frankly impossible to believe that so many people could have been assaulted without so much as one video of such an event or it’s immediate aftermath being captured on video and uploaded to the net
PS – just to repeat – I’m not even slightly interested in statements of alleged events, nor am I even slightly interested in media reports concerning such alleged events, nor am I even slightly interested in Polizei reports alleging such events (and I have no interest at all in hearing from fakes or hystericals ranting “How DARE You!!”)
I am looking for hard video evidence of such events or their immediate aftermath – so far I have found none.
The absence of such evidence, which absolutely should exist in these days of ubiquitous inner-city cctv surveillance, Phone-cameras etc, is a glaring hole in the alleged narrative of rampant sexual assault.
Whenever the MSM spreads sob/horror stories pandering to Western fears, hatreds, and plain paranoia, much of the so-called 99% are suddenly all ears; this forum being no exception whatsoever. Indeed, every now and then, there are people here spreading the rumour of surging rape numbers in Sweden. Forget about it — it’s pure fiction just like a host of other Swedish MSM imbecilities such as intruding Russian submarines, rampant social benefit fraud, and of course terrorist threats all over the place. The true horror story about Sweden is the God-awful toll of neoliberalism which eventually has brought outright, permanent chaos to Sweden’s public transportation, schools, the housing market, and so on. Heavy deindustrialisation, unemployment, and most notably: thanks to the adorable Eurocrats, there are now dirt-poor EU migrants begging everywhere in the cities here (and I do mean everywhere). As for our own despicable governments and ditto ruling elite, they are fully committed to taking Sweden into NATO, in which case foreign — mercenary — rapists become a certainty.
In short, just like Sweden’s alleged rapefest, the Cologne New Year Street Brawl is simply total hogwash. The MSM are to be duly congratulated for successfully spreading the message to the faithful.
Gassan Khadi said – Not that I wish any harm to anyone, but I would just wonder what would those critics do or say if it was their own sisters, girlfriends, daughters and mothers getting ganged raped in the streets!
Well before they got all hysterical and started ranting about filthy “muslim refugees” and dangerous “north africans” I would hope they would seek out some actual evidence that any crime actually occurred in the first place.
So far none has been forthcoming, despite the thousands or even hundreds of thousands of video recording devices being carried by virtually everyone in the middle of Koln that night.
And I hope they would be smart enough to be a little suspicious of the mass rape narrative when no such evidence is available.
——–
Regarding the “surge in rape” reported in Sweden
This has more to do with the constant redefinition in the Swedish legal code of what actually constitutes “rape”, than it has with any actual rise in the actual number of actual rapes.
If you redefine “rape” to include a whole plethora of actions that are clearly ” not rape”, (Assange’s alleged “crimes” while in Sweden for instance) then yeah, the number of alleged rapes is certain to rise dramatically.
@”It is frankly impossible to believe that so many people could have been assaulted without so much as one video of such an event or it’s immediate aftermath being captured on video and uploaded to the net”
Totally agree and ahve said this quite a few times on this blog and others have said the same:
Show me the money shots. Where is the evidence. It is beyuond credibitiy that there are NO videos or Tweets or whatever of these rapes. C’mon. We live in the age of social media. Soooo? Where is the evidence?Show it, or shut up.
Katherine
» In the EU itself, left-wingers and humanitarians, well-meaning as they may be, often live in total darkness of all sorts of wheeling and dealing that go on around them. They stood up and coerced their governments to welcome in refugees, and Erdogan knew they would, and he banked on this too. «
These left-wingers and humanitarians are complete dimwits. But they did not “coerce” the government. Merkel acted without any such visible coercion. There must have been a hidden, invisible influence on her, though. Because she knew the massive influx of migrants would be met with opposition and would create problems.
Even if there had been some “pressure”, she could have easily deflected it by pointing to the danger of “Islamist terrorism”.
» On the other hand, Merkel might have been tempted by the idea of bringing in a massive cheap labour force that is badly needed for German manufacturing industries. «
This is completely wrong. There is absolutely no need for unskilled labour in Germany, even less os when they don’t even know the language. Many of these migrants are unfit for labour for a variety of reasons. There are more than enough low-skilled unemployed people in Germany.
» The West on the other hand is, generally speaking, often short-sighted and even stupid. What adds to the short-sightedness and stupidity of its politicians is that section of humanitarians who are noisy and who do not know the difference between a true refugee in need and a rascals taking advantage of their lofty principles. «
Merkel is cold and calculating, loyal to the U.S. and Israel – but not stupid. She must have known full well these migrants would cause trouble. Everything was and is done to lie the German people about these migrants. MSM creates the impression that it’s primarily women and children, when in fact it’s mostly groups of able-bodied well-nourished young men.
» Erdogan simply wants to flood Europe with Muslims, radical Sunni Muslims of any persuasion. «
Could be, but that doesn’t explain Merkel’s open border nonsense. There must have been an unknown influence on Merkel. An external influence.
Erdogan wants to move people out of the way to be able to reshape the region. So does Israel. So does Saudi Arabia. So do F/UK/US, at least some factions within these countries.
Do they want to take land away from Syria and create an anti-Syrian Kurdistan there? And let Germany deal with the Syrian refugees?
What about the non-Syrian migrants? Are they the by-product of Erdogan’s djihadist recruiting campaign? Those who turned out unwilling, upon arrival in Turkey, to join the war in Syria? Push them on to open border Germany along with the Syrians?
Anon: “The more diverse American society is the safer [Jews] are.”
This is also a point. Jews in Germany seem to be divided on this issue. Some propagate more immigration, some oppose it. The former can be classified as enemies, the latter are okay. The latter want to live in peace, the former work on the disintegration and destruction of their host society – whether in Germany, in France, or in the U.S.
Lumi:
“Could be, but that doesn’t explain Merkel’s open border nonsense. There must have been an unknown influence on Merkel. An external influence.”
Yes What I found most striking adn weird was Merkel’s abrogating of German and EU law.
WTF?
That is really odd and most noteworthy but is it being talked about? Who gave her teh go-ahead to do that? Who promised her shelter from a legal challenge for simply setting aside by fiat the law of the land?
It is kind of like creating a state of emergency while announcing that there is no emergency and refusing to call the state of emergency when that is what is needed because of an unchecked flood of unsorted individuals from outside the EU. It is just so weird, from a legal standpoint. Someone has to have given her orders and assured her that she would be protected.
Katherine
There has been much dispute here as to whether the influx of refugees, most notably into Germany, would be the result of some tacit/secret agreement between Industry and EU/foreign governments about the perceived labour demand, primarily in Western Europe.
My take is that this hypothesis, strictly speaking, is wrong as it stands but still a good guess since the truth (as per my understanding) is indeed related to Europe’s labour market; only more profoundly so. To wit:
It is the ageing, decaying demographics prevailing in the EU accompanied by Capital’s interest in maintaining forever a sizeable Reserve Army of unemployed people that we see play out here. To the utter shock and horror of its hitherto solid, dependable social prop — the deluded, arrogant, and chauvinistic Euro-American middle classes and labour aristocracies — Western imperialism has reached the stage where it’s becoming time to ditch its loyal servants’ sacred way of life (Global Apartheid) in favour of the neoliberal ultimate wet dream (NWO).
Long story short: European Monopoly Capital (with EU as its political clout) has seized a most promising opportunity made possible by the violently insane Ziofascists in the US and a compliant Western stooge in Turkey. How could possibly anyone expect the vile politicos and presstitutes in the EU not to go along with that?
Thanks for your comments.
» That [Merkel’s supralegal action] is really odd and most noteworthy but is it being talked about? «
Of course, it isn’t. We’re a democracy after all. We avoid truth wherever it rears its ugly head.
Only irresponsible populists and nasty right-wing extremists talk about it. Heck, they even filed criminal charges against her. (Press reports 29.10.2015, Google: Merkel Strafanzeige Hochverrat)
Nussiminen, I think your line of thinking is too radical for reality (in this case). Let’s not forget that “ditching its loyal servants’ sacred way of life (Global Apartheid)” (of which the influx of migrants would be a first step) has a risk of totally destabilizing the system … So why would Western Imperialism be implementing this delicate “neoliberal ultimate wet dream” at the very moment an unexpected Russian challenger has risen and strategically allied himself with the Chinese Giant, who everyone in the transatlantic Moloch establishment seemed to agree was the future challenger number one?
Such ditching is not necessary. Such ditching is dangerous. I fail to see what would be accomplished by such ditching. Such ditching is definitely not the order of the day. I think such ditching will not take place. Because it would be like the System slapping the Sheeple in the face, and the Sheeple would slap the System back.
Vis-à-vis their sheeple, “they” don’t operate by slapping; they operate by deceiving.
There must have been an external influence on Merkel.
See this: Nikolai Starikov explains Europe’s refugee crisis. Starikov unequivocally says Uncle Sam forced the EU and Germany. And frankly, there is no one else I could think of. And Starikov links it to the Nordstream gas pipeline project. Which Germany has insisted on. (Whole Russian/USA pipeline war behind it.) So Germany will have Nordstream, but the US opens a migration South Stream.
Now how can Uncle Sam force Germany? Many people will not accept this idea. On the other hand, they apparently have accepted the idea that on (Anglo signature date) 3/24/15, the German co-pilot of GermanWings 9525 “committed suicide” by crashing the airplane with 150 people on board into the French Alpes. Which is so ridiculous that it boggles my mind how anyone can believe it. And yet people do because the television tells them so.
The ridiculous suicide idea was launched by the New York Times and then officially endorsed by the French prosecutor. And Merkel and all the Lufthansa executives went along with it. Why did they do this? Because they can’t handle that type of incident. It was a terrorist atrocity and Merkel must have understood where it came from. And she couldn’t handle it. So she accepted the ridiculous solution (which by the way was immediately pushed out with massive shock & awe force by the atlanticist mainstream media) and thus became complicit in the cover-up of mass murder.
There are other terror incidents in Germany where the official story doesn’t add up, such as the school massacres of Erfurt 04/26/02 and Winnenden 03/11/09. They were perpetrated by professional killers, not by school boys. Who sent them?
Or the assassinations of Alfred Herrhausen and Detlev Karsten Rohwedder. Left-wing R.A.F. terrorists my ass. Herrhausen said new Golden Age coming for Europe, economic integration up to the Ural mountains. So they assassinated him. Because they don’t want Europe to unite. Because United Europe including Russia would mean Uncle Sam is irrelevant and will be marginalized. Because he is marginal, take a look at the map.
So I don’t know how exactly Merkel was influenced, but she is a very weak, anemic leader, and it shows when there is a crisis. She always caves in and does as told by Wall Street and City of London. She would never have become chancellor without massive U.S. protection and hyping. She is boring and colorless. She doesn’t know how to talk properly. She’s a sleeping pill. She’s not good-looking. She didn’t have allies in her own party. Her whole rise to prominence is inexplicable if you look at what she, as a person, brings to the table of political action. But Uncle Sam decided she would be chancellor, introduced her at the Bilderberger meeting, and so chancellor Merkel became a spooky reality. That’s democracy.
Merkel was somehow threatened and she obeyed. She has learnt what can be done against her, and she knows she cannot handle it. She doesn’t have the guts. I have no other explanation.
I watched Starikov’s presentation (twice, for good measure) and his views are highly intelligent, coherent, and articulate — he should no doubt be total anathema to the swine and scum at the MSM. He is of course absolutely right that the influx of refugees into Europe is organized and, as fitting for any endeavour of Western imperialism, that it also involves massive coercion, deception, and utter lawlessness/corruption. His blind spot is his inability to see or admit that the Eurocrats don’t give a hoot about Europe itself. The EU is but a political organization by and for European Monopoly Capital, totally committed to neoliberalism, imperialism, and all-out reaction. In other words: poor little Merkel, Cameron, Tsipras, and what-have-you won’t ever “see reason” — or rather: they “see reason” as per the rulers of the Global Free Market. On this basis, they are all ears to each and every ugly whim/desire of Pindo or Euro Big Capital; the former primarily on international issues (Russia, Ukraine, China, NATO, Syria), the latter primarily on domestic issues (labour laws, deregulations, privatisations, immigration). In this light, there is a most profound, special significance which pertains to the ongoing refugee torrents towards Europe, as these latter clearly are the brainchild of both gangs of rapacious global finance.
I’m absolutely not denying the rivalries between the gangsters and all the ensuing blackmail in the realms of politics and business alike. The entire system really stinks to High Heaven and it’s the West (EU & US) which stinks the worst. But facts are stubborn things: European Monopoly Capital is working tirelessly to “boost market competetiveness”, which is the agreed euphemism for brutal austerity at the expense of a steadily increasing majority. To wit: when Pindo Big Capital first tells the Eurocrats that “we expect you to join forces to oust Assad”, they’ll obey right away; no problem. And then when Euro Big Capital tells the very same Eurocrats that “we expect you to cooperate with Erdogan and grant instant asylum en masse to whatever people wish to settle here”, they’ll obey that as well, albeit not likely feeling too happy about it. However, being the very well-rewarded spineless lackeys and poodles of Big Finance that they are, there’s not much they can do about it.
So to conclude I believe my point stands: The time is approaching when European Monopoly Capital will ditch its mass base. The Eurocrats are firmly in the pockets of the plutocracy whose tender loving care for any grovelling Western middle classes and labour aristocracies is pure fiction.
I think it’s too radical, but we will see.
It’s clear the influx of migrants creates nothing but problems for the host country. Not talking about the Syrian middle class, who would return to their homeland and would not be a social (but still a financial) problem even if they stayed, but about the uneducated hordes of analphabets from other countries, who would be unwilling to return. Merkel created this problem.
It is bad for Germany and the Euro – and it is therefore good for the USA and their Dollar. This could be one of the motivations.
Merkel and the executive idiots on all levels who executed her crazy plan should be sent to an integration camp.
Theory of Erdogan is old wine in new bottle. People have been writing this for a while now.
While the thinking aloud about the beneficiaries is definitely interesting, from the real life experience in a European country I can tell, that it is very unlikely that this is all Erdos :) doing. From the latest leaked emails of the Czech prime minister it is obvious that he is pushed into the benign and welcoming attitude to immigrants by his advisors that get their script from the American masters. They need by all means to suppress the anti immigrant movement and mood in the nation. What makes a lot more sense is the scenario that Erdo has been advised and encouraged by the deep staters to start launching the avalanche of refugees . It is typical of the NWOders to operate behind the scenes and let their puppets believe they are the puppet masters creating the reality. The clear beneficiary is the the US that is economically falling aparts (which has been covered by the creative media propaganda) and very badly needs new markets for credit and goods. While a strong Europe, relative to the US would not provide that, a weak one will then make sense. Also a major war conflict on european soil would be beneficial to the deep staters and NWOrders as the history has proven several times by now. So concluding the thought proces, Erdo has been used by the real puppet masters and if he eventually gets the blame that is all fine.
Erdogan is my prime culprit. Not only does he have a Ministry of Religion which funds Turks in German cities and sets up umbrella groups, but he has the Turkish Mafia in Germany and an ongoing war against Kurds in Germany. In short he has the infrastructure to destabilise cities like Berlin, Frankfurt, Stuttgart, Hanover, Cologne-Ehrenfeld.
By injecting the rabble ejected from prisons across the region into Greece he destabilises his prime enemy and decants the invaders onto German Europe. He disintegrates the German State and Security Apparatus. What Jan Sobieski halted in 1683 is circumvented by flooding Europe’s borders and stirring up the ghettoes in France – after all France has borne the brunt of terrorism resulting from Merkel’s Open Frontier.
I suspect it was a giant miscalculation. The 25th Anniversary of GDR Citizens going to Hungary and Genscher paying the Hungarians to let them flee to Austria in 1990 and the GDR collapses…..that imagery was in Merkel’s mind and the timing was key.
» France has borne the brunt of terrorism resulting from Merkel’s Open Frontier. «
Hi Paul, please note that the Paris Bataclan and elsewhere “attack” was a hoax, a staged show, with actors, where no one died. Just like the Boston marathon bombing. And Sandy Hook. Among others. Anglozionists and Francozionists prefer hoaxes to actual terrorism so they don’t have to get their hands dirty with mass murder of their own sheeple. It has nothing to do with Muslims. See my prior comments.
» I suspect it was a giant miscalculation. … GDR Citizens going to Hungary … that imagery was in Merkel’s mind … «
Absolutely not. This is an extremely naive assumption. Merkel is a cold and calculating person. Who can’t handle a crisis because she is void and nihilistic … without belief, without children, driven by her ambition, attached to her incredible career. Germany means nothing to her. She is a loyal servant to the Anglozionist powers who made her chancellor. In the wake of 3/24/15, she has figured out that she is only a tool, but she is apparently unable to draw the consequences. She is a very weak leader, who is consequently led from abroad.
One thing I’ll say for Erdogan: He really knows how to give the snubbing Euro-trash a highly classy response! I can readily imagine his malicious glee at their moaning and groaning, not least as he watches the utter charlatans and imbeciles who ‘rule’ Greece which is heading towards total chaos. Erdogan understands “European values” all right. In short: Keep the anti-Russian nonsense going, do as you’re being told by the financial parasites and you can be a Sultan in his full magnificent glory. The Eurocrats don’t mind Islam or even Jihadism. They seem to have adopted Francisco Franco’s “liberal” brand of Christianity which allowed him to launch a nominal “Crusade” against his country’s government with the aid of significant Moorish Muslim troops.
On a more serious note: Apart from being (partly) driven by megalomania, Erdogan resembles Hitler in a more significant and quite interesting aspect. In a highly militarised society, Erdogan never emerged as a politician from within the Officer Corps. This allows him, as it did Hitler, to make good use of cunning diplomacy and propaganda, understanding exactly what it takes to keep the arrogant, self-worshipping West happy.
Still, the fact of the matter is that it wasn’t Erdogan who created the refugee crisis. And it would have, most likely, been a gross blunder to let loose the refugee torrents on his own accord. Also, the Eurocrats would have snubbed him unceremoniously had he asked for their “kind permission”. There’s no doubt that the Eurocrats were instructed by their paymasters within the global finance elite to take action. This has certainly not been lost on Erdogan.
This mass movement of people will benefit those who desire the destruction of the nation state, the destruction of liberty and the imposition of the New World Order. Once the chaos is embedded simple minded citizens will clamor for their “government” (sock puppets of the New World Order) to completely destroy their freedom in the name of “safety” or “protection” from the “terrorists” – who are probably graduates of their Wuhabbi madrasses.
Who are these people? Quite possibly the monarchs of Europe, the Middle East and the Global Banking cartel (defacto monarchs of places like the USA and China). People like Merkel and Obama are little more than illusions of democracy.