A new religious movement was born September 11th, 2001. This movement was conceived by the American government and comprises many members of the American and European elite, politicians, editors of mass and so-called alternative media, publishers and academics. The movement’s unifying faith is the legend of 9/11, namely that 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four airliners and flew these airliners into the known landmarks in a suicide operation. The legend of 9/11 is composed of a number of distinct beliefs. Here are ten of the most tenacious beliefs that unite cult members:
1. They believe that 4 young pilots who love money, alcohol and sex, could be convinced to kill themselves for a religious purpose.
2. They believe that four teams of four to five rather smallish men could subdue 40 to 80 passengers without using firearms and without raising the suspicion of the pilots.
3. They believe it is possible to subdue a pilot and co-pilot in their flight cabin before either can transmit a hijacking code, a verbal Mayday message, or raise the suspicion of the crew.
4. They believe a person who could hardly control a one-engine Cessna can fly a Boeing passenger airliner on instruments alone for more than an hour in a foreign country and crash this airliner at 500 mph into the side of a building 20 feet above ground.
5. They believe the capital of the United States, Washington, D.C. , is undefended against approaching unidentified aircraft.
6. They believe crashing aircraft can disintegrate, leaving no visible debris such as fuselage, wings, tail or engine.
7. They believe an airliner with 45 passengers can crash without leaving visible bodies and blood.
8. They believe debris from a crashing airplane can be found eight miles away.
9. They believe it is possible to induce a free-fall collapse of a skyscraper by hitting it with an airplane (even if the skycraper was designed to withstand such a strike) and then letting the resulting fire bring it down.
10. They believe that 19 Arab terrorists actually boarded the four aircraft that crashed on 9/11.
Religious movements are generally peaceful, but this is not the case with the 9/11 Cult. The cult’s members control weapons of mass destruction and the information flow to the public. When such powers are concentrated in the hands of cult members who base their decisions on irrational and unsubstantiated beliefs, rather than on facts, everyone is in danger.
Members of this cult, no matter their status, fame or power, must be designated as madmen. It is important to secure the removal of such madmen from positions of influence and power as soon as possible, in order to give international peace and security a chance.
(*) Thanks to Barrie Zwicker (Canada) and Prof. David Ray Griffin (USA) for critical observations
I like these common sense arguments.
There is one more miracle that these believers see as true: that 3 skyscrapers came down symmetrically in their own footprint because of fires.
For that to happen, the fires must have weakened each side of the building enough to collapse. How can this point be reached in each wall, at exactly the same second?
See: http://xevolutie.blogspot.com/2011/07/155-911-continued.html
Numerous intelligence agencies independent of each other including an FBI of an American jihadist turned informant all gave prior warnings that there was an impending terrorist attack that included hijacking commercial planes in the US even following some of the 9/11 not just in the US but in the Czech Rep, France and Germany so to claim no hijackers boarded the planes is pretty absurd.
Jack, your message is difficult to grasp for me.
You write: “…. so to claim no hijackers boarded the planes is pretty absurd.”
Jack, did you ever see a video of them boarding a plane?
( Like we saw of the 7/7 London terrorists.)
Each plane passenger is filmed many times before he boards, on security camera’s.
Of all these possible proofs,we saw none.
Did we ever get a passenger-list with the names of the hijackers on it?
Jay Kolar wrote a study on this, which is no longer on the net, but is in a book by prof. Zarembka.
Here is a part of a description of it:
Kolar also has expertise in film analysis, and offers his criticism of video sequences that are often used prima facie to bolster the official story. Under heavy scrutiny is the supposed closed-circuit sequence from Dulles airport that reveals a host of anomalies. Among them a complete lack of verifiable security data on the released sequence, the obvious evidence of editing, (including a close-up and panning), and most peculiarly, two separate establishing shots for this supposedly closed-circuit video. Were two tapes spliced together? What date were the tape(s) taken? Why does the lighting suggest midday v. early morning?
—
I agree that the alleged hijackers were known before 911 to the FBI etc.
But look how strange parts of the CIA and FBI behaved: http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20110722092008373
The 9-11 Lie Movement. Perhaps we should start referring to these folks as “Liars” in contrast to “Truthers.”
@Sean: now that is hardly a logical or substantiated argument. You want to try again?
@EVERYBODY:
10. They believe that 19 Arab terrorists actually boarded the four aircraft that crashed on 9/11.
That is definitely a very poorly phrased argument. It’s like saying “They believe that Marinus van der Lubbe was at the Reichstag”. That kind of poor formulation leaves you wide open to formally correct criticisms.
Nobody will seriously deny that van der Lubbe was there, the issue is why he was there and what he actually did or did not do. The same applies here – whether there were 19, 10 or 30 alleged hijackers makes not difference once you realize that no pilot could have flow the flight profiles which were recorded on that day.
My 2cts
I think he left one out… the same government agency that is responsible for arms and narcotics trafficking, assassination, genocide, and a host of other nefarious activity had their second largest headquarters next to the building….. how convenient.
-AAA
@Sean: oh, and Sean, since I consider myself to be very much what you would call a “9/11 Liar” I would ask you to take a look at this:
http://vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-am-i-not-hearing-endless-rumble-of.html
and tell me where the lie is/are.
Thanks
@Saker. I think you are misinterpreting the target of my remark. When I refer to “Liars” I am talking about people who propagate the official 9-11 story, or attack those who question it.
The official 9-11 story is such a ludicrous fairy tale that anyone who endorses it is either misinformed, willfully ignorant or a deliberate liar.
“Liar” may be too strong a word for the majority of people who have been duped by this lie, but not for those who are informed enough to know better.
@Sean:I think you are misinterpreting the target of my remark
Yep. I sure did. Guilty as charged :-)
After posting my reply, I took a look at my piece about “jaws dropping” and saw that you had commented there and that your comments were not anti-truther at all, but I had to leave the keyboard for a while (yes, I do have a life in meatspace) and I just came home.
Anyway, sorry for the misunderstanding.
cheers!
@Jan Verheul
Sorry I messed up the comment I posted when I was editing it. I meant to write:
Numerous intelligence agencies independent of each other including a American jihadist turned FBI informant all gave prior warnings that there was an impending terrorist attack that included hijacking commercial planes in the US even following some of the 9/11 hijackers not just in the US but in the Czech Rep, France and Germany so to claim no hijackers boarded the planes is pretty absurd.
Did we ever get a passenger-list with the names of the hijackers on it?
This 9/11 website has the passenger lists used in the Moussaoui Trial.
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.html
I think it includes names of hijackers that have come forth since then to announce they are still alive.
I was looking for the passenger flight list to see if there were any Russian or Chechen names on it to bolster my theory about what happen on 9/11 and what the original plot as stated by French intelligence to hijack planes land them in the US and demand Russian withdrawal from Chechnya but Bin Ladin secretly instructed his pilots to turn it into a suicide mission helped with the aid of Mossad and their assets in the US.
More plausible than a multi layered conspiracy which would involve hundreds of people.
It would explain why the FBI/CIA where not interested in finding out the real identity of the 6 hijackers listed as still being alive although they admit the hijackers used false passports and the airport camera images were not released apart from Atta at Portland airport.
As for the Shanksville plane the question I had is not that the phone conversations were faked but why would hijackers in a suicide mission let the crew phone their families to let them know the plane was on a suicide mission which as the official story goes invited the crew to rush the hijackers and try to regain control of the plane?
Perhaps they were letting them phone their family members to find out what was happening if the other hijacked planes landed.
@VINEYARDSAKER:
Vladimir Putin does not believe that there was a 9/11 conspiracy.
http://rt.com/politics/9-11-putin-seliger-investigation-toronto/