by Paul Schmutz Schaller for The Saker Blog
General situation
The SMI (Swiss Stock Market) index is presently about the same as one year ago. This means that the Swiss brokers did loose nothing in the year 2020. The feelings of the broad population however are completely different, most would say that 2020 was really a bad year. Moreover, the SMI sharply dropped twice in 2020, in the end of March and in the end of October. This corresponds to the first and the second wave of the pandemic in Switzerland. However, the SMI fall was much bigger in March while in reality, the second Corona-19 wave is much stronger. Rarely, the big discrepancy between the reality of the most rich and most mighty social class and the reality of the overwhelming majority of the population is so obvious and so easy to see.
The first wave of the pandemic was in March/April while the second started in October. Before the end of the year, about 5% of the Swiss population will be tested positive. 90% of them stem from the second wave. Statistically speaking, around 1.5% of the positive tested persons die because of the new coronavirus; the general excess mortality is almost at this level. Most of the persons who died due to Covid-19 were more than 70 years old. With respect to the data of the WHO (World Health Organization), Switzerland is one of the worst affected countries in the second wave; in very few countries, 5% of the population (or more) have been tested positive.
In spring (with respect to Switzerland), some estimations predicted that over 50% of the population will be infected and that 1% of the population will die. We are still very fare from these numbers. However, if there will be a third wave in the next months, then it is not excluded that these numbers were quite realistic. So, this is a very serious disease.
The worldwide course of the Covid-19 pandemic depends on the regions. The course in Switzerland with a first wave in spring and a much stronger wave in fall is typical for European countries (and also for Canada). On the other hand, South-East Asia and India for example had the most cases in August/September and, until now, there is no second wave. China has more or less no new cases since February. South Africa had a first wave in June/July and now, in December, a second wave seems to begin, but less strong than the first one (all indications from WHO).
Despite the fact that, in Switzerland, the second wave is much stronger than the first one, the authorities took less strong measures. While schools were closed between March 16 and summer, there remained open in fall. Most of small business were closed in spring, but not in fall. Domestic mobility remained high in fall. On the other hand, the wearing of masks is now quite general and is required. One cannot oversee that the reaction of the government and of the Swiss stock market were quite similar. This is juste an objective fact which I will neither comment nor judge.
Social distancing is still strong and so is the financial support for affected (small) business. The newest prognoses see a decrease of the GDP (gross domestic product) in 2020 of 3.3% and an increase of 3.0% in 2021. The unemployment rate was 2.3% in 2019 and is expected to be 3.2% in 2020 and 3.3% in 2021. However, the prognoses are very insecure, due essentially to the fact that the impact of vaccines in 2021 is not clear.
Switzerland is among the countries in Western Europe with the weakest restrictions (however without downplaying the pandemic). This is not so surprising since traditionally, the state is not so strong and the weight of the private sector is high. On the other hand, the Swiss prefer to be be good pupils in Western Europe and they will not risk too much confrontation. Nevertheless, Switzerland has not given in to the pressure coming from Germany and France to close ski resorts.
The vaccine question
Until now, Switzerland has received four demands for a Covid-19 vaccine registration, all coming from Western countries. It is very unlikely that Russian or Chinese vaccine producers will ask for admission in Switzerland; they have enough possible clients elsewhere. Of course, theoretically, Swiss companies could produce Russian or Chinese vaccines in collaboration with the developers, but this also is not to expect. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, the vaccine question has been highly politicized in Switzerland and in other Western countries. Only Western developed and produced vaccines are advocated by the authorities and by the media (of course, US vaccines made in Taiwan would also be accepted). Vaccines developed and produced in Russia or China are ridiculed. Moreover, the fact is hidden that other countries such as India, Iran, South Korea, Vietnam, or Cuba are developing their own vaccines. This politicization of the vaccine question is the reason why I have decided to not getting vaccinated (even if I am 69 years old).
It is obvious that the leading class in Switzerland would like to vaccinate the whole population. This would be the easiest and cheapest way in order to bring Covid-19 under control. Their propaganda machine has already started. Of course, they benefit from the fact that getting vaccinated is a reasonable choice for a large part of the population.
Nevertheless, skepticism against Covid-19 vaccines is high in Switzerland, among the highest in the world if we can trust international surveys. This skepticism has some healthy reasons. The confidence that the big companies act for the good of the population has clearly decreased. There is pretty much of mistrust. Moreover, the confidence in sciences and technology has become weaker. Many have lost confidence that every new problem can be solved just by more technology; they rather think that the society as a whole has to get more sane.
This skepticism is violently attacked by the ruling class. The latter classify the skeptical people as anti-scientific, misinformed, conspiracists. I will not deny that such people exist. But these attacks of the ruling class are completely hypocritical. In fact, there are heir attacks against Russian or Chinese vaccines which are utterly anti-scientific and altogether a misinformation.
Having worked as a mathematician for decades, I know quite well the scientific milieu in Switzerland. While I think that my scientific spirit was always and is still high, I lost very much the respect for the Western scientific world. Most Western scientists are not very much interested in the search for truth, they are much more interested in their workplace and in their career. And the degree of independent thinking is rather low. Therefore, when this kind of people attack the population of not thinking enough, then this rather means that the thinking of the population is not servile enough.
I cannot judge by myself the scientific milieu in China or Russia or Iran. But as a whole, these societies are healthier than the Swiss society and because of that, I am confident that their scientific level and spirit is better than in Switzerland.
No bright future in sight
The crisis around the Covid-19 pandemic is a particular one. It is not, as a usual crisis, an escalation of existing conflicts. It is a problem which came from the outside. So, it s a kind of examination for each society.
Sweden’s king said yesterday that the country has failed in protecting the people from Covid-19. This has been interpreted by European media as a criticism of Sweden’s particular strategy in this pandemic. But I think that this interpretation is not justified. Much more probable is that Sweden’s king did not make a political statement, but deplored the too many deaths due to the pandemic in Sweden. In other words, he showed humility. Switzerland has no king. However, the number of deaths has a comparable size than in Sweden. But nobody in Switzerland has the courage and the humility to say that Switzerland has failed in protecting the people.
In spring, unity in Switzerland was quite big and the country managed to pass this first wave more or less without real problems. But now, the situation is quite different. The usual domestic conflicts came to the surface. The government is much more navigating than in spring. Consequently, people are more unsettled.
In my eyes, the main problem is ideological. Switzerland has no project, no aim. There is no collective engagement. There is no clear idea how Switzerland could build a more healthy society. Nearly all efforts have the objective to defend the status of Switzerland as a rich and stable country belonging to the West. This has even got stronger during this crisis. The media concentrate on Switzerland and neighboring countries. The situation with respect to the pandemic in countries in Asia, Africa, or Latin America is just ignored. Or is used for attacks against these countries. An exception is South Korea which was emphasized by Swiss media as a „better“ alternative to the „dictatorial“ China.
It is probable that, during the year 2021, Switzerland will be able to control the new coronavirus, mainly due to vaccines. Then the holiday trips abroad will restart in full force. But I would bet that the enthusiasm is somewhat gone. Even with this pandemic overcome, I cannot see a bright future for Switzerland.
PS: Even if it is not part of the theme, I cannot resist to comment the recent decision of the US authorities to label Switzerland and Vietnam as „currency manipulators“. Certainly, the US authorities have powerful computers for their sophisticated calculations. For the common mortals however, the question is quite simple. „Currency manipulation“ would mean that a country artificially devalue the currency in order to increase exports. In this regard, one observes that one year ago, one US dollar was exchanged for 0.98 Swiss franc. Now, one US dollar is worth 0.88 Swiss franc, hence a devaluation of about 10%. Hence, if one of USA/Switzerland is a „currency manipulator“, then it is clearly the USA.
Many readers of this blog do not believe in the so-called pandemic.
This pandemic is currently a PCR test pandemic, the so-called second wave is only a wave of test positives, not of ill people.
The German anti-corruption lawyer Reiner Füllmich is going to make a class action case against Christian Drosten for fraud.
Drosten is the man behind the Corman-Drosten PCR methodology. All of the corona measures build on one sole paper, this one: https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045
And this paper is probably a fraudulent one. A retraction request is delivered, see here: https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
My former comment links to two scientific papers offering difficult reading for most of us. Sorry for that, but my point was only to document that the notion of a second wave of Covid-19 is a controversial one, also among scientists.
For a more easy introduction to the PCR-test, and how it produces false positives, I recommend Dr. Pascal Sacré:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
I do not want to insult anybody, but after so many writers on this blog have challenged the official narrative of Covid-19, I find it strange that Paul Schmutz Schaller writes like more waves of the «pandemic» should be a natural and expected thing. The fact is that coronaviruses and other flu-viruses never have behaved like this before. A virus epidemic lasts usually only four or five months and then it fades away. After reading Pascal Sacré you will understand why the Covid-19 «pandemic» behaves so differently. A third wave is expected, yes, there I agree with Schmutz Schaller. The question is the nature of such new waves.
Ulrich,
Did the Spanish flu have a second wave more deadly than the first?
Yes, it did.
OK, I stand corrected on this one. Cheers! (But why the Spanish flu behaved like that is open to questions. And how could our governments predict a second wave before it came is still a mystery. The Spanish flu was something exceptional, after all.)
The Spanish flu was bacterial not a virus as I understand it. It also killed all age groups at about the same rate. Much more deadly than this pandemic.
It was a virus.
How do you *know* that Erico? Lots of well-informed and suitably-qualified people doubt it; much as they doubt, increasingly vocally, that this ‘pandemic’ is anything like as serious as we’re being told – constantly – by axe-grinding, hidden-agenda-serrving public-opinion manipulators.
https://scholar.google.com.br/scholar?hl=pt-BR&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=spanish+flu+virus+1918&btnG=&oq=spanish+flu+virus
I do suggest you find out how many intensive care beds are available in your City.
That’s no need to read any opinions.
Ulrich von Kafkanien
As per a recent study 60% of India’s 1.35 billion people may have already been infected with the virus and have developed natural antibodies against it. If this isn’t ‘herd immunity’ then what is ?
Moreover, empirical data shows, cases as well as hospitalizations have come down drastically in India.
This article states through an expert that there will not be a ‘second wave’ in India –
https://reut.rs/2KmzfXE
In India uptill now only about 145,000 persons have succumbed to the virus. Given that 60% of 1.35 billion people is 810 million, the IFR (infection fatality ratio) is just 0.0178% in India. Should this be treated as a epidemic or a disaster ? Fact is virus mutate, but we cannot predict that it will become more dangerous.
Thank you for proving vitamin d3 effectiveness. Closer to the equator less people getting ill (any illness, including Covid). It would be interesting to find out whether those in India who fell ill or died are those having inside jobs and thus never getting some wholesome ultraviolet B on their skin…
“Many readers of this blog do not believe in the so-called pandemic.”
Not so strange when stuff like this- “Grand County, Colorado: 40% of COVID Deaths Were Actually Victims of Gunshot Wounds”
(i will post the link in the news feed)
And the court case(s?) that say the test is 97% wrong, i do not remember which country rn.
+ The bigotry and tyranny from elected politicians, WEF/davos/gates/fauci/w.h.o etcetera etcetera..
I do not trust proven liars, and i a real pandemi we would all Personally know someone that died, 7% of the “healthy” population would be sick/dying.
This is not a pandemi, it is a dirty trick by desperate malthusian billionaires.
It is the Economy, the pyramid is about to crumble.
It was in Portugal, where the court dismissed PCR as evidence of infection, due to dubious execution of the test. They based their ruling on several scientific sources, especially a paper, which concludes that a PCR with 35cycles produces as much as 97% false positives. (on a side note: the infamous “Drosten PCR test” has 45 cycles…). According to a recent article by Kit Knightly, even the WHO warns about the high rate of false positives.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/20/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-tests-unreliable-quarantines-unlawful/
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/
In Portugal the ruling also hinged on or included the point that it is illegal for people who are not licensed physicians or licensed in some other status to make medical diagnoses to do so.
Thus, the idea of some local authority arresting a person because he did not quarantine after getting a probably false positive PCR test is totally illegal. Involves impersonation of a person with legal authority to make such a medical designation.
I have a feeling that this ruling is not very well known in the USA. If it were—and if the idea that only licensed medical personnel can make diagnoses, and a diagnosis of Covid-19 is *not* the same as positive PCR test (which is also probably false anyhow— were taken seriously, I believe the whole mask nonsense would collapse of its own weight, since there is no evidence that wearing a mask has any positive effect for stopping the virus aerosols.
As was observed elsewhere: Clothes don’t stop a fart. Quite.
And, to repeat: a positive PCR test (even if genuine) still is not a “case” of covid-19.
I applaud your comment and the links provided, as I think for a long time no clear statements as to the
fraudulent nature of this “pandemic” have been heard in the articles and comments on this blog.
I also stand by my assumption that this operation is currently the most dangerous attack of the western elites on the world`s populations and on world peace. Its purpose is to gain total control over the population in western countries, so that their criminal elites can make whatever moves they wish to with regards to their war against Russia, China and other states resisting the NWO.
I live in Switzerland in a small Jura valley. There is a 2nd wave. My skepticism about the persistence of the threat made me forget the barrier gestures and I and my wife had COVID, moderate fever, diarrhea, headache, partial loss of taste and difficulty breathing. One month after the acute crisis ended, the breathing difficulty decreased very, very slowly. A lot of manipulation, a lot of disinformation, the Swiss political class was bought by the mundialists a long time ago in favor of their agenda, but the covid is real.
May I ask how you treated your illness?
Covid is certainly real, and a very nasty illness, at least for the unlucky ones who get it badly. But it’s simply not the world-threatening monster that we’re being propagandised to believe.
I had the disease earlier this year, just before I turned 80, and it was no big deal. But to understand that statement, a bit of background information is necessary:
I’ve always looked after my health, particularly my still-very-strong immune system (the one thing which, all medical treatments notwithstanding, is still the only real curer of our ills): never boozed or smoked; always physically active, and still so; prudent diet for many years, having found one that seems to suit my constitution (different people need different diets; depend on that! No one diet fits all! Find the ones which suit you. And stay active!!)
For the past 25+ years I have had no cold or flu illnesses, though I used to get them occasionally when younger. I put this down to my self-doctoring regimen. As a settled habit, I take multivitamin supplements daily. These are reinforced with extra B vitamins, as brewer’s yeast tablets, extra D vitamin, and quite a lot of extra vitamin C. C is, in fact, my mainstay anti-illness immune system helper. I call it my immune-system’s 50mm ammo against pathogens, and always keep it well supplied.
When the covid struck me this year, I did as I usually do whenever I get the early-warning symptoms of a respiratory disease trying to establish itself: I upped my daily prophylactic dose of C from two grams per day in slow-release tabs, to 20-30 grams per day of sodium ascorbate powder in water, agitated and sipped every half hour, right round the clock. Please note that those amounts – grams, not milligrams, and the figures, are not typos. To be fully effective in all it can do for you, C must be taken in amounts of this size. Please note that there is no known lethal dose, and there are plenty of people on record taking even bigger daily doses than mine, either by mouth of – better still when you can arrange it – intravenously, with literally no serious ill effects. Occasional stomach unease when taken by mouth, and occasional bowel loosening – not outright diarrhoea – being about the worst that are reported.
Despite my age, the covid attack made me feel just slightly under the weather and ready to take a bit of bed rest, for the three days it took to beat it off; nothing more than that. I consulted no doctor, nor did I take any other medicine – though this year has demonstrated conclusively that there are **at least six** cheap, widely available, long-tested and familiar medicines which treat covid effectively; both as prophylaxes, and as outright cures for infected people: vitamin C, vitamin D, ivermectin, hydroxychloraquine+azithromycin+zinc, anti-asthma cortisone drugs inhaled via a nebuliser, and Dr. David Brownstein’s naturopathic cure involving hydrogen-peroxide and other treatments.
You’ll only hear about these authentic cures when the lugenpresse mediawhores have been set on to slag them with lies: “Doesn’t work!” “Actually dangerous!!!” and other such pernicious mendacity. Otherwise, virtually nothing. You have to search out the information for yourself. But meanwhile, independent-minded doctors continue to cure covid effectively with them in less than a week in most cases, with virtually no deaths.
There is no global health emergency from covid.
Nor is there any need at all for highly-deceitful, gouging-profit-oriented, wholly unproven and possibly dangerous vaccines. What there is is a huge propaganda racket going on, for still-unclear, but clearly nefarious purposes. Under no circumstances will I take these grossly-deceitful vaccines (though like most so-called ‘anti-vaxxers’ I agree that there are *some* vaccines that are indeed proven safe and effective for some illnesses; though there are also plenty that emphatically aren’t).
For one entry point into actually-trustworthy information about appropriate medicines, see Andrew Saul’s ‘Doctoryourself.com’ website; and ‘The Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine’, which he also edits.
Rhisiart Gwilym,
absolutely brilliant, helpful and hopeful post. Great to hear you’ve taken charge of your health and remain well and able to fight illness. I’m going to post this in the ‘ Cafe ‘ where this subject is often discussed.
Many thanks and best wishes to you.
You’re welcome, sandinED! :)
all cause mortality numbers are the key. look up any country and look at total mortality each year for the last decade. these stats cant be fiddled. you can re classify a pcr test positive into a covid death from a car accident but the numbers speak for themselves. there is a flu there is no pandemic. usa we are told has a total 250,000 deaths from covid . thats below total deaths of 280,000 a year previously. car accidents from lockdowns are saving lives apparently. but dont believe any link i put up. look for yourselves.
global capitalism is working hard. yes there are no holdouts. there is no us v them in this level. thats reserved for murdoch readers and cnn. china russia usa are all being directed by those that are known as “stakeholders”. the real owners of our system. investing in think tanks and WHO programs requires a return. what returns are they ? holistic feel good ones? hardly. they are all hastening the transition to prison planet earth with a talking fridge that does your shopping. how cute. high tech gulag future cities. only people of western nations that thought they had freedoms are offended. others accept the paternal guidance of our corporate overlords.
WEF talks up “stakeholder capitalism” one of many organisations with this mindset. accountability not just to shareholders but stakeholders. the difference seems subtle but is dramatic in the management of humans. the uk openly admits in SAGE there is applied behavioural psychology as part of herding the public to make decisions. holding people down to forcibly vaccinate is a latter option. shame , fear and censorship of options is preferred.
I began analyzing the all-cause mortality numbers as early as last spring to show that that the death-by-Covid numbers were being inflated. Now, however, the situation becomes more complicated. Suicides are rising rapidly, as are deaths-by-lack- of- health-care as people avoid or are locked out of hospitals for anything besides Covid in some countries.
Here is my take after traveling to several countries during the pandemic, studying much of the scientific literature, speaking with hospital-based doctors, and much experience helping people avoid and deal with the infections:
Covid-19 is indeed some type of real disease.
Most people experience few or no symptoms.
Some people suffer greatly or die.
The actual CFR is probably less than 0.5%
Immunity lasts only a few months after infection.
Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin both work well when used early.
Good zinc, vitamin D, and vitamin C status often make the difference between mild and severe cases.
There are almost certainly genetic issues that play a role in case severity.
Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin are useless against COVID. One of the Brazilian doctors that you like (the creator of the “COVID kit”) have died of COVID.
The mortality rate is close to 1%.
HCQ+ and Ivermectin are “useless” are they Erico?
https://vimeo.com/490351508
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTSLFU0wL6A
ad hominem removed ..mod
The case of Switzerland is interesting also from a global perspective. On one hand you have a system (read intermediate cadres) with a certain integrity, in politics as well as in health. I can reasonably say that that is the best health system I have ever dealt with (I have lived in 6 countries), perhaps excepting Japan. On the other, they dropped their pants years ago at the insistent request of the USA, and revealed the names of all US citizens who had bank accounts there, effectively ruining their most profitable national business (money laundering). This happens only if, by hook or by crook, the elites there have been subdued by the larger forces of globalism.
Which brings me to the next point. In the current scenario of required rapid depopulation, due to the rapid decline in oil production, and crash of global financial system, which way will the Swiss elites orient themselves? The answer to this question will depend on the type of vaccine being administered there. Ridiculing the Russian one is an ominous sign. Of course, many readers here will realize that Mr Schultz Schaller belief, that he is able to choose between vaccine and no vaccine, is probably wrong. I mean he may be right about himself, but people of working age, specially young women, could be forced to take a (US-made) vaccine by their employer. The author does point out the large fraction of political power the private sector holds.
Interesting comment. I would appreciate seeing your “choice of vaccine by political goal” list. The Russian vaccine, being a simple, traditional type of vaccine is likely less harmful, so I agree that it matches with a political goal of simply trying to provide immunity.
The mRNA vaccines, from my perspective as a scientist, are insanely risky. These vaccines induce our own cells to produce proteins from the Covid virus. Our immune cells then attack our own cells.
But the politics of all of vaccine efforts are a bit difficult to grok. No vaccines were developed for SARS, because tested concepts resulted in severe reactions when the vaccinated animals were later exposed to the virus. The Covid virus is similar. So why bother to produce vaccines?
Choice of vaccine by political goal follows stronger principles than, say, the democratic principles endlessly debated on this forum. It follows the principle that, with oil production declining, the elites will find themselves at the wrong end of pitchforks even if they behave humanely and honestly from this point on (which they have no intention to do anyway). So it has nothing to do with mRNA either.
So, the way out of this apparently is to reduce population along with declining oil production, so that everyone keeps his or her 2.7 liters per person per day. My previous comment was inspired more by many writings by R. Kennedy Jr, or articles like these
https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/covid-19-vaccine-warnings-women-should-not-get-pregnant-for-at-least-2-months-after-vaccination/
https://www.moonofshanghai.com/2020/12/covid-19-un-explained-waves-ripples-and.html#more
https://greatgameindia.com/bill-gates-agenda-in-india-exposed-by-robert-kennedy-jr/
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I mentioned mRNA only as an example of the dangers of the vaccines. As Mr. Schaller wrote in the article, objective thinking and commitment to truth is rapidly being lost among scientists in the public eye. I was rigorously trained in old-school science, and this is extremely painful to watch. As little as 20-30 years ago, such indefensible statements as are being released now would be widely ridiculed and the proponents shunned.
The global plan behind Covid-19 is becoming more and more obvious and it is diabolical in the extreme. As some have said, we are all Palestinians now unless there is a rapid awakening and resistance. The so-called “public health measures” like social distancing are designed to prevent such an uprising.
Sputnik (the Russian vaccine) is not a traditional vaccine. It uses 2 human cold viruses as vectors. Years of research but not traditional. AstraZeneca uses a chimpanzee cold virus as a vector. Never used before. Only one of the Chinese vaccines (I think sinovac) uses a traditional approach, meaning a neutralized real virus.
Guys, please THINK before saying this pandemic is fake.
If this was a global conspiracy, do you think the following countries would have taken part in it?
– Russia
– Iran
– North Korea
What’s the point in ruining your own economy? To make the WHO happy?
Yes, the PCR test can return false positives (so does a HIV test). Yes, there’s probably a few death that are wrongly blamed on COVID. That doesn’t mean that the whole thing is fake.
I live in Switzerland and I can confirm that this post is correct. The hospitals are almost full of COVID patients, many in intensive care unit. Do you really think the (exhausted) hospital personal is doing it just for fun, to play into a global conspiracy (which wants us to stop working and stay at home? What kind of conspiracy is that?).
The average life expectancy in Switzerland has dropped by 5 years this year according to statistics. This is not “just a flu”. It’s far more contagious and far more dangerous, and let’s not forget the people who survive it but have lasting consequences, like losing 50% of their pulmonar capacity or more.
Do you think 1% of death is nothing? Well, the devastating war in Syria which lasted 9 years killed “only” between 1-2% of Syrians. Think about that for a bit. Is it really nothing?
One thing for sure is that this coronavirus made a lot of pro conspiracy sites which seemed reasonable look like total fools.
To add to the above article
This article from Stalker Zone
https://www.stalkerzone.org/andrey-ilnitsky-covid-is-a-project-of-globalists/
I note the article above because of who is quoted
I note the above article because who is quoted may surely have access information that we do not.
This article reenforces what my gut instinct told me when this Covid beast appeared.
Planned,utterly malicious,and deadly to people in poor health poor means and people ignorant unable or unwilling to help themselves.
I use ignorant in its true meaning.
After reading all of 11 months of comments,links,lectures,blogs,
opinions,experts,bullshitters,doctors,
nurses,lawyers,and speaking to all who are capable of reasonable discussion whom I encounter in life including sharing my two cents here from time to time,the above linked article lays it out very clearly what we are facing for the foreseeable future.
Now is as it always has been ,now is time to be courageous in our struggle against what we have every reason recognise for what it is.
A deadly assault on each and every human beings existence family and all meaningful social contact activity and discourse.
Surely forearmed is forewarned.
Best regards to all here and be positive as the truth is at least coming in very clear focus which should help all of us to navigate peacefully and safely through the coming craziness.
The USZ in Zurich allegedly is full of Corona patients, but its a lie. They have very few of them. I know this because i know workers from there and yeah they are tired and overworking, but Corona isn‘t the reason. Their officials are liars when they come to the public and demand lockdowns. That hospitals has organizational problems and they deflect it to Corona.
@TJT, thanks for the article, the dude says what i am suspecting here what the real reason is for this Plandemic.
Dave, thank you. I am from Brazil and here I am seeing the same thing happening: hospitals full of COVID patients, people dying and many survivors suffering sequels. In addition, the sequels are comorbidities that make the COVID more lethal. That is why one of the most scaring things are the reinfections (apparently, immunity lasts only 5 months). In many cases, the second time is worst then the first one. If the numbers of reinfections increase then the mortality rate can increase to nightmarish proportions.
Érico – The people behind Covid have worked on similar viruses for decades and so have a vast advantage over the general population. Additionally, public figures like Fauci confuse people endlessly. If you watch Rete Globo, you are almost certainly brain washed as the propaganda is non-stop. I am trained extensively and have high level experience in related areas, and even with continual study and experience with the virus have had to struggle towards the truth of the situation.
Many Brazilian doctors have posted videos contradicting the media propaganda. One pointed out that the “second wave” in Brazil is wrongly named. The first wave was a fast hit on the communities (also known as favelas). These people cannot realistically do the same level of isolation, etc. A study in June showed that some communities around Rio already had 25% infection rates. The virus penetration by now must be nearing maximum. The doctor went on to point out that the second wave was mostly from the wealthier class who had avoided the virus in the early stages and who have co-morbidities.
The level of emotional and economic depression in Brazil is horrifying. São Paulo is like a ghost town. The virus can certainly lead to serious sickness, but the human impact of the lockdowns is unspeakable and will scar generations if they are not all vaccinated to death.
JohnTB, “when you assume you make an ass of you and me”. I don’t watch any of the Brazilian msm (specially reDe globo).
My information came from researchers that are tracking COVID cases and deaths, from friends (doctors and nurses) that have seen firsthand the effects of the pandemic and from friends seeing the neighbors and relatives dying.
Theses “doctors” are fanatics that will tell any lie to protect mass murder in charge (bostanaro). All the information that you get from this charlatans are lies.
The bostanaro gang have being sabotaging the fight against COVID and have tried to hide the number of deaths.
Lockdowns are emergency measures. To control the pandemic we need masks, social distancing, tests, tracking and vaccines.
Simply put, Érico, we disagree. I did not assume you feed from the Rede Globo trough, but rather said “if”. Similarly, don’t assume I support Bolsonaro – I find him deeply problematic. Do note, however, that all your positions are in full agreement with Rede Globo, which you may already know, is engaged in financial agreements with Chinese state- connected companies. You can read that Rorschach as you like.
I won’t lead you through the evidence contradicting your views as it is all rather easily available, but for the sake of other readers, I will offer a brief thought exercise:
Early this year, I was fully in support of lockdowns for flattening the curve because most of us with expertise in this area did not know the characteristics of what we were dealing with. Brief lockdowns might have made sense if hospitals were overwhelmed.
Beyond a brief period, however, lockdowns make no scientific sense and are dangerously destructive. Highly contagious viruses can barely be contained within high level biolabs. If Covid is so contagious, it simply will not be stopped by masks, lockdowns, etc. Even one remaining case -human or animal – is enough to reignite the contagion.
But then the authorities point to vaccines. Even ignoring mutations, immunity to coronaviruses fades, so you will likely need to take a vaccine twice per year or so. Are you ready to take vaccines, never even tested on animals, twice per year? Remember, the pharma companies insist on zero liability. If you are harmed, it is
your problem.
You will see, in the coming months and years, the devastation caused by the lockdowns. Yes, some people are sadly dying of Covid, mostly with co-morbidities. But I am also in pain watching my friends unable to hug, touch, or even visit their beloved parents who are in hospitals for other reasons and without any indication of Covid. These parents will almost certainly die alone and grief on both sides will be amplified by meaningless loneliness.
Too many have grown soft and lost the calculus of life. It comes with risk and choices. Taking away choices does not save lives or add to life. It only puts it on a shelf in formaldehyde. Look around and see the devastation that is taking place. There is a better way.
As a Swiss, its not true that hospitals are full of COVID-19 patients. Our numbers are very skewed. We count every patient that is tested positive of Corona as a Corona patient. Regardless of the reason of hospitalization. The same with COVID-19 deaths. Hospitals here are always at 80%-90% capacity due to profit reasons but also due to health care workers leaving their jobs, due to low wages. All the restrictions of Switzerland are not based on science, but on politics.
There was a video by doctors screaming for taken the measures seriously from the Cantonal hospital in Schwyz, because its allegedly full of COVID-19 patients from a Jodel event. It made the news here. My uncle posseses a restaurant and health care workers from that hospital come to eat there, and guess what they said, that the hospital had 2 COVID-19 patient at most during that time span when the video was released and after it. So Switzerlands doctors are prone to lying to the public, to justify measures.
The same with many other hospitals. I am voluntary working in the University Hospital of Zürich, and i tell you its a tale that this hospital
Dave
What is happening is a Vaccine Pandemic packaged as covid19 at the expense of the lives of some unfortunate elderly citizens & a criminal upward movement of wealth.
I recommend you take care of yourself, cool down, wait & see as the game plays itself the way it was designed. In two years time all will become clear even to you.
Dave, why was the German daily newspaper Bild reporting from Wuhan already around New year 2020? How should China interpret this sudden interest in a lung illness that at the time was a minor problem? China felt being under attack, with good reason, and so did Iran. China did not and does not want to be enemy of the Empire, not even Iran wants to be the enemy. For all my respect for Hisbollah, politicians are rarely scientists. When it comes to corona measures in Syria this spring, spraying some liquid in the streets, it looked like doing something, but not against a virus spreading from man to man. This corona story is sooo important to the masters of the empire and China, Iran and Russia have nothing to gain and much to lose from challenging it.
We measure-resisters have likewise nothing to gain from support from Russia, China and Iran. Being labelled deniers, covidiots and so on is one thing, being labelled enablers to a pandemic that China has unleashed on the world is quite another thing. Facing the genocidal measures, we in the West are on our own.
Intellectual honesty and courage to face the ugly truth is required. For our masters it is no problem if our numbers decrease by some billions. At the same time the multi billionaires have increased their fortunes insanely since March. The number of owners is reduced by the lockdowns and new opportunities to invest are opened for the super rich. Fascism always need some kind of imagined danger to the public in order to be justified by the people. The so-called pandemic serves a wide range of purposes.
Dear von Kafkanien;
. Your information that the journal Bildt (Bildt=picture) suddenly adds new insight into the picture og a Bildtzeitung-like operation planned for in advance. WHen exactly did Bildt start reporting from Wŭhàn — and how broad and vulgar were the strokes in their paint on the situation there? RSVP!
Dear Tollef Ås,
«WHen exactly did Bildt start reporting from Wŭhàn — and how broad and vulgar were the strokes in their paint on the situation there?»
How vulgar I will not judge:
Bild online 31.12.2019 – 12:14 Uhr
SCHON 27 LUNGENKRANKE IN CHINA
Sars wieder da?
Eine mysteriöse Lungenkrankheit greift in der zentralchinesischen Metropole Wuhan um sich – und erinnert an die Sars-Pandemie Anfang der 2000er-Jahre.
https://www.bild.de/ratgeber/gesundheit/gesundheit/schon-27-lungenkranke-in-china-sars-wieder-da-67017416.bild.html
We (switzerland) reduced intensive care beds this year by a non insignificant amount.
It’s all theater.
The ruling Global Crime Syndicates need ‘neutral’ ground, where they can meet undisturbed, sip brandy, and sign their secret genocidal contracts. That’s Switzerland for you.
And by the way, Cococorna is a fictional in the Alps region as everywhere else…
“With respect to the data of the WHO (World Health Organization), Switzerland is one of the worst affected countries …”
Stands to reason; because Switzerland is not only wealthy but also a bankers nest. And Con-19 is a bankers fraud: a disease that produces high statistics of morbidity mainly in wealthy Western countries (WHO statistics). Lockdown makes no difference to these statistics; for instance, Sweden has no Lockdown but is a wealthy Western country: therefore, Sweden is honour bound (bankers honour) to produce the same morbid Con-19 statistics as UK and U$A with Lockdown, no more, no less.
The Rothschild banks, who own the Western world, aim to bring down Con-19 morbidity to Third World levels by reducing the standard of living of Western people to Third World levels, and transferring their excess wealth to bankers accounts.
“It is obvious that the leading class in Switzerland would like to vaccinate the whole population. This would be the easiest and cheapest way in order to bring Covid-19 under control.”
The author is under a misconception: Covid-19 (or Con-19, as I prefer to call this imaginary disease) is under tight control; it is under the control of a handful of financial conspirators who own the media and own the politicians of the Western world.
Everybody, if you believe the official infection numbers from various countries, first let us verify what they are based on. You will find that the majority is based on the PCR-test created by a German by the name of Christian Drosten. He sits on the editorial board of the scientific journal eurosurveillance which published his paper on the PCR-test after a peer review of only one day! That of course is already tragically unusual, to put it nicely. The publication of this paper resulted in the WHO recommending the test globally. Recently 22 respected medical researchers from different countries have reviewed the paper now and are requesting eurosurveillance to retract the paper because of serious scientific flaws. Their review and retraction request is contained in the link to the cormandrostenreview as given by Ulrich von Kafkanien at the top of this comment list.
I recommend anybody here to do the research themselves into what the PCR test was originally made for by its inventor, and to look into the ways the tests are interpreted by official medical institutions in the various countries. One looks at the reported numbers differently then.
I am not denying the severity of the cases where people are really serously infected. But, to add to the Swiss witnesses on this blog my German voice, from Germany I also hear of medical workers reporting that hospitals are far from overcrowded. On the contrary, because people know that they will be possibly asked or even required to take a CoVid test when they go to the hospital with their various unrelated problems, most are postponing their visits with hospitals and even doctors!
Finally, as mere mortals with no access to special information, we can only speculate based on what little we know, and what makes sense in the overall situation. As such I cannot believe that Russia or China, Iran and other truly sovereign states that are in opposition to the West were in on this op. They are as much the attacked ones as are the populations in the rest of the countries, that is us. Looking at the numbers of dead in Iran and the numbers reported from Russia, it seems possible that different countries got different strains of the thing.
To end on a light note, some month ago I came across a headline somewhere that somebody in Madagascar had tested a papaya with the PCR test, and it was positive…
I am glad so many readers here disagree with the nonsense MSM content of this article. More and more people now understand that the PCR test is totally inappropriate for detecting this “virus”
No clinician would ever use the PCR test to detect HIV in a patient – even a patient with symptoms. The PCR test would tell us that half the population is positive for HIV. Why is that so difficult for so many people to understand?
You cannot discuss rationally this “pandemic” without using an accurate and specific test that is only used on those with symptoms.
“No clinician would ever use the PCR test to detect HIV in a patient.”
You are mostly right for HIV, because HIV antibody tests are available since decades and much cheaper than nucleic acid tests (NAT). However, in the US, the FDA requires that all donated blood be screened for several infectious diseases, including HIV, using a combination of antibody testing and more expeditious NAT. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_test)
NAT for HIV is analogous to RNA testing for coronaviruses.
In Switzerland up to 30% of PCR tests were positive, because tests were applied scarcely. The false positive rate of the PCR test is in the ballpark of 1:30’000, four orders of magnitude below the measured positive rates. Do you think that the unrelenting second wave in Switzerland happens despite or because of scarce testing?
How could it be despite scarce testing, if testing is the culprit?
How could it be because of testing, if testing is scarce?
“You cannot discuss rationally this “pandemic” without using an accurate and specific test that is only used on those with symptoms.”
To the contrary, you cannot objectively study this pandemic without randomized weekly population studies irrespective of symptoms. With the UK as a notable exception, none truly knows (or wants to know, I suspect) the current state of affairs.
“To the contrary, you cannot objectively study this pandemic without randomized weekly population studies irrespective of symptoms”
I beg to disagree. Currently, the only meaningful and useful statistic is the number of death per million in the population – compared with the previous 10 years.
This website has these numbers for 26 European countries – including Switzerland.
“EuroMOMO is a European mortality monitoring activity, aiming to detect and measure excess deaths related to seasonal influenza, pandemics and other public health threats.”
https://euromomo.eu/
And here are the graphs by country. It can filtered by age group
https://euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/
There is a bump in Switzerland. However there are no bumps for age groups under 64. So why are they shutting schools, shops, offices factories and all that crap?
Believe it or not, it is not unusual for people in their 80’s to die. I am 70. I protest strongly against this discrimination against young people. It is criminal.
I am in Kiev. A month ago, I had a slight fever and an infection. The temperature went in 2 days. I took no medications – except 2 aspirins (one per day). Within a week, I was perfectly fine. I did not get tested or see a doctor.
The media says absolutely nothing about improving the immune system – by consuming vitamins C and D, by eating healthy food, by avoiding stress and not watching the TV, by sleeping when tired, by a little walk every day, by getting some fresh air, by not wearing masks and by enjoying life. :)
Why do you think the media want people to wear masks and to stay indoors? Do you think Bill Gates wants you to have a long and healthy life with lots of kids?
One should not conflate political measures and their (in)appropriateness with scientific necessity for an objective quantitative study. EuroMOMO was useful for the first wave because many people died before any meaningful counteraction was taken. As mortality is influenced by all our activities – think of tragic accidents or the seasonal flu – EuroMOMO can no longer serve as baseline. We do not have a “normal” year to compare against.
“We do not have a “normal” year to compare against.”
Well, many would dispute that.
There is a major effort afoot to convince the world that this is not a “normal” year or a “normal” illness. Everything is different! “New Normal!”
Others point out that actually this is a normal year for deaths. The only abnormal thing is ascribing most of those deaths to covid-19 instead of flu, pneumonia, etc. Meanwhile death rates for flu, pneumonia, etc. have plunged.
We would have to remove all measures against the SARS-CoV-2 to compare against the expected number of fatalities based on the previous normal years. The current situation is not normal, hence no longer comparable unless you manage to quantify any other confounding change in fatalities. For instance and just for starters:
– Fatalities from missed medical procedures (down short-term, maybe up long-term)
– Fatalities due to other infectious diseases (down)
– Fatal drug side-effects (rather down)
– Fatal road accidents (down)
– Fatal work accidents (down)
– Fatal leisure accidents (down)
– Fatal drug abuse (rather up)
– Suicides (rather up)
These numbers may get available later. Statistics bureaus usually publish data with a year-long lag.
Marcel
Thank you so much for endeavouring to bring some common sense and sanity to this thread.
In NZ the pragmatic use of the PCR test has led to resounding success in controlling and ring-fencing outbreaks and avoiding it becoming endemically entrenched nationwide. Subsequently, we have witnessed a mortality rate some 1/250th of the US and roughly 1/50th of the global average. A huge component of this incredible success is absolutely due to a disciplined and effective testing regime.
If Alfred cared to check the below link he would see that the NZ experience completely contradicts his broad-brush stance on the accuracy of the PCR test and therefore also its importance as an essential tool in the control of the spread…
https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-data-and-statistics/testing-covid-19
The data clearly shows that of the total of 1,363,124 PCR tests taken in NZ from Jan 22 2020 – Dec 18 2020…
0.17% were positive
99.83 were negative
Obviously, if all the positives were false they would still only account for 0.17%…this fact alone makes a complete mockery of Alfred’s claims…where on earth do these false positives in the realms of 30-95% come from?
This data plus our resounding success as a nation clearly illustrate the fact that PCR testing can be an enormously successful life-saver if it is deployed in a coherent, effective, and consistent manner. Surely these numbers speak for themselves.
Marcel, you mentioned a figure of 1:30,000 false positives…the NZ experience would back this up…meaning this minute number would be completely insignificant if you looked at the potential benefits of using PCR testing as a basic strategy.
My very best wishes from down under
Col
Dear Col,
thank you for your kind words and for describing the situation in New Zealand.
Just in case you wonder where I did get the false positive rate from, China has repeatedly tested millions of inhabitants in big cities to stop small outbreaks in the tracks. About 30 PCR tests per million showed positive. These people were then diagnosed clinically (symptoms, retests, etc.). Unfortunately, I cannot track the true fraction of infected people. In any case, the false positive rate was < 1:30'000 there.
I recall stats from a large German laboratory claiming that they had 1 raw false positive in some 54'000 PCR tests, which was then eliminated during verification.
PCR tests are sensitive and fairly precise to check for the presence of RNA/DNA sequences. Raw error rates are << 1% as discussed above. However, the pure presence of a tiny amount of a specific RNA/DNA sequence in someone's sample does neither prove that this person is sick nor that he/she is infectious. A positive PCR test is only an indication that it might be so. This hint strengthens with the amount of RNA: if only few RNA duplication cycles are required to detect the specific RNA sequence, the virus very likely replicates in the tested person, who should thus isolate him/herself to avoid potential transmissions.
My impression is that many people mix definitions, which leads to dubious conclusions. Science seems to settle on "asymptomatic bearer of SARS-CoV-2 are not infectious". Given that about 40% to 80% of infected people are and stay asymptomatic, the others must spread the disease explosively to keep the pandemic going. So even if it were true that up to 97% of people that tested positive do not need to isolate, who tells the 97% from the 3%?
To me it is proven beyond doubt that the western approach failed catastrophically, because it caused unnecessary harm by letting SARS-CoV-2 roam free. Instead of trying to eliminate it in a coordinated effort right away, our nations put their own economies first. Thus we got an ungovernable situation, deservedly so.
The PCR test (allegedly)is very accurate. People claiming it is not and it gives false positives usually aren’t wording their statement accurately. The inaccuracy concerning the PCR test comes from using the test result to determine if someone is infected or not and counting all positive results as cases of infected persons. The PCR test isn’t suitable to determine if someone is infected. Yet the media continue to portray positive PCR test results as cases (of infected persons). People who claim that the PCR test is inaccurate usually mean that a positive result doesn’t mean the tested person is infected with Corona.
The PCR test can only detect if (a specific) part of the genetic material(RNA) from a Corona cell is present. But that doesn’t mean it is a (complete) live cell and that it managed to infect the person that was tested. It only means that part of the Corona virus RNA code that the PCR test specifically looks for is present.
People who have been infected with Corona shed fragments of Corona cells after they recovered for weeks up to 2 to 3 months. So someone who’s immune system didn’t manage to defend against the Corona virus and got infected by it should test positive up to 3 months after he/she recovered.
Also the sensitivity of the PCR test depends on the number of amplification cycles being done. The higher the number of cycles the higher the number of positive results. The number of amplification cycles has generally been on the high side.
Thank you, Marcel and GoverntheMente for helping to clarify these aspects of the PCR test.
As small as we are here in NZ I still maintain that a lot can be learned from our handling of the Covid-19 challenge. To a degree, the fact that we are an island nation, and were able to isolate relatively early and effectively, has given us a huge advantage. It has also meant that our results are arguably much more conclusive and contain vastly less noise than those from so many other less fortunate nations.
My 2 cents of observations are as follows…
#1 The PCR test is not 100% accurate, however, I have never heard of any health test that is. In the meantime, it is the best test we have and many countries have demonstrated how incredibly effective it can be in monitoring and ring-fencing infection IF it is used sensibly.
#2 It can be extremely accurate in terms of absolutely insignificant false positives and this has been clearly demonstrated in other countries apart from NZ.
#3 The NZ model tells us that there has to be a minuscule number of false negatives in the 1.3 million tests we have done to date. How do we know this? If we had any degree of false negatives we would have sporadic unexplained cases and clusters popping up…this has simply not happened…99.99% of cases have been able to be traced to a non-endemic source.
#4 Despite the repeated rubbish parroted around social media, scientists sequenced the virus’s genome and made this information available on Jan 10, 2020… [see below link]…incredibly this was just one month after the first case of pneumonia from an unknown virus in Wuhan. Reading these genomes subsequently provides a roadmap that helps us monitor the source of the disease, its pattern of spread as well as providing important clues as to how it mutates and develops.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947
Cheers and thanks again
Col
Dear GoverntheMente,
your arguments are valid but I apply a different interpretation.
If someone got infected and sheds RNA fractions of the virus, a positive PCR test (at moderate amplification) effectively detects this infection. Experience shows that the virus can be detected for about a week by a nasal or throat swab. It is found in lung sputum for another two weeks or so. If it infects the intestine also, it can be detected in excrement for about a month. Much longer periods occur rarely and contribute little to the average.
For the determination of the true number of infected people, I rate the usual two to three weeks long detection period as an advantage. Otherwise, if the virus could be detected only for two days for instance, we would miss much more infections but still count fatalities. In this case, we would be misled towards a much higher infection fatality rate of 5-10% instead of about 1%.
Crucially, the PCR test does not tell if the person is currently sick and/or infectious.
People usually feel sick themselves, hence no big issue here. However, infectious people should isolate, whereas non-infectious people could follow their life. The PCR test cannot answer this question because it does not test for the complete live virus. As a precautionary measure, I would isolate at least after a positive result from a nasal or throat sample at low amplification (up to 20-25 doubling rounds), because chances are high that an ongoing virus replication causes the shedding of live viruses in dangerous quantities.
Marcel:
” after a positive result from a nasal or throat sample at low amplification (up to 20-25 doubling rounds),”
Well, that is the point isn’t it.
The issue of amplification.
Exactly the point that is not being made clear to the public and also to local enforcement agencies, not to mention local newspapers etc. that are reporting—make that shrieking—of “6 new cases!” etc. No one is saying, well, after 35-40 reounds of amplifcation, that is . . . I am not an expert so can only report what I have picked up from *extensive* reading on this subject, also at sites such as Lockdown Skeptics.org.
Furthermore it has been charged that in order to get “positives”, the amplification is being ramped up beyond the point where the resulting “positive” actually has much significance.
This is another issue of which the public seems to be kept in the dark.
Only in Florida (AFAIK) has it been mandated that the amplification used to achieve a positive PCR be reported along with the “positive” datum.
Regardless of what they did in Vietnam, there is virtually zero evidence that wearing a mask retards the spread of the virus and the transmission of infection from or between asymptomatic or presymptomatic persons. (The same is true of the wearing of masks in a surgical setting.) Dr. Michael Osterholm was crystal clear on this in his podcast of June 2 of this year.
Katherine
GoverntheMente:
Thanks for the clarification. Marcel in his posts seems to assume that none of the readers here has been following the issue with PCR tests in some detail and thus can see the lacunae in his presentations
Re: “The inaccuracy concerning the PCR test comes from using the test result to determine if someone is infected or not and counting all positive results as cases of infected persons. The PCR test isn’t suitable to determine if someone is infected. Yet the media continue to portray positive PCR test results as cases (of infected persons).”
Exactly. And if one write a comment to a (local) newspaper to point out that a positive PCR is not a “case,” the comment is suppressed.
No clarity is offered as to exactly *what* the PCR actually tests, and how that relates to communities’ “covid “score.”
Furthermore, journalists and media who should know better consistently use “covid-19” to refer to anything related to the current epidemic. They seem to lack the basic IQ to take on board the info that covid019 refers to the disease, and SARS-CoV-2 refers to the virus.
So, extreme frustration and skepticism regarding health authorities’ the responses to the epidemic are definitely in order. Governments and others could mount an information campaign to clarify terms and what the PCR actually tests, etc. But they do not. They let the public thrash around trying to understand important issues that appear to be deliberately obfuscated by the media, thus fanning fury within families and groups of erstwhile friends , while actually suppressing useful information that would help everyone get on the same page.
Katherine,
I refer to SARS-CoV-2 (the virus, not the disease) and the amplification cycles of PCR tests (because they matter). Therefore, you conclude that I take you and others for imbeciles. You seem to apply negative logic here. But anyway, everyone is free to bend his/her perceptions to the reality he/she wants to note.
Dear farmer from NZ,
At the moment, both Australia and New Zealand are effectively cut off from the rest of the world. Tourism and education were big sources of income to many people in these countries.
What do you think is going to happen if NZ were to reopen its borders to travel by tourists and students? Don’t you think there will be sporadic outbreaks of this virus and consequent repeated shutdowns?
Here is what it is like in Sydney. It is summer there and people are not allowed to go to their fabulous beaches:
“Northern beaches now in lockdown as Sydney COVID-19 cluster spreads”
https://www.theage.com.au/national/coronavirus-updates-live-northern-beaches-now-in-lockdown-as-sydney-covid-19-cluster-spreads-20201219-p56oz6.html
Australia and New Zealand are partly insulated economically because they export raw materials – farm, forestry and fish are the main exports of NZ. You are a farmer so you are largely insulated from the policies that you propose for others.
It really comes down to what sort of society you want to live in – a society where people are largely responsible for taking care of themselves or a society where the government tells you how to behave at all times. I know what my choice is.
Col the farmer: Has the old adage “correlation does not necessarily imply causation” not percolated through to Aotearoa yet?
Rhysiart:
Took the words right out of my mouth!!
Is the apt response to a number of comment here.
Especially concerning mask wearing.
Katherine
There is gross political and ideological overreaction and even governmental malfeasance to Covid-19.
It is a huge mistake to conclude that because of this, Covid-19 doesn’t exist as an illness.
We have now to my knowledge 5 different protocols to treat infections as well as prophylactics. A good place to focus, is to learn those and do not allow your government to lock you up and give you poison injections. But first, learn what works so that you are able to withstand government and state pressure. For them, it is just a money game. They get IMF or World Bank loans for regulating their societies.
“There is gross political and ideological overreaction and even governmental malfeasance to Covid-19.
It is a huge mistake to conclude that because of this, Covid-19 doesn’t exist as an illness.”
who actually still says this?
Very few.
I think constant harping on these supposed “deniers” is a straw-man argument.
Commenters and readers at this site are perfectly able to distinguish between “covid denial” and “covid revisionism.”
The latter means challenging mainstream narratives and searching out the best available science to understand the *actual* illness, not the “illness exploited as propaganda.”
I said so, Katherine, because it is true. And I could care not a hoot about the various descriptors and categories deniers, idiots, revisionists or whatever, people decide to use. It is comfortable to apply a category and enter into a divisionary debate. It is not so comfortable to just see people as people, trying to come to grips with this issue. In fact myself, with help from another knowledgable alternative health Saker supporter and broad work in the alternative health community across the world, came up with one of the very first non-pharmaceutical protocol as prophylactic and treatment. My interest has always been to have actionable information toward life, instead of categorizing. It may help others, for me, it is just a distraction.
Amarynth:
Not sure of the point of your post, so I’ll clarify the point of mine.
There is a difference between calling covid-19 a “hoax” and trying to figure out what is really going on with this phenomenon.
Calling covid10 a hoax—that is being a denier. That is the difference between “denier” and “revisionist,” in my lexicon, which I perhaps failed to make clear. To me a “revisionist” is one who questions the mainstream narrative and seeks the truth about the virus and the disease it putatively causes.
Your statement “It is a huge mistake to conclude that because of this, Covid-19 doesn’t exist as an illness” implies that you think a lot of people don’t believe that covid-19 “exists as an illness.
I think you are incorrect in this supposition and hence I think that is a straw man argument.
I hope I that is now clear.
.Amarynth, I have difficulties in understanding your comment. Do you mean that all governments show overreaction and malfeasance? Do you mean that the governments of Russia, China, Cuba, USA, Brazil, Switzerland all have more or less the same wrong reaction? Do you encourage the peoples in all these countries to stand against their government and against state pressure? Do you mean that Russian or Chinese vaccines are poison? Do you mean that for Russia, China, and Cuba, this is just a money game? As far as I know, these countries do not get much money from IMF and World Bank. Certainly, Switzerland does not get money from IMF and World Bank for regulating the Swiss society.
Unfortunately, most commentators here do not understand or not respect that my article is a political article. Your comment is not very helpful in this regard.
Yes Paul, one will have to go country by country and then it becomes another essay. So, I stayed with a generalized comment. And you are talking Switzerland here, so, comparisons of countries may be a little off-topic. But, I say the same things as you, just from the perspective of other countries that I know better.
Let me mention a few examples only.
– Yes, this is political. Everything is political, and of course economic, from who has the first vaccine (Russia of course – there is no question about it from their Gamaleya Center, but how many people know that?) The politicians are squeezing the juice here right out of the fruit, to attempt to show that they ‘did best’ on the vaccine front.
– Yes, it is political. Politicians use the numbers to make themselves look good, and they even misuse or misrepresent numbers for this purpose. I don’t have to give too many examples – we’ve all seen it. A reference is this woman, a state employee in Florida, who was dismissed because she refused to lie on the numbers, she then went on to keep a database on correct numbers at home, and for her trouble, she was swatted, raided and arrested. We have similar stories all over the western leaning world.
– Take the case of Iran, where the advent of Covid was easy to use for more sanctions, this time on medical equipment and even a damn headache pain reliever. Highly political and no matter how Russia and China are working at the UN, the sanctions stay and people are just dying. Political? Of course. Also sickening.
– In general, we’re not following good practice – take Vietnam for example – total deaths, 35 only. Have you heard of anyone following Vietnamese protocol? Does anyone even know what it is?
– Col…’the farmer from NZ’ consistently tells us that the rest of the world can learn from the New Zealand experience. He also is good on the numbers themselves. Generally, on the blog, he is laughed out of the house and accused of working for the borg. What is New Zealand doing with their tests to get accurate results? Anyone even interested?
– Numbers are generally confused and used for political purposes. Russia for example reports deaths only after autopsy confirmation. I don’t know of any other country that does that consistently and how many people actually know that? So, I trust the Russian numbers. But elsewhere we have the stories of people going to the hospital with 2 bullet wounds in their head and the cause of death is Covid-19 of course. Who gets paid for overstating Covid deaths?
– The Chinese experience is consistently ignored – just the fact that lockdowns for them were solidly socially supported so they got through them easier is never reported. We see the results now because they are almost in full recovery and their economy is showing that. But, we do not hear of how they did that – we just hear China virus or Wuhan virus – politically motivated and in western climes, their economic recovery is somehow spun as evidence of their evil. I just saw a bitter tweet somewhere in the technical sphere that I follow, saying: All China had to do to take over the world was to present a few photos of people dying in the streets and be nasty to their own people for a few weeks – no bullets fired and China has taken over the world.
And this from a professional and intelligent person.
China put lives first in word, and in deed. In the earlier days there were stories of nurses and medical workers with oldies, people in their 90’s and even one of 102 years old that recovered, where the medical workers said that they treated the old people just like their mothers and their fathers.
– In the US and elsewhere for sure, there is a big component of people that say .. there is no virus, it is only a variation of the common cold. But yet, we have literal governmental financial collusion with vaccine companies under Operation Warp Speed. Some of the companies involved here have never put out a vaccine in their whole existence. (Read Whitney Webb)
– Tests are consistently incorrectly used to up and down numbers in order for the political classes to decide on further lockdown or not. China does still today the most testing, but their lockdowns are contained in areas of infection, i.e., spot lockdowns. In other countries, the more tests are done, the more evidence of infections are found, and they generally lock down, without social support mechanisms.
– What is a ‘case’. That word is consistently misused and internationally across the countries used differently. A case of confirmed infection by clinical examination? Or a case of a test showing positive. These numbers are again used for political purposes.
– There is an underlying process, the one of extreme disaster capitalism. Again, in western countries we see this but it looks different from country to country.
See CAF’s latest on how the big money is flowing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmKLUJ0_tUM&feature=emb_logo
Secondly on this point, +- 90 countries (smaller ones) had to, as a condition of the loan (IMF and World Bank) declare new lockdown or agree to austerity. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/over-80-cent-imf-covid-19-loans-will-push-austerity-poor-countries
– You say in your essay that you lost respect for western scientists in general. The state of the scientists is political – they may not move away from the politically motivated narrative, or they get canceled. So, we’ve built a landscape where it is almost impossible for the honest person to simply release the results of studies if they are contrary to the state or governmental propaganda. This level of control is political.
But it has also lead to a situation where people will believe the greatest garbage if it comes from a source that even looks like it is independent.
– It is up to us to educate ourselves and live according to our own decisions. That would be political. I think and I am not very sure of this, that mass action in the streets is not what is called for but individual action. I think of the yellow vests, and see that the controllers can deal very effectively with mass action.
So, behind my comment, this is some of the thinking. I don’t know Switzerland beyond what I see from you, and this is appreciated, but to me I don’t see much new, from a western leaning country. The actions may differ, but the trajectories are similar.
We’re in the hands of a bunch of idiotic bureaucrats who are all scared of losing their own gravy train in all of the western leaning countries. Russia is doing her best and focusing on her own people as we see from the recent conference posted here with Mr Putin. They are also in a sense decoupling from the west, and so is China and the whole eastern leaning bloc, although economically things are still very entangled.
The one leader that made the most sense for me, is the Mexican President. When all the new lockdowns started coming down, he said ..
– No, we will not lock down in Mexico because in Mexico we do not have a dictatorship.
– People know the procedures to follow and if the rest of the world thinks their people are stupid, we don’t think our people are stupid.
My friends tell me despite numbers up or down, the general zeitgeist is one of calm mostly and no serious hysterics among the population. Everyone follows the disciplines, masks while in public (not always the right masks), handwashing, supermarkets have gone out of their way to clean and disinfect as people go in or out. Mexico bought mostly the Sputnik-V vaccine, they tell me. There are spots of calm in our world, despite people getting sick and a percentage of those dying. Of course, it is then also so that they cannot lock down, because of areas like the favelas in Brazil – that actually takes the law into their own hands and start protecting themselves.
(Geez, like I said – another essay, but luckily I did not have to do the hard editing for a formal one :-)
… take Vietnam for example – total deaths, 35 only.
You cannot separate the measures against the Con virus, being taken by the ‘authorities’, that is, the governments of the upper class, from the socio-economic problems being faced by the ‘west’ at the moment. The western global banking system is going to collapse, and the intention is that it coincides with BREXIT, so, when the consequences hit, they can claim that ‘people chose it’… Meanwhile, the measures against the virus guarantee that people will be under house arrest, deprived of their rights of speech and association, and will then be unable to raise hell and change the system for their own benefit. Everything else the ‘authorities’ are doing or saying is circus – yes, it is that evil! Now, people do have leaders – they are everywhere, and only come out at the right times. The upper class knows this very well. So, since they are in a position of power, they are using pre-emptive measures to avoid that genuine leaders come out and take the podium. The upper class intends to take control of our future without opposition. Will they succeed? This is the biggest question of our time, and most of us will still be here and will see what happens – it is likely we will have years of struggle… My guess? Well, there are too many variables and something may go wrong for the upper class. I would bet something will.
Dear amarynth,
you mentioned Vietnam and asked about their actions. In five words: masks, testing, tracing, support, restrictions. Basically the Chinese approach with an emphasis on infection prevention since day one and on dedicated support to the people affected by quarantines. Restrictions are tough but limited to critical periods and areas. Otherwise, the Vietnamese health care would be overwhelmed and the economy would tank.
Vietnam was extremely effective even with an outbreak in a touristic region:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFpX7n9KP3s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VO-FlnH0_Tw
As the above reports make clear, SARS-CoV-2 can be nailed (only?) if battled head-on.
Thanks Marcel. I actually do know, so that was a bit of a rhetorical question. Excellent to see someone else actually knows that. Do you know how many times I’ve asked that question, only to see blank looks.
I forgot to say something given we have the success so far of Vietnam in our eyes. We have examples of successful countries, but somehow we emulate not those but repeat and repeat unsuccessful actions. People can cry about lockdowns and they should, but if a lockdown is not accompanied by support, it will never work. You mention the five aspects and they have to work in concert, not one by one – its a protocol, not a menu.
The western leaning countries are using Covid to implement a financial and economic system and literally torturing their people in this process.
We have examples of successful countries, indeed. China is among those and it became obvious to anyone with a sane mental state in February 2020 already. So why do we not follow these examples? I think it is due to arrogance and ideology. None can babble about evil China for years and then suddenly note, that the Chinese did something right. Even if it is mostly our leaders’ evilness that is projected onto the designated enemy, our societies deserve what they get, because they allowed this projection to go on unimpeded for far too long.
In February and March, I called SARS-CoV-2 to be a killer of societies and economies if let roam free. Based on Chinese data, it was obvious to me then that this virus spreads fast and to some extent silently. Albeit it is not very dangerous, it kills enough people that it cannot be ignored. I still stand that we might be forced to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 anyway. We did not even try at the very start, when things were easy.
So, chickens are coming home to roost.
Kind regards,
Marcel
Thanks, Amarynth! I new about Vietnam. There are also Thailand, Kampuchea, and Laos with very small numbers, but I do not know enough about the situation. By the way, the numbers of Syria are also very ok. I am also very much aware that each country has its own way of counting.
Switzerland differs from other Western countries by the political system which tries to integrate the different forces. Until now, one can see very few attempts of the political parties to politically exploit the pandemic.
I keep my idea that the ideological question is central. The measures in China would not work without a common idea, sometimes called the Chinese dream. I would bet that in Mexico, there is also some kind of common dream, certainly less explicit than in China. In Switzerland, during the first wave in spring, the unity was rather strong, and because of this – I think – the measures taken by the authorities worked quite well. But as I wrote, there is no kind of common dream in Switzerland, and it cannot be one for the time being.
About Vietnam and other “successful” countries.
There must be strategical thinking persons over there that see a political opportunity of helping the competitors shooting themselves in the foot:
besides the personal pizza-burger-sugar-diabetes-is-my-right-life-style that puts the Western, especialy North American person at risk, the “societal” comorbidities in the West put them far behind.
We can’t say for certain that the Vietnamese health care system would be overrun if the virus would be let loose. We can’t even say the virus or the next one isn’t everywhere.
So even when they appear to take harsh measures to “fight the spread” , I can’t believe that those measures are as effective as they are wanting us to believe. The governments over there just take the best cost benefit from them that puts the governments in a very favorable spot light.
Rather just playing along. Same for Russia: Pres. Putin appearing in his yellow biohazard suit signaled that from that point the game was on but did not give away the strategy if only for this little exaggeration.
In a country where it is easier to eat pizza all day than to find a lady selling healing herbs on a market. (not yet Vietnam), the virus not going away is a recurring. Not so much an issue for the corps making money out of it. Those are the societal commorbidities of the West.
While the junk life style conversion of Vietnam and China for example is in full swing in the cities, and there are now plenty highly stressed, obese people that have been helped more than a hand to forget and even hate their old food traditions, I expect the rural population to be vastly more immune to severe and lasting effects of this virus.
Getting high levels of zinc into cells has been known for two decades to help them resist viruses, it’s why zinc lozenges for the common cold are widely used.
Hydroxychloroquine acts as a zinc ionophore escorting zinc into cells. Low doses are sufficient.
I checked the WHO website about HCQ at start of year. It was listed as an essential antimalarial drug with good tolerability & low incidence of serious side effects although it does increase time of cardiac conduction (QT interval) in high doses. But so do around 100 other medications many very commonly prescribed & advertised. In the low anti-Covid doses recommended it is safer than many widely prescribed & heavily advertised medications.
Two studies involving HCQ – one in The Lancet, one in New England Journal of Medicine, were designed to discredit HCQ (which is cheap, off-patent) these were used by WHO & governments around world to ban or restrict HCQ usage. The Lancet study was retracted when approx 100 medical whistleblowers from around the world reported the patients described in the study from their hospitals did not exist. The NEJM study used toxic high doses late in disease with very sick people without Zinc – which was useless because of role of zinc & furthermore increased cardiac conduction problems as would be predicted for high doses in dying people.
Thus HCQ was demonised & sidelined as a treatment because it was cheap, off-patent & threatened the profits of new vaccines & anti-virals.
President Trump touting it (obviously because medical advisors told him it had merit – he struggled to pronounce it) allowed the corporate media to further disparage HCQ.
Here in Australia a former Nobel Prize for Medicine doctor has touted another old cheap drug in combination with zinc – ivermectin – yet again it is being ignored because the aim is profits with new on-patent vaccines & antivirals. HCQ & ivermectin as cheap off-patent drugs threaten BigPharma profits.
But wait, there’s more – what goes with vaccines: control of the world’s people via Bill Gates’ “digital passports” which World Economic Forum founder & head (& evil arch villain look-alike and sound-alike) Klaus Schwab says will work best when planted under the skin as readable electronic chip.
At this point Google “Microsoft patent WO2020060606. Just do it. Read – a wearable biometric movement tracker device that allows the wearer to earn digital currency by moving around (doesn’t say lose currency but would be easy to add that in). Cross on green pedestrian light – earn 20 cents, run over on red pedestrian light – lose $20. Or whatever is deemed best social control credit system.
Look at that patent number. Recall no zeros in the Roman Empire when Revelations was written, so it’s patent 666 for 2020 in that sense.
Now read Revelation Chapter 13 last 3 verses. To paraphrase: “No man could buy or sell save he had the Mark of the Beast on hand or forehead”.
Now watch: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4EotFDfZaao
Recall also the evidence the virus came from Wuhan biolab who had collaborated with biolabs in Fort Dettrick & Uni Nth Carolina in USA & Winnipeg biolab in Canada on ‘gain of function’ research to make bat coronaviruses from caves in Yunnan (1,500 km from Wuhan) more infectious to humans by alteration of the spike protein that attaches to cells.
China has admitted no bats sold in the wet market, but the biolab had collected bats from Yunnan to extract coronaviruses from in 2013 and was a couple hundred metres from the wet market & many index cases of Covid were from the area but a sizeable proportion had no contacts traceable to the market. The chief scientist at the Wuhan lab has old lectures online admitting the GOF research on these bat coronaviruses. Many virologists criticised this work as dangerous.
When gain of function research in the USA was banned from 2014 to 2017 due to the very real risk of zoonotic viruses modified to infect humans escaping – Dr Fauci approved two $3.5M grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to continue the ‘GOF’ research.
‘Event 201’ in New York on 18 October 2019, was run by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the WEF of Klaus Schwab & Johns Hopkins University. It simulated a global coronavirus pandemic outlining need for lockdowns & restrictions on free speech & movement & coincided with the World Military Games in Wuhan from where many of the 10,000 athletes returned home with viral symptoms. Doctors in Wuhan started reporting Covid in November & were hushed up or disappeared.
The WHO, China & Dr Fauci played down the pandemic risk and Trump was accused of racism & over-reacting in January when he stopped flights from China. Thus the virus appears to have been purposefully spread at the start.
The fact the virus is less virulent (Infection Fatality Rate ~ 0.25% but far greater in infirm elderly) than ‘Event 201’ simulated (65M dead worldwide) or the Bill Gates funded Imperial College London modelled in February (3.6%) & was adopted by the WHO to push worldwide lockdowns – is a blessing and partly reflects widespread cross-immunity from common cold coronaviruses.
The 1% or greater IFR rates quoted in this article are likely an over-estimate because based on tests done and not accounting for latent immunity in population with majority asymptomatic following clinical level exposure.
Nonetheless it is a nasty virus, especially for elderly, obese, diabetics, those with preexisting lung & cardiovascular diseases. Plus most younger deaths from hyper-immune responses & serious risk vaccines – particularly mRNA new vaccines – make hyperimmune responses worse. This is why lab animals mostly or all died from the first SARS vaccines in early 2000s when later exposed to SARS-1. But this time most animal testing has been skipped in the ‘warp speed’ rush.
We truly are living in a B-grade but scary Sci-Fi movie.
It is a shame Switzerland is in this political quagmire. At the end of the day it is for people to choose and they should be provided choices. Meanwhile some interesting developments in Russia in regard to vaccines:
https://tass.com/society/1237417
“Russia will soon start testing single influenza and coronavirus vaccine. This vaccine prototype has already been tested in laboratory animals, it has shown its immunogenicity, General Director of the State Research Centre of Virology and Biotechnology Vektor Rinat Maksyutov noted…….”
So Russia is now at the next stage of development by combining more than one vaccine so people can have the flu vaccine and coronavirus vaccine at one time. They are also looking at combining with measles vaccine and coronavirus too.
Russia moves ahead and is faster with neutralising this virus in the long-term.
“Today it was announced that Russia plans to vaccinate 60% of its adult population against coronavirus
Health Minister Mikhail Murashko said that in an interview with Rossiya 1 TV channel…..” (Tass)
I’m a Swiss, was living in Switzerland more than 50 years, now living in Vietnam.
–
One interesting point not mentioned by Paul Schmutz Schaller: The federalism of Switzerland, where various Kantons take different measures, leads to strange situations.
Example: On the last Sunday Kanton Basel-Stadt started a new “Lock-Down”. My friend wanted to buy Croissants in a bakery, but finding the bakery closed. So he went to Kanton Basel-Land – just 5 more minutes by bicycle – where he found both bakeries and Restaurants and Cafés still to be open.
–
About Switzerland not having closed Ski resorts: Here, again, it depends on the Kanton. The following Kantons closed: St. Gallen, Schwyz, Luzern, Zug, Nidwalden, Obwalden. Wallis (VS) keeps them open. Graubünden (GR) not yet decided (currently open). GR and VS definitively with the most, also the most swanky resorts – and generally two of the most important Kantons regarding tourism (and having a strong lobby in Bern). Kanton GR also paid subsidies for already suffered economical loss – tho with very arbitrary seeming rules deciding whether you get something or not.
–
While many Swiss people seem to very obediently follow and and trust in the measures, many also start to wonder about how different regions and different businesses are treated differently. If you want, you easily can find a pattern the government supporting big business but letting die small trade.
.
.
Now to the the inevitable ;-)
.
I don’t deny that Covid-19 (the disease) can lead to severe complication, in rare case leading to death. Tho I believe that its dangerousness is much lower than originally assumed. Personally I highly value the work of Prof. John P.A. Ioannidis and his group from Standford University – definitely not a tinfoil hat guy. They analyzed Covid 19 cases data of the “1st wave” of various countries including Switzerland.
.
Ioannidis (and many others) concluded that the dangerousness has been estimated much too high originally. Current measures – not only but also in Switzerland – still rely on the original (wrong) assumptions. The MSM still spreads fear and horror across the board – from the very beginning until now. The politics also follow this path. Death rates in Switzerland in 2020 are not higher than in many previous years. (This raises questions about how “Death by Covid” numbers are counted.)
.
Today Swissmedic has authorised the vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech. That’s remarkable. Tho I don’t think a vaccine is “the solution” to get out of this crisis.
.
Without going further into worth to look at scientific aspects (e.g. the reliability of the PCR test as developed by Drosten or the rationale of vaccines against virus diseases) – I finish with some general remarks.
.
Now available data from the 1st wave should be discussed honestly. Generally data should be presented honestly and transparent by the government – if necessary challenging fake or patchy data presented by the MSM. Discussions – including the scientific discussion – about meaningful measures must be allowed and should take place. As soon as possible.
.
But, to be honest, right now I don’t see how “my country” Switzerland and many others, mainly Western countries – can do this in a reasonable time. Many western politics of high positions are in bed with the big pharma. The society has been strongly divided (by the Covid topic). The economic impact of the lock downs is enormous and can hardly be reverted. Dark times :(
No bright future in sight.
I totally disagree with you on this point. The future is Extremely Bright for Me and My Kind. I/We don’t look at the Elites’ attacks and assaults on the sheep as grim ,but rather ,predictable. A New Day will Dawn for the Elect Few and The Beast and the Whore have had Their day. When the Son of Man returns in all His Glory to Deliver His Own from the snares of Liars ,Cheats and Thieves, He will at that Time ,purge Humanity of All Satanic practices. Believe it or not, no worries to Me. Even Death won’t hold Us!
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/reconstruction-1918-virus.html#discovering
P.S. Your P.S.
Nothing At All unusual about that! This is Satan’s Way. Accuse and destroy others for doing what He Himself is doing, hand over fist. Maybe Your bearded lady from the Catholic Catechisms will save you, but don’t hold your breath.
P.S.
My Heart Breaks for the Fool ,who sold His Birthright for a Morsel of meat ,only to Steal it back by gigantic Fraud in these Last Days of the Ethnos. I See You! El Gibbor help you now.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Paul Schmutz Schaller.
I am not a virologist nor a micro-biologist, I’m an industrial engineer and I like to tackle things first from a practical point of view.
Here are two points of view.
1- You go to a supermarket, and grab some food. On the backside of the containment, a whole list is served with its ingredients. How much fat, proteins, carbohydrates of which sugar, additives, allergic info. The whole bunch and that’s good.
Now you grab another. Its info states that’s its ingredients are secret. Also it states that any liability towards the producer is null and void. But, ‘authorities’ claim that the risk is low (you know ‘authorities’ also allowed the Boeing 737 MAX, and after they keep dropping from the sky were forced to say ‘Mmhh, maybe we should look at it again’).
Would you drop this product into your shopping cart?
2- We, the people, you know that horrific bunch of peons, will be punished when not taking the secret cocktail of Bill Gates, who has such a terrific track record of successful vaccinations in Africa, where really no reintroduction of polio has taken place, and really no hundreds of thousands of African women were sterilized in Tetanus campaigns – this is no tin foil hat story, but documented fact.
So we, the people that have serious thoughts against it, will not be able to shop, use public transport, enter a public building or whatever.
Now my question: when I, as a non-vaccinated person, would enter a room with vaccinated people, can someone explain me the ‘danger’?
Is the danger that they could infect me, a risk that I take myself as an adult?
Or is the danger that I could infect them, which illogically means that a vaccination is futile?
You know what? This vaccination is not a means. *It is the goal*. And our beloved leaders are *obsessed* to inject us with the secret cocktail.
Not for me, and I’m definitely not alone. I think certain people have overplayed their hand.
Cheers, Rob
Let me add a citate to this:
“When we give authorities the power to take medical decisions for us, in essence we accept that authorities own our bodies.”
This is from Ron Paul, and I strongly agree with this. Something to think over.
Cheers, Rob
Thanks Rob,
the engineer’s way of thinking – practical / must make sense . I, like you have no training in virology but come to the subject from the same point of view ( engineering background ), and I came to the same conclusions. There is too much of this, “.. you must trust the science / the FDA ( or equivalent ) would never allow vaccines if they were dangerous… ” – hmm….right – just ignore all past experience to the contrary.
It’s a campaign of terror followed by a demand for blind unthinking trust and obedience.
Cheers,
Sand
Here is an article that posits that dying from Covid-19 is largely a lifestyle choice. Nature’s way of dealing with people who don’t respect it. IMHO, it makes a heck of a lot more sense than any “vaccine”. BTW, these “vaccines”, including the flu vaccines, are known to be less effective for the elderly and infirm. There is absolutely no reason for a healthy person to take them when mortality for those infected is in the region of 0.05% for that group.
“Survey Confirms: We’re Killing Ourselves It’s A Lifestyle/Dietary Disease Vaccines Won’t Help”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/12/no_author/survey-confirms-were-killing-ourselves-its-a-lifestyle-dietary-disease-vaccines-wont-help/
Many have died with Covid 19! Ok ,maybe. Truth is Though, that Covid 19 has caused very Few Deaths! It is documented the Way it suits The They.
Digital Passport (Impfpass) = Aryan Certficate (Ariernachweis)
I am no Aryan
I am living in Switzerland.
Here there is no pandemic, rather a plandemic or a case demic.
I am sick and tired and disgusted to discuss:
if there is a coronavirus (yes, there are 19 different CV in the CV family),
if it sticks for days on your hands, but not on vegetables in COOP,
if for f* sake the mask is holding any viruses up (check the law, the part what masks employers need to provide to employees in which situation)
and the if can go on and on.
Oh the latest is, that the flu does not exist any more, because of the mask and distancing, but somehow they forgot to explain why covid still exists.
This world has become completely insane beyond any cure, the people have lost their minds and any rationality and brains and the government and its institutions have lost all credibility.
I will not take this vax (and I am not an anti vaxxer), if this means I won’t travel anymore, be it, if this means I have to pay a fine, I don’t pay, if this means I have to go to jail, I’ll go there, but if someone puts that crap in my venes, the rest of my life I will spend to hunt this person and their offspring down. Thats a promise and not a threat.
BR
JM
I live in Australia (not Austria for American readers), and minus the media fear hype there is no pandemic either. On the west coast about 9 people (out of approx. 2 mill) died with/from etc. “Cases” are touted when they are only positive PCR test readings with all the diminished accuracy that entails. The east coast is a little more wide spread but not ‘black plague’ proportions. The old and immune deficient are at higher risk but the whole economy gets hit in the policy reaction.
Sweden is largely ignored as a control case study unless some minor aristocrat can be misquoted to attack the government’s policy. Most deaths there and elsewhere are centered on nursing homes etc. The moment the western medical system has a vaccine it is headline news. The fact that Russian research has been licensed (e.g. UK) to support this roll-out (a cooperation, not competition strategy) is rarely mentioned and actively suppressed in public media comments sections.
It is a nasty strain and appears to be a rapidly mutating variant with numerous strains testing the evolutionary niche within the human domain (e.g., UK, Africa) — something pointed out to me by experts early in 2020 which caused me to take it more seriously as a risk. (https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1374530/Covid-mutant-strain-coroanvirus-new-variant-world-health-organisation-chris-whitty)
I keep this Swiss site in my browse list for a sober window into developments — https://swprs.org/facts-about-covid-19/
As for international travel: I have young family in Canada and will take whatever is required to travel when the opportunity arises. I’m not anti-vaccination and sometimes take the annual flu vaccine (free at my age) although I had a bad reaction one year. Imo, we need to keep perspective, take reasonable precautions with health, hygiene and consume wholesome food. The main correlations with risk of death seem to be age (of course) and comorbidity with other issues that affect immune system effectiveness — e.g. obesity, diabetes, and essential mineral deficiency in the food chain (especially the USA).
I am also of enough age to remember when travel to many 3rd-world places would require shots for malaria, typhoid, etc. It is just a fact of life, imo. We have squeezed the jungle wilderness into remnant bits of (yet to be) Ikea furniture supply and now the jungle swamps are coming out to greet us in a zoonotic tango. It is not a conspiracy; it is a sick world working itself out. Humans in plague proportions at modern western lifestyle standards are the virus from a planetary scale.
I’m not misanthropic, but until a new balance is found with Nature (and out nature) we had better be prepared to be flexible, agile, and innovative. As for the creeping authoritarianism in public policy (in general, not just health) — I agree, it is disconcerting; but let’s not fixate at the micro-level on what appears a broader generational trend at times of economic and environmental (and soon perhaps social) collapse. QE-Forever is a far more dangerous vaccine for the normal capitalist boom-bust ‘business cycle’ than some new (somewhat tested) jungle juices swirling around the blood veins of the barely living rich elites and middle classes trying to re-activate dead immune systems.
As recently pointed out at ZH, with vaccines now rolling out (and the $$$$ rolling in) the PCR ‘case’ rates (many propped up with cycle thresholds of over 35 cycles) we will likely see ‘miraculous’ reductions in PCR tests and the associated ‘positives’ (real or false) due to the efficacy (of course) of the vaccines. (https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives)
Problem solved, and back to business as usual. /s
Huh. Well, I saw some very nasty vids of the arrest of a mother in Melbourne after a SWAT team I believe broke down the door of her house. Because she had responded to a FB thing regarding some kind of demo.
Think I woudl rather expose myself to the virus than to that type of government “response.”
In fact, lots of crazy stuff was coming out of Victoria.
Again, give me the virus and hold the Victoria gov response.
Katherine
“but if someone puts that crap in my venes, the rest of my life I will spend to hunt this person and their offspring down. Thats a promise and not a threat.”
I’m with you, Brother, and will lend you any hand I can fulfilling your and my promises.
Best Wishes for the New Year from a very wet Aquitaine.
As long as PCR is the diagnostic tool used, the infection rates cannot be regarded as accurate for meaningful statistics.
Add in a correction factor for false positives then report the numbers.
The proper scientific procedure would be to develop a more reliable made for purpose diagnostic test, then develop possible vaccines.
But this event is not a medical emergency, it is socioeconomic event.
Many viruses grow in the intestines without symptoms. The intestines can develop the most specific antibody to virus match over weeks while SARS _CoV-2 grows in the intestine. Intestinally developed immunity to SARS-CoV-2 usually lasts at least 8 months or years. I did the first deliberate SARS-CoV-2 intestinal inoculation in June 2020. But same principals apply to Influenza A. In my videos of last week, I show how I successfully swallow LIVE Influenza A in enteric-coated capsule with no symptoms. Influenza A can grow in the small intestine and develop specific accurate immunity. I took no Flu shot this fall. In the interest of full disclosure, I bought some Vaxart stock. Vaxart claims a potential adenovirus vector as an oral vaccine for influenza virus. The intestinal system is in charge of mucosal defense for SARS-CoV-2. Most people are to ignorant ad fearful to swallow enteric-coated SARS COV-2. But many more people have the courage to swallow Influenza A capsules. Once they understand how intestinal immunity works and swallow Influenza A …. they’re prepared to move up to inoculation with SARS-CoV-2.
Steven Mark Hayden w w w .antivirusair ,c o m
videos antivirusair on youtube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBNfpFZ_qc5QUmKCZwRgzMA/videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsN-Fkwye1M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVOniyCY-g4
Over the last few months I have formed a hypothesis about why the course of COVID 19 seems to be substantially independent of measures taken to prevent its spread (aside from vaccination). Thus, Taiwan had very mild Swedish-style restrictions, but also very few cases, but its data was folded into the PRC’s and escaped notice.
Viruses are not alive, they are aggregates of macromolecules. This was shown very elegantly by Aaron Klug in the 1970’s (Nobel Prize in chemistry 1982). The core nucleic acid and coat protein molecules are made independently in the host cell, and aggregate and are expelled.
COVID 19 is a large virus, and oddly the virus particle contains two copies of the RNA chromosome. My hypothesis is that sometimes, in a cell containing not only COVID 19 RNA but also the RNA of other RNA viruses, chimeric viral particles are formed, containing COVID 19 RNA and one (or perhaps two) copies of another viral pathogen RNA, surrounded by COVID 19 coat proteins. Sufferers thus find themselves infected with two (or more) viruses. The varying clinical pictures from people who all test positive thus arise from COVID acting as a carrier of other viruses.
I spent 55 years in research at the chemistry/biochemistry interface, and wrote a well-received 800-page graduate textbook in retirement, so my knowledge of biological macromolecules is substantial. Moreover, a proper doctor of my acquaintance could not see anything wrong with the idea from a medical standpoint.
I formulated the idea originally from early data that the virulent forms of the virus infecting Europe were traceable to the Austrian ski resort of Ischgl, the “gay friendly” “Ibiza of the snows” (hence my use of HSV as an example). The “chimeric viral particle” idea is so obvious to anyone with a biochemistry/molecular biology background, that I am surprised no-one else has publicised it: perhaps, with the Ischgl data in mind, they feared “cancellation”
One thing I know is that doctors and scientists still cannot explain precisely how body & cell activity works – like how a wound or tissue heals.
Until they can do that they shouldn’t call themselves experts on medical conditions.
Wiganer, I am impressed with your 55 years in research. Did you use to go to Wigan Pier? I have been to Patscherkofel and Ibiza with my family over the years. I come from Oldham, and have been to see the doctor once in the last 17 years. I thought I had covid about this time last year. It was like a mild cold, not as bad as the flu, which I have had about 2 or 3 times in my 67 years of existence. I was cured by a bottle of cheap whisky, and lots of water over 2 or 3 days, and a tiny little bottle of of urea and hydrogen peroxide, to clear the wax in my right ear.
I think this is a mass brainwashing event – using the most highly refined psychological techniques including behaviour analysis and behaviour modification
I came to the conclusion that this was nothing much about a virus in March, even though I thought I had a different kind of cold/flu which may well have been covid. This may have been deliberately produced as a bio-weapon, which seemed most likely to have been made at Fort Detrick, USA and might heve been accidentally released and transfered to Wuhan China, during the world military games. I am still not convinced that covid actually exists as anything beyond a normal cold/flu variant that happens every year.
So it is about “something else”. Being a typical mad conspiracy theorist, and reading about the panic affecting millions of people in India – where vast quantities of food were left to rot in the fields, I quickly came to the conclusion that this was most likely a massive depopulation event, and the main method of killing vast numbers of people was impoverishment and starvation. I was so convinced of this, that I bought a rotavator, to dig up my garden, and grow lots of potatoes and vegetables.
The depopulation theory ties in with the global warming nonsense. The physics of the matter prove that solar power can only run the world with a massive reduction of population, to the kind of levels achieved when solar power, was all we had – about 500 Million.
The fact of the matter that forced population reduction is completely unnecessary, because CO2 is not a pollutant, and oil is not a fossil fuel, but formed deep within the earth, and there is no shortage of it, is irrelevent, because the very richest most powerful people in the world want to kill the vast majority of us off. We can easily feed ourselves, and educated civilisations already have a birth rate far below replacement levels.
Everything else is bullsh1t, fear and diversion.
I have no solution to this, because covid is the new religion, and the vast majority of people believe it through a combination of propaganda, brainwashing and group think in every country in the world.
Almost no one wants to know any alternative point of view. Almost everyone thinks I am still completely mad, as I was perceived after 9/11, when I attempted to point out to numerous people that the official us government story re 9/11 was impossible.
Taking that position caused me an enormous amount of grief, though I was very pleased to take early retirement at the age of 51, as suddenly everyone at work thought I was a loony.
Tony
Wiganer- That is an interesting idea, but of course raises various questions:
Does the double RNA status of Covid make it more likely to drop a copy and pick up a foreign RNA? Larger envelope? Or, does some other feature of Covid make it more likely to produce chimeras?
The cellular machinery produces Covid, so whatever the mechanism is for producing viral particles with two RNA copies, it would also need to function for adding a different RNA.
The bigger issue is that Covid is presumably difficult to isolate. If one has trouble isolating even a typical Covid virus, what are the chances of isolating rare variants.
Still, the idea is worth thinking about.
There is no COV-19 pandemic crisis only a Govt & Globalist Corporate created fraudulent media PR claim there is one. They are liars and this is the biggest fraud in world history.
There has only been a bad persistent winter cold bug around that is effecting the elderly and those whose immune systems are weak.
But another issue arises in all this …………..
What needs to be explained in all this COV-19 thing is WHY there are 2 types of vaccines being developed – one the old tested viral type one, and the other this untested MRA one and why those in USA are going for the latter one ?
See comparison table on middle of this page
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-55269381?fbclid=IwAR1Es4vBci251MfhbXUwO4I5nqErKvPux8TZQTTPXN6rKR4eGCUAKIa4sgI
Note that the US Pfizer one is in conjunction with the German BioNTech company and given the behavior of Klaus Schwab and Merkel I wouldn’t trust anything out of Germany these days. Being a former Nazis state.
Why the US is going with an untested type is a grave worry and needs a full proper explanation, and no legal liability waiver should be allowed in such circumstances. Why no use the old tested viral type ?
In this whole agenda I doubt more than 20% of people everywhere will be volunteering to have these evil untested vaccines, so what are these wicked untrustworthy politicians going to do then ?
And no amount of marketing of them will change that view.
There is going to serious repercussions for all Govts and political parties peddling this nonsense and the bright side of it is it will be great means of the people getting rid of the mainstream 2 party state politicians in most western countries.
The ruling classes that run these Govts will find they will be ousted very soon if this goes on.
@Santiago –
In your bbc-quote it says that the (old viral type) vaccine was abandoned as HIV-antibodies were generated in some of the recipients.
This reminded me that the inventor of PCR (Kary Mullis) was stubbornly insisting that his invention was not suitable as a basis to diagnose people to be infected by a virus. The virus in question back then was HIV. Mullis insisted that there was no evidence, no scientific documents, not even a propability that HIV causes AIDS. See his personal quotes: http://aras.ab.ca/aidsquotes.htm
In this article https://www.globalresearch.ca/fauci-first-fraud-documentary-exposes-decades-old-lies-behind-man-cancelled-thanksgiving/5730282 Kary Mullis is even quoted to have named it fraud [the diagnosis of AIDS via PCR]. Most will know up to now that Fauci was running the AIDS-HIV-scheme back then, and he is now one of the main protagonists of c19.
Unfortunately Kary Mullis died in August 2019. I am sure he would have used similar words for the misuse of PCR in 2020.
Concerning your questions about why 2 types of “Vaccines? and Why no use the old tested viral type ?:
The alleged virus – to date – may have not been isolated by anyone. Its been reported by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter in https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/ and by Iain Davis in https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/ David Crowe adds in https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf that “the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).”
Honestly i have not made up my mind about these articles. But following their logic, for an intellectual game (not meant derogatory!), it follows that without “isolated” agent, its not possible to produce a traditional vaccine (i.e. an “inactivated” or “attenuated” agent). Therefore the fuzz about totally experimental RNA-agents. Maybe they simply do not have the agent in the first place and therefor they resort to untested RNA-constructs with non-knowable properties. I honestly do not know. The vaccine mentioned in your bbc-quote may have been abandoned for this or that reason … and maybe they just needed a story (hiv-blabla) to feed to the public or investors.
In looking at the past year I tend to get the impression if there is a pandemic it seems to be a Northern Hemisphere problem because not much is happening of any substance in the Southern Hemisphere.
Is there something peculiar in the north that is causing this or is it just because 90% of the world population is there ?
Could it be in the air-bio mixture in the north or something venting into it from the ground ?
Or some type of (bio) toxin or pollutant that there – contaminated water or rain/snow?
In this we must remember the 2 hemispheres atmospherics are separated at the equator with their own separate weather and airflow systems and not much interchange takes places – if any its slow.
Santiago
Peru currently has 1116 deaths/million MR which puts it 2nd or 3rd to worst globally…only beaten by Belgium and almost identical to Italy.
Chile and Argentina are not good either at 839 and 920.
Regards
Col
Health and nutrition there is Peru is poor and not much better elsewhere.
Less sanitation too.
The air is cleaner in the South and that may be a factor.
https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/09/29/2377123.htm
Is the 5G roll-out on the pretext of so-called pandemic is just a conspiracy theory?
The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization has statewide status. Please take the time to browse briefly. You will understand how Switzerland has made itself into a syphilitic whore.
https://jdmichel.blog.tdg.ch/media/00/02/923759379.pdf
What does “statewide status” mean?
GAVI is a creature of the Gates Foundation.
GAVI is pushing ID2020.
https://www.biometricupdate.com/201909/id2020-and-partners-launch-program-to-provide-digital-id-with-vaccines
Further to my other comment and the authors point too –
part of the problem lies with the fact the drug companies have for the past century or more have only been interested in sales & profits selling treatments, not cures for conditions.
When they know about a cure they actively seek to hide or suppress it and try to ruin those people providing information or selling cures.
THAT problem needs long term addressing by lawmakers.
A large percentage of public are aware of this problem and that is why there the distrust of drug companies and tablets & vaccines.
And this may be tied in with this pandemic as it appears they now may be creating bugs so they can sell treatments.
There needs to series of legislative inquires into what these companies are doing and have done, and strict Govt and public oversight for the future imposed.
I know there are lot of cures for things and we have to ask why have people got sicker since the rise of these companies post WW2 when people survived ok prior to the time of antibiotics using old style medicines which are now not used ?
A cancer cure is said to be Vitamin B17 found in fruits seeds husks and millet grain – and the ancients and medieval period people knew this and ate whole fruits and breads, but diets has moved off that in the past 250 years to removing the seeds and growing wheat instead. Perhaps a dose of those will get rid of any COV-19 ?
“drug companies have for the past century or more have only been interested in sales & profits selling treatments, not cures for conditions”
I will go one further. They absolutely dread prevention.
I have had a US patent that has been FDA approved for the prevention of infections such as HIV. It is ethical and cheap to introduce – but pharmaceutical companies won’t even reply to my mail. They have put a ring of around 30 other patents about my invention – a legal minefield. You can see my original patent here:
“Method of controlling transmission of defects – US Patent 5,108,131”
https://tinyurl.com/bibopatent
Nothing new under the sun…
https://www.theguardian.com/world/cartoon/2009/apr/27/swine-flu-globalrecession
(Swine flu, 2009)
Countering the Second Wave with Facts, not Misconceptions
By: Udi Qimron, Uri Gavish, Eyal Shahar, Michael Levitt
https://www.dropbox.com/s/72hi9jfcqfct1n9/Haaretz-20Jul20_ENGLISH%2012082020%20v3.pdf?dl=0
Some highlights for you:
Pre-immunity. No country has got more than 20% infected before it died out.
In several closed communities that underwent testing, the infection rate was always capped at 20%, which statistically aligns with maximal infection rate in these communities rather than recurring coincidences.
In Sweden the infection rate did not exceed 20% and the percentage of people who survived the epidemic exceeds 99.9% of the population.
In Belgium, the country with the highest population mortality rate, where less than 20% were infected, and more than 99.9% of the population has survived.
Immediate removal of most restrictions on the economy, immediate return to normal life of low-risk population while helping high-risk groups reduce the rate of social contacts is in order.
Robert Kennedy Jr has been doing a lot of work with his “Children’s Health Defence Organisation”.
The CDC is over counting covid-19 deaths by 90%
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/if-covid-fatalities-were-90-2-lower-how-would-you-feel-about-schools-reopening/
Why do we need a vaccine when we have at least 3 cures.
Cures – If you doubt that these work discuss it with the doctors promoting them.
1) Inhaled steroids like Budesonide
The interview with Dr. Richard Bartlett has been BANNED BY YOUTUBE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDSDdwN2Xcg&feature=emb_logo
But you can still see it here starting around the 4 minute mark:
https://banned.video/watch?id=5f06524a672706002f481047
Cheap and can be used on very sick people with serious existing health conditions.
2) Ivermectin + Doxycycline + Zinc
Professor Thomas Borody developer of the triple therapy treatment for peptic ulcers in 1987.
“It’s easier than treating the flu now”. “You can actually eradicate it”. “We know it’s curable”
http://covexit.com/we-know-its-curable-its-easier-than-treating-the-flu-professor-thomas-borody/
3) Swiss Policy Research HCQ+ Treatment Protocol (5 to 7 day regimen)
https://swprs.org/on-the-treatment-of-covid-19/
Zinc — 50 milligrams [mg] to 100 mg per day
Hydroxychloroquine — 400 mg per day
Quercetin — 500 mg to 1,000 mg per day
Bromhexine — 50 mg to 100 mg per day
Azithromycin — up to 500 mg per day
Heparin — usual dosage
Fine article, thanks! But I have to disagree on some points, for instance:
“But nobody in Switzerland has the courage and the humility to say that Switzerland has failed in protecting the people.”
Now where is the responsibility for oneself? Who has dictated that the ‘governement’, whatever that means, has to take care of everything?
It has become easier than ever before to get good information on how to stay healthy, from whatever illness. Why would anyone want to be taken care of by our quite fascist (in bed with BIG corporations) governments?
Look up the functions and importance to our health of the next tiny list of easily available substances;
Vitamin d3 in combination with its co-factors (vitamin K2, magnesium, boron, zinc as the most important of these co-factors), vitamin c (very powerful anti-toxin and anti-oxidant, also necessary for healing (collagen)), stabilized allicin (sold under brand names like Allimax, etc.), sodium bi-carbonate (to be used for many different purposes, for example to brush your teeth with, as safe deodorant and anti perspirant, in your shoes against odor and worse ;-), and what not), add to this some essential oils and you can fire your doctor and never need the hospital ever again unless you have an accident.
Just high-dosing of vitamin D3 (with vitamin K2 and magnesium supplements (MgCl2 or Nigari cheapest and among best bio-availability) will prevent any severe illness including whatever form of Covid. You will get infected, but your organism will handle it with ease.
The correct daily dose of vitamin D3 is 75 IU per kg of body mass per day, and 45 mcg of vitamin K2 per every 1000 IU of D3, add to that at least 2 to 3 grams of MgCl2 and you’ll stay healthy.
Already ill? You can reverse most if not all illnesses quite effectively with high dosage of vitamin D3. This meaning up to 1000 IU of D3 per kg of body mass per day and also 45 mcg of vitamin K2 per each 1000 IU of D3. Don’t forget the magnesium and adapt its dosage to what your organism needs. D3 and K2 supplementation use and thus deplete magnesium, which may cause arythmia, weakness, concentration problems and worse and your doctor will blame vitamin D3 toxicity, but that’s a BIG pharma fairy tale to make us all fear vitamin D3. Do a search for Dr John Jacob Cannell and the vitamin d council and Jeff T Bowles, who hyper-dosed himself successfully to get rid of health problems. After that Bowles read around 65,000 medical publications on vitamin D to get to the bottom of it.
Understand that BIG pharma does not want you to have this information because they stand to lose 99% of their money grubbing operation. What modern medicine and thus ‘the government’ can do for you is to fight or obscure the symptoms, not to heal you. And isn’t to be healed what all of us would like?
Bonnes Fêtes! Seasons Greetings!
With all due respect to Mr. Schmutz Schaller their are deep flaws in his beliefs about covid-19. First, what does he mean when he says that %5 of the Swiss will have tested positive for covid-19? If he is talking about a PCR Test, numerous studies including one by Rita Jaafar et al as well as public health agencies such as Public Health England, Australian Health Autorities and the CDC have all stated that PCR tests are incapable of detecting infectious disease so it is not possible to use it as a metric for whether someone has covid-19 or not. So unless he has data related to hospitalizations and deaths, the estimate of 5% testing positive has no value. Nor does his quote that 90% of them will stem from the second wave!?! Where did Mr. Schmutz Schaller pull that statistic from?!? Then he pulls out more “estimates” predicting 50% of the population being infected and 1% of the population dying!?! Next he moves on to vaccinations. Does Mr. Schmutz Schaller know that no research lab in the world has actually isolated SARS-COV2?!? So there is no proof of viral origin for covid-19.
So on what basis are the pharmaceutical companies developing a vaccine? The assumption is that it is necessary to attack spike proteins in the body because supposedly SARS-COV2 “virus” is characterized by spike proteins. Does Mr. Schmutz Schaller know that even Synyctin-1 which is found in both female and male reproductive organs important for placental development and for male sperm? Or has he even looked at the data related to the trials? Here is an example based on CDC data from mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. Of 112,807 who received the first dose of their vaccine, there were 3,150 health impact events including 13 deaths (7 from the “placebo” which in vacccine trials is all the adjuvants in the vaccine, and 6 from the vaccine). That is about 1 in 36!?! And the basis of the “efficacy” of the vaccine is not based on people who have been diagnosed as having symptoms associated with covid-19. It is the PCR test!?! I cannot speak to the vaccines from Russia, which is based on adenoviruses, an older technology and from China which I don’t have any information.
Finally as to what you are terming the second wave. I would point you towards a very informative book by Dr. Edgar Hope-Simpson, The Transmission of Epidemic Influenza who in researching all recorded data on influenza and other epidemics across the globe, highlighted the seasonality of influenza epidemics. As well the trajectory of all influenza epidemics follows a bell curve as per William Farr a 19th century epidemiologist. There are no second waves. As Dr. Michael Yeadon, Allergy & Respiratory Therapeutic Area expert with 23 years in the pharmaceutical industry and former chief scientific advisor to Pfizer noted in his latest paper, “How Likely is a Second Wave?”,
“There are at least four well characterized family members (229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1) which are endemic and cause some of the common colds we experience, especially in winter. They all have striking sequence similarity to the new coronavirus.”.
Because of this, “It is now established that at least 30% of our population already had immunological recognition of this new virus, before it even arrived…COVID-19 is new, but coronaviruses are not.”
And this is linked to “…epidemiological studies show that, with the extent of prior immunity that we can now reasonably assume to be the case, only 15-25% of the population being infected is sufficient to bring the spread of the virus to a halt…”. Which if you check herd immunity studies across data around the world is consistent with the data.
So if you understand how the immune system works and the principles or theories based on more than 100 years of data on epidemics and pandemics, the idea of a second wave is just silly. If that was the case, how many waves have we had now of 229E, NL63, OC43 and HKU1 which appear every winter and which scientists have already detected back in February when they did PCR tests back in February of last year?