False Flag gas attacks and phony causes for wars. US has perfected these tools.
Tulsi sees the regional war the Israelis and CENTCOM are plotting. Not just the limited war focused on Iran, but the regional war to destroy Hezbollah which would destroy Lebanon.
She calls out Bibi and Saudi Arabia.
And the war would so marginalize and endanger Russian bases that they would have to leave Syria.
Destroying nations is a board game in Washington.
Tucker and Tulsi are shedding bright light on the maniacs who are desperate for more war and chaos.
That was a SKY report,what a disgrace those bastards are at SKY,first they enter Syria and meet up with Al Qaeda,then they complain when attacked,that News whore Crawford is a terrorist Groupie,i remember her riding into Tripoli Libya with Al Qaeda just before they murdered people in Tripoli Hospital,they are the scum of the Earth.
Yes the shameless of the British media is breathtaking: first they illegally enter a sovereign country, then they provider propaganda and moral support and encouragement to vicious Islamist terrorists there then they call foul when the civil and military authorities try to hold their “entitled” criminal asses accountable.
Ahh… the sense of entitlement these spoiled idiots of the Anglosphere have knows no bounds. Its actually banal to the point of amusing
Fully second your comment Mulga. The lies and propaganda and straight out censorship, all in the craven service of the Anglo Zionist Empire and the economic status quo, and the rabid smearing of anyone who sticks their heads above the parapet. Filth.
Yes Colvin was another one,these people are made out to be heroic,anyone who works for SKY is a Media prostitute,they keep on collecting their inflated pay to tell lies,how do they sleep at night.
And now Colvin’s family have been granted three hundred million in blood money, by a ‘judge’ in New York, against Syria, for her death. So you have a jihadist propagandist, doing the brainwashing work for the head-loppers, getting her just desserts inside the country that her lies and propaganda are helping to destroy, and whose people she is helping to slaughter and terrorise, and the traumatised and devastated people of Syria must pay blood money for her eradication. As the West moves, with that pitiless viciousness so well known from 500 years of history, to prevent aid going to Syria for reconstruction. I can hardly think of a more repulsive example of Western arrogance, racist hatred and blood-sucking.
How can the US promulgate a ‘regime’ change in Iran when it is undergoing the exact same ‘regime’ change at this moment in Washington DC? IMHO President Trump will be impeached shortly and under somewhat suspect charges, ‘suspect charges’ being the understatement of the year if not the decade.
So here we have the same out of control, to put it mildly, three letter agencies scattered around DC who have somewhat honed their methods of ‘regime change’ throughout ME and east Europe and utterly failed in each one if one does not count the horrendous casualties to the civilians, read counted in the millions, who are now turning on yet another country in ME while at the same time turning on their ‘masters’, IOW the President and his administration? Be careful when unleashing the dogs of war, they can just as well turn on their masters, read the three letter agencies, as their assigned target.
War with Iran will be a very difficult task for the US Armed Forces. Iran is not a fragmented and unarmed third world country, Iran has been around for more than two millennia. Sure, Uncle Sugar can bomb the living daylights out of them, but in this instance Iran will fight back very hard. Look for the ‘splatter affect’ on this one, in other words Iran has the ability, and the will, to strike back hard not only at US and allies armed forces, but the bases they are camped in all along the west coast of the gulf and deep in to Irak, Syria, Jordan and Israel. The splatter affect will also put paid to Saudi and other’s oil production and exports, in other words the Gulf will be closed and not a thing US/nato can do about it. And there, my friends, goes the global economy.
This war, and it is coming, will be very expensive in body bags coming back to Dover, ships and aircraft littering the sea bed and land all around the Gulf and up to the Med and Caspian, let alone another unfathomable drain on the US, and EU, treasuries.
Toss in the fact that this one will be very close to Russian assets and borders and one can understand the clear danger of this war growing in to an all out conflict. And how will that end? Is US willing to see damage to coastal cities and military bases? Is EU willing to see yet another war on it’s very land? Hope they are, because that’s what is coming if clowns like Bolton and Pompeo are given free range.
@Auslander: “Is US willing to see damage to [its own] coastal cities and military bases? Is EU willing to see yet another war on it’s very land?”
It makes no difference whether the sheeple in “The U$A” and “The EU” are willing or not. They will follow the Judas-goat to their slaughter. As Goering said, “It’s easy”.
Our only hope is, that our Leaders in “The West” will not be like Goering and Hitler, nor like Bush and NatanYahoo, nor like the Clintons and Goldman Sachs, nor like Obama and NatanYahoo, nor like Trump and Adelson (the Yahoo’s friend, who owns Trump).
By the way, has anybody mentioned nuclear war? Mini bombs? Tactical nuclear? Dirty bombs? Gamma radiation? Alpha radiation via so-called “depleted” Uranium aerosols as in Belgrade and Fallujah? We the sheeple are being softened up for widespread use of that 20th century innovation in mass slaughter — whether ‘The U$” or “The EU” are “willing” to see it or not.
“US researchers postulate Israeli tactical nuclear strike on Iran. Our sources note that in July 2009, the two researchers (in a 114-page report) maintained that the Israeli Air Force possessed the aircraft and [tactical nuclear]resources for striking Iran’s [allegedly warlike] nuclear facilities. …Cordesman and Toqan were of the opinion that it was not necessary to hit scores of targets [with tactical nuclear bombs] …: Seven to nine sites would suffice. …In their latest work, the two researchers find that “”Ballistic missiles or submarine-launched cruise missiles … could serve for Israeli tactical nuclear strikes without interference from Iranian air defenses.”
Lest you forget that everything made recently is obsolete in 4 years, so should your non interference be interrupted by the latest technology, not only would the rockets be shot down, the offensive country would be rather embarrassed to explain the motivation for this action since the two sides already do not talk or agree about so many things for so many years, so why take offensive action now?
Israel is not going to use nukes against Iran – tactical or otherwise – and neither is the US. The international community would throw a fit and Israel would end up even more of a pariah than it is now – and most likely would be forced to disarm its nukes, whether it likes it or not.
That report also comes from Debka which is an Israeli front organization and mostly full of crap propaganda from Israel.
Richard Steven Hack
I am not so sure about that. At the moment Washington is provoking Iran. It has brought two carrier groups to the Gulf. It is not clear if Washington is bluffing, or if it intends to use a limited, aerial assault against Iran, using cruise missiles and possibly aircraft. If it does, Iran would retaliate and Israel would have an excuse to use nukes. As the old saying goes, never say never.
The talking up of a war with Iran distracts from the real target – Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel can’t afford a war with Iran as long as Hezbollah could possibly get involved. There are 2 reasons those carrier groups are in the Gulf – one is to propagandize the public about Iran in order to justify a joint US-Israel attack on Lebanon, and the other is to provide some immediate response capability should Iran support Hezbollah directly in such an attack (which is unlikely as Iran knows it would justify a full-scale US attack on Iran.)
The B-52s Trump sent to the Middle East are critical tactical weapons against Hezbollah. And the numbers of troops Trump and the Pentagon have been talking about are just about what the US would need to directly support Israel in an invasion of Southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley.
Also, all the talk about “Iranian proxies” is intended to justify an attack on the biggest “proxy” – Hezbollah.
The US does not intend to attack Iran at this time. The goal is a “summer war” with Hezbollah either this summer or next summer.
I agree with Richard. Hezbollah is a thorn in the Zionist’s side. It makes sense for them to go after Hezbollah first. Is the US escalation in the Gulf a warning to the Iranian leadership not to interfere when the war on Hezbollah starts? What will Iran do if Hezbollah ends up needing help?
Hezbollah is not the target. The Shia of southern Lebanon, which ‘belongs to the Jews’ if you remember your Talmudic and Zionazi theology, are the target. The more dead as the ‘Dahiya Doctrine’ (straight from the Book of Joshua) is inflicted, the better.
Israel does what it likes, and the Sabbat Goy stooges of the USA, UK and EU will approve, no matter what. What is more the hatred of the world’s human beings is not a hindrance to the Zionazi elite (I most definitely DO NOT include all Jews in this category, nor as complicit fellow travelers)but an incentive. They live in true Talmudist fashion, by and through the hatred of others not of their ilk. They are like little fishies consisting of pure malice, who swim in a sea of hatred. The only way to humanely sens them back to the Pit from which they emerged, is to drain that sea.
Ah, but today we heard the sound of the other shoe dropping.
In Capitalism, especially the current extreme crony capitalism as seen in the USA, its always all about the money. At first I thought this latest round of hate towards Iran was the standard, early in the year, Pentagon campaign drive to grab more of the taxpayer’s money. The usual, “oh, we can’t cut the defense budgets. Not when we have Iran making such threats.” sort of stuff.
But today, it was announced that Trump is now authorizing another $8billion in arms sales to the head-choppers in the KSA and UAE. This will soon be flowing on the way further to Yemen where it will be used to kill more people including more kids and more civilians. At this time, its highly unlikely that such a bill would have been approved by the Senate, which has started to act upity about approving massive weapons deals for the head-choppers. Trump just had to veto a bill to cut off sales. He can do that because the pro death to children and civilians caucus in the Senate has enough votes to prevent the overturning of his veto. But Trump could never have gotten democracy to approve new sales.
Thus, the fake crisis with Iraq, with the usual useful idiots waving the usual blank pieces of paper which of course contain the most damning evidence which no one can see because it is so top secret. And, after a few days of the Big Scare, suddenly Trump slides in that he’s approving $8billion in weapons sales. This of course is a boon as the Merchants of Death will make yet another killing off of the work of their best sales rep in the White House. A chunk of the profits will then be returned to modern CREEP, Campaign to Re-Elect the President, and likely no one will even no about it in this modern era of dark money in politics and no transparency.
When dealing with Capitalists, always follow the money. Always be asking who’s making a killing from this deal. In most con games, this isn’t obvious at the beginning. But if you keep your eyes peeled you might be able to spot which billionaire made a few more bucks by selling the tools to kill more children and civilians.
I rather enjoy watching a little of Fox, then a tad of MSNBC, particularly Madcow. Both sides are barking mad, but both are correct. The other side are psychopathic slime-balls. It is the best entertainment going-I can’t wait for the spin-offs.
Agreed that impeachment on spurious grounds is not viable. The Republican Senate would never allow.
However, Daniel Ellsberg makes a good point. He says that Trump’s attack on Julian Assange, none of whose reports put any one in danger, is a direct attack on the First Amendment Freedom of the Press, which is a clear violation of the Constitution, about as grave an offense as could be. And such an offense would be impeachable for sure.
If–and that is a tall order–if the American people could understand what his attack on Assange does, which is to put any journalist under threat. That would be something which they could agree on and is valid, not the pathetic Russophobic allegations.
Auslander
What is dangerous here is that the EU is the civilian component of NATO. Both were pushing towards the East, trying to get to Russian borders. On the other hand, individual EU countries are anything but pleased with anti-Russian sanctions, losing billions of euros in trade, as well as sanctions against Iran, again losing profits. Since EU countries are also NATO members, they can indeed be drawn into a military conflict with Iran, with tremendous consequences for the Middle East and possibly for the world. If such an event happened, then we can conclude that this would probably lead to the breakup of both NATO and the EU.
The Democrazies will impeach Trump, to provide cover for his real policies, which the Dems ignore because they so massively favour the rich and Israel, the Dems’ owners and controllers. It will founder in the Senate, but, meanwhile, Barr’s investigations into the plain conspiracy to derail Trump as candidate and President, will see a lot of characters, including, hopefully, our own Antpodean scum-bag, Alexander Downer, end up in the hoosegow. The thought of the two wings of the parasites’ servants Parties destroying each other is priceless. The best entertainment in town. I recommend a soupcon of Hannity, followed by a screech of Madcow-it is very encouraging and mirth-inducing. Exceptional? It is to laugh!
she’s awesome – like Pepe she’s allowed to attack Bibi – but not Israel per se – but those are the stakes in today’s politics…Rand Paul also knows the stakes – I’m sorry more people don’t like him and his dad – I don’t understand their economics – it would be nice if Tulsi would be president and Rand Paul would be vice president – but then we still don’t get rid of Israel at the helm – because both of these players have said not a thing against Israel or the genocide going on every day – in Palestine.
Conflict with Iran has all the potential to bring the US into direct contact with the growing Sino-Russian alliance. These powers have vital interests to defend in the region; instability in the country or regime change in Tehran is unacceptable to them: which they would see as a strategy of encirclement by Washington – an existential threat to them. The next step is Armageddon. https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/
Both Saudi Arabia and Israel host the holiest sites in Islam and there is a evident war against religion. Get Saudi Arabia destroyed, and have the vessel state isreal destroyed in hopes the holy sites are collateral damage. At the end of the day you cannot govern the way shrapnel moves through the air. Would not surprise me one bit if under these holy sites lay significant military installations or command rooms. Lasts places to be hit you would think.
I notice, with regret, that even the enlightened and thoroughly decent Tulsi Gabbard feels it necessary to frame her argument against war with Iran in terms of how difficult it would be for the USA to win.
As if that made the slightest difference to the moral unacceptibility of any such war.
No further proof is needed of the utter corruption and amorality of American society.
Tulsi Gabbard exemplifies the Controlled Opposition movement called the American (snicker) antiwar movement–not to mention the not-so-alternative media that pimps for her.
As demonstrated by Gabbard’s “criticism,” she firstly obscures the reality that America is *already* waging low-intensity war on Iran through economic siege warfare/sanctions; sponsorship of anti-Iranian terror groups like the MEK or Balochistan “moderate rebels”; cyberwar attacks like the USA-Israeli Stuxnet virus that attacked Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility in 2010; or colored coup d’etats like the USA-fomented Green Revolution in 2009.
Gabbard opposes an escalation of America’s ongoing low-intensity war against Iran to a conventional war because she fears that the USA would get its ass deservedly kicked–not because this escalation would be criminal, immoral, or against pesky things like international law.
Gabbard is much like that other “anti-interventionist” faker Donald Trump, who ran his mouth about not intervening in other nations, but now tries to stage regime change coups against Venezuela, Nicaragua, Iran, and other nations.
It’s is not Politically Correct to say this, but American regime leaders are criminals, sociopaths, and liars of the first order. All of them.
But they are only an organic outgrowth and reflection of America as a nation.
It perplexes me a lot when she says only 10% percent of the truth. But no candidate says even that.
We are all laptop warriors here and can say anything which we want behind lady’s back. Perhaps if she would have now not her 75000 donors but at least 5 millions, they can protect her better?
She would not need then, CNN, Fox and can create own media company or TV channel and get out from Dem party. After all, what here we ask her is to put dots under i-s for the “secrets all already know” and which inevitably unfold up when people follow her?
Excellent point Tom. A majority (in my firm opinion) of Merkins has always been totally indifferent to the suffering of others, and the Zionazification of US politics and media and the Talmudic Judaisation of much of the religious fundamentalist lunatics has just made that predisposition even worse.
For me, this looks incredible, but true.
Anglo-Zionists have organized a conference in Moscow !!!
Obviously, Russian authorities did not allow V. Nouland to attend this Aglo-Zionist party in the Russian capital, but I’m totally shocked at what this conference is even allowed!
All bloody Russian enemies (without Nouland), on one place – and in Mocow!
Incredible madness.
Orlov believes prospect for war is somewhat less than broadcast by the cons in DC: (the threat of closing the Gulf would drive insurance rates off the scale)
______________________________________
The way a lot of otherwise intelligent and well-informed commentators are sounding, a war between the US and Iran could break out at any point. Their evidence in favor of this view consists of some US aircraft carriers that are supposedly en route to the Persian Gulf, which Iran threatened to blockade if attacked. To do so, Iran wouldn’t actually have to do anything kinetic; it would suffice for it to threaten to attack some oil tankers for their insurance coverage to be voided, preventing them from loading cargo or setting sail. That would block deliveries of close to two-thirds of all the crude oil that’s shipped by sea and cause a truly staggering amount of economic damage—so staggering that the oil-fired economies of the oil-importing nations (and even some of the oil-exporting ones) may never recover.
First, let’s look at this bit of evidence. In my view, the sight of US aircraft carriers anywhere near a well-armed potential adversary such as Iran, or China, or Russia, is a crystal-clear indication that there isn’t going to be any sort of military escalation. The math here is simple. In order to be effective in action, a US aircraft carrier has to be within 500 km of the targets its aircraft are going to bomb. That’s the typical round-trip range of the aircraft without mid-air refueling. But if said aircraft carrier approaches any closer than 1000 km of said potential adversary, it can be sunk using an entire array of modern weapons against which it has no defenses. Obviously, under such circumstances, the command of the carrier will avoid doing anything at all provocative while doing all it can to telegraph its complete lack of hostile intent.
If you want to oppose American war–in *all* its forms like economic, political, media and not just military–then you have to understand what America’s tactics and strategy really are.
The somewhat hysterical claims that America may “go kinetic” and militarily attack Iran, though possibly sincere, miss the point.
America’s ongoing war on Iran is primarily a hybrid war based on economic strangulation, balkanization, and colored revolution coups.
Finally, Donald Trump is not nearly the buffoon he masquerades as.
Never underestimate the cunning or deviousness of the America Empire and its rulers–including Trump.
America didn’t become the greatest empire in human history by being dumb.
America got to that position of world supremacy through ruthless Machiavellianism and sociopathic deception that is likely pathological.
The second article above states this about Trump:
Trump has mastered the so-called “madman theory” of feigning craziness for calculated strategic purposes similar to what Nixon did during the Old Cold War but in a much more believable way given his reality TV and social media experience. While a war by miscalculation or one provoked by rogue “deep state” factions through false flags can never be fully discounted, it looks unlikely that such a scenario will transpire. Instead, Trump is resorting to bombastic threats in order to scare his country’s regional vassal states into buying more American arms, as well as manipulatively make other ones elsewhere in Eurasia believe that the US will staunchly support them against Russia and China too when the time is right.
Good to see Tulsi hugging with the Muslims. She is a little green still, but she sees the problem and is doing something about it which is what we need. How do we solve it in terms of government programs. 1) Audit the Pentagon. a) Long Term Strategies determined by whom (Who is deep state?) b) What is its link to Congress (Funding. We Stopped THE Vietnam War By Cutting The Funding.no caps please – its like screaming. Changed this time. Mod.) c) Why the stress on covert (hidden) activities – are they illegal? d) Is our current defense equipment capable of working in the battlefield of the future with the new technology. e) What technologies is DARPA withholding. f) How does DARPA chose who to give the technology to once it is perfected? g) What is the return to the people for developing that technology? How are we compensated for the development costs of the government h) Should the people own the internet? i) Why are our weapons so much more expensive than those of the Russians who are more advanced in missile technology, nuclear technology, and “electronic warfare?” j) Are our bases everywhere around the world a costly quagmire; why do we need bases around the world if we offer the world so much? k) Who is going to pay for the war? (Stopped Vietnam by de-funding)
@Alabama: “Alabama on May 24, 2019 · at 8:15 pm EST/EDT
They tried to audit the pentagon, it was an accounting nightmare of missing trillions and then they gave up trying.”
Can anyone give a date for when they gave up trying to audit the missing trillions? Would it by any chance be 911 2001 when the U$ Defense Secretary ordered the U$ Air Force to halt its defense of U$ air space for that day, and allow unmarked planes to set off the utter destruction (by Military Grade thermite) of offices in both the WTC and in the Pentagon itself? Offices which held the records and in which many people were trying to trace the missing Pentagon trillions.
It was way more recent than, i recall just about a year ago on the tv one night about the statement I made, I quickly found this article with the insertion.
“When Army financial experts mustered the courage to submit their books for review last year, the Inspector General discovered $2.8 trillion of accounting errors and numerous missing receipts and invoices that were needed to back up their figures.”
All those US presidents who have passed, this present one and those who want to become presidents of USA are like captains on merchant ships. long ago with the captain on board there was also a representative of the company. because, Captains, as much as they were cunning and good in naval skills, had not been able to do the job of the company they were working for. Today captains are high educated and they are also representatives of the company. they have the responsibility for the ship, ship’s crew and commercial activities and of course represent the interests of the company and the company. the American president, whoever it is, is the captain of the USA ship whose crew is American people and the company (……………..name here) is a company whose one part is called the deep state. there have been cases when we saw company representatives looking at presidents in the public that they did not break the powers given to them. Tulsi can talk what she wants, to build itself as a moral and honest public figure, but if she becomes the “captain” of the USA ship, she will be responsible first to the “company” and then to the “crew” – the American people.
USA is an “organism” that has its own nature. And it is ridiculous to look at politicians, especially Russians, who appeal to American politicians to reason. Americans are normal to themselves and it’s okay to do what they do, just as a poisonous snake is normal to itself. reason has nothing to do with it. the rest of us must be aware of this.
Isn’t it interesting that its almost always the middle range military or political elite that are most against war. Tulsi,who has no chance of winning the Democrat nomination is an example. But even more so are retired military Colonels Laurence Wilkerson and Douglas MacGregor. It seems once you reach the “General” level its too late. They have already sold out and are pro-war.
Uncle Bob: “Isn’t it interesting that its almost always the middle range military or political elite that are most against war.”
Or those retiring and especially those retired. These ex-this ex-that people. This is perfect (but sad) example how opportunist middle man and woman really is.
I like to look at strengths and weaknesses whereas Bolton and Yahu only look at what strengths can be used for the greater glory of Israel.
I hate to say this, but even though our (US) military can drop sufficient megatons of conventional bombs to flatten the cities in Iran, the result would that Iran is damaged but not defeated.
On the other hand, looking only at the damage Iran could effect on US, I think only a limited number of incidents of sabotage would occur before martial law was declared. The unfortunate aspect of all this is that with well chosen targets and correct timing, our electric power transmission grid could be disabled for a period of weeks or even a couple of months.
I do not think our modern society with its just in time delivery and the “milk comes from store – not a cow” mentality would hold up very well.
I am certain the USofA after would not be very much like the USofA before.
For this reason we (American citizens) need to stop this war and muzzle Bolton and Yahu.
As I have said before, Hegemon is desperate, but their desperation need not be our (flyover people) problem.
Russia needs to supply the houthi with the weapon to knock out the Saudi 14mbpd salt water injection plant at Qurayyah (it results in 8.6mpbd oil recovery from ghawar/khurais, 85% of Wahhabi crude production), oil prices rise to 150 and Russia makes a clean profit of $400 BILLION EXTRA EVERY YEAR (14mbpd Russian oil/gas exports x 80 price increase x365) !! But Putin will not play dirty with the great satan, but a 20m famine in Yemen would be averted. And all US plans in the region would cease.
The power brokers with lots of black gold must die. The human filth, scum of the earth must destroy the oil power brokers. Not rocket science defining the situation. Definately not difficult to discern who, what, when, where, why and how the time is in world earth. Thanks Saker for your portal into the cosmic reality enema. Should Homosapiens survive these most interesting times, maybe a miracle.
I’ve thought Tulsi Gabbard to be the most qualified, moral and ethically responsible possible candidate for the Presidency in 2020, for some time now. In the attached video clip, she ‘Went out on a limb,’ doing something that VERY FEW politicians in the U. S. dare to do. She associated the benefactors or an Iran-American War with Saudi Arabia AND Israel. I commend her for her courage and candor for doing that! Jewish interests within the U. S. and abroad, will exert significant, and possibly overwhelming political leverage in the months ahead, to ensure that she does not become President. The entrance of J. Biden–an Israel ”Coddler,’ as a Democratic candidate in 2020, may possibly have been due to Jewish, Zionist and Israeli manipulation, for the aforementioned reason.
Tulsi and Tucker-what a show! Two of the very few sane voices inside the beltway.
It’s too bad she’ll be marginalized in some way, shape, or form, just as Carlson is being squeezed economically by the Zios. I can only take solace from the fact that, much as I like her foreign policy, her domestic ideology is anathema to me.
False Flag gas attacks and phony causes for wars. US has perfected these tools.
Tulsi sees the regional war the Israelis and CENTCOM are plotting. Not just the limited war focused on Iran, but the regional war to destroy Hezbollah which would destroy Lebanon.
She calls out Bibi and Saudi Arabia.
And the war would so marginalize and endanger Russian bases that they would have to leave Syria.
Destroying nations is a board game in Washington.
Tucker and Tulsi are shedding bright light on the maniacs who are desperate for more war and chaos.
I see a UK TV crew were ‘deliberately’ attacked by Syrian Army forces. Good.
That was a SKY report,what a disgrace those bastards are at SKY,first they enter Syria and meet up with Al Qaeda,then they complain when attacked,that News whore Crawford is a terrorist Groupie,i remember her riding into Tripoli Libya with Al Qaeda just before they murdered people in Tripoli Hospital,they are the scum of the Earth.
Yes the shameless of the British media is breathtaking: first they illegally enter a sovereign country, then they provider propaganda and moral support and encouragement to vicious Islamist terrorists there then they call foul when the civil and military authorities try to hold their “entitled” criminal asses accountable.
Ahh… the sense of entitlement these spoiled idiots of the Anglosphere have knows no bounds. Its actually banal to the point of amusing
The Western fakestream presstitute liars are the very nadir of human villainy.
Fully second your comment Mulga. The lies and propaganda and straight out censorship, all in the craven service of the Anglo Zionist Empire and the economic status quo, and the rabid smearing of anyone who sticks their heads above the parapet. Filth.
Let’s hope she gets the same treatment as that one-eyed (expletive deleted)Colvin.
Yes Colvin was another one,these people are made out to be heroic,anyone who works for SKY is a Media prostitute,they keep on collecting their inflated pay to tell lies,how do they sleep at night.
And now Colvin’s family have been granted three hundred million in blood money, by a ‘judge’ in New York, against Syria, for her death. So you have a jihadist propagandist, doing the brainwashing work for the head-loppers, getting her just desserts inside the country that her lies and propaganda are helping to destroy, and whose people she is helping to slaughter and terrorise, and the traumatised and devastated people of Syria must pay blood money for her eradication. As the West moves, with that pitiless viciousness so well known from 500 years of history, to prevent aid going to Syria for reconstruction. I can hardly think of a more repulsive example of Western arrogance, racist hatred and blood-sucking.
How can the US promulgate a ‘regime’ change in Iran when it is undergoing the exact same ‘regime’ change at this moment in Washington DC? IMHO President Trump will be impeached shortly and under somewhat suspect charges, ‘suspect charges’ being the understatement of the year if not the decade.
So here we have the same out of control, to put it mildly, three letter agencies scattered around DC who have somewhat honed their methods of ‘regime change’ throughout ME and east Europe and utterly failed in each one if one does not count the horrendous casualties to the civilians, read counted in the millions, who are now turning on yet another country in ME while at the same time turning on their ‘masters’, IOW the President and his administration? Be careful when unleashing the dogs of war, they can just as well turn on their masters, read the three letter agencies, as their assigned target.
War with Iran will be a very difficult task for the US Armed Forces. Iran is not a fragmented and unarmed third world country, Iran has been around for more than two millennia. Sure, Uncle Sugar can bomb the living daylights out of them, but in this instance Iran will fight back very hard. Look for the ‘splatter affect’ on this one, in other words Iran has the ability, and the will, to strike back hard not only at US and allies armed forces, but the bases they are camped in all along the west coast of the gulf and deep in to Irak, Syria, Jordan and Israel. The splatter affect will also put paid to Saudi and other’s oil production and exports, in other words the Gulf will be closed and not a thing US/nato can do about it. And there, my friends, goes the global economy.
This war, and it is coming, will be very expensive in body bags coming back to Dover, ships and aircraft littering the sea bed and land all around the Gulf and up to the Med and Caspian, let alone another unfathomable drain on the US, and EU, treasuries.
Toss in the fact that this one will be very close to Russian assets and borders and one can understand the clear danger of this war growing in to an all out conflict. And how will that end? Is US willing to see damage to coastal cities and military bases? Is EU willing to see yet another war on it’s very land? Hope they are, because that’s what is coming if clowns like Bolton and Pompeo are given free range.
Auslander
Author
http://rhauslander.com
@Auslander: “Is US willing to see damage to [its own] coastal cities and military bases? Is EU willing to see yet another war on it’s very land?”
It makes no difference whether the sheeple in “The U$A” and “The EU” are willing or not. They will follow the Judas-goat to their slaughter. As Goering said, “It’s easy”.
Our only hope is, that our Leaders in “The West” will not be like Goering and Hitler, nor like Bush and NatanYahoo, nor like the Clintons and Goldman Sachs, nor like Obama and NatanYahoo, nor like Trump and Adelson (the Yahoo’s friend, who owns Trump).
By the way, has anybody mentioned nuclear war? Mini bombs? Tactical nuclear? Dirty bombs? Gamma radiation? Alpha radiation via so-called “depleted” Uranium aerosols as in Belgrade and Fallujah? We the sheeple are being softened up for widespread use of that 20th century innovation in mass slaughter — whether ‘The U$” or “The EU” are “willing” to see it or not.
https://www.debka.com/us-researchers-postulate-israeli-tactical-nuclear-strike-on-iran/
“US researchers postulate Israeli tactical nuclear strike on Iran. Our sources note that in July 2009, the two researchers (in a 114-page report) maintained that the Israeli Air Force possessed the aircraft and [tactical nuclear]resources for striking Iran’s [allegedly warlike] nuclear facilities. …Cordesman and Toqan were of the opinion that it was not necessary to hit scores of targets [with tactical nuclear bombs] …: Seven to nine sites would suffice. …In their latest work, the two researchers find that “”Ballistic missiles or submarine-launched cruise missiles … could serve for Israeli tactical nuclear strikes without interference from Iranian air defenses.”
Yahweh would definitely approve.
Lest you forget that everything made recently is obsolete in 4 years, so should your non interference be interrupted by the latest technology, not only would the rockets be shot down, the offensive country would be rather embarrassed to explain the motivation for this action since the two sides already do not talk or agree about so many things for so many years, so why take offensive action now?
Israel is not going to use nukes against Iran – tactical or otherwise – and neither is the US. The international community would throw a fit and Israel would end up even more of a pariah than it is now – and most likely would be forced to disarm its nukes, whether it likes it or not.
That report also comes from Debka which is an Israeli front organization and mostly full of crap propaganda from Israel.
Richard Steven Hack
I am not so sure about that. At the moment Washington is provoking Iran. It has brought two carrier groups to the Gulf. It is not clear if Washington is bluffing, or if it intends to use a limited, aerial assault against Iran, using cruise missiles and possibly aircraft. If it does, Iran would retaliate and Israel would have an excuse to use nukes. As the old saying goes, never say never.
The talking up of a war with Iran distracts from the real target – Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israel can’t afford a war with Iran as long as Hezbollah could possibly get involved. There are 2 reasons those carrier groups are in the Gulf – one is to propagandize the public about Iran in order to justify a joint US-Israel attack on Lebanon, and the other is to provide some immediate response capability should Iran support Hezbollah directly in such an attack (which is unlikely as Iran knows it would justify a full-scale US attack on Iran.)
The B-52s Trump sent to the Middle East are critical tactical weapons against Hezbollah. And the numbers of troops Trump and the Pentagon have been talking about are just about what the US would need to directly support Israel in an invasion of Southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley.
Also, all the talk about “Iranian proxies” is intended to justify an attack on the biggest “proxy” – Hezbollah.
The US does not intend to attack Iran at this time. The goal is a “summer war” with Hezbollah either this summer or next summer.
I agree with Richard. Hezbollah is a thorn in the Zionist’s side. It makes sense for them to go after Hezbollah first. Is the US escalation in the Gulf a warning to the Iranian leadership not to interfere when the war on Hezbollah starts? What will Iran do if Hezbollah ends up needing help?
Hezbollah is not the target. The Shia of southern Lebanon, which ‘belongs to the Jews’ if you remember your Talmudic and Zionazi theology, are the target. The more dead as the ‘Dahiya Doctrine’ (straight from the Book of Joshua) is inflicted, the better.
Israel does what it likes, and the Sabbat Goy stooges of the USA, UK and EU will approve, no matter what. What is more the hatred of the world’s human beings is not a hindrance to the Zionazi elite (I most definitely DO NOT include all Jews in this category, nor as complicit fellow travelers)but an incentive. They live in true Talmudist fashion, by and through the hatred of others not of their ilk. They are like little fishies consisting of pure malice, who swim in a sea of hatred. The only way to humanely sens them back to the Pit from which they emerged, is to drain that sea.
Ah, but today we heard the sound of the other shoe dropping.
In Capitalism, especially the current extreme crony capitalism as seen in the USA, its always all about the money. At first I thought this latest round of hate towards Iran was the standard, early in the year, Pentagon campaign drive to grab more of the taxpayer’s money. The usual, “oh, we can’t cut the defense budgets. Not when we have Iran making such threats.” sort of stuff.
But today, it was announced that Trump is now authorizing another $8billion in arms sales to the head-choppers in the KSA and UAE. This will soon be flowing on the way further to Yemen where it will be used to kill more people including more kids and more civilians. At this time, its highly unlikely that such a bill would have been approved by the Senate, which has started to act upity about approving massive weapons deals for the head-choppers. Trump just had to veto a bill to cut off sales. He can do that because the pro death to children and civilians caucus in the Senate has enough votes to prevent the overturning of his veto. But Trump could never have gotten democracy to approve new sales.
Thus, the fake crisis with Iraq, with the usual useful idiots waving the usual blank pieces of paper which of course contain the most damning evidence which no one can see because it is so top secret. And, after a few days of the Big Scare, suddenly Trump slides in that he’s approving $8billion in weapons sales. This of course is a boon as the Merchants of Death will make yet another killing off of the work of their best sales rep in the White House. A chunk of the profits will then be returned to modern CREEP, Campaign to Re-Elect the President, and likely no one will even no about it in this modern era of dark money in politics and no transparency.
When dealing with Capitalists, always follow the money. Always be asking who’s making a killing from this deal. In most con games, this isn’t obvious at the beginning. But if you keep your eyes peeled you might be able to spot which billionaire made a few more bucks by selling the tools to kill more children and civilians.
I rather enjoy watching a little of Fox, then a tad of MSNBC, particularly Madcow. Both sides are barking mad, but both are correct. The other side are psychopathic slime-balls. It is the best entertainment going-I can’t wait for the spin-offs.
Agreed that impeachment on spurious grounds is not viable. The Republican Senate would never allow.
However, Daniel Ellsberg makes a good point. He says that Trump’s attack on Julian Assange, none of whose reports put any one in danger, is a direct attack on the First Amendment Freedom of the Press, which is a clear violation of the Constitution, about as grave an offense as could be. And such an offense would be impeachable for sure.
If–and that is a tall order–if the American people could understand what his attack on Assange does, which is to put any journalist under threat. That would be something which they could agree on and is valid, not the pathetic Russophobic allegations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPdIO_nvzhY
Auslander
What is dangerous here is that the EU is the civilian component of NATO. Both were pushing towards the East, trying to get to Russian borders. On the other hand, individual EU countries are anything but pleased with anti-Russian sanctions, losing billions of euros in trade, as well as sanctions against Iran, again losing profits. Since EU countries are also NATO members, they can indeed be drawn into a military conflict with Iran, with tremendous consequences for the Middle East and possibly for the world. If such an event happened, then we can conclude that this would probably lead to the breakup of both NATO and the EU.
The Democrazies will impeach Trump, to provide cover for his real policies, which the Dems ignore because they so massively favour the rich and Israel, the Dems’ owners and controllers. It will founder in the Senate, but, meanwhile, Barr’s investigations into the plain conspiracy to derail Trump as candidate and President, will see a lot of characters, including, hopefully, our own Antpodean scum-bag, Alexander Downer, end up in the hoosegow. The thought of the two wings of the parasites’ servants Parties destroying each other is priceless. The best entertainment in town. I recommend a soupcon of Hannity, followed by a screech of Madcow-it is very encouraging and mirth-inducing. Exceptional? It is to laugh!
she’s awesome – like Pepe she’s allowed to attack Bibi – but not Israel per se – but those are the stakes in today’s politics…Rand Paul also knows the stakes – I’m sorry more people don’t like him and his dad – I don’t understand their economics – it would be nice if Tulsi would be president and Rand Paul would be vice president – but then we still don’t get rid of Israel at the helm – because both of these players have said not a thing against Israel or the genocide going on every day – in Palestine.
Conflict with Iran has all the potential to bring the US into direct contact with the growing Sino-Russian alliance. These powers have vital interests to defend in the region; instability in the country or regime change in Tehran is unacceptable to them: which they would see as a strategy of encirclement by Washington – an existential threat to them. The next step is Armageddon.
https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/
Both Saudi Arabia and Israel host the holiest sites in Islam and there is a evident war against religion. Get Saudi Arabia destroyed, and have the vessel state isreal destroyed in hopes the holy sites are collateral damage. At the end of the day you cannot govern the way shrapnel moves through the air. Would not surprise me one bit if under these holy sites lay significant military installations or command rooms. Lasts places to be hit you would think.
I notice, with regret, that even the enlightened and thoroughly decent Tulsi Gabbard feels it necessary to frame her argument against war with Iran in terms of how difficult it would be for the USA to win.
As if that made the slightest difference to the moral unacceptibility of any such war.
No further proof is needed of the utter corruption and amorality of American society.
Tulsi Gabbard exemplifies the Controlled Opposition movement called the American (snicker) antiwar movement–not to mention the not-so-alternative media that pimps for her.
As demonstrated by Gabbard’s “criticism,” she firstly obscures the reality that America is *already* waging low-intensity war on Iran through economic siege warfare/sanctions; sponsorship of anti-Iranian terror groups like the MEK or Balochistan “moderate rebels”; cyberwar attacks like the USA-Israeli Stuxnet virus that attacked Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility in 2010; or colored coup d’etats like the USA-fomented Green Revolution in 2009.
Color revolution fails in Iran
https://www.voltairenet.org/article160764.html
Gabbard opposes an escalation of America’s ongoing low-intensity war against Iran to a conventional war because she fears that the USA would get its ass deservedly kicked–not because this escalation would be criminal, immoral, or against pesky things like international law.
Gabbard is much like that other “anti-interventionist” faker Donald Trump, who ran his mouth about not intervening in other nations, but now tries to stage regime change coups against Venezuela, Nicaragua, Iran, and other nations.
It’s is not Politically Correct to say this, but American regime leaders are criminals, sociopaths, and liars of the first order. All of them.
But they are only an organic outgrowth and reflection of America as a nation.
I value comments like that highly. Skeptical outlook on reality has become increasingly rare, many people exert various forms of prejudice.
It perplexes me a lot when she says only 10% percent of the truth. But no candidate says even that.
We are all laptop warriors here and can say anything which we want behind lady’s back. Perhaps if she would have now not her 75000 donors but at least 5 millions, they can protect her better?
She would not need then, CNN, Fox and can create own media company or TV channel and get out from Dem party. After all, what here we ask her is to put dots under i-s for the “secrets all already know” and which inevitably unfold up when people follow her?
Excellent point Tom. A majority (in my firm opinion) of Merkins has always been totally indifferent to the suffering of others, and the Zionazification of US politics and media and the Talmudic Judaisation of much of the religious fundamentalist lunatics has just made that predisposition even worse.
For me, this looks incredible, but true.
Anglo-Zionists have organized a conference in Moscow !!!
Obviously, Russian authorities did not allow V. Nouland to attend this Aglo-Zionist party in the Russian capital, but I’m totally shocked at what this conference is even allowed!
All bloody Russian enemies (without Nouland), on one place – and in Mocow!
Incredible madness.
The easier to identify the local traitors and agents of the Empire. A clever move.
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2019/05/a-hegemon-checkmated.html
Orlov believes prospect for war is somewhat less than broadcast by the cons in DC: (the threat of closing the Gulf would drive insurance rates off the scale)
______________________________________
The way a lot of otherwise intelligent and well-informed commentators are sounding, a war between the US and Iran could break out at any point. Their evidence in favor of this view consists of some US aircraft carriers that are supposedly en route to the Persian Gulf, which Iran threatened to blockade if attacked. To do so, Iran wouldn’t actually have to do anything kinetic; it would suffice for it to threaten to attack some oil tankers for their insurance coverage to be voided, preventing them from loading cargo or setting sail. That would block deliveries of close to two-thirds of all the crude oil that’s shipped by sea and cause a truly staggering amount of economic damage—so staggering that the oil-fired economies of the oil-importing nations (and even some of the oil-exporting ones) may never recover.
First, let’s look at this bit of evidence. In my view, the sight of US aircraft carriers anywhere near a well-armed potential adversary such as Iran, or China, or Russia, is a crystal-clear indication that there isn’t going to be any sort of military escalation. The math here is simple. In order to be effective in action, a US aircraft carrier has to be within 500 km of the targets its aircraft are going to bomb. That’s the typical round-trip range of the aircraft without mid-air refueling. But if said aircraft carrier approaches any closer than 1000 km of said potential adversary, it can be sunk using an entire array of modern weapons against which it has no defenses. Obviously, under such circumstances, the command of the carrier will avoid doing anything at all provocative while doing all it can to telegraph its complete lack of hostile intent.
If you want to oppose American war–in *all* its forms like economic, political, media and not just military–then you have to understand what America’s tactics and strategy really are.
The somewhat hysterical claims that America may “go kinetic” and militarily attack Iran, though possibly sincere, miss the point.
America’s ongoing war on Iran is primarily a hybrid war based on economic strangulation, balkanization, and colored revolution coups.
No, There Won’t Be A War With Iran, But Rather A Slow-Motion Strangling
https://orientalreview.org/2019/05/16/no-there-wont-be-a-war-with-iran-but-rather-a-slow-motion-strangling/
Granted, Israel or the USA may go rogue and launch a false flag to initiate a military war.
However, hybrid war is America’s preferred option at this point.
That should be the focus of any real peace movement: opposition to American Hybrid War (like economic sanctions).
Here is a strategy to defeat America’s hybrid war on Iran. Build what is called a geopolitical Golden Ring in Eurasia:
Korybko To Iranian Media: “Now’s The Time To Build The Golden Ring!
https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/05/23/korybko-to-iranian-media-nows-the-time-to-build-the-golden-ring/
Finally, Donald Trump is not nearly the buffoon he masquerades as.
Never underestimate the cunning or deviousness of the America Empire and its rulers–including Trump.
America didn’t become the greatest empire in human history by being dumb.
America got to that position of world supremacy through ruthless Machiavellianism and sociopathic deception that is likely pathological.
The second article above states this about Trump:
Trump has mastered the so-called “madman theory” of feigning craziness for calculated strategic purposes similar to what Nixon did during the Old Cold War but in a much more believable way given his reality TV and social media experience. While a war by miscalculation or one provoked by rogue “deep state” factions through false flags can never be fully discounted, it looks unlikely that such a scenario will transpire. Instead, Trump is resorting to bombastic threats in order to scare his country’s regional vassal states into buying more American arms, as well as manipulatively make other ones elsewhere in Eurasia believe that the US will staunchly support them against Russia and China too when the time is right.
Good to see Tulsi hugging with the Muslims. She is a little green still, but she sees the problem and is doing something about it which is what we need. How do we solve it in terms of government programs. 1) Audit the Pentagon. a) Long Term Strategies determined by whom (Who is deep state?) b) What is its link to Congress (Funding. We Stopped THE Vietnam War By Cutting The Funding.no caps please – its like screaming. Changed this time. Mod.) c) Why the stress on covert (hidden) activities – are they illegal? d) Is our current defense equipment capable of working in the battlefield of the future with the new technology. e) What technologies is DARPA withholding. f) How does DARPA chose who to give the technology to once it is perfected? g) What is the return to the people for developing that technology? How are we compensated for the development costs of the government h) Should the people own the internet? i) Why are our weapons so much more expensive than those of the Russians who are more advanced in missile technology, nuclear technology, and “electronic warfare?” j) Are our bases everywhere around the world a costly quagmire; why do we need bases around the world if we offer the world so much? k) Who is going to pay for the war? (Stopped Vietnam by de-funding)
They tried to audit the pentagon, it was an accounting nightmare of missing trillions and then they gave up trying.
And to the rest, we have to put a gun to their heads to make it work for us, its that simple.
@Alabama: “Alabama on May 24, 2019 · at 8:15 pm EST/EDT
They tried to audit the pentagon, it was an accounting nightmare of missing trillions and then they gave up trying.”
Can anyone give a date for when they gave up trying to audit the missing trillions? Would it by any chance be 911 2001 when the U$ Defense Secretary ordered the U$ Air Force to halt its defense of U$ air space for that day, and allow unmarked planes to set off the utter destruction (by Military Grade thermite) of offices in both the WTC and in the Pentagon itself? Offices which held the records and in which many people were trying to trace the missing Pentagon trillions.
It was way more recent than, i recall just about a year ago on the tv one night about the statement I made, I quickly found this article with the insertion.
“When Army financial experts mustered the courage to submit their books for review last year, the Inspector General discovered $2.8 trillion of accounting errors and numerous missing receipts and invoices that were needed to back up their figures.”
Here is the full article
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2017/05/18/Yet-Another-Attempt-Audit-Pentagon-Good-Luck
and this about the start of the audit:
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/12/08/569394885/pentagon-announces-first-ever-audit-of-the-department-of-defense
All those US presidents who have passed, this present one and those who want to become presidents of USA are like captains on merchant ships. long ago with the captain on board there was also a representative of the company. because, Captains, as much as they were cunning and good in naval skills, had not been able to do the job of the company they were working for. Today captains are high educated and they are also representatives of the company. they have the responsibility for the ship, ship’s crew and commercial activities and of course represent the interests of the company and the company. the American president, whoever it is, is the captain of the USA ship whose crew is American people and the company (……………..name here) is a company whose one part is called the deep state. there have been cases when we saw company representatives looking at presidents in the public that they did not break the powers given to them. Tulsi can talk what she wants, to build itself as a moral and honest public figure, but if she becomes the “captain” of the USA ship, she will be responsible first to the “company” and then to the “crew” – the American people.
USA is an “organism” that has its own nature. And it is ridiculous to look at politicians, especially Russians, who appeal to American politicians to reason. Americans are normal to themselves and it’s okay to do what they do, just as a poisonous snake is normal to itself. reason has nothing to do with it. the rest of us must be aware of this.
Isn’t it interesting that its almost always the middle range military or political elite that are most against war. Tulsi,who has no chance of winning the Democrat nomination is an example. But even more so are retired military Colonels Laurence Wilkerson and Douglas MacGregor. It seems once you reach the “General” level its too late. They have already sold out and are pro-war.
Uncle Bob: “Isn’t it interesting that its almost always the middle range military or political elite that are most against war.”
Or those retiring and especially those retired. These ex-this ex-that people. This is perfect (but sad) example how opportunist middle man and woman really is.
I like to look at strengths and weaknesses whereas Bolton and Yahu only look at what strengths can be used for the greater glory of Israel.
I hate to say this, but even though our (US) military can drop sufficient megatons of conventional bombs to flatten the cities in Iran, the result would that Iran is damaged but not defeated.
On the other hand, looking only at the damage Iran could effect on US, I think only a limited number of incidents of sabotage would occur before martial law was declared. The unfortunate aspect of all this is that with well chosen targets and correct timing, our electric power transmission grid could be disabled for a period of weeks or even a couple of months.
I do not think our modern society with its just in time delivery and the “milk comes from store – not a cow” mentality would hold up very well.
I am certain the USofA after would not be very much like the USofA before.
For this reason we (American citizens) need to stop this war and muzzle Bolton and Yahu.
As I have said before, Hegemon is desperate, but their desperation need not be our (flyover people) problem.
Russia needs to supply the houthi with the weapon to knock out the Saudi 14mbpd salt water injection plant at Qurayyah (it results in 8.6mpbd oil recovery from ghawar/khurais, 85% of Wahhabi crude production), oil prices rise to 150 and Russia makes a clean profit of $400 BILLION EXTRA EVERY YEAR (14mbpd Russian oil/gas exports x 80 price increase x365) !! But Putin will not play dirty with the great satan, but a 20m famine in Yemen would be averted. And all US plans in the region would cease.
The power brokers with lots of black gold must die. The human filth, scum of the earth must destroy the oil power brokers. Not rocket science defining the situation. Definately not difficult to discern who, what, when, where, why and how the time is in world earth. Thanks Saker for your portal into the cosmic reality enema. Should Homosapiens survive these most interesting times, maybe a miracle.
I’ve thought Tulsi Gabbard to be the most qualified, moral and ethically responsible possible candidate for the Presidency in 2020, for some time now. In the attached video clip, she ‘Went out on a limb,’ doing something that VERY FEW politicians in the U. S. dare to do. She associated the benefactors or an Iran-American War with Saudi Arabia AND Israel. I commend her for her courage and candor for doing that! Jewish interests within the U. S. and abroad, will exert significant, and possibly overwhelming political leverage in the months ahead, to ensure that she does not become President. The entrance of J. Biden–an Israel ”Coddler,’ as a Democratic candidate in 2020, may possibly have been due to Jewish, Zionist and Israeli manipulation, for the aforementioned reason.
ALL US Presidential candidates MUST be pro-Israel. No exceptions.
Tulsi and Tucker-what a show! Two of the very few sane voices inside the beltway.
It’s too bad she’ll be marginalized in some way, shape, or form, just as Carlson is being squeezed economically by the Zios. I can only take solace from the fact that, much as I like her foreign policy, her domestic ideology is anathema to me.
A good assessment of Iran’s very serious mistakes which have left it so vulnerable to a Western attack 🇮🇷 🇺🇸
https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/in-america-s-crosshairs-what-makes-iran-a-much-softer-target-than-north-korea-part-one