Syrian War Report – Jan. 21, 2019: Kurdish Political Leadership Reveals 10 Demands To Damascus
If you’re able, and if you like our content and approach, please support the project. Our work wouldn’t be possible without your help: PayPal: southfront@list.ru or via: http://southfront.org/donate/ or via: https://www.patreon.com/southfront, BTC: 3Gbs4rjcVUtQd8p3CiFUCxPLZwRqurezRZ, BCH: qpf2cphc5dkuclkqur7lhj2yuqq9pk3hmukle77vhq, ETH: 0x9f4cda013e354b8fc285bf4b9a60460cee7f7ea9
On January 19, the so-called Democratic Federation of Northern Syria (DFNS), an entity established by US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces in attempt to legalize their control over a part of Syria, released a 10-points long list of demands to the Damascus government.
Besides formal claims about the need to keep the unity of Syrian land and grant some rights to the minorities, the list includes the demand to accept the DFNS’ Autonomous Administration as a legal part of the Syrian political system, to guarantee the representation of the DFNS in the Syrian Parliament, to use the Syrian Flag alongside with the flag of the DFNS, to allow the DFNS to employ own independent foreign policy, to allow the Kurdish-dominated SDF to keep control of the Syrian border, to allow the DFNS’ security force Asayish to remain the main security force within the SDF-held area and to distribute “the Syrian wealth to the Syrian regions in a fair manner.”
Summing up the claims, the DFNS in fact demanded the Damascus government to legally recognize and a semi-independent Kurdish state and its military force within Syria and to fund this state from the central budget.
If these demands were the official stance of the Kurdish leadership during the recent round of talks with Damascus over the situation in northern Syria, it becomes apparent why no notable progress has been achieved so far.
In the case of Afrin, such stance undermined all efforts of Damascus to find a political solution with Kurdish armed groups and allowed Turkey to kick off a military operation capturing the entire area from Kurdish forces. This scenario could be repeated once again in Manbij.
On January 18, the Afrin Liberation Forces (ALF) released a statement claiming that they had carried out a fresh attack on Turkey-led forces. According to the AFL statement, ALF fighters attacked a “base” near the village of Jinderes on January 17 injuring 5 Ahrar al-Sham members and 2 Turkish service members.
The AFL is a brand created by the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) to hide their involvement in attacks on Turkish-backed militant groups and the Turkish military in the region. Previous attacks took place on January 16 and 15 resulting in the deaths of 2 Turkish-backed militants and injures of 6 others.
On January 19, the US-led coalition stressed that its warplanes had eliminated 200 ISIS fighters and commanders in the period from January 7 to January 13. The coalition also confirmed that the SDF had captured al-Kashmah, Sirat Masoud, and al-Shafah from ISIS.
On January 18th and 19th, two bomb blasts targeted the Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham-controlled city of Idlib. The first explosion was a booby-trapped car killing 15 civilians and militants and injuring nine others. The second explosion injured eight people, including four women and children.
On January 19th, the Nedaa Syria news outlet reported that the Turkish-backed Ahrar al-Sham Movement will redeploy hundreds of its fighters in the opposition-held part of the northwestern Hama countryside under a new agreement with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham. Previously, Turkish-backed militants were defeated and forced to flee the area. It’s possible that a new agreement with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham is that success in the implementation of the de-escalation agreement, which was recently claimed by the Turkish Defense Minister.
Anything about an “independent” foreign policy must not be entertained by Damascus.
This would allow the Kurds to host countries/entities hostile to Syria, namely the US, Israel et al.
If Damascus accedes to this demand – which the Kurds are pushing for with the support of Israel – it would work to Syria’s detriment.
The Israelis refuse to let Palestinians even operate their own airports and insists that any final “peace” agreement must allow Israel to control all borders, yet they are pushing the Kurds to demand independence from Damascus in “foreign policy”.
Damascus must never allow this under any condition.
Selah
Kurds who front for israeloamerica, or who allow those that do, are like Jews who let zionazis/israel represent and speak for them.
“the US-led coalition stressed that its warplanes had eliminated 200 ISIS…”
the US-led coalition lied that its warplanes had eliminated 200 ISIS… fixed.
Summary of the recent zionazi-gay air aggression against Syria:
Israeli strikes struck 2 provinces and 10+ military sites: full report
https://mobile.almasdarnews.com/article/israeli-strikes-struck-2-provinces-and-10-military-sites-full-report/
Initial attack Sunday around midday, second between 1 and 2 am Monday. After the 1st attack, the israelis claimed “Iranians” in Syria fired a missile into israel, which was (cough) intercepted.
Likely the initial zionazi-gay attack was to trigger Syrian AD to attempt location of Syrian AD units. In the second attack, the zionazi-gays then targeted those units they were able to locate.
Unusually, this israeli attack was reported where I live by the local affiliate of the zionazi-gay colonial radio administration (american conservative talk radio, known usually as hate radio). Normally they don’t report massa israel’s aggression against Syria. How these israeli media agents reported this israeli aggression explains why the israelis invented that nonsense about intercepting an Iranian missile. The 1st Israeli attack went unmentioned, so pindos were falsely informed that israel was respondimg to Syrian/Iranian aggressionl.
Looks like they won the war.
Its better Assad comply or else….lol.
Those are not surrender terms. Those are the demands of a victor. The Zionazis clearly see Rojava as a done deal. Too bad the Kurds chose the Nionazis. That decision will curse their civilization forever.
The Kurds are in an impossible situation between Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, none of which want an independent Kurdistan backed by the US and Israel. Their list of ten demands shows they learned nothing from Afrin. They should cut the best deal they can get from Damascus before Turkey makes its move.
Looks like American style negotiation tactics. Ie
negotiations in bad faith.
One can almost speculate that perhaps the terms were drafted in Washington??