by GH Eliason
How well the candidate from either party satisfies 7 questions from a particular group of people will determine who the President of the United States will be after this election. The winner will be the one that proves they are the most willing to go to war with Russia and China after they are elected. Will you do your part and vote for them?
The only thing we need to agree on at this point is 1+1=2. It can’t vary. The simple logic doesn’t care how it makes you feel. If the information adds up without any leaps the conclusion presents itself in the simplest form, 1+1 always =2.
The determining factors in the US Presidential election won’t be decided in Kiev if that’s the direction you think I’m going in. Rather, along with the super-delegates, there is a secret super- majority that has existed for the last 40+ years in the USA and this is the most important election they will ever hijack and decide.
The problem with facts is once you know them, you can’t argue with them anymore.
This group has a 50-year history of deciding elections. Included in that history are the deaths of over 100,000 Americans and millions of people in other countries. For them, this is the most important election of all time. This time, they want to bring the war home.
With over 235 million eligible voters in the US, if you could count on more than 20 million of them to vote en bloc could you win? What if they were concentrated around swing cities in swing states across America? These are the cities with the highest number of electoral delegates. If any candidate could count on more than 15% of ballots cast before counting traditional party voters, could they lose?
In the 2012 election only 54% or 129 million voted out of 235 million eligible voters.
More than 20 million votes get’s more mileage with low voter turnout. When you take party affiliation into account it gets even more impressive. According to 2014 data, 39% identify as independents, 32% as Democrats and 23% as Republicans.
This makes it clear that 15% of the electorate beyond your party is not only enough to win a presidential election but supplies a mandate. But whose mandate in 2016?
An easier way to understand this is if your candidate is predicted to win/lose by +-3-5% points in a given state and I can deliver 7%, am I really important to you? Or if I can deliver 5-7 states this way, do you owe me anything?
What if “WE” can deliver 15-18 important states this way in your national election? How about 20 states? Would you go to war for me? Would you sanction my enemies or at the extreme give me diplomatic cover if I commit or support genocide in other countries?
The Primaries- Where 5-15% Can Turn into 80% of the Vote!
The presidential primaries are where it really gets impressive. Why? No one votes. This is why candidates start with radical positions that after the convention “start to drift toward the center.” After all, they need to talk to the rest of us.
When you take the above and apply it to the primaries the math goes on steroids. Only .8% to 5% of eligible voters are needed to win a state. It can translate into 40-80% of the votes cast. Don’t believe me?
Let’s take a look at Iowa. In Iowa, there were 2,403,229 eligible voters for the 2016 primaries. Only 15% of registered voters showed up at the polls. That translates to 357,283 voters. Or just enough to make up a small city.
That figure covers both Democrats and Republicans. For either party that was just a little over 7% of registered voters. Democrats fielded 171109 votes for their candidates. Hilary Clinton won with a margin of .29 percent. With even a small bloc vote the Iowa primary could be turned either way.
The Emigre Super Blocs
The CEEC (Central and East European Coalition) represents a combined group with 22 million bloc voters. As the CEE immigrants came into the US, they were guided to the cities where they were needed to build out the power blocs for their representative groups. Most groups were a government in exile and today are the hand behind their home country’s government. They lobby for the home country’s interests to the US government. They also bring in money from the home countries to influence or outright buy American politicians.
More importantly, as governments in exile, they determined the type of government that would rule their home country. They turned over the reins of power to the new ex-Soviet bloc countries like Ukraine in 1991. They “advise” the home country, especially on Russia policy.
Their PAC’s come together to work on problems like immigration quotas or visas, relations with the US, and business. When it suits their interests they come together and determine election outcomes and foreign policy.
These groups have changed the outcomes of presidential elections both separately and working together for the past 50 years.
What the Emigres Want In 2016
Right now the CEEC emigres are working together for the last goal all of them have which is war with Russia and China. Their caucuses are traditionally so strong in Congress, it’s impossible to get elected without CEEC support in major states. And Congress has been pushing their agenda toward war with Russia since the days of Joseph McCarthy. Their influence on eastern European and Russia policy is unchecked. The time has come.
The 7 Questions that will determine 15% of the vote and the outcome of the 2016 US elections
The following 7 questions are what the combined Eastern and Central European emigres are demanding for votes and electoral votes in 2016. Following that, the proofs of how much weight their gerrymandering has gained in American politics since the early 1950s is supplied. Each emigre population listed had fathers and grandfathers that were Waffen SS or supported them in some fashion. Their families emigrated to the United States only understanding Nationalist/Nazi political views. Their politics never changed. They raise their children to be more committed than they were.
They even advertise their pride in their own Waffen SS soldiers that when combined took part in the murder of more than 2 million people. When each of their respective countries was freed, these same governments in exile and ethnic groups delivered the same ultra-nationalist government models their grandparents had in WWII as Axis countries or pre-WWII as Prometheans Group members. And no one ever had to answer for this.
From the CEEC-“ As President, what would your strategy be to deal with Russian aggression in Ukraine and threats in Central and Eastern Europe? What options would you employ to achieve Russia?s withdrawal from lands it unlawfully controls, such as Crimea, eastern Ukraine, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria?
- What is your position on the current sanctions against Russia?
- How do you view NATO?s role in countering Russian aggression? What is your position on maintaining U.S. /NATO equipment and troops permanently in the CEE region? Please provide specifics.
- Do you favor NATO enlargement to include countries such as Georgia and Ukraine?
- What is your position on the Visa Waiver Program?s possible expansion to include other CEE countries, such as Poland?
- What is your position on U.S. assistance to ensure energy security in the CEE region?
- What is your position on the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)?”
Ultimately this is about one thing, starting war with Russia and China. For the last 50 years, the one demand all the emigre populations have is the destruction of Russia.
According to the Independent “Nato risks a nuclear war with Russia within a year if it does not increase its defence capabilities in the Baltic states, one of the alliance’s most senior retired generals has said.”
Disputin’ Putin
Russia has no interest in attacking any of these countries. This Harvard University article puts the nails in that coffin. Russia really isn’t interested and you don’t have to take my word for it. If no one in these countries is worried about a Russian invasion, why go to war with Russia or risk nuclear war just because a few whiny nationalists want it? According to the corresponding monograph from the US Army War College, “It was the unanimous view [of academics] that overt military action by Russia against the Baltic States…is unlikely in the extreme.” Sorry Gen. Breedlove, check and mate. Your own military researchers think your credibility is a little light these days.
If Russia isn’t a real threat why do all these countries hate Russia so much?
First and foremost is understanding where the CEE countries are coming from politically. Each country is a new country that came out of the Habsburg “Spring of Nations” and are Wilson Doctrine countries. All of these countries were bordering or close to bordering Imperial Russia, later the Soviet Union, and today the Russian Federation.
Nationalism and Fascism were set up as a prophylactic against Russian or Soviet influence inside each country and the corresponding Diasporas. If you ask why they hate Russia, you are more than likely going to get an unintelligible rant instead of a reason. They simply don’t know and don’t care to look at the history.
Polonia &The Polish American Congress
“Polish-Americans in the United States comprise a voting bloc sought after by both the Democratic and Republican parties. Polish Americans comprise 3.2% of the United States population but were estimated at nearly 10% of the overall electorate as of 2012. The Polish-American population is concentrated in several swing states that make issues important to Polish-Americans more likely to be heard by presidential candidates. According to John Kromkowski, a Catholic University professor of political science, Polish-Americans make up an “almost archetypical swing vote.”
If you look at Presidential election results from 1916 to 2012 the Polish community was only distracted twice. Their choice of candidate won every other election. They are an archetypical swing vote. They have been described since the 1950’s as the one emigre group that could determine a national race on their own. Every candidate has paid real attention to this trying to gain their bloc vote. As early as 1960 this included JFK.
The Polish-American community is a tightly knit nationalist enclave and the only way for Kennedy to beat Nixon was to get the Polish vote and win it in the electoral count.
But what about today? The Irish named Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, is connecting with his Polish roots through the Polish-American Congress in an effort to be ready for a future presidential run. Senator Murphy has started the long neglected “Polish Caucus” to better gain support and contributions later on.
What do the Poles want? War with Russia. This is especially clear because Poland is pushing to make sure it happens. Bill Clinton won the Polish-American vote for helping Poland enter NATO in 1996. He recently gave his assessment of Polish nationalist politics.
Is Bill Clinton correct saying that the Hungarians, the Poles and by extension the Polish-American community that gave them their nationalism are looking for their own authoritarian leader and reject democracy? Yes, he is.
What was the Polish American Congress reaction to Bill Clinton‘s statement? “The Polish American Congress threatens to undermine Clinton campaign.It’s therefore, no surprise the Polish American Congress has protested, announcing it may throw its weight in the election behind anybody not named Clinton.” “Polish Americans are thick on the ground in several states Hillary Clinton will need to win in November if she plans to be our next president—including Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, New York and New Jersey.”
Does this sound like a super bloc vote to you? The last time a candidate insulted the Polish-Americans, it was the gaff prone Gerald Ford. Ford, until that moment, had their vote and the election against Jimmy Carter was almost wrapped up. Despite the fact that the president of the Polish-American Congress was friends with Ford, the damage was done too close to the election. The Polish-American bloc went with Carter.
Is this good for Donald Trump? Not quite. Polonia is divided on this issue because Clinton represents the best candidate for longer range goals. November is a long way off. Full Polish support and war is only a half-hearted apology away.
Just ask Anne Applebaum, wife of former Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski a staunch Polish Nationalist about how hypocritical we are to call a democracy, nationalism. “People close to the couple say she inspires his foreign policy plans and strategies” and “Europe’s history, he warned before anyone else, would be decided in Ukraine.”
“In the United States, we dislike the word “nationalism” and so, hypocritically, we call it other things: “American exceptionalism,” for example, or a “belief in American greatness.” We also argue about it as if it were something rational—Mitt Romney wrote a book that put forth the “case for American greatness”—rather than acknowledging that nationalism is fundamentally emotional. In truth, you can’t really make “the case” for nationalism; you can only inculcate it, teach it to children, cultivate it at public events.” – Anne Applebaum
How the 2016 Super Bloc Vote Creates David vs the Russian Goliath
Voting blocs, smoting blocs, who gives a damn? I got bloc’d in traffic the other day! This is America and everybody has a “voting bloc!” What ya’ didn’t know they’re on sale at Walmart? Two for a dolla’.
Yah, I get it. Voting blocs are part of the American experience. What you may not get is that we are discussing two entirely different things.
When we look at American bloc voting it has been issue oriented about American civil rights, immigration, and American life. These are American issues brought front and center by American people, to be decided by and for American people.
Looking at the largest American bloc voter segments today we find “In the 2012 elections, African-Americans accounted for about 13% of total votes, while Hispanics accounted for about 10% of the electorate.”Add in the Asian-American bloc vote “…, that figure is nearing 6 percent and spiraling upward.
These represent what is purported to be the largest voting blocs in America today and yet, “Arab Americans make up about one percent of the US population, but many live in the swing states that could decide the White House race.” What’s really weird about this election is that Arab Americans are predominately Christian and traditionally voted Republican- oopsie Mr. Trump.
What’s different about the voting blocs I am describing is they could care less about American democracy or civil rights. They were the constituency of governments in exile that served Nazi Germany in WWII. They are still ultra-nationalist politically and serve the foreign governments they set up when the Soviet Union collapsed.
If they were “democratic” would it be reasonable to assume the countries they set up or helped set up and support would be democratic too? Their impulse to support nationalist countries is so overwhelming for them they could give a damn when Americans lose their lives in wars they start for their foreign governments…so be it.
Four short examples of this are the Polish presidential election of 2015, Ukrainian-American perceptions about themselves, the actual reason we fought the Korean and Vietnam Wars, and the elections of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. People self-describe themselves clearly in their actions.
Remember 1+1 always=2. In 2015 Andrzej Duda was elected president of Poland. That sounds democratic. But president Duda is profoundly ultra-nationalist. This sounds like a problem for Poland, right? Well, no, Polish-Americans voted in that election and showed their true democratic colors.
More than 80% of Polish-Americans voting, supported the Nazi, now president, Duda. The Telegraph called it the “Velvet Road to Dictatorship.”What would be a good start for a Nationalist/Nazi president of Poland?
How about Holocaust denial? Shown earlier, Polish-Americans make up 10% of America’s electorate on their own. In America, Polish-Americans that voted for Duda traditionally prefer to vote for the Democratic ticket.
In February 2015 I wrote an article about the illegality of Ukrainian-Americans supplying weapons to volunteer groups in Ukraine that were systematically killing civilians. Even though they openly stated at the time that funding was going for weapons, knew they were openly breaking Federal Law, the practice continues.
The Ukrainian Diaspora even acknowledged that this is illegal in their own publication linked below. “Supplies are all nonlethal equipment, as sending weapons would be illegal.”
This has been going on for the entire war in Ukraine, from Maidan onward. Open calls for weapons donation funding became common in American social media.
How do they self-identify? Did Adolf Hitler call himself a Nazi? Would Adolf Hitler be happy if you called him a Nazi to his face? Or was it how his enemy identified him? Are these Ukrainian-Americans Republican, Democrats, or Independents? Or Nazi? Do they believe in Democracy for Ukraine? For America?
In the U.S., he had made a connection with Ivanka Zajac, 62, a nurse who is the president of the New York branch of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America, an organization that represents all Ukrainians in the U.S. and one that is lobbying Congress to pass a law authorizing the supply of weapons to Ukraine from the U.S…Zajac is in some ways the archetype of an Ukrainian nationalist…”
In some ways? If you go to the official UCCA website, every group listed in member organizations were classified as Nazi organizations by the US government in QRPLUMB VOL1_0004. Let’s not forget the listings that openly celebrate the Ukrainian Nazi Waffen SS, Ukrainian Veterans of the 1st Division or the Brotherhood of Veterans of Ukrainian Insurgent Army.
Because of her position she is naturally at the top of the food chain in the CEE organizing over 20 million election votes. But wait, how does America’s home grown voter blocs compare with them? Its a natural question. They don’t.
A natural outgrowth of the CEEC has been the Asian-American and Central American emigre blocs. From the 1950’s through the 80’s these countries rose and fell in election cycle importance through the Ukrainian nationalist World Anti-Communist League (WACL). For the American-Asian this culminated in 1972 when Richard Nixon was running for reelection.
Nixon was elected in 1968 with the 4th largest margin in election history. In 1972 his greatest fear was Chiang Kai-shek, the president of Taiwan destroying his presidency and electability through the Asian-American emigres relationship to the CEE emigres. How could this happen? It was the CEE bloc vote to begin with that got him elected by that margin. The Asian-Americans by themselves were less than 1% of the vote.
The real cause for both the Korean and Vietnam Wars was the factor the CEE groups played in elections. The president’s of the United States of America during this period were afraid of what these groups could muster on American soil with good reason. Today the same kind of nationalist views have become mainstream again so just look around you. To paraphrase one president and the actions of the others “I am afraid of a Nationalist/Nazi takeover of the US government that would make “McCarthyism look like chicken-shit.”
Seriously? Could it be true Stepan Bandera and Chiang Kai-shek were Nazi comrades? The proof is in the pictures. The next generations, unfortunately, stayed by the same political tree.
When you combine the Black-Hispanic-Asian American voting blocs and subtract the pro-Contra (nationalist) factions and the pro-Taiwan (Chiang Kai-shek, South Korean, South Vietnamese) nationalists that are fringe outliers to the CEEC, the CEEC vote is closer to 20% of the total US vote, while the natural American blocs dwindle in voting power considerably.
This begs the question- Can a group without even enough of a population to count as a bloc be a bloc to reckon with today?
The answer came in 1980. They can if they become a cause celeb! The election of Ronald Reagan was due to pro-Contra CEE group funding. The entire Iran-Contra mess was initially put together by the CEE groups leader Yaroslav Stetsko, leader of the Ukrainian emigres. Stetsko’s WACL had 2 member states fund Ronald Reagan’s primary campaign and then they (CEE) funded and organized it with him all the way to victory.
It’s the same for the Baltic states today. They are politically important because of the cause celeb. They are made out to be David against Russia’s Goliath.
There was a recommendation for NATO to engage as an alliance in ongoing wars – specifically in Ukraine, Georgia, Libya, and Syria – under the hypothesis that failure to engage weakens the effectiveness of the alliance’s deterrence efforts. There was disagreement on whether NATO needs to publish Russia’s specific violations.
The CEEC believes it is time to establish permanent NATO bases in the Alliance’s eastern member states, since any objection has been removed by Russia’s war on Ukraine…In the face of Russia’s aggressive actions NATO …In 2014, the Russian Federation forcibly annexed Crimea …Russia’s war on Ukraine and continued escalation of armed conflict threatens both Ukraina’s independence and the welfare of tens of millions of Europeans. A strong, coordinated military force is essential to stop Russia as it continues to destabilize its neighbors and disrespect international rules. ..Russia’s intimidation of the Baltic countries must cease.
Support the establishment of permanent NATO bases in these front-line countries to assure their security. Bases currently used by NATO for training and supply purposes in Central Europe should be made permanent and re-focused to territorial defense;
The Kremlin’s propaganda campaign justifies its aggression by claiming that NATO has broken its promises to not pursue enlargement and is in the process of aggressively encircling Russia. This therefore poses a serious threat that Russia is justified in defending in the interest of its citizens…the panelists agreed that the West needs to push back in the face of Russia’s disregard of national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
How did all this pan out for them? SCORE!
The war game, titled Anaconda-16, will take place in Poland ahead of next month’s NATO summit in Warsaw, where officials are expected to approve permanent troops to be stationed in the country and throughout eastern Europe, to combat what they consistently refer to ‘Russian aggression.’
“When I first came to Lithuania 22 years ago to try and help convince the local authorities to bring unpunished Lithuanian Nazi war criminals to trial, I tried to convince them that such proceedings were the best history lesson to help their society honestly deal with Lithuania’s bloody Holocaust past. Unfortunately, those efforts were only very partially successful, and now that fight for historical truth must continue without the advantages provided by the prosecution of local killers.” -Dr. Efraim Zuroff
Where does modern Lithuanian ultra-nationalism come from? In their own words-“ …the birth of nationalism (and of ethnic consciousness) occurred simultaneously in America and in Lithuania. Further, he believes that such a development would not have been possible without Lithuanian-American contributions.”..“Jonas Šliūpas himself, one of the prime movers of nationalism in the United States.” The CEE(Central & Eastern Europeans) have all been the largest promoters of nationalism in government in the USA for the last 50 years.
Pound for pound the vote from the Baltic’s is symbolic, but their influence on Russia policy is huge. The emigre influence is so great in the Baltic States some have gone over and served as Presidents. Can you imagine being so dedicated to “freeing the old country” as an American, you decide to take over the presidency there? What started as anti-communist showed its true light when the “wall” came down. Russia was the new old enemy. American and other emigre populations were the true citizens of those countries.
In this light, Estonia still hasn’t ratified a border with Russia in all these years. What would be the reason why?
“According to Russian analysts, they need to wage one more little victorious war in order to keep the euphoria alive — or carry out some sort of foreign policy operation and make Russia’s situation in the international arena even more complex in order to show voters that they really are under siege,” said the center’s director. “An unratified border treaty with Estonia may play some kind of role in such a combination which we are yet unable to picture.”
Perhaps they should read Ukrainian- American scholarship a little more closely as both countries are aligned at the hip these days, nazis and all. Professor Moytl, a Ukrainian-American nationalist, thought at the time statements like this were ok.
“Although the possibility of war is not as far-fetched as one would like it to be, it would not work to Ukraine’s disadvantage. Indeed, the emergence of a genuinely hostile Russia would translate into Ukraine’s rapid integration into European economic and security structures and its concomitant transformation into a client state of the United States. As an East European version of South Korea, Ukraine would become the recipient of large-scale Western–in particular, American–military and economic assistance that would guarantee its stability,if not its prosperity…. Russia’s aggressiveness, therefore, could be Ukraine’s salvation . ” [See Alexander J. Motyl, “Will Ukraine Survive 1994?” in the Harriman Institute Forum, Vol. 7, No. 5 (January 1994), p. 4.]
The unratified border serves as a friction point to start a war Estonia cannot fight. Help us NATO!Which candidate do the Baltic states and emigres support for president?
“Because of her “hawkish” approach towards Russia, she would most likely step up the rhetoric against the country when in the Oval Office. This would work well for the Baltics, especially Lithuania,” the analyst underlines. “She is kind of a bellicose person. Hillary Clinton supported the war in Iraq and wanted US intervention in Libya.”
One plus one equals two.
Russia’s response to all this is amazing and not something you see much of in today’s world. It’s the kind of statement governments across the world should take note of when they claim the high ground.
The Russian Response
“After World War II we tried to impose on many Eastern European nations our model of development and we did it through force. We must acknowledge that. There’s nothing good in it, it still affects us today…The Americans are doing something like that now, trying to impose their model on virtually the entire world. They will fail too.”- Vladimir Putin, 2015 Q&A
What do the Baltic emigres want? Lithuania along with the other Baltic states are trying to light the flames of war between the US and Russia. At the same time, they celebrate their home grown Nazi heroes. Are they or have they ever been democratic?
I’ve started to wonder if the high degree of propaganda in the US is to keep you in line or keep them in line. As we all found out this primary season your vote didn’t have enough dollars attached to it to make a difference. The only way to combat this right now is to get people to vote. The more people that do, the less effective they are. Election reform, anyone?
The next part is where this article series will liven up. Do you still doubt the power of the CEEC super bloc? If you do go to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial “the Wall” and count the names. Does one plus one equal two?
It’s high time for Russia and China to pull the plug on the US dollar. They can no longer afford to let the Empire threaten them.
Maybe a change in terminology is in order? Instead of “war with Russia” we should start referring to “a war in Europe and North America,” or/and a war with Russia and its allies including China.
You title should look like this: “Inside The Secret Super Majority that Decide Election 2016 & War in Europe and the US with Russia, China, and their allies.”
Scott – please pursue that change in terminology. We see how powerful narratives are, and how we can change some of them.
In fact, “War With Russia” equals “War On US Soil” – high time the people in the west started to understand this.
Thanks for the work you do.
I was at University in the 1970s of free education in Oz, when students weren’t burdened with fees and multiple part time jobs. The Vietnam war was still raw fresh memory. The Cold War hung over us. Big rallies against uranium mining and militarism were regular. There was debate as to how evil the oppressive USSR and communist insurgencies were vs the CIA exploitative capitalism third world coups in favour of right wing dictators and corrupt elites.
Today no awareness.
Agree – wording of current situation needs to alarm average sleeping Westerners.
It would be too long. The text makes the case as an introduction. I appreciate the thought, though. The ramp up the next part gives the article series the focus your critique is demanding. This includes titling.
No problem, these so called CEEC emigres want to get nuked just as bad as the neo-conservatives.
They will get their war God willing !! …..and what is left over of humanity will see them get vaporized.
A truly excellent article. As I remember writing months ago,”the winner of the US election will be the one to be the most Russophobic”. I think we know as of now,which one that is.
The winner is either:
1. Who the media has programmed people to believe in (in todays society they have programmed ppl to be anti-russian, islamophobic, genderunsure, etc).
So in an election campaign, the winner will be who follow that line, and the media then shows the public that is that “hero”.
(But always a chance of backlash. For example despite all the msm highlevel propaganda bs about Russia, a big part of europeans dont buy into that bs!.).
2. Then one has 2nd option… Righing the electionresults.
Thanks to modernized electronic/computers, its very easy for insiders to rig.
In usa most votingmachines are delivered and maintaindd by properity by Soros company.
3.
And if still wont win election.
Then for example in Eu, the brussel eu powers can overrule or ignore national elections and do it anyway.
Eu is not a democrazy, and the bureacratz in brussel is neither voted on, and can make up own decisions and laws. (And override many countries objections).
4.
In usa if Trump wins (i hope he by a miracle win).
Then the insane azylum that controlls Hillary etc, will easily stahe a new internal false flag: getting Trump assasinated.
And they will do it in a way that will give the blame towards what those insane puppetmasters want.
(Taking away rights, starting wars, increasing policestate, more surveilance, inprison opposition they dont like, profiling, etc, etc).
Sorry, Uncle Bob, I cannot see the “excellence” of this article or/and its author, GH Eliason, otherwise a Harmaggedon scientist.
In his view, American presidents are made by the CEEC voters (Americans from Eastern Europe, all – according to him – former nazis who went to America because Nazigermany seemed temporarily to have lost its aim to nazify the whole world), and the biggest CEEC group are Poles, who, according to Eliason must all be ex-Nazis, because he put them into that group. He does not get his notions from reality, but has notions already, and forms his reality according to these preconceived idiocies. Thus it had to escape him that unlike Latvians etc Poles were not fighting with the nazis against the rest, but were fought by nazis and their waffen ss friends from Holland, Latvia and elsewhere. Yes, Donald Tusk’s grandfather had fought for Hitler, that’s why Tusk has been made Mister EU by Angela Hitler – she loves nazis, because she is one herself. But she does not love Poles, not PiS and not the Kaczynskis, that is why she had 96 of them murdered in Smolensk on one of her pesonal fesat days. Duda is PiS and pro-Kaczynski – so? Simple question for Eliason, removed. No insulting the author. Mod posing as world prophet: Since all CEECs are nazis, Duda (who is a Pole and not an american CEEC) is necessarily a “nazi”, too, as Eliason decrees. Eliason gives no other reason for his “finding out” (=inventing) this “fact” than just Duda’s being Polish – a distaste removed. stop the insults. Mod. Duda was born in 1972 – thus, clearly a nazi relict! He studied law, made a BA, MA and doctorate in law, was a lecturer for law at Krakow university – all of which proves he must be a nazi, since he is a Pole! Eliason mentions CEEC-forefathers working within the waffen-SS – and, Yes, we read in Duda’s Wikipedia entry that his grandfather fought against the Red Army and in 1939 against Germany – thus, a clear nazi! An uncle was tortured by the gestapo to death – thus, he clearly must have been a nazi! With such ancestors Duda himself could only become a nazi, which he did, according to Eliasonremoved – again!.
If you follow the links given by eliason you’ll find that nothing is like he pretends… E.g. not the conservative english (=zionazi) rag “Telegraph” found out that Duda`s victory neans a velvet way to dictatorship, but “a former anti-communist dissident”, who prefers speaking out from anonymity. If he is a former anti-communst he must be pro-commie today and want a proletarian dictatorship, not a velvet one, so that Duda is not to his taste – what a heart-breaking tragedy! What a pity that Eliason failed to mention the biggest Polish CEEC nazi minority within the biggest CEEC-nazi subgroup, the Poles: Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski. Since he is a Pole, he must be a nazi, too, so why did he not get an honourable mention? Looking into Brzezinski’s Wiki entry one finds that presidential votes in America (and the CEEC Poles deciding them) are irrelevant since the antirussian policy is always the same, namely Brzesinski’s: He wants war with Russia and slowly steers us all into it. He started whispering about “peaceful engagement”, as jesuits always do, but is for more military and more covert warfare since 1979, when he founded Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. The reason must be, as with all CEEC and all Poles that B.’s parents were Waffen-SS, of course, fighting for the Reich in Canada where they lived since 1938 under the cover of being Polish diplomats.
If one is not yet removed., one might find that both Brzezinski and Eliason are misusing language for slandering whoever they do not like for other, undisclosed reasons, or in short, that they behave like jesuits, the professional warmongers of the Vatican, the nazi-murderers who (unlike typical german nazis) are able to read and write and use that gift for slyly starting mass murders from a safe place. Those to be murdered are often Poles – and this is what all that present Pole bashing at VT, in the EU, in Germany etc etc – all reminiscing the foreplay of WW II – is about: last time, if 1939-1945 was so good, we need more of the same, and sisinforming everybody about everybody else is the velvet way into general chaos.
bp
If you continue to post insults – no further posts will be approved. Mod.
Your problem is equating “nazis and fascists”. They are so close as to be twins. But classical nazism was only for Germans. While fascism can include any people.We use the slang “nazi” all the time. So when it needs to be defined it becomes complicated. And gives rise to points like you brought up. The pre-war Polish government was a hard right-wing “fascist like” government. And had the Germans not wanted Polish territory they would have ended as allies ,I’m pretty sure. There was much talk between them of becoming allies. But the territorial issue was too strong for that to happen.But still the members of the government at the time of the war. And those that immigrated to the West after the war. Were very much “tainted” by a homegrown “Polish brand of fascism”.Its that same “tainted brand” that is seeing a form of revival in Poland. Not “nazism”,but a Polish fascism.
What was your reasoning in coming to this conclusion UB1??
This writer – falsely or truly – provides us with a psychopathic Polish diaspora with enough votes to swing an election.
But if you also said that the most Russophobic would win – can I ask on what basis.
By the way – I dont know if this writer is close to truth orspouting arrant nonsense. What it does do for me is confirm that the whole concept of “Democracy” is the biggest hoax ever hoist on masses of peoples – along with Darwin and Scientism,
That is just a comment about the way US elections work. It didn’t relate necessarily to the article except as the article is more proof. I mentioned that first months ago.The media has spent years making Putin and Russia “the danger”. The candidates will capitalize on that. With Clinton its natural. She hates Putin and Russia. With Trump,he’ll have to join in (so as not to be accused of being “soft” on Russia) before the campaign is over.I suspect he’ll try to come off as the “Reagan”. Say things like “we need to stand up to Putin. And that will bring him to the table”. He’ll hope to gain the hate-Putin vote,while keeping his options open to negotiate if he wins.Clinton will just purely go for the anti-Putin/anti-Russian vote.
I’m a big believer in fairness and political neutrality in the press (pretty much impossible to find today). But except for “maybe” a few media sites in the US and Worldwide. Almost 100% of them are anti-Trump. Even RT,in a country that would probably be better off with a Trump victory. You can feel an anti-Trump bias in their reporting,and the “always” unflattering images of Trump they show in their articles.I really don’t know what can be done about that. But the lack of internal control over RT is beginning to work “against” Russia’s interests.
> RT is beginning to work “against” Russia’s interests.
Good joke, RT is doing so for a very long time already.
No reporting about DonBass (neither about the really terrible crimes at _any_ point in time, nor abput the ongoing shelling and deaths).
No reporting about the recent prisoners swap (I checked RT several times since yesterday).
Full of western overloaded Disney style gimmick trash.
the latest from St Petersburg is
ST. PETERSBURG, June 16. / TASS /. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said it is unreal to observe the full ceasefire in Donbass during three months.
“Our company Ukrainian colleagues have again Said That the Minsk Agreements will of being of the start Implemented in full only the if there is full and unconditional a ceasefire without a violation for the single AT Least a three months,” Lavrov Said AT the Valdai club the session of the the St. International, Economic Forum Go Petersburg .
“This is just unreal. There will be always someone who opens fire twice and says that the regime has been violated,” he said.
READ ALSO
A peacekeeper (archive)
Russian diplomat calls speculation about UN peacekeeping mission in Ukraine propaganda
The Ukrainian side earlier said that elections in Donbass must take no earlier than 90 days after the adoption of a special law. During the consultations in the Contact Group on settlement in eastern Ukraine Kiev insisted that the polls can be held only on the condition of a sustainable ceasefire.
Holding elections in Donbass is one of the key points of political settlement in eastern Ukraine. Under the Minsk deal of February 2015, the polls were due to take place last year along with the constitutional reform in Ukraine aimed at granting certain areas in the Donetsk and Lugansk region a special status on a permanent basis. However, the deadline has been repeatedly postponed due to Kiev’s refusal to comply with its commitments, in particular to grant amnesty to all participants of events in Donbass, to adopt legislation on a special status and to pass a law on elections. Late last year, the leaders of the Normandy Four group (Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine) set a new deadline for elections – the first half of 2016. Kiev still refuses to discuss preparations for elections explaining this by a low level of security in the region.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/politics/882526
so what is next????????????????
!
“We don’t need one more cold war,” Sarkozy said as quoted by Agence France Presse. “I can’t approve the construction of a political wall dividing Russia and the European continent after the fall of the iron curtain.”
“We need positive shifts in Russian-European relations. These could be gradual and reciprocal lifting of sanctions, reciprocal steps by both sides,” he explained.
The ex-president also spoke with criticism of the United States’ actions in the sphere of missile defense in Europe.
“Back in 2010 I spoke for Russia’s admission to the missile defense system for the Russians not to think it is aimed against them. This is a right decision. But the idea was rejected,” he said.
“Even with account for my friendly feelings toward the American people I want to say directly: it is not up to Obama to decide who is the enemy for France and who not,” Sarkozy said.
More:
http://tass.ru/en/world/882190
I will force myself to read at least the next article in this series. But I think that this guy is way off his rocker.
There are distinct identity groups that we can expect to vote along lines of their identity: Blacks, Mexicans, Homosexuals, Jews, and Feminists.
Apart from the A-list socialites, who show up at their respective national annual parade day functions, there is hardly any “voter’s bloc” among Poles, Italians, Chinese, Indians, etc.
We have learned too much about mass market manipulation to believe that any of theses “CEEC” emigres (and much less their children and grandchildren) represent a “swing vote” in any statewide election.
Those who control the media, and those which have the money to pay for their services, control the “swing votes” in this country; and through this mass media, they also control the (s)elected officials in government who will do their bidding. These manipulators/controllers use the cultured belief that they are “victims” -prominent among Blacks, Mexicans, Homosexuals, Jews, and Feminists- to form voting majorities.
Exactemundo!
There is no such block – unless made up by the eastern european (((diaspora))) and their brezynskys.
We all know that the soviet union was an (((internationalist))) creation, in which the Russian volk has been occupied as much as all the rest of us. God knows Hungary has some grievances against the su, even Russia if we go back as far as 1848, when the Czar sent troops to help out his habsburg cousin.
Is any hungarian crazy enough to deam about revenge for the last two centuries?
Sure there are – they are all comfortably embedded/tenured in them DC think-tanks and are established members of the matrix, but they have no clout with the voters.
The other day one of them wrote an article, that the victory of the Hungarian team over the habsburgs (soccer eu)was such a tragedy, since it basically takes the pressure off the Orban gvmnt. in some fash. or another.
Now I do not even care about soccer, not a bit, but for the ridiculousness of that statement.
(((They))) are INSANE, but hey, they always were…
It is the diaspora.
assertions, assignations, transpositions, and slanders.
trash A-Z. one example:
CEEC – 50 years of concentrated and monolithic political power.
but Dan Rostenkowski of Chicago, head of the Ways and Means committee,
possibly the most powerful Democrat in Congress, was jailed by
a Republican smear campaign for 20 yrs of stealing postage stamps.
why is this on your site Saker?
..
Even Saker has blinders. He is after all just a normal guy.
The “powerful” Dan Rostenkowski got taken down because of Postage STAMPS !!!!
re Rostenkowski:
Ways and Means controls the money.
it was called “mail fraud” (see Wiki);
a hatchet job followed by a tidal wave
of Republican corruption.
as for “troll” fool below,
there is no “50 years of history” here.
the contention is that CEEC invented
anti-communism in America.
you work it out.
Exactly. They did
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-The-US-Endgame-for-Rus-by-George-Eliason-American-Exceptionalism_American-Facism_American-Hypocrisy_American-Terror-140917-413.html
Nonsequitur Not relevant Possibly a harding troll
With over 50 years of history presented if you had an argument or real example it surely would have come out of the text itself. Your example rings as honest as there is no mafia because Al Capone got deported.
Your writing style is very close to Ukraine’s king troll. Look it up.
If you want to be taken seriously argue the merits of the article from the facts presented instead of emotional side bars.
The telling part is you couldn’t argue the facts.
I’m with you on this one.
There’s a lot of good info provided by Saker on HOW elections are manipulated but I will not believe that the “CEEC”’s decide US policy. They are tools in the barn that are taken out when needed to say “But they made us do this”. Sort of like the Kuwaiti’s diplomat’s daughter who lied to Congress about Saddam’s Evil Storm Troopers throwing babes out of incubators in Kuwait prior to Desert Storm.
Half of my ancestors lived in what is now the southeastern Ukraine, during the Russian Empire. I’d never heard of this Neocon propaganda group, the “CEEC”, before. They definitely do not represent me. I suspect that the “CEEC” is probably composed of the usual suspects: a few Banderites, Polish nationalists, and Zionists.
You are correct in part but they are more than propagandists. Have you heard of the UCCA (Ukrainian Congressional Committee of America), UWC (Ukrainian World Congress), or PAC (Polish American Congress)? They are only a few that make up the CEEC.
It took many many moon’s to pass before I understood how easy it is to high-jack a group and lead it off the cliff. It only takes a few to do the job.
book – “COINTELPRO- Papers Documents Against Dissent”
Yep
By the way, I live in Southeast.
I don’t think the answers on the 6 points mentioned in this article will have a decisive impact on the outcome of the 2016 presidential elections in the USA.
I think Hillary or anybody else for that matter will be able to stop Donald Trump from becoming the next president unless they kill him, and he’ll win the presidential election in a landslide victory, regardless of the talking points that will come up during the debates.
Don’t see him go to war with Russia or China either.
Should read: I don’t think Hillary or anybody else for that matter will be able to stop D. Trump
The zpc/nwo is currently at war with Russia and China. No doubt the sods (litteraly) would love to heat it up with some fission/fusion finality, but the sods (litterally) dont have the technical means to survive it. Expect the sods to practice this war by every other means, especially of the covert and cowardly zio-gay manner they currently do.
How true this article is . It really depicts how sick , morally and intellectually bankrupt the western hemisphere has become. This insistent paradigm of confrontation with anyone who does not follow the washington consensus. The anglo-zionist have created this mess. Like I have stated before in other blogs the similarities with the 30s is so frightening. The western economies r no longer growing to service the massive debt that has been orchestrated by the financial elite . Which brings me to my next argument. The anglo-zionist have only three options left. 1: restructure the massive debt: 2:Zero the debt so scrub the slates clean and start again. 3: Or off to war we go. Just look at how the anglo-zionist have been playing since 2007. They have hedged their bets on both sides. In the war front ie: Ukraine(Donbass) and Syria they r hoping that both sides bleed themselves dry so the can pounce on both sides. Just look what they did in WW2. The allowed the Soviets to take the initiative and drive bak the Nazi alliance and just as the Sovciets were heading towards western Europe the western alliance finally invaded Europe. The narrative for over 3 years has been off an agressive posture towards Russia and any state that does not follow the washington consensus. Just like the article alluded to all these eastern blok countries of europe have nationalistic/fascistic philosophy it is so obvious but the west/ USA still dont seem to mind and just propmote it as long as it goes against Russia. MSM constantly blaming Putin for everything under the sun and how they went and denigrated Qhadaffi. Not once has the MSM ever mentioned that Libya had the best standard of living in all of Africa. Free education health and housing. Not once do they mention how he threatened the western sysytem of banking by introducing the Gold backed African Denar not once did the MSM ever mention that Mubarek was on board with Qhadaffi with his introduction to an Pan African banking system. Viola the Arab spring comes and Humanitarian interventionism. Syria the barrel bombs Daesh and the blatant transgressions upon the peoples of the ME. Iranian s being labelled backers of terrorism. Gee such Orwellian times we r living. The constant reminder in the MSM that war is inevitable with Russia. Will it sooner or later the prophecy becomes a reality and the sheeple of the west just goes along with it. The blatant rigging of the US primaries so obvious that a neonate could even see it. The likes of Cohen and other western Russian experts warning and telling everybody that the west is playing with fire. 50 white middle class people get slaughtered in Orlando Florida and the western MSM r all sympathetic and all wondering what has gone wrong. 100s get blown to smitherins in Latakia weeks before not one tear is shed in the west. Hypocrisy and its duplicitous nature of the western narrative only proves how intellectually and morally bankrupt it is and has been for over a century. Here is hoping for detente so badly needed during these times for humanities sake cause if it doesnt happen soon it will be a nuclear winter all over the world. Pace e Bene
”
Inside The Secret Super Majority that Decide Election 2016 & War with Russia
3475 Views June 15, 2016 17 Comments
by GH Eliason
How well the candidate from either party satisfies 7 questions from a particular group of people will determine who the President of the United States will be after this election. The winner will be the one that proves they are the most willing to go to war with Russia and China after they are elected. Will you do your part and vote for them?
The only thing we need to agree on at this point is 1+1=2. It can’t vary. The simple logic doesn’t care how it makes you feel. If the information adds up without any leaps the conclusion presents itself in the simplest form, 1+1 always =2.
The determining factors in the US Presidential election won’t be decided in Kiev if that’s the direction you think I’m going in. Rather, along with the super-delegates, there is a secret super- majority that has existed for the last 40+ years in the USA and this is the most important election they will ever hijack and decide.
The problem with facts is once you know them, you can’t argue with them anymore.
This group has a 50-year history of deciding elections. Included in that history are the deaths of over 100,000 Americans and millions of people in other countries. For them, this is the most important election of all time. This time, they want to bring the war home.
With over 235 million eligible voters in the US, if you could count on more than 20 million of them to vote en bloc could you win? What if they were concentrated around swing cities in swing states across America? These are the cities with the highest number of electoral delegates. If any candidate could count on more than 15% of ballots cast before counting traditional party voters, could they lose?
In the 2012 election only 54% or 129 million voted out of 235 million eligible voters.
More than 20 million votes get’s more mileage with low voter turnout. When you take party affiliation into account it gets even more impressive. According to 2014 data, 39% identify as independents, 32% as Democrats and 23% as Republicans.
This makes it clear that 15% of the electorate beyond your party is not only enough to win a presidential election but supplies a mandate. But whose mandate in 2016?
An easier way to understand this is if your candidate is predicted to win/lose by +-3-5% points in a given state and I can deliver 7%, am I really important to you? Or if I can deliver 5-7 states this way, do you owe me anything?
What if “WE” can deliver 15-18 important states this way in your national election? How about 20 states? Would you go to war for me? Would you sanction my enemies or at the extreme give me diplomatic cover if I commit or support genocide in other countries?
The Primaries- Where 5-15% Can Turn into 80% of the Vote!
The presidential primaries are where it really gets impressive. Why? No one votes. This is why candidates start with radical positions that after the convention “start to drift toward the center.” After all, they need to talk to the rest of us.
When you take the above and apply it to the primaries the math goes on steroids. Only .8% to 5% of eligible voters are needed to win a state. It can translate into 40-80% of the votes cast. Don’t believe me?
Let’s take a look at Iowa. In Iowa, there were 2,403,229 eligible voters for the 2016 primaries. Only 15% of registered voters showed up at the polls. That translates to 357,283 voters. Or just enough to make up a small city.
That figure covers both Democrats and Republicans. For either party that was just a little over 7% of registered voters. Democrats fielded 171109 votes for their candidates. Hilary Clinton won with a margin of .29 percent. With even a small bloc vote the Iowa primary could be turned either way.
The Emigre Super Blocs
The CEEC (Central and East European Coalition) represents a combined group with 22 million bloc voters. As the CEE immigrants came into the US, they were guided to the cities where they were needed to build out the power blocs for their representative groups. Most groups were a government in exile and today are the hand behind their home country’s government. They lobby for the home country’s interests to the US government. They also bring in money from the home countries to influence or outright buy American politicians.
More importantly, as governments in exile, they determined the type of government that would rule their home country. They turned over the reins of power to the new ex-Soviet bloc countries like Ukraine in 1991. They “advise” the home country, especially on Russia policy.
Their PAC’s come together to work on problems like immigration quotas or visas, relations with the US, and business. When it suits their interests they come together and determine election outcomes and foreign policy.
These groups have changed the outcomes of presidential elections both separately and working together for the past 50 years.
What the Emigres Want In 2016
Right now the CEEC emigres are working together for the last goal all of them have which is war with Russia and China. Their caucuses are traditionally so strong in Congress, it’s impossible to get elected without CEEC support in major states. And Congress has been pushing their agenda toward war with Russia since the days of Joseph McCarthy. Their influence on eastern European and Russia policy is unchecked. The time has come.
The 7 Questions that will determine 15% of the vote and the outcome of the 2016 US elections
The following 7 questions are what the combined Eastern and Central European emigres are demanding for votes and electoral votes in 2016. Following that, the proofs of how much weight their gerrymandering has gained in American politics since the early 1950s is supplied. Each emigre population listed had fathers and grandfathers that were Waffen SS or supported them in some fashion. Their families emigrated to the United States only understanding Nationalist/Nazi political views. Their politics never changed. They raise their children to be more committed than they were.
They even advertise their pride in their own Waffen SS soldiers that when combined took part in the murder of more than 2 million people. When each of their respective countries was freed, these same governments in exile and ethnic groups delivered the same ultra-nationalist government models their grandparents had in WWII as Axis countries or pre-WWII as Prometheans Group members. And no one ever had to answer for this.
From the CEEC-“ As President, what would your strategy be to deal with Russian aggression in Ukraine and threats in Central and Eastern Europe? What options would you employ to achieve Russia?s withdrawal from lands it unlawfully controls, such as Crimea, eastern Ukraine, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria?
What is your position on the current sanctions against Russia?
How do you view NATO?s role in countering Russian aggression? What is your position on maintaining U.S. /NATO equipment and troops permanently in the CEE region? Please provide specifics.
Do you favor NATO enlargement to include countries such as Georgia and Ukraine?
What is your position on the Visa Waiver Program?s possible expansion to include other CEE countries, such as Poland?
What is your position on U.S. assistance to ensure energy security in the CEE region?
What is your position on the proposed Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)?”
Ultimately this is about one thing, starting war with Russia and China. For the last 50 years, the one demand all the emigre populations have is the destruction of Russia.
According to the Independent “Nato risks a nuclear war with Russia within a year if it does not increase its defence capabilities in the Baltic states, one of the alliance’s most senior retired generals has said.”
Disputin’ Putin
Russia has no interest in attacking any of these countries. This Harvard University article puts the nails in that coffin. Russia really isn’t interested and you don’t have to take my word for it. If no one in these countries is worried about a Russian invasion, why go to war with Russia or risk nuclear war just because a few whiny nationalists want it? According to the corresponding monograph from the US Army War College, “It was the unanimous view [of academics] that overt military action by Russia against the Baltic States…is unlikely in the extreme.” Sorry Gen. Breedlove, check and mate. Your own military researchers think your credibility is a little light these days.
If Russia isn’t a real threat why do all these countries hate Russia so much?
First and foremost is understanding where the CEE countries are coming from politically. Each country is a new country that came out of the Habsburg “Spring of Nations” and are Wilson Doctrine countries. All of these countries were bordering or close to bordering Imperial Russia, later the Soviet Union, and today the Russian Federation.
Nationalism and Fascism were set up as a prophylactic against Russian or Soviet influence inside each country and the corresponding Diasporas. If you ask why they hate Russia, you are more than likely going to get an unintelligible rant instead of a reason. They simply don’t know and don’t care to look at the history.
Polonia &The Polish American Congress
“Polish-Americans in the United States comprise a voting bloc sought after by both the Democratic and Republican parties. Polish Americans comprise 3.2% of the United States population but were estimated at nearly 10% of the overall electorate as of 2012. The Polish-American population is concentrated in several swing states that make issues important to Polish-Americans more likely to be heard by presidential candidates. According to John Kromkowski, a Catholic University professor of political science, Polish-Americans make up an “almost archetypical swing vote.””
What I find funny about this Polish block is that to this day their countrymen need a visa to get into the US as opposed to any of the other Eastern European countries. Hence they have zero influence except to go like sheep to the voting booth and make themselves feel “I am important “.
Ooops, something went wrong with Cut/Past .
Sorry
Any way to eliminate that section from your already present text and just have what I typed ?
I am not quite sure what you mean, so I just leave it as it is. (Mod)
The only problem is you are arguing with over 50 years of political history and the statements of the people involved. Inside the linked material is the chronological history of their importance. As far as visas, that’s up next after this election. I’ve notated that too in previous articles.
“As far as visas, that’s up next after this election. ”
They have been jaw boning this one in the US for years and NOTHING. Just promises. Another signal that the Poles are just a tool to be discarded or ignored when convenient.
A lot of the research Saker provides is excellent but it is next to impossible to follow the inside action of countries through years.
The Poles (not the only ones in Eastern Europe) are the Big Con Job. The final deal was reached here,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Round_Table_Agreement
As to Duda being a Nazi (I had a hardy laugh and I suspect his wife as well, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agata_Kornhauser-Duda). It is best to read the commentators of this article that was provided by Saker
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/poland/11628799/Poland-on-the-velvet-road-to-dictatorship-after-Andrzej-Duda-wins-presidential-elections.html
They seem to have a good pulse of the situation in Poland that will not be provided by Newsweek, Times or Gazeta Wyborcza. To read these periodicals one needs to have very sharp BS detectors.
Saker, I’m not sure you are aware of this “interesting” release of candid conversation between important Polish politician which needs to be considered as to who is driving Polish politics. It is not the Polish politicians or the people in my opinion. The “driver” is on your land mass.
“The Polish-American alliance is worthless, even harmful, as it gives Poland a false sense of security. It’s bullshit.”
http://www.thenews.pl/1/2/Artykul/174386,Tape-scandal-PolishAmerican-alliance-worthless-says-foreign-minister
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28001780
A little OT perhaps, but I hope still relevant.
Poland! What a strange country–my experience with Poles and Poland is very limited, having visited a friend there who lives in Gdansk. The main blockage for foreigners in getting to know Poland is the language. It has the reputation of being fiercely difficult to learn. The written language uses roman characters like English, which to my mind makes it actually harder to learn than Russian. Given this barrier, it is the rare person who would undertake to learn the language without some special incentive like family ties.
The language thus serves to isolate Poland, and Poles are forced to learn English to connect to the rest of the world. I have had a tiny experience with respect to the legal profession, and have read many papers of their legal scholars. The main preoccupation seems to be to harmonize Polish law with EU directives. Nevertheless, it is striking how these legal scholars form a small tightknit circle who cite each other in the papers they write, which seems to be a kind of insularity imposed by the language barrier.
Poland is probably the most homogenous country in Europe. It is overwhelmingly white and Catholic. I went to Mass there in a smallish church and what immediately struck me was the giant tableau of Christ behind the central alter, the Divine Mercy Christ with the rays of colored light emanating from His chest. This is the Christ of St. Maria Kowalkowska, whose writings had been on the Church’s Index of banned books ever since John XXIII. They were taken off the Index by John Paul II. I have never cottoned to that portrait of Christ with its hard, glowering expression. Nevertheless, it seems to be the pride of the Polish people and the Divine Mercy devotion is widespread throughout Catholicism.
Poland appears to be a prosperous country with an ever increasing standard of living. In time it may distance itself from its religious roots and become more of a typical western European country. The way is already being paved for introducing abortion into the country and gay marriage will undoubtedly follow. These seem to be necessary sequelae of materialism. Materialism has both a philosophical and a social dimension. The philosophical side is that only material reality exists and therefore, for instance, souls do not exist and there is no life after death. If the human being is no more than a collection of cells, then there is really no objection to abortion. Abortion also makes perfect sense on the social plane as well. Since both husband and wife must work to maintain a decent standard of living, abortion removes what would otherwise spell economic disaster, and allows the family to stay small–another necessity for economic survival. (Unfortunately, in this scenario birthrates fall below replacement level.) It is intriguing to observe the practical consequences of seemingly absract philosophy, but people subscribe to these philosophies in the depths of their being, especially when they permeate the air we breathe. We are not even conscious of them. We develop a sort of inchoate distaste for religion that occasionally surfaces, which is reinforced by our social circles. Indeed, this materialism is like our mother’s milk to us. It must be consciously identified in order to commence a long process of deprogramming to root it out. The philosophical and social are not two axes in this philosophical/social geometry, but represent a sort of “spacetime”. Thus, the philosophical is fully available in and reinforced by the social (as the French would say, it is “enfoncé” by the social).
So let it be with Poland, right next door to the country that used to be Germany but is now fully engulfed in the EU phagocyte.
Could not relate to this article at all…
Like reading something about a parallell world which was far off from this world.
Blocks…?
Foreigners controlling usa?
If “foreigners” means the zionist jews then yes. But then all of usa is more or less foreigners.
And the election math? Did not make much sense to me (and im good at math).
Besides why would The people controlling Hillary need to buy votes?
They have the media, and if false flags, media controll doesnt work.
Then they have trojan backdoor to the electronic votingmachines. Yes thats right, they are owned by Soros and only his company has backdooraccess and only his company know the programcode. It can be meddled with from remote.
Fantastic system when Soros has special access;)
Hillary is very likely to win one way or the other.
Best chance would be to attack her with wikileaks and wholerange of scandals so she cant hide or get sympathyvotes.
@ Anonymous: Like reading something about a parallell world which was far off from this world.
LOL, I had the exact same thought. Although I thought it was a little too snarky to post. Perhaps you are correct. Or perhaps you and I are in a parallel world.
It should also be pointed out that if the Poles want war with Russia they may be quite surprised to find out that their soldiers will serve as the front line. The US doesn’t have the manpower.
many thanks for this article,
like it, or not , giving alternate views and therefore some balance?
however I don’t reckon it identifies the power behind the throne.
Trump is too long in the tooth to be ‘idealistick’ as a young person may be.
He would not have entered the presidential race if he could not win.
He is assured of it.
And with Killary it is a case of clearing out the old guard and install a new requime/emperor( ‘The Donald’ )
I wonder……
“however I don’t reckon it identifies the power behind the throne.”
Exactly !!! Those that “set” the agenda and not those that show up at the protest. There is a difference. One is a nail and the other the hammer. For sure the CEEC’s are not the hammer.
Yes they are just tools to be used by the puppetmasters, not even close to having any real power themselves.
So this whole article seem to put all on its head. (As if those pathetic fodder/puppets have anything they can say. Thats how the puppetmaster would consider those puppets. Ants.
This sounds exactly like old time Chicago politics with its large voting blocs of Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Bohemians, and Croats, all of whom were universally Russophobic, Roman Catholic and arch-conservative. Both Barack Obomber and Hitlery, having made their bones in Chicago politics, know this all too well and will use the hatred of Russia as the biggest incentive for these groups to vote Democratic in the coming elections. Back in the “old country” many of them lined up with der Fuerher during the war to boot… and why they ended up here rather than on the other side of the “iron curtain.” They are mostly gone, but their kids and grandkids still carry the torch of, let’s call it, authoritarianism. The joke was usually on them, however, as they mostly ensured that the Irish would get elected to most of the offices in Chi-town. I can hear Hitlery’s campaign rhetoric already, emphasizing to the good white ethnic folks of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin and even Minnesota that all of Eastern Europe is just a hair breadth away from becoming “captive nations” once again unless you choose someone tough on “Russian aggression” like herself. Just watch, Trump will be pegged as a Putin apologist, just like Stephen F. Cohen is by the Obombites.
Doode, those old blocks have been crushed by the process of the white flight ages ago.
There are no whites in chicago proper….or any city of any size, that could or would form anything but a Trump-block.
And that is the main reason for the alarm on the left…whites are going, going, going, gone baby.
Few more islamic involved faux-pas, and all the thus far protected minorities are gonna get the picture…and it is not a nice one, if they were hoping for a nice long carrier ripping off the taxbase, cos as with communism, islam will throw the useful idiots under the bus first.
Read my words. I said “old time” Chicago politics. And, I used the past tense: “all of whom Were universally Russophobic…” etc, etc. I did this knowing that inattentive people such as yourself would still mis-read the passage. Removed. Stop attacking other commenters. Mod I am well aware of current population patterns in Chicago and throughout America’s Midwestern Rustbelt. Though those people have moved to the suburbs, or the Sunbelt, their prejudices and voting habits have not changed.
“their prejudices and voting habits have not changed.”
You have it completely right on the mark. They are in the boiling pot and the heat has been turned up but they are not noticing this fact.
Fascinating. He calls me “doode” and it’s allowed. I address him back as “doode” and it’s “an attack.” I could say more but I’ll take the high road.
Sorry about the inconsistency but we have multiple moderators and each ‘calls them as they see them’. Our policy in general is to avoid personal attacks on other commenters and authors and to keep the discussion about the topic, idea, or article. Thanks for your understanding … mod-hs
That is exactly what is going on.
In modern politics, post-Citizens United, elections are really decided by the group of billionaires with the deepest pockets. The actual vote is still important, and it’s preferable to win that way if possible, it’s cleaner and simpler. But if not, then that is not the end of the story.
This became clear to me in the Democratic primary. The billionaires supporting the Hillary Victory Fund had clearly decided Hillary was to be the nominee at least a year in advance of the election. This group first did everything possible to attempt to win in a reasonably legal manner. The Democratic party itself was clearly compromised in advance. Not only the super-delegates but the entirety of the party down to the grass roots organizers was strongly pulling for Hillary. There was also a mysterious lack of other Democratic candidates, Joe Biden notably. One might suspect they were advised to not challenge Hillary.
Still, despite all that, the entrance of Sanders, a great candidate, threw a monkey wrench into the machine. At that point, bigger guns were drawn, particularly through manipulation of the media. When even that was not enough, it became necessary to resort to fraud up to a massive level to push Hillary through. Had that still failed who knows what would have been done.
In the general election, Hillary will win. The FBI investigation will not be allowed to produce a result that will challenge her candidacy. Trump is not only no threat, but some of his recent statements have suggested to me that he is not making a serious effort. The media suggesting that Trump is a serious threat to win is probably the only way voters would actually vote for such a weak candidate as Hillary.
Watching this “election” unfold it’s difficult for me to come to a conclusion other than that this is all a very elaborate, scripted farce. If HRC is the annointed one this season — after all, she passed the job interview: https://youtu.be/Ba9wxl1Dmas — the challenge for the quadrennial event’s producers was how to get the public to elect someone so universally despised. Everyone may know the game is rigged, but the ritual must still be acted out to give even the slightest veneer of legitimacy to Murka’s whole “freedom and democracy” mandate. And this [s]election season has been an especially spectacular and entertaining hoax.
So how to get someone so despised to win an election? Hey — get the public to despise her opponent even more! There has to be someone even more repugnant to the
idiotspublic than Hillary, but who could that be? The common republican troglodyte has a good chance of defeating Hillary because she is reviled across the political spectrum, so that’s not going to work. Hey — how about asking the Clintons’ long time friend Donald Trump to play along! He’d love such a large spotlight, and he’d drive everyone into her camp just by giving him enormous venues to let his megalomania fully unleash.Yeah, but what about the always problematic democratic left-flank? The demoncrap machine may hate them, but they know they can’t win without their numbers. They fell for Obama last time ’cause he’s black. They can try the Hillary’s a woman thing, but that’s not enough this time. Hey, why don’t they get that faux-socialist Bernie to play the pied-piper for them this time? He’s really good at saying what the kids want to hear, and he’ll play along if we make him the chair of some committee or other.
So from where I’m sitting, the spectacle is playing out just as the script called for. I suspect that if things were to go dangerously off-script they’d have no problem stealing the election with their proprietary voting-booth software (which has been proven to work all too easily and often); or, if it reaches a terminally dangerous point, a shot will ring out thanks to some patsy-du-jour.
I left the country years ago, clearly seeing the trajectory the nation was on. Every so often I talk to a friend or relative in Murka, all of whom are solidly in the mainstream. They are all proof of just how well propaganda works. Each one has asked me “Hey, how about that Trump, hunh?” Then I say “Yeah, Trump’s bad, really bad, but Hillary’s a lot worse.” They’re shocked I would say such a thing and refute me, to which I give a reply that opens a door to further discussion; but then they get quiet and change the subject, often to the latest movie they’re meant to see. And they’ll all vote for Hillary. (Except my brother-in-law, who is a rabid tea-partiery.) (Oh, and they’re all afraid of ISIS, so they’re ok with tighter security everywhere. And Putin is evil. They may not trust the media, but they parrot it perfectly.) All my friends and relatives in Murka are mushrooms (“kept in the dark and fed shit”) who drink deeply from the propaganda well, and I think they are a very accurate indicators of the public as a whole.
The mask is off, but no one seems to care, or at least want to do anything about it (like, say, lots of second-amendment solutions aimed at the right people [cough]CFR[/cough] [cough]Goldman Sachs[/cough] [cough]Bilderberg[/cough]…). The sheeple may seethe with anger, but they’re a docile bunch as long as they get their soma from their big-screen TVs.
“The media suggesting that Trump is a serious threat to win is probably the only way voters would actually vote for such a weak candidate as Hillary.”
Have you seen any polls lately covering the public trust towards the presstitudes?
Noone I know cares about their mouthings. Not one person.
If the Donald doesn’t move his finger from now on, he has already destroyed the msm.
He’s got my blessing.
If he has I can’t say it’s a step in the wrong direction. However, are all your anti-MSM friends glued to their TVs watching the Orlando shooting/ISIS coverage? If not, good for them.
I should say that I am Trump-neutral. I neither love nor despise him. Some of the nationalist populist rhetoric he had been using seemed worthy of attention: opposition to trade agreements, protecting US industry, rebuilding infrastructure, even preserving Social Security/Medicare. His criticism of NATO and favorable statements about Putin were interesting. Immigration is an issue, jobs are disappearing in the US at an alarming rate, insufficient to provide work for those already here.
It does seem to me though, that he is backpedaling on a lot of these talking points. I expect the debate to who can be tougher on ISIS and Putin as well.
Who has the greatest hatred for Russia? It has and always will be the Khazarian Mafia…
What is being said is not convincing: lot of allegations. The CEEC (Central and East European Coalition) . The central and east European people were never able to get along together and they are making a coalition in the US: it is a joke. And they are NAZIs and Holocaust deniers. It is absurd. I suspect that the author is close to Zionists and wants to hide their responsibility for the chaos generated by Washington and his friends all over the World and in particular in the Middle East.
The CEE stepped back and are working on the Prometheans group formula. A truce was declared until all had their own country. Only afterward could they grind axes with each other. That’s history. Your point is good though and is why an early proposed union of states never got off the ground.
“The central and east European people were never able to get along together and they are making a coalition in the US: it is a joke.”
Very good point and right on the mark. I would guess the cooperation equal to zero.
Reading the article I had the sensation that it was written by several people with a mind to push all the right buttons. Voice of America is the moral equivalent of Pravda in the Soviet days. Ann Applebaum is a neocon through and through. She is the only reason Sikorski (after his boozing in UK) was given the position in Polish gov. that he did. Once his candid comments became public due to secret recording his career came to an end. One could say that that was a great service he did for his country. Told the truth.
Speaking of the 2016 American charade… er …election this article raises a provocative question as to whether Trump is nothing more than a Democratic “plant” to make Hitlery Clinton look good in comparison.
If Trump Were a “Clinton Plant”, What Would He Do Differently?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/if-trump-were-a-clinton-plant-what-would-he-do-differently/5531142
A great comment from a Zero Hedge article that in part refers to our discussion here.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-16/fed-has-brought-back-taxation-without-representation#comment-7697723
Beating around the bush that things just happen and that the little guy decides is not intellectually honest. The little guy is made to think that he decides. What has happened to the US was not a decision of the little guy or any green-men called “CEEC”.
The Saker should have re-read and reviewed the article. Normally, I find his writing informative, but this was highly iffy and poorly written. The grammar was appalling, and I am sure 1+1 does not always equal two (2).
I’m still not exactly sure what the CEEC is but from pondering the description it seems to me that this group is the American blue collar industrial worker. Conservative, Catholic, prosperous and unionized, they formed the backbone of the labor force of what was once called the American Industrial Heartland (now the Rust Belt). They were the “hardhats” that clashed with the hippies and draft dodgers during the Vietnam war and they were the Reagan Democrats. Always more order-takers than order-givers, though. Clearly a powerful demographic group, in 1960. Since then, however, the industrial economy has been largely liquidated and the unions humbled. Don’t know how much power they still can have left.
I think the author hugely, hugely exaggerates the influence which central European countries and their immigrant communities have on US foreign policy. In fact, their influence is virtually zero. To the contrary, the USA will use these countries for its own personal gains, i.e. simply because they can be used for military bases and if need be a war front in the unlikely event there would be war with Russia. And guess what? There will not be any war with Russia. Why? The USA/NATO will not take on an adversary who is remotely equal in military strength. Blame all the saber rattling and base building on the US military industrial complex: even if there is no real need for war, they must ‘act’ like war is coming, or Russia is a threat. In this way they can keep feeding on the trough of trillions of US dollars, the biggest socialist gravy train there ever was: endless government defense contracts to Boeing, General Dynamics, Booze Allen Hamilton, Halliburton, etc. What’s more journalists everywhere (like this website) must keep screaming “The sky if falling!!! really!! WWIII is coming!!” because let’s face it: peace, prosperity, and the pursuit of happiness is the journalists worst nightmare come to life. So, ever since the end of WWII we have been reading about WWIII between Russia and USA. Guess what? It ain’t ever gonna happen. You can wait another 50 years for that…still won’t happen.
I’d say the bankers and other oligarchs who run this world aren’t afraid of any emigre groups– neither their voting patterns, nor otherwise. Election outcomes are determined via corruption in the vote count. Candidates are decided via corruption in the primary vote count. http://richardcharnin.com/
The media just help to make it all more believable. I don’t see how elections are our way out of the global oligarchy.
I don’t think there will be a world war because those who would be behind it, the oligarchs, are winning.
China has gone neoliberal and joined the oligarchs’ plans? Why not? She has her own oligarchs of her “heavenly families,” and China has never been democratic.
Putin says he wants economic integration w EU, w/o visas. He’s made no attempt to free Russia from the IMF/FED system. On the contrary, at Valdai he said, “I am certain that if there is a will, we can restore the effectiveness of the international and regional institutions system. We do not even need to build anything anew, from the scratch; this is not a “greenfield,” especially since the institutions created after World War II are quite universal and can be given modern substance, adequate to manage the current situation.”
If citizens’ votes have no impact on trade, on monetary policy, or immigration, how is this democracy? Where is the sovereignty of individual nations? How does this differ from the NWO?
War?! Over what? There is no disagreement as to the endgame. Might be a limited pretend-war to scare us into going the next step. If war was contemplated they wouldn’t be announcing it in the media. They’d want a surprise first-strike.
Your piece describes in detail what my family and I have be screaming about in Canada for years about the power and weight the CEEC community has over institutions and government decisions in Canada as well.
My family came to Canada between 1916 and 1920 and all were dirt poor peasants escaping prosecution not from Russia but the Polish army and the Fascist’s. My relatives fault’s? Atheist’s and Leftist’s who as they gained increased right’s and freedom’s wished to share it with everyone. The biggest swear word in Capitalist dogma is share. Because of the time period and our belief’s we were the Muslim’s of the day.
The list of alleged crimes is too long for this post however down the road I will provide your web site with a detailed list of my families trials and tribulations in Canada. And I now threaten court action every time Government or Corporate raider’s take liberties with my families or my right’s sending them running for the exits. My family and I hate no one and in Canada if your of Ukrainian heritage and you don’t hate the Russian’s you must be a communist. For the record our current political models are outdated and corrupt. Most of my families detractor’s are so social engineered anything outside the pablum explanation becomes a lie to them.
In Canada, the Ukrainian emigres are the 3rd largest voting bloc and control Russia policy, China policy, and CEE policy. I’m writing this because of what is at stake. This subject has been ignored other than really great work by Ieva Zake who only did the parts, not the whole. Please contact me through the site.
So how many pollacks does it take to elect a president?
I generally agree with your essays, including those critical of Polish neocon/romantic thinking about Russia. I am a Pole myself and a Catholic, as well as a nationalist conservative. I edit the site konserwatyzm.pl.
But I truly do not know how the hell one can call President Duda a “Nazi”??
And you make too much of the “fascist” straw man. Coming from a Russian, I can understand. That is why I recommend to you these two texts and book to clarify things up:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/who-isnt-fascist/
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/whos-a-fascist/
https://www.amazon.com/Fascism-Career-Concept-Paul-Gottfried/dp/0875804934
Mike,
Wait for the next article installment and please comment again. I’m having a few technical difficulties so it’s going to be a few days before I can finish it.
“When I first came to Lithuania 22 years ago to try and help convince the local authorities to bring unpunished Lithuanian Nazi war criminals to trial, I tried to convince them that such proceedings were the best history lesson to help their society honestly deal with Lithuania’s bloody Holocaust past. Unfortunately, those efforts were only very partially successful, and now that fight for historical truth must continue without the advantages provided by the prosecution of local killers.” -Dr. Efraim Zuroff
Isreal is not only guilty of war crimes but genocide as well.
There being in the SCO-hopefully, going to lead to and end to that landed carrier in the ME. For a Multi-Confessional, Multi-Ethnic Secular Palestinian State!
Were on our way.
RR