The Guardian published the full text of the Geneva Statement. This is what eight hours of negotiations produced:
The Geneva meeting on the situation in Ukraine agreed on initial concrete steps to de-escalate tensions and restore security for all citizens.
All sides must refrain from any violence, intimidation or provocative actions. The participants strongly condemned and rejected all expressions of extremism, racism and religious intolerance, including anti-semitism.
All illegal armed groups must be disarmed; all illegally seized buildings must be returned to legitimate owners; all illegally occupied streets, squares and other public places in Ukrainian cities and towns must be vacated.
Amnesty will be granted to protestors and to those who have left buildings and other public places and surrendered weapons, with the exception of those found guilty of capital crimes.
It was agreed that the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission should play a leading role in assisting Ukrainian authorities and local communities in the immediate implementation of these de-escalation measures wherever they are needed most, beginning in the coming days. The U.S., E.U. and Russia commit to support this mission, including by providing monitors.
The announced constitutional process will be inclusive, transparent and accountable. It will include the immediate establishment of a broad national dialogue, with outreach to all of Ukraine’s regions and political constituencies, and allow for the consideration of public comments and proposed amendments.
The participants underlined the importance of economic and financial stability in Ukraine and would be ready to discuss additional support as the above steps are implemented.
That’s it. Good thing that they called it “initial” because it really contains only vague well-intentioned truisms. They might as well have written something along the lines of “give peace a chance” or “we are the world, we are the children, we are the ones who make a brighter day”. So if there is nothing of substance here, what is the big deal? Why did it take so long?
The big deal is that Uncle Sam had to accept Russia as an equal party to the solution of this mess.
The big deal is that Kiev had to accept the East as an equal party to the solution of this mess.
This might look obvious to any mentally sane person, but for die hard imperialist who believe their own hubris and for neo-Nazis thugs who thought that they could built their Banderastan and basically eliminate the East in one way or another, this is a very painful concession one, in fact, they will try as hard as they can to renege on.
Furthermore, this “statement” (it is not even an agreement) has a huge flaw which is already becoming obvious: it was signed by “the Ukraine” as if there was such an entity in the first place. But that, of course, is a fiction. The two biggest forces which really matter are the Right Sector and the Russian-speakers of the East, neither of which was invited. Instead, it is this fictional and wholly illegitimate regime of oligarchs and CIA agents which put it’s signature in the name of all Ukrainians. The problem is that this regime is about as representative of the Ukrainian people as the Kerensky regime was in 1917 Russia: it represented only itself.
As for the Right Sector and the Russian-speakers in the East, they are not bound by this agreement and the latter have already declared so. As for the Right Sector, there is one word in this document which refers directly to them, the word “square” as in “all illegally occupied streets, squares and other public places in Ukrainian cities and towns must be vacated“. That they won’t like one bit. Of course, all the revolutionary junta needs to do is to deliver the “Maidan” a public demonstration permit and, voila, they will be “legal”, except that the Maidan is a much bigger threat to the regime than to anybody else. So doing that might be very dangerous.
The bottom line is this: this “statement” is only a “partial acceptance of reality” by the USA and its puppets in Kiev, that’s it. What made them cave in is the absolute failure of the so-called “anti-terrorist operation” which far from crushing the East saw several instances of units switching sides (the 24th Airborne Brigade, were most of these defections occurred, is now reportedly being disbanded, thus Kiev is basically getting rid of what is probably the comparatively best trained and most combat capable unit in the entire Ukrainian military).
The most important thing to understand at this point is that the future of the Ukraine will not be decided by this document, but only by the correlation of forces on the ground. That is the only thing which the AngloZionist Empire responds to: force. With the Empire, written agreements, treaties, promises and pledges are not worth the paper they are written on, and the Russians knows that better than anybody else.
Putin gave the Ukrainians one month to, at the very least, resume paying their electricity bill and negotiate a payment plan, then Russia will switch to a monthly pre-payment option in which the Ukies will only get the energy they have paid for in advance. The effect of that will be nothing short of an economic nuclear explosion, especially in the context of the promised Presidential election. And even if by a mix of halfway measure (loans, reverse gas deliveries, etc.) the West managed to keep a few streetlights in Kiev on over the summer, by September the severity of the shortage will be nothing short of apocalyptic.
As for the Russian-speakers in the East, nobody currently has the means to disarm and crush them by force. I see no way this could change in the foreseeable future. What the East will do over the summer is simply to organize itself better and prepare for any attempts by Kiev to crush its people. As for Russia, it now has all the time it needs to covertly assist the Donbass financially, organizationally and even militarily.
Time is most definitely not on the USA’s side and with the passing weeks the position of the current oligarchic regime will get weaker and weaker and that will force it to more and more concessions. Frankly, a much better solution at this point would be to have direct negotiations between the Right Sector and the Russian-speakers. I know, this sounds far fetched, and it it, but at least these two parties do most definitely have power and legitimacy (with their own people, that is).
One more thing: some of you have expressed concerns about the planned OSCE monitors mission. You have to understand that all this is is a fig leaf to try to give the impression that all parties want to de-escalate the violence. Furthermore, and I assure you that this is true, nobody on the planet knows the OSCE better than the Russians, especially Putin, as they saw how these “observers” “observed” in Chechnia! As a result, if and when these so-called “observers” show up in the eastern Ukraine, they might as well wear T-shirts with “CIA”, “MI6”, “DGSE” or “KSI” written in big letters.
The bottom line is this: this agreement is first and foremost a symbolic concession by the AngloZionists and nothing else. It will have zero real impact on the ground. One should not be distracted by all the hot air being currently released in the corporate media and the blogosphere because words are just that – hot air, political flatulence. Only one thing will decide the eventual out come of this crisis: the correlation of forces on the ground and it unambiguously indicates that the “Ukrainian experiment” is over. It is now just a matter of time.
The Saker
saker. please try not to quote from “the guardian” which is a british war monger propaganda machine having supported iraq and syra-libyan wars with no moral compuction and which also used assange and snowden to iuncrease its then defunct circulation.why give importance to this evil english media?
the guardian is an evil apper and ll its journalists msut be treated as war criminals.
OSCE is an anglo controleld evil lair organisation which did not recongnise even putin.s election despite the fact that 68 % of russians voted for him !
Russia shoulkd enver have allowed oSCe any role anywhere.
lavrov is an idiot and weakling who thinks that agreeing to wetern agenda will make him popular amosnt the wetern evil plotters.
Further down you mention ; 3) The USA, NATO and the EU have lied, cheated, mis-represented, twisted and simply betrayed pretty much every promise which they made to Russia ever since Russia freed itself from the yoke of Communism in 1991.
.
But i can not agree with this without todays context of capitalistic failures… i think it is very important to always keep this in mind. There are hundreds of millions of capitalistic disabled people around the globe. Around 120 Mio. alone in Europe with a further 25 Mio. more in the next few years.. The current economic systems fails to deliver its promises for ever more people… to be able to make things better it is not wrong to rididule communists because the others are by far not better at all… One failure is for example the profit hungry media unable to delivery proper information to its citizens or the parameters of the financal world repeated over an over as success or failure but without any significance in daily life for the common men… what we need in the end is a balance of both worlds…
.
Besides all this… i can already hear, read and see the ongoing agressions, lies, fabrications, betrayals from the US and Europe and the Ukraine against Russia… and the day has not even comming to and end.
.
It does not stop. The media fabrications, lies, betrayals, fabrications, agressions, war mongering… Dialog and Diplomcy with Russia is obviously unwanted…
Saker, do you have any thoughts on what we’ll do now? More mercenaries maybe — but where exactly, and doing what? (If I were a Kiev oligarch I’d hardly trust Brennan’s judgment at this point; I’d just hire a bigger personal security force.) But really, given the Empire’s goals and methods, what ploys is it likely to attempt in Ukraine over the next few months, and how successful are they likely to be?
As far as what any American official, or Anglo-Zionist Empire MSM, have to say about any of this: it’s all propaganda aimed at the typical American teevee watcher who’s got the attention span and working memory of a gnat. Syria was a big deal here for maybe a week, now it’s as old as the pyramids and comes to mind about as often, so there’s no problem really if our leaders focus our “minds” on the next few countries they wish to disrupt and Ukraine simply drops off the radar screen — the American public will willingly trot along. Which at least would be good for Ukraine.
The big question of course is how the hell do you stop us. All I see ahead is chaos.
“The most important thing to understand … Is the only thing which the AngloZionist Empire responds to: force.”
100% correct, unfortunately. Encapsulated in the notion of ‘infidelity’ accurately described 1400 years ago.
OT:
Has anyone called Crimea? Any changes to country code?
T1
Dear Saker,
This is a bit on the sideline but I’d be interested to know what’s the situation in Transnistria, specialy with regard to the free moving of people and goods. What i heard is that the import / export used to transit mainly via Ukraine, but the frontier has partialy been barred for people. What are the options in face of a blocus of the territory ? My understanding is that access through Moldavia is minimaly open if at all, and the territory doesn’t seem to have an open access to the Black Sea ? Right ? Being a territory of 550 000 people, a lot of things need to be imported and some other exported : textiles, etc. Gazprom has apparently significant investements there too. Saker, would you be in a position to address this issue, considering the short term and mid term outlook for this small territory ? Thank You
After yesterdays talks I’ve got a feeling that Russia doesn’t really want east Ukraine inside its own borders. Probably because of the economic impact (?) and reaction from “the world opinion” (western masses).
CM
Saker, out of curiosity: how come you mention KSI (swedish intelligence) along with CIA, MI6 and DSGE? Do you view them as a player in this?
Anonymous said…
saker. please try not to quote from “the guardian” which is a british war monger propaganda machine having supported iraq and…
Reading what the zio media says often exposes the sof belly of the zios. It leads me to where they obtain their BS propaganda aimed against civilisation and decency.
Go ahead, read their crap, use your common sense and empower yourself. They are such slaves to the Zios that they dont even make an effort to cloak their BS.
Since US/Ukraine insist that Crimea is still Ukraine: can Crimeans vote in the May 25th election?
What are the details of the Devolution/Autonomy that has been offered/proposed? It appears that pro-Russian/Separatists see this as insufficient while the US/West see federalism as ceding control of East and South Ukraine to Russia.
Is any middle ground possible?
You mention the potential for Russia to provide some form of military assistance to the Occupy groups in the East.
I suspect that the proposed “sleeping bag” pipeline sponsored by the US Dept of Defence will be used for exactly the same purpose. Once the logistics chain is in place there will be additional items included along with the “non-lethal aid.”
If this is correct (see the recent Sy Hersh article on a similar “rat line” set up by the US to supply arms to the Syrian opposition) then the Geneva agreement is nothing but an agreed intermission while both sides have the opportunity to buttress their respective clients / proxies / co-religionists.
This implies that at some point in the future (likely around the time in the fall that the lack of gas results in a crisis) there will be an outbreak of hostilities and this will represent the shift from a phony civil war to a hot war.
I concur that the Geneva ‘agreement’ signifies little of actual consequence and that processes in motion in Ukraine are what is important in the near term. That said perhaps a step back to look at the objectives of the major players is in order. I can’t claim any particular expertise in these matters so my comment is really a question.
Is this conflict fundamentally a conflict between the financial powers of the West and Russia – an attempt to bring Russia (and EU trade partners) to heel? Russia and China are the only actors of consequence that still have the possibility to confront that power directly in my view.
So where does China stand on this? Are they willing to try and replace the current financial system dominated by the dollar? Or do they (and Russia for that matter) simply want a place at the table?
In a conversation with a Russian acquaintance recently (someone who went to school with Putin) they expressed a mistrust of China (citing its population, industrial needs and proximity to the resource rich Russian east). They also commented that in their opinion Putin and his oligarch inner circle’s interests just happened to coincide with widely perceived (by Russians) Russian national interests of late.
I am assuming that the West wants control of the gas transit system in Ukraine, control over pending energy exploration and development in southern Ukraine and the Black Sea, another piece in the network of missile sites surrounding Russia, and denial of Russia the naval base at Sevastopol none of which is acceptable to Russia.
Is this the defining conflict of the current world order?
I hear that life is growing more difficult in Kiev with price inflation and poor dollar exchange rate.
@marcus:Do you view them as a player in this?
VERY good and important question, thank you!
Yes, definitely. I picked KSI, but I could have picked any other EU/NATO intelligence service. The reality is that they all have more or less secret agreements with “partners” which means each other when they are friendly and with the USA. This is how this works:
The CIA and/or DIA toss some general intel to its European vassal states, stuff like lists of Russian units, their dislocation, low level stuff like what most of Wikileaks is, some State Department or USDoE reports and, in exchange, the Europeans provide the CIA with human intelligence at which they are often much better than the Americans. This allows the USA to literally “coopt” all of the Europeans HUMIT capabilities and add them to their own. And make no mistakes, sometimes, often, the small countries with small intel budgets can be *much* better than the huge, bloated, US agencies and their monolinguistic and parochial undercover agents who are tracked and monitored by the other side much closer than, say, a Danish or Romanian officer. The big guys are, of course, the French and the Germans, as for the Brits, they are even above on the food chain since they have a special relationship with the USA and the rest of the Anglosphere.
I picked the examples of the KSI because it is small and Sweden is very anti-Russian, not because it, Sweden or even the EU have any say into what is going on. Europe is a US colony, a protectorate, and all it gets to say is “Yes, master, anything you say master”. Sad, but true.
Kind regards and thanks for a very good question indeed.
The Saker
You may find these interview interesting. Apparently a major German television network investigated the Maidan shootings and concluded they were perpetrated by the Maidan protestors:
http://michael-hudson.com/2014/04/obama-channeling-dick-cheney/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uE9jULgC42o
US assessments of four-party meeting on Ukraine highly disappointing — Russian FM
http://en.itar-tass.com/russia/728701
Moscow disappointed by US assessment of Geneva meeting – Russian FM
http://voiceofrussia.com/2014_04_18/Moscow-dissapointed-by-US-assesment-of-Geneva-meeting-Russian-FM-4062/
It is not the 24th, but the 25th Airborne Brigade from Dnipropetrovsk – the same one that was sent to Crimea by the junta around March 1st. One company of some 80 soldiers returned to Ukraine with their arms, the only unit to do so.
Thanks for the reply Saker. I am swedish, hence the question, and I am a bit confused myself about the sentiments in Sweden towards Russia these days. It’s hard to keep up.
I am aware of the long animosity and the wars in the past, but I do believe we have moved past that now, and if not we should have.
From 1917 and onwards it was usually the fact that the political left in Sweden, or maybe the far left, leaned more towards Russia and that the right was vehemently opposed to it – even though the official line was “neutrality”. But to my recollection that wasn’t so much animosity towards Russia or russians, but towards expasionist communism that we for good reasons feared, being in its neighborhood so to speak.
Today there is a very strange mix of thoughts on Russia here in Sweden. Conservatives and the non-liberal right* are basically rooting for Putin and Russia. While the left and the liberals and the very small number of ultra rightists hate/fear/loath Russia albeit for very different reasons.
But it’s even more complicated than that and you find pro- or anti-russia sentiments within the same political parties, depending on the issue.
The media though is definetly and firmly anti-russian, or more to the point anti-Putin. But that’s only one out of many areas where the collective media in Sweden is not in sync with the feelings of the general population.
I dare say that the majority of the general public wants no confrontation with Russia. And many, many people both left and right are very put off by Carl Bildt’s incessant inflammatory Twittering that appears to be in our name but in fact are his own private and extremely anti-russian thoughts on matters.
*In Sweden, as opposed to in many other countries the libs are to the right, when compared to the Social Democrats.
big deal . . . that US had to accept Russia [and] Ukraine had to accept East
Not so sure. If they had not participated in the talks, Russia would’ve been vilified as preferring violence rather than a peaceful solution. And West Ukraine hasn’t accepted the East/South – they are trying (with US/EU support) to eliminate the hope of Russian support to these areas as a means of quelling separatism.
Isn’t the “big deal” that they are all talking past each other?
Putin is a cold blood personn and a chess player. I obtain the maximum possible for its country : Crimea and to be recognized as a partner in the resolution of the Ukranian collapse solution. The russian speaker wins exactly what they want : participation to the future of Ukraine and not secession, dissolution of the political armed militias. There is no real enthusiasm for the russian option in eastern Ukraine unlike Crimea. Therefore, the better solution is to let the OTANists with the Ukranian collapse issue.
Putin is a cold blood personn and a chess player. I obtain the maximum possible for its country : Crimea and to be recognized as a partner in the resolution of the Ukranian collapse solution. The russian speaker wins exactly what they want : participation to the future of Ukraine and not secession, dissolution of the political armed militias. There is no real enthusiasm for the russian option in eastern Ukraine unlike Crimea. Therefore, the better solution is to let the OTANists with the Ukranian collapse issue.
The masked men who demanded Jews register in the East was a nice piece of agit-prop run by the chicken Kievs to try to recruit Western sympathy, and it has played extensively in the UK papers but it doesn’t seem to have worked. Most email responses see it for what it is – a provocation, coming so soon after Brennan’s visit … My concern is that as it hasn’t worked, the protagonists may upgrade and start assassinating random Jews. That would certainly make a loud false flag.
I’ll try once more to make my points.
(a) From the time of the Levelers to the present day, phony truces have served defensive militias badly. One need not have read Truong Chin on protracted war to understand that such defensive militias need a threatening enemy to remain viable, and must rely on actions against the enemy to grow and develop. The current ‘agreement’ comes at a bad time for the still nascent resistance, a time when it is expanding and gaining confidence while the enemy is stumbling and demoralized.
(b) A respite will allow Kiev,buttressed by mercenaries, benefiting from western assistance, to rebuild its forces and turn the Maiden rabble into usable tools. The resistance, denied comparable material help, or any at all, without the high stimulus of imminent threat, will–if history be the guide- decline.
(c) A respite will also give Kiev time to set up a repressive apparatus in places where resistance has not yet flourished.
(d)The constant Russian disavowals of any intent to intervene militarily are sure to discourage on-the-fence military officers from joining the resistance and demoralize people in the Donbass and Odessa. It is likely, at the same time, to stimulate the US/NATO appetite.
I have just today come across an article that tends to confirm my sense of how Moscow may really be viewing events. It is by Boris Kagarlitsky, From the Maidan to The REvolution. appearing in Znet but originally from Links.org. His conclusion is that Moscow powers that be are not at all comfortable with a true popular rebellion on their border, far less a revolutionary gov’t.
This Parthian shot: Before it is all over the Eastern resisters and the ‘infamous’ Right Sektor in the west, may find themselves de-facto allies. Here in America, the anti-war positions of the hard left and the paleo (eg Pat Buchanan)and libertarian right are indistinguishable. The same pattern is showing up in Western Europe and I’ve often encountered it in anti-pork barrel environmental issues.
View from an additional perspective:
http://cluborlov.blogspot.be/2014/04/the-geneva-agreement-on-ukraine.html#more
On German 1st TV Channel a couple of days ago, a balanced, objective piece on the snipers at Maidan -Eng subtitles-:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDPJ-ucnyPU
Once again, despite condemnations of religious intolerance, we get a special mention for ‘antisemitism’, because, as we all know, Jews are a special case, separate from the rest of humanity. It is such a common feature of discourse that it goes unremarked. I must say that I find it rather distasteful, because I hold this heretical belief that Jews are just human beings like Parsis, Buddhists and ‘Goths’etc. Some are good, some bad, some indifferent, at least in my understanding of the terms.
@Once again, despite condemnations of religious intolerance, we get a special mention for ‘antisemitism’, because, as we all know, Jews are a special case, separate from the rest of humanity.
What follows is an indirect admission of the fact that indeed the Jews played the first violin at the Maidan open-air concert and an attempt to play the dumb to avoid a backlash.
Foxman: Anti-Semitism card overplayed in Ukraine
Apr. 17, 2014 |
“While Ukrainian Jewish leaders recognized the flier as a political dirty trick, it caused widespread outrage here in the United States, where just about everyone – from Jewish community leaders to the State Department – was immediately struck by its echoes of the Nazi policies that led to the Holocaust in Europe.
And yet unfortunately, this was just the latest escalation in a series of political maneuvers in Ukraine where the anti-Semitism card has been repeatedly overplayed.
Manufactured incidents of anti-Semitism have been cynically used to discredit political opponents as anti-Semites, whether they are, or not. In recent years, some Ukrainian political operatives have spread rumors that opposing candidates are Jews, likewise whether they are, or not. Last year, political operatives, presumably of deposed former President Viktor Yanukovych, sent a dozen young men to an opposition rally with T-shirts that read “Beat the Jews!” on one side, and “Svoboda,” the name of the ultra-nationalist opposition party, on the other. Both classical political anti-Semitism and the manufactured, manipulative version rely on a common assumption, that a significant number of Ukrainian citizens do not consider their Jewish compatriots to truly be part of the Ukrainian nation.When Jews are considered a natural part of the Ukrainian nation, anti-Semitism in Ukraine should wane and the temptation to use anti-Semitism in politics should follow.
And that will be a relief, because anti-Semitism is a big enough problem without having anyone with a political ax to grind add to it artificially.
A positive first step was taken in today’s statement from the U.S., the European Union, Russia and Ukraine, with the firm, clear and direct condemnation of “all expressions of extremism â?¦ including anti-Semitism.”
To change Ukraine’s atmosphere of insecurity, political, civic and religious leaders in Ukraine and Russia must continue to reinforce this message”.
http://www.sheboyganpress.com/usatoday/article/7848821
It reminded me the stupefying remarks of G.H.W. Bush in his visit to Ukraine (1 August 1991) ahead of the “independence” (24 August 1991). He had nothing else to say than to weep at the Babi Yar Memorial, vowing that:
“And we make solemn vows:
We vow this sort of murder will never happen again.
We vow never to let the forces of bigotry and hatred assert themselves without opposition.
And we vow to ensure a future dedicated to freedom and individual liberty rather then to mob violence and tyranny.
And we vow that whenever our devotion to principle wanes, we will think of this place. We will remember that evil flourishes when good men and women refuse to defend virtue”. Ironically, “On 26 August 1991 the executive committee of Kiev also voted to remove all the monuments of Communist heroes from public places, including the Lenin monument on the central October Revolution Square. The large square would be renamed Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square) as would the central Metro station below it, the executive committee decided” (Wiki)
WizOz
WizOz, a few hours ago I heard a report on the radio of some ‘Rabbi’ in eastern Ukraine supposedly calling upon the authorities in Kiev (ie the fascist junta) to ‘protect Jews’ in eastern Ukraine from the evil pro-Russian ‘antisemites’. In other words the leaflet distribution false-flag is still being played for all it is worth as a Russophobic hatemongering propaganda card, and, once more, the situation of the Jews is the greatest concern of all good and decent people everywhere. In plain language, the absolute pre-eminence of Jewish interests over those of all other people, which is a given in Western MSM agit-prop. Call me a bigot, but I see the safety and welfare of Jews just as important as that of goyim, not one jot more or less.
@Mulga,
Thanks mate.
Perhaps the “oligarchs” have an inkling of what might be in store for them.
Have a good one,
Happy Ester
WizOz
Now, a few hours later, the ‘antisemitic leaflets’ lie has grown even more hysterical. It covered the entire last half of the local ABC News segment on Ukraine. In case you are ignorant as to what ‘a Jew’ is, the accompanying video was not of some secular Jewish person, probably unidentifiable from other Ukrainians. No, in order to ram the message home we were shown a fellow, with a full and luxurious beard, wearing a funny, broad-brimmed black hat inside a room, and a young lad wearing his yamulka and those silly, if religiously ordained, curly side-burns. No doubt they were both wearing the special cosmic underpants, too. I believe the Mormons have copied the style.
To top it off, for extra emetic effect, they had a brief cameo from the repellent Susan Rice, whose peculiar physiognomy and impersonation of a distempered Rottweiler…female, always makes my nostrils twitch and my olfactory bulb detect the whiff of sulphur. Yes, indeed-this is a full hatemongering agit-prop campaign, with every foul tactic being thrown into the fray. I suspect that by tomorrow they will have found Martin Bormann hiding in the Kremlin.
Now, a few hours later, the ‘antisemitic leaflets’ lie has grown even more hysterical. It covered the entire last half of the local ABC News segment on Ukraine. In case you are ignorant as to what ‘a Jew’ is, the accompanying video was not of some secular Jewish person, probably unidentifiable from other Ukrainians. No, in order to ram the message home we were shown a fellow, with a full and luxurious beard, wearing a funny, broad-brimmed black hat inside a room, and a young lad wearing his yamulka and those silly, if religiously ordained, curly side-burns. No doubt they were both wearing the special cosmic underpants, too. I believe the Mormons have copied the style.
To top it off, for extra emetic effect, they had a brief cameo from the repellent Susan Rice, whose peculiar physiognomy and impersonation of a distempered Rottweiler…female, always makes my nostrils twitch and my olfactory bulb detect the whiff of sulphur. Yes, indeed-this is a full hatemongering agit-prop campaign, with every foul tactic being thrown into the fray. I suspect that by tomorrow they will have found Martin Bormann hiding in the Kremlin.
Saker
As already I commented earlier on your initial reading of the agreement, I think what you say about this agreement makes a lot of sense.
I noticed that Tymopsycho is now calling for negotiations with east Ukrainians. Maybe her docs finally found the correct dosage level for her medication? ;
There is an interesting bit of info in this article:
Самооборона Славянска опровергла информацию о потере двух БМД (Self-defense Sloviansk has denied the loss of two BMD)
http://lifenews.ru/news/131613
“They’re all coming up, take credit for feats that did not commit himself to hang medals and soothe themselves with it, – says Eugene. – All six machines that were with us, are in place in full combat readiness. By the way, it was in terrible condition and our volunteers, mechanics and machinists brought to mind machines. Now everything moves and shoots.”
The 6 AFVs were in terrible shape mechanically, but the antimaydan people were able to repair them. I would imagine they selected the best operating AFVs when they prepared their invasion of the east. It seems that the Ukraine military isn’t able to properly maintain their equipment now.
вот так