PressTV Interview – Peter Koenig
23 November 2020
Background
China has reacted strongly to a senior U-S official’s unannounced visit to Taiwan, warning that it will take legitimate and necessary action according to circumstances.
The Chinese foreign ministry spokesman reiterated Beijing’s firm opposition to any official ties between Taiwan and the US. The reaction came after the media cited sources, including a Taiwanese official, as saying that U-S Navy’s Rear-Admiral Michael Studeman was on a trip to the self-ruled island. He’s the director of an agency which oversees intelligence at the U-S military’s Indo-Pacific Command. The administration of U-S President Donald Trump has recently ramped up support for Taiwan, including with the approval of new arms sales and high-level visits. Beijing has long warned against such moves. China considers Taiwan a breakaway province and maintains its sovereignty over the region under the One-China policy.
———————–
PressTV
What is your overall take on this latest US aggression against China?
PK
China has of course every right to protest against any visit and any US intervention in Taiwan, be it weapons sales, or provoking conflict over Taiwan self-declared “sovereignty” which it clearly has not, as it is but a breakaway part of Mainland China.
By and large this looks to me like one of Trump’s last Lame Duck movements to do whatever he can to ruin relations between the US and China.
In reality, it will have no impact of significance.
In fact, China’s approach to Taiwan over the past 70 years, has been one of non-aggression. With various attempts of rapprochement – which most of the times were actually disrupted by US interference – as Taiwan is used by the US, not because Washington has an interest in Taiwan’s “democracy’ – not at all – but Taiwan is a tool for Washington to seek destabilizing China – not dissimilar to what is going on in Hong Kong, or Xinjiang, the Uyghur Autonomous Region, or Tibet.
But China’s objectives are long-term and with patience – and not with force.
Just look at China’s recently signed Trade Agreement with 14 countries – the so-called Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. This agreement alone is the largest in significance and volume of its kind ever signed in recent history. It covers countries with some 2.2. billion people and controlling about one third of world GDP.
And the US is not part of it.
Worse, the US-dollar is not even a trading currency.
This must upset the US particularly – especially since the 2-year trade war Trump was waging against China resulted in absolutely zilch – nothing – for the US. To the contrary, it pushed China towards more independence and away from the US.
The same applied to Chinese partners, happy to have honest trading partners, not of the western, especially the Washington-type, that dish out sanctions when they please and when they don’t like sovereign countries’ behavior.
So – no worries for China, but geopolitically, of course, they must react to such acts against international rules of diplomacy.
——
PressTV:
What will change under President Biden?
PK
Most likely nothing. To the contrary, Biden’s likely Secretary of Defense, Michèle Flournoy, played an important behind the scene role in the Obama Administration. She has not changed the aggressive position of Obama’s “pivot to Asia” which essentially consisted in surrounding China with weapons systems and in particular stationing about 60% of the US navy fleet in the South China Sea.
Though at this point, it looks like China is but the target of an off-scale aggression by President Trump, in reality, China is part of a long-term policy of the US, not only to contain China, but to dominate China.
As we see, though, to no avail.
Interestingly, China does not respond with counter-aggression, instead she moves steadily forward with new creations, towards an objective that does not seek domination, but a multi-polar, multi-connected world, via, for example, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) – not the type of globalization that especially the Biden camp – along with the corporatocracy behind the World Economic Forum (WEF) is seeking.
The US empire is on the decline and China, of course, is aware of it. Washington may be lashing around in its deteriorating times, to create as much damage as possible and to bring down as many nations as they can. Case in point is the constant aggression, sanctions and punishment against Iran and Venezuela – but here too, these two countries are moving gradually away from the west and into the peaceful orbit of China – pursuing after all a shared bright future for mankind.
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a water resources and environmental specialist. He worked for over 30 years with the World Bank and the World Health Organization around the world in the fields of environment and water. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals such as Global Research; ICH; New Eastern Outlook (NEO) and more. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe.
Peter is also co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020)
Peter Koenig is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
With regard to the U.S.’s increasingly militaristic posture: More than anything else, it’s just sad. Like watching a once proud, competent, and reliable geriatric slip into final irreversible senile dementia. When they finally pose a danger to themselves and those around them, they simply must, for the good of all involved, be restrained and/or sedated. One wonders, who in the world is up to such a monumental task in the case of the once mighty and still dangerous U.S.? That’s by far the greatest question facing the world at large today.
Sie Lancelot comes to mind.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZbG7iwRh34&t=103s
LOL! Sums things up perfectly!
”The US empire is on the decline and China, of course, is aware of it.”
As is most of the planet except ”Ukraine”, Poland, the Baltics, the Hindunazis, and the die-hard Exceptionals and Indispensables proper. Of course, Iran and Venezuela have got what it takes to fend off these lowlives and their pathetic puppets such as Guaidó, Tikhanovskaya, Navalny, etc.
PK always on the ball. China always makes sure everybody knows its posture on the matter as an automatic reaction.
Let’s try to see things from the right angle though. Taiwan is recognized by 14 countries only (small players in the international arena) and it was even expelled from the UN:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-that-recognize-taiwan
The US itself does not recognize Taiwan as a country since 1971.
As PK says, the US is trying to do as much damage as possible in its way out. That’s all. Cheers.
Funny questions: What will change under President Biden?
First this war is far from being over, the fat lady did not sing, the process is ongoing. Second, the prospects of winning the presidency are weaker and weaker every day. Third, if a global fraud is proven, Biden may be spending his retirement time in a protected house.
The answer is not better than the question.
I do appreciate your work Peter.
As words can be used as weapons, i.e. the political use of language, can we refer to Taiwan by the more appropriate ‘Chinese Taipei’ as it was referred to in the early 2000’s, even by the MSM?
Thanks
T
For both China & the US, the island chain strategy emphasizes the geographic & strategic importance of Chinese Taipei
The Island Chain Strategy is a strategy first mentioned during the Korean War by US foreign policy analyst John Foster Dulles. It suggested surrounding the former USSR and China by sea. For the US, the island chain strategy is an important plank of the US military’s China Containment policy and force projection in E. Asia while for the Chinese: their fear by US encirclement (Japan in the N-E, A’stan in the West and Hindutva India in the S-W plays the same role)
See:
– Yoshihara, Toshi (July 2012). “China’s Vision of Its Seascape: The First Island Chain and Chinese Seapower: China’s Vision of Its Seascape”. Asian Politics & Policy. 4 (3): 293–314
– CHINA’S REACH HAS GROWN; SO SHOULD THE ISLAND CHAINS”. ASIA MARITIME TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE. Center for Strategic and International Studies
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a1/Geographic_Boundaries_of_the_First_and_Second_Island_Chains.png/800px-Geographic_Boundaries_of_the_First_and_Second_Island_Chains.png
Note: Map shows the 1st & 2nd Island Chains only – not the 3rd, 4th & 5th Island Chains, the last two being in the Indian Ocean & Red Sea respectively
Regards
We imagine that the chinese leaders are bound to, and in a near future forced to do something far more practical.
Offer to Russia a free harbor and re supply place in one of their Spratil artificial islands and use the russian one just being put in place in Sudan.
Just a deal to make things smoother in the future.
I can’t be the only person who wants a showdown between a declining empire and a rising one where both will lose and leave the rest of the world alone in peace.
except… the rising one is not an empire, and wishes not to be. the rising one is a civilisation with 5000 years of history and knows more than any other peoples what the problems and costs of an empire become. the declining one is a ragtag nation only, has only 250 years history, and has learned nothing but how to pillage and plunder. which do you think will prevail: the civilisation or the nation?
Calling the CCP run China a civilization is akin to calling Fascist Italy Roman Empire. The Chinese destroyed much of their culture during the Cultural Revolution and openly embraced Western materialism. What culture does China exactly produce at the moment? Its entity is more of an all-consuming juggernaut than a “civilization”.
The idea that culture must be continuously “produced”and exported is precisely a canard of modern Western consumerism and Cold War mentality.
China is fantastically diverse in its culture–food, art, language. It is a massive & ancient land. Of course, it has so far not tried to export these things, and has in fact stated it has no desire to force its culture on others.