Since I get a lot of requests for that file, which Google modified with some kind of “security update”, which forces people to ask for a viewer permission (sigh) so I am reposting this old article of mine here. I hope that this solves this issue.
Andrei
Saker Message:
This exact David Chandler’s excellent set of videos was the turning point for me, too. Setting aside everything else, the WTC7 was undeniably rigged and demolished (somehow – I don’t particularly care about the method). On top of that, the way NIST massively “screwed up” and then backtracked wreaks of a massive cover up. Of course, the whole thing stinks to high heavens… but then so does the JFK assassination…
Yes, NIST really blew it, first they fed us crap, then they basically fessed up, but nobody in the “free and democratic press” to any notice.
The real perps of 9/11 must be laughing their asses off to this very day.
Thank you for that — it’s a great summation.
So many people want to analyze it, down to the dust grains. It was obviously planned, and carried out by parties which have the ability to corrupt ‘science’ . . .
Of course, the problem with that is you no longer really have science. You have the equivalent of Lysenko.
Thanks for well outlined logical arguments and the key problems of the mainstream narrative laid out. The need for a higher quality investigation is obvious. Anyone who is led by the investigations of the truther movement to think the buildings were brought down with explosives and not by planes or fire will be labeled a conspiracy theorist. My argument is that any crime planned by 2 or more people is a conspiracy. This would include most organized criminality, whether committed by mafia types, corporations, drug cartels, banks or governments and their agencies. How can such criminality be apprehended or stopped without theories of who committed the crimes and how? Theories and research and testing of hypothesis and leads are how we get to the facts. The mainstream media demands that we accept their theories even when mountains of evidence expose the problems of those narratives. Even when they are exposed they continue to claim preeminence as arbiters of factual reporting.
The war with truth cuts to the heart of all politics and we give in to oversimplification, and blinding hatred at our peril because we all struggle with truth issues. Mercy must be paired with truth, hope with fear, not to avoid action, but to make action effective and thought persuasive.
I posted this on the older thread, but I think it’s relevant here too.
I came to the conclusion early on that the we need to suspend our belief in Newtonian physics to accept the official story, but I also look at it from the angle of a pilot.
I recall in the immediate aftermath of the day that the high-jackers had trained in small Cessna aircraft, were poor students and only interested in learning how to control a plane in-flight and took no interest in takeoffs and landings. That should have raised an alarm somewhere.
So then I’m supposed to believe that a low hours, poor pilot is going to step into the left-hand seat and take over the controls of a complex 757 airliner. Then he’s going to descend 30,000 feet in under 10 minutes while making two left hand (descending) turns and make a perfect hit on a target that was 200 feet wide.
Then his mate does a similar job on the other tower.
Simply ain’t gonna happen.
The flying into the Pentagon by a low-hours pilot is also preposterous for a couple of extra reasons.
The amateur Pentagon flight hypothesis is pretty ludicrous – much more so than the Twin Towers. A rookie pilot, hitting a 22m tall building (YES – it’s TWENTY TWO METERS TALL) with a commercial airliner, from the side (NOT FROM THE TOP)… It’s almost the same level of disbelief required as a free-falling building due to “fires”.
Yes, let’s call that about 72 ft. I think a 767 is about 55 ft from top of fuselage to bottom of engine pods. The pilot has to be about 10 ft AGL to make a roughly centre hit. That would require an expert hand (if it’s even possible) over the last approach mile in ground-effect.
Also the approach from about 7,000 looks similar to a standard vfr approach to a small airfield – something that we were told they didn’t want to learn. Plus, it’s a right-hand approach which is only performed rarely and is more difficult (only because it’s rarely performed) because the spacing is different and yet the pilot with ‘poor’ skills comes out on the final leg of the approach perfectly lined up on the Pentagon. Hmmm…
Simply ain’t gonna happen.
All good points, yes, the aviation part of the official conspiracy theory (because that is what the OFFICIAL narrative is: a ridiculous conspiracy theory) makes no sense. If you study the flightpaths of the aircraft you quickly realize that they were remotely controlled, either by beacon+computer or a beacon+human, but probably beacon+human+computer. As for flight 93, it was shot down.
And there are SO many more gaping holes in this story, it deserves a full book (and many excellent ones have been written about this).
Thank you all for bringing up the aviation issues of 9/11!
Yes, the official narrative is so full of holes that it’s (imo) one of the most ridiculous theories put forward.
I worked for some years flying small planes (largest a Cessna Caravan) and have a bit less than 2,000 hrs. I also did a couple of hours in a full motion simulator of type 737. Even with instruction it was a challenge to fly the aircraft accurately. Did those highjackers do a speed read of the flight manual on the way to their targets? And how did they find their targets 100 miles away?
Anecdote: I briefly communicated with a pilot who flew the big commercial airliners and had many thousands of hours. He claimed that he and several of his colleagues used the simulator to duplicate the AA-11 flight path and that typical success was about 1 in 10 being bang-on target. He also claimed that the auto pilot in those airliners was accurate enough to have accomplished the job – no beacon needed.
Flight 93: I have zero expertise on crash investigation, but it is interesting that there is a large hole with little debris around it. I recall the German Wings flight in 2015 had an enormous amount of recognisable plane pieces spread over a very large area. Just something that needs a little explaining that I’m sure will not be forthcoming.
I find it beneficial to rank evidence and pick the top [less than handful] reasons to explain my feeling on 911. My top two are:
(1) It was never investigated. Even Kean and Hamilton, the committee co-chairs disowned the 911 commission report.
(2) You can actually hear enormous explosions with your own ears on video of firemen walking away from the scene talking on their cell phones.
Although it is instructive to become familiar with various viewpoints and all the myriad evidence (and I did), the major portion of the weight of evidence does not necessarily stem from the large numbers of pieces of evidence.
Take care, Shyaku
For me the icing on the WTC7 cake is the BBC reporter on TV saying the building had collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did collapse, and the building is standing behind her in the background for all to see while she is reporting this. Tells me the whole thing was one big production but there were some bloopers that can’t be covered up in the internet age. If you go to the link below start viewing the video at the 15 minute mark.
https://archive.org/details/911WTC7BBC
It was WTC7 that also convinced me the ‘official’ story was a sham.
The news was on a TV in the office where I worked in 2001. It was on the 8th floor, I looked out the window to check for mushroom clouds, and went back to work and didn’t think about it a whole lot. In October of 2001, I was on an air flight from Texas to Rhode Island. As the plane flew over Manhattan, everyone was straining to see the wreckage from the buildings — it was still smoking. Flew home from the family event in a few days, and didn’t really think about it, aside from the security theater at the airport…
I only saw two buildings fall on the day it happened. Texas is far away from New York, and I had a job, so I didn’t watch the news past the building collapses. I still remembered Oklahoma City, which had happened while I was at work, too.
In 2005, I was searching for news about Katrina and Rita, curious about how they would affect Gulf oil drilling and production platforms (a lot — Rita was worse than Katrina). Somehow I stumbled on a video of WTC7 in the search results. And it was obvious just from watching that ten or fifteen seconds of video, the building was demolished by experts.
Later I saw the other videos, “Lucky Larry” saying he decided to “pull it”, the other stuff kept by James Corbett, and bought the book by Michael Ruppert. He had done a lot of old fashioned gumshoe work, with all the leads going back to the desk of the Vice President. His detective work was not perfect, but he had found the broad outline of the event.
And still later I learned about how it is easier to fool people, than to convince them they have been fooled.
What was BBC’s explanation for the discrepancy? Surely somebody asked them
for an explanation.
Thank you for re-posting this article. I’m an engineer that is a signatory to the petition you mentioned in the article calling for a new investigation into the destruction of the three skyscrapers at the World Trade Center.
To me the unbelievable reporting in the western media about the war in Ukraine is a direct descendant of lies allowed to propagate about 9/11. The ability to present and sustain (and even amplify) a false narrative in the face of contradictory information is the hallmark of the media after 9/11.
I am a careful analyst of the mechanical details of 9/11 and would like to share a few items. After years of research these were finalized in about 2019 and were not available when you wrote your editorial. The following are details of the physical events and do not contribute to the “who did it,” but rather to what was done.
To paraphrase Dima, “so lets begin … ”
1) Destruction of the WTC South Tower on 9/11: Analysis of Perimeter Column Trajectory Reveals Mechanism of Demolition
The exact mechanism of destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11 has been discussed, at an cursory level, for the last 19 years. Because of outwardly directed energetic forces, a gravity-only collapse subsequent to fires is not supported by the observations. Analysis of the trajectory of a wall of perimeter columns from the South Tower provide a clear example of how the Towers were destroyed by a “Propelled Demolition” mechanism.
http://censoredbysefi.org/Analysis/Perimeter_Columns_of_the_South_Tower_Surfing_the_Big_Wave.pdf
2) Why Were the WTC Twin Towers Destroyed That Way: Explaining the Mechanism of Their Destruction on 9/11
One of the unanswered questions about the events of September 11, 2001, is why the Twin Towers were destroyed in such an energetically outward manner. The primary reason for this mode of demolition was the ability to exploit the structural weakness of the floor truss to channel connection requiring the breaking of a limited number of 5/8″ bolts per floor. A nano-thermite propellant could have provided the needed outward force.
http://censoredbysefi.org/Analysis/WTC_Propelled_Demolition_Paper.pdf
3) Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study
This paper is about ethics and was presented at the “2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology.” Ethics and the Official Reports about the Destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC1 and WTC2) on 9/11: A Case Study, by John D. Wyndham, Wayne H. Coste and Michael R. Smith, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology.
http://censoredbysefi.org/Analysis/IEEE_Ethics_Paper_030714.pdf
See also the poster for the paper presentation in Chicago, May 23-24, 2014.
http://censoredbysefi.org/Analysis/IEEE_Ethics_Poster.pdf
4) The website http://censoredbysefi.org describes a paper on engineering ethics that was peer reviewed and accepted for publication but withdrawn days before the conference.
Regarding the Pentagon issue, David Chandler separated and re-narrated a 13 chapter lecture that I prepared that describes the a) physical damage, b) how the Pentagon was built and c) what the damage reveals. People who prefer hypotheses based on missiles, explosives, bombs and whatever refuse to discuss the damage and have preferred to hurl insults at David and myself. I invite you to select a chapter and learn about the damage to the Pentagon and the resulting debris that was observed. Chapter 8 discusses the damage in detail. In summary, the damage to the Pentagon can only be explained by a large momentum impact by an object with the dimensions of a Boeing 757 (not a 737 or a 767 only a 757 … the damage is that clear.)
https://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/
The actual events of 9/11 have past into history … but the repercussions of having a world-wide media that is afraid to speak up has consequences … as the reporting on Ukraine has revealed.
As a post script, I will acknowledge that widespread misinformation in the media began long before 9/11:
9/11 and the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; Leaving Out Important Information Has a Long History
https://web.archive.org/web/20200925061546/https://911tap.org/10-publications/news-releases/694-9-11-and-the-atomic-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki
Great Stuff! You are to be commended
Thanks for the kind words.
I would like to do another Engineering Ethics paper related to WTC Building 7 and the discrepancies between critical aspects of the NIST report and the errors that have been found. Apparently adherence of the Federal Institutions to the the Congressionally mandated “Data Quality Act” is subjective — even for dimensions and physics in structural engineering reports.
If “Data Quality” in engineering reports is discretionary, it is no surprise that the information about the causes and consequences of the Ukraine war is anything-somebody-wants-it-to-be.
There is video of the towers falling from the top on downward, not from the bottom and being crushed, a bottom explosion probably would have tilted a building not brought it down upon its self.
This is nothing but pure physics that flew over over the literature talking heads.
Professor Niels Harrit from denmark has found the smoking gun
Thank you for what you are doing and for all the info!!
That’s impressive! I’ll have a peep. Thank you.
YouTube libeled me a hate monger for the 5 minute video exposing the fraud of 911. https://www.bitchute.com/video/0nwR88z9Etiu/
If people had listened to all of us in 2001 and that tragedy’s real perps had been arrested and punished, we would not be here now!
Everyone (not zombified) knew the truth, but remember that the terror was unleashed through the anthrax letters, among others…
The problem is that the vast majority are zombified. I was on the subway here in Vienna yesterday. Only in Vienna you are required to wear a useless, harmful face mask. Yet only a very few of us did not. It gave me this uncomfortable alone, estranged, kafkanesque feeling – hopeless to stop the herd from going over the cliff. Helpless. Sad.
How do three building come down by getting hit with two airplanes? I could not help but think of this one famous Charles Bronson western movie clip where one guy (Bronson) shoots down three bad hombres* after noting they brought two horses too many. How did he do it? Why Hollywood of course!
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyuwBW9lNa8
Please check out the video gallery at Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, see https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos Start with Solving the Mystery of Building 7 https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/video/2-architects-and-engineers-solving-the-mystery-of-building-7
Another great documentary on 9/11 was done in Italy, includes footage of the Pentagon taken immediately after it was hit by a *missile* — absolutely no plane wreckage visible. See “Zero: An Investigation into 9/11” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETF0_SOXcg
Also listen to Major General Albert Stubblebine (top Air Force investigator for crashes) speak on 9/11: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDoCLobUhuc
Apologies, General Stubblebine was responsible for all of the U.S. Army strategic imagery.
All I ever heard Stubblebine say were a) his credentials and b) that “the hole was too small.”
No data, no analysis — not even verbal description.
Apparently Stubblebine didn’t know that there were 90 feet of columns in the facade that were knocked-down and severed in the first floor. He also didn’t know that Column 9AA was bent-and-bowed, but not severed at a height that documents where the left wing would have hit (so the left engine would be above the floor slab and the damage to the windows on the second floor between columns columns 11-12 would have been caused by the tail impact — due to rotation caused by hitting the generator trailer).
Also in Stubblebine’s hole-too-small comment, he should have used some sleuthing that he boasted of in his credentials and noticed that column 14AA on the second floor is actually hanging from the third floor and pushed in the direction of the impacting plane.
http://hopeoutloud.org/pentagon/Column_14_Ver00.pdf
If people can’t describe the physical damage accurately, what hope is there that they can get the “who-dun-it” right?
Bringing this back to the media and the Ukraine SMO … People listen to their favored sources, regardless of whether it has anything to do with reality or not. I listen to thesaker.is and believe I am much better informed than other people I interact with — but I can’t change their perspectives.
Stubblebine was being interviewed, not making some presentation. I doubt that you watched “Zero: An Investigation into 9/11” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gETF0_SOXcg There is plenty of evidence presented there about what happened at the Pentagon.
Likewise, the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth present overwhelming evidence that the Twin Towers and Building Number 7 were taken down by explosive demolition; see the series of videos at https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/videos/category/25-9-11-experts-speak-out-individual-chapters
I see no evidence that you are well informed.
When this happened, I remember being stunned and bewildered, staring at the screen throughout the event, but automatically convinced it was an inside job; suddenly, due to the innumerable contradictions in the information that was delivered by the press.
Simultaneously, I was reminded of the Korean plane that flew over Russia and had to be shot down, for not responding to or obeying the orders of the Russian pilots, which, together with a series of inexplicable crashes of Boeing planes in various parts of the world ( tests?), raised the suspicion that the on-board computers were intervened through satellites or remotely (not much is said about this subject, but note that Europe suddenly decided that it had to make its own planes… before there wasn’t much of a rush). This would later explain, in the events we are dealing with, the takeover and precise maneuvers of the planes that faced the towers.
Even without technical knowledge it was evident to many (although they kept silent, to avoid the anthrax mail) that it was an operation of the “invisible government”, as the “deep state” or “the swamp of empire” was then called. Already, by then, it was clear that we were facing an imperial power with total control of information and without any scruples, which is clearly demonstrated in current events.
It was in the fall or early winter of 2001, when NHK aired a special on building demolition late at night. They made absolutely no mention of 911, and the documentary had probably been filmed prior to that disaster, and the not-ready-for-prime-time late night crew at NHK just sort of ran it for the benefit of whoever was up that late.
The documentary featured demolition crews painstakingly placing charges, crossing their fingers and celebrating like mad when it all went as planned. It described what would have happened if it didn’t.
The ninja style of placing important information in front of the public in some inconspicuous way that would otherwise be taboo. We are adults. They don’t need to connect the dots for us.
I also note that after the SMO began, they reran Empress Ki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empress_Ki_(TV_series) , a historical drama from Korea depicting the Yuan Dynasty (Mongolians in China) at its peak and early downfall. My husband exclaimed, “My word, that’s just what America’s doing in the Ukraine!” The East has a long history and Japan has a living memory of life under tyranny and ways of communicating important messages despite it.
Thank you for re-posting your 9/11 article Andrei. It was like reading my own thoughts on the matter.
I vividly remember watching the events unfold all day on 11th September 2001 from around 13:15hrs in the UK, and was subsequently glued to the continual TV coverage long into the night in a state of total shock – traumatised you might say. In fact I seem to remember that the continual media coverage lasted for days but maybe that was just me seeking it out, it was over 20 years ago.
However, it was not long before I began to question the narrative that I was being told. In the beginning it was little things like the almost immediate release of who did it, and then all the little snippets of evidence to back it all up like the passport found in the dust of the WTC’s or was it Lee Harvey Oswald’s wallet, hard to tell with these conspiracies as the plot outlines, dare I say, could almost be written in advance.
After years of online investigation into all the material I could find I have long come to the conclusion that the story of 9/11 is the biggest lie ever told and that the laws of physics did not stop operating on that day in New York City as demanded by believers in the official narrative.
However, just like a religion, people will believe whatever provides them the most comfort.
And that, it seems to me, is where we are.
After the mass hysteria and panic caused by the ‘War of the Worlds’ CBS radio broadcast in October 1938 the intelligence communities knew that they could control and manipulate the mass public as they wished through the broadcast media, and today we are saturated 24/7 with media manipulation via radio, terrestrial TV, satellite TV, Mobile communications, Internet and all the social media platforms and applications these provide.
Whether you seek out the truth, or blindly follow the mainstream output or simply want to be entertained, it all depends entirely on where you place your attention.
The mainstream media coverage of ongoing events in the Donbass is simply another example of the mass hysteria and panic that broadcast media provides to control the majority and get them to think in a particular way.
If there is to be a multi-polar world then there must also be a multi-polar broadcast media.
I would place breaking up these huge media corporations and returning ownership to numerous independent and sovereign voices in the same master plan that involves expanding BRICS into BRICS+ and creating an alternative basket of currencies linked to commodities.
Its all the politicians fault, no truth in design legislation , no products last the test of time. No truth in advertising legislation, who knows what behind a product, no truth in reporting legislation, no idea what’s really going on.
Its the politicians refusal to do the right thing that brings all the wrong things to light, while the citizens live in confusion and darkness.
As a structural engineer, for many years specialising in steel properties and steel structures subject to petrochemical fires, I have been following the debate regarding WTC7 collapse with avid interest.
Professor J. Leroy Hulsey of University of Alaska Fairbanks, has done an outstanding study of the collapse of WTC7 which shows that the collapse mechanism was initiated by instantaneous removal of columns on several floors, using structural FEA (finite element analysis). From memory, the two FEA programs were STAAD and SAP 2000. I am familiar with both. Basically, these are standard tools in structural analysis and design.
This study also shows that the ‘office fires’ (600 odd C) were not responsible for the collapse, using thermal FEA analysis which also contradicts NIST report.
This UAF report can be downloaded from their website: https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Centre 7
The .pdf of the final report:
chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://files.wtc7report.org/file/public-download/A-Structural-Reevaluation-of-the-Collapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf
Yesterday (20th Jan ’23), Prof Hulsey gave a presentation of their results:
https://youtu.be/gCFlGlAnJ4U
At some point, over the last 20 odd years, I decided to discard any theories about how and why it was achieved and concentrate on the science, so to speak. After the report was published in ’20, I thought it was job done. Not so fast, it needs to be taken through the courts. Judging by the results so far, I lost hope that I am likely to see this brought to a successful conclusion, ever.
Which is the most precise, inescapable and irrefutable Science of the Nature? Chemistry !
CH4 + 2*O2 -> CO2 + 2*H2O
So the real smoking gun of 404 2001 event was chemistry and the professor who (with 16 other experts) found the proof was Niels Harrit from denmark. micro iron (Fe) ball on the lung of asbestos deaths and in the dust of the event. He has done tens of conference everywhere but no one report of the fact in the media/social
I do read a good number of comments from time to time, claiming that there were no airplaines involved, and the footage released showing planes crashing into the towers was post event fake.
This is a problem for me, for I saw what definitely appeared to be a plane flying into the second tower, in real time. How this got faked I dont know, unless the Aussie reporter was a first class actor.
I was watching late night news on TV, very unusual for me, as I havent watched TV for over 30 yrs. It was a concatenation of circumstances. I had been watching, I think, a tennis match. There was a scene of utter hysteria. People in crowds screaming, yelling, cars with sirens going, one tower standing, the other barely existing.
In front of all this, an Aussie reporter, almost screaming “as you can see behind me,,, we dont know how it happened,, etc”.
As I watched I saw, in the distance, an airliner flying across from left to right as I watched. I thought then
– what the hell? What in Gods name is that doing there? Surely they’ve closed the airspace to all by military aircraft?”
I continued watching in some puzzlement, as it then, having circled, came closer into frame and flying from left to right, towards the tower. More and more I was thinking “this cant be right, this is clearly a commercial airliner, what the hell is it doing in that airspace”, then I saw it approach the tower, and plough into it.
As you can image, it threw me from my chair with a yell, and then the Aussie reporter, picking up on crowd reaction spun around, saw the event and started yelling, screaming almost, and then had to run from the pyroclastic dust.
So I feel I saw it in real time. How can that be a fake?
I might add I had another reaction. I had, when a young teenager, been taken by my Father to watch some old cooling towers being demolished. He had shown me how they are controlled to fall into the towers own footsteps, my Father admiring the precision, careful measurements and planning needed to bring a huge tower down and not cause damage around it. And when I saw that second tower fall, that was my own immediate reaction “Thats a controlled demolition. I’ve seen that before, several times”. So I never did believe a word of the “official story”. I’ve seen too much for myself to accept it.
IMHO the “no airplanes in NY” is utter nonsense.
But in DC, I honestly don’t know.
But this begs the question: why the two different methods?
My only logical conclusion is that the Twin Towers were very high, whereas the Pentagon is low.
But, again, this conclusion is based on a unproven assumption about DC.
I don’t know and, frankly, I don’t care very much.
What happened in NY is “good enough” for me.
DC and flight 93 are secondary and not crucial for the “inside job” thesis.
Kind regards
Andrei:
While you say, “But in DC, I honestly don’t know” followed by “I don’t know and, frankly, I don’t care very much.”
Because you cared enough to raise the Pentagon issue, I will suggest that you (and your viewers) should look at the damage and ask yourself what could have caused the damage. There is zero evidence for any explosive detonations (rules out bombs, pre-planted explosives and missiles, etc.)and only evidence of a large momentum impact.
I am focused on the physical evidence from an engineering perspective. Here are the chapters. David Chandler re-narated these because he was impressed with the depth and breadth of the analysis — and thought more people would actually listen to his voice instead of mine (I am an old stuttering engineer).
Chapter 0: Preface
Chapter 1: Overview
Chapter 2: Endless Pentagon Debates; How Did We Get Here?
Chapter 3: Size of the Opening in the Pentagon
Chapter 4: Design, Construction and Destruction of E-Ring Wall
Chapter 5: The Tree at Column 16
Chapter 6: Review of the C-Ring Exit Hole at the Pentagon
Chapter 7: Plane Approach Path
Chapter 8: Plane Impact Analysis
Chapter 9: A Comprehensive Review of the Lloyd England Accident Scene
Chapter 10: Analysis of the CITGO Security Cameras
Chapter 11: Pentagon Security Camera Analysis
Chapter 12: Debris
Chapter 13: Evidence of Explosions
Chapter 14: The April Gallop Lawsuit
Chapter 15: Ground Effect and Yaw Rotation
Chapter 16: Porter Goss and the Sonic Boom
https://911speakout.org/wayne-coste/
Also, regarding the plane impacts at the Twin Towers, you may find the following two articles I wrote interesting.
1) It is not possible to “fake” the momentum transfer that was observed (and recorded) in both the North and South Towers.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221018010014/https://www.911tap.org/10-publications/news-releases/770-plane-impact-and-tower-sway-at-the-wtc-on-9-11
2) The impacting planes did not “slice through” the steel perimeter columns. Instead, what happened was the bolts holding the perimeter column sections together stretched and snapped– allowing the perimeter columns section to be pushed aside (and thus easily bent and deformed).
https://web.archive.org/web/20220630155743/https://911tap.org/10-publications/news-releases/801-aircraft-impact-damage-to-the-wtc-perimeter-columns
Thank you for such an interesting and informative site — it is my number 1 recommendation for people who want to know what is happening in the world.
thank you for posting your materials!
You give me chance to revive what has become a YouTube Classic. Amusing as well as informative. James Corbetts 5 minute “hit job”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzy9i4tIHU
Hi. I, some time ago, came across some info about an american engineer, that has prepared a law suit acainst a private contractor, that helped an agency investigate this case. Not to go into details, but nothing came out of it. Her investigation and evidence, she has turned into a book. (https://wheredidthetowersgo.com/). To me, it is the most valid explanation I have seen so far: https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/, https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/presentations/, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11334129-where-did-the-towers-go. Also: https://911nwo.com/ eg. (My original source for this information.)
All this can of cause only be valid, of we actually live in an electric universe, with an abundance of free energy, that can be harvested for free. Actually, there is a lot of evidence, that this is the case, but it is just hidden from the public by main stream media and main stream science. In the “shadow corners” of the internet, a lot of information can be found of this, though, and I think, that this theory is much more plausible than the “Big bang theory” and “The theory of relativity”. It is up to oneself to decide though, of cause: https://www.holoscience.com/wp/, eg.: https://www.holoscience.com/wp/the-simple-electric-universe/, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/a-real-theory-of-everything/, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/the-madness-of-black-holes/, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/venus-isnt-our-twin/. Also: https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/, https://www.velikovsky.info/worlds-in-collision/, https://www.plasma-universe.com/hannes-alfven/, https://www.electricuniverse.info/, http://www.ice-age-ahead-iaa.ca/ (Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/cygnicom ) Eg. Maybe: https://www.mariobuildreps.com/ (Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD9dk54Tb8DmWbh0B-h6FpA ) could also be interesting. I am not a construction engineer, a plasma physicist or electrical engineer, so? Just if this might be of interest? Nice day to all, no matter what.
The guy who was going to keep a battery always fully charged with wireless tech, I thought that was clever and shazam in 10 years, it’s probably all around us.
Oh, and about the waves that do it, not a problem right now, but I would trust it about as far as an x-ray.
Some extra information to my comment above:
https://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-earthquakes/, https://www.holoscience.com/wp/global-warming-in-a-climate-of-ignorance/, https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2015/11/27/earthquakes-and-volcanoes/, https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2016/01/15/ben-davidson-does-the-sun-trigger-large-earthquakes-eu2015/, Bruce Leybourne: Geometry of Earth’s Endogenous Electrical Energy — Geophysical Evidence | EU2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q355Haapq-0, Andrew Hall: Cosmic Resonance | Thunderbolts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ez6KJWL_-NU&t, Stuart Talbott: Electric Quakes on Mars | Thunderbolts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ko-detWy6Y. Eg.
Some claim, that HAARP can control the weather. Others say, that it is a conspiracy
http://truthstreammedia.com/: Yes, of Course HAARP Can Control the Weather: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ_-uux5P3Y. (Something about earthquakes 4.44 in and forward.) https://haarp.gi.alaska.edu/, now owned by University of Alaska.
Maybe other constructions have taken over from HAARP, doing the same, but more effectively?
(From a tweet of mine): Is https://drjudywood.com/wp/presentations/ ‘s claim about a hurricane (https://scienceabc.com/eyeopeners/what-is-a-tesla-coil.html?) steared/controlled up from the tropics, to pass NYC at 9.11 2001 not so far out afterall?: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8X1j58Y6B0s , https://youtube.com/watch?v=WybqAvcjE0w , https://youtube.com/watch?v=o372a50IsYQ , and https://hutchisoneffect.com
With due respect to the honorable Saker and everyone here, I do not subscribe to this theory. I believe that 9/11 was the greatest intelligence failure in American history. They are paid billions over the years to protect us and they failed miserably. And not one resigned from their positions out of respect of those killed. We make out these government officials as clever but many are not. They’re more concerned with their pensions and their attainments of higher positions for more money. At the end of the day quite a few fail to do their jobs, that being protecting their citizens. And on this day that’s what happened. They failed miserably.
To all open minded readers …
One need only spend ~5 minutes and watch the interview with Barry Jennings as he described his first hand experience of being trapped in Building 7 during the morning as the bombs were going off.
As he was eventually led out of the dark, smoke-filled lobby by the NYFD, he was stepping over bodies.
Yandex is the only credible search engine to use in these ‘controversial’ (conspiracy?) matters.
Correct.
And, iirc, there were strong suspicions that Jennings was murdered following his revelations.
Bit of a really sad week losing Jeff Beck…..my favourite all time guitar player, here is a nice piece with Jeff and another all time great guitar player, John McLaughlin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXajknoszv8
Some Ronnie doing what Ronnie did best……Dio
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?&q=holy+diver&view=detail&mid=7C712BF80994AC1EFEA77C712BF80994AC1EFEA7&FORM=VDRVRV&ajaxhist=0
Any fans of Beck, might I suggest a listen to the Jeff Beck Johnny Depp album. Diverse to say the least
https://genius.com/albums/Jeff-beck-and-johnny-depp/18
Cheers M
As for falling towers……have the ASME Codes been changed to reflect the fact that (official story) jet fuel with a burn point of 1030c melts structural steel with a melt point of 1300-1500c…….
Beck was an fantastic guitarist, especially in his later years.
But I think that his best work was for Roger Waters on “Amused to Death”.
And, of course, John McLaughlin is the top of the top (and a great guy!)
though I will say that that specific recording is not my taste at all.
and yes, that is totally subjective :-)
cheers
My first realization that something was amiss with the original “official” version of 9/11 was how did they come up with pictures of the 19 so-called highjacks and Osama bin Laden that were plastered on the front pages of newspapers within hours of the attacks? This was way before any evidence-based investigation could possibly have been done.
In August of 2001 hardly anyone thought that invading Afghanistan was a good idea. By the end of September fully 80% of Americans and all but one Congress woman, Barbara Lee, thought it was a grand idea. The reaction to her vote was furious, reflecting the strong emotions of the day. The Wall Street Journal called her a “clueless liberal” and asked if she was anti-American. The Washington Times called her “a long-practicing supporter of America’s enemies.” General Wesley Clark spilled the beans shortly after that Rumsfeld planned to take out seven Muslim nations in five years, all of this planned way before 9/11.
I am from NY. I had 3 relatives in the buildings and they were evacuated safely.
My extended family was involved in the Conservative Party and Bush.
9/11 was the final disagreement we had . Now I have been estranged from my family for 20 years. I am stopping the story because it is too extensive.
There are many ways the event has led to destruction.
These were steel frame buildings. The fires took down the WT 1 and 2.
Was not this building the largest heat sink in the world. The conductivity of steel is
good and the insulation on the beams favors the heat sink.The floors were made up of metals grids.How did the heat take effect on the structure over time to bend beams. This is why steel building do not collapse. The steel is made to deform slightly under the most extreme conditions.
Why do the countries we are hostile with not expose the complete event?
Dear Andrei,
This is probably one of the most incisive articles you have written that I have read. You have perfectly articulated some of what I know, some of what I have suspected and educated me on what I did not know.
Thank you.
KR
Jim
I like Occam’s razor, I also like deductive thinking.
I think there is a cover up over 9/11 but it is rather mundane as it is post 9/11.
Fact is two planes did hit the twin towers, massive fireballs, lots of fuel from the aircraft and within the buildings.
The Tower’s builders and architects promoted their plan in part that the buildings could withstand an impact from a commercial airliner, and they did. Superficially.
What happened next was the structural weakening of the integrity of a building designed purely for height to maximise commercial floor space.
In essence, the buildings could not withstand such an impact and failed… twice in a row.
The conspiracy is that the design of the buildings and the engineering involved were sold and are part and parcel of every mega-tall building throughout the world. That is the conspiracy
Dick Cheney was in charge of NORAD on nein eleven. There were no planes; all we saw was a video of a plane hitting the North Tower high up in the building. The “plane” was seen entering the building with the plastic nose cone coming out the other side. Hollow aluminum tubes cannot possibly penetrate steel girders. No jet engines nor black boxes were found in the debris. Military exercises were being conducted with false blips inserted on radar screens to lead any fighter jets astray over the Atlantic.
WTC1 and WTC 2 did not collapse; they disintegrated to micron sized dust that blew away in the wind and covered lower Manhattan. In order to vaporize steel and steel reinforced concrete, a minimum temperature of 2,863 degrees C is needed that then condensed into dust particles. Hardly any steel or concrete debris was found at ground zero. The bodies of the 2,000 victims were not recovered except for bone fragments.
The NYT published an extensive interview with Bill Ayers, formerly of the Weather Underground and one of America’s most famous terrorists on 9/11. The next day the NYT had a blistering editorial denouncing all terrorists, picked up my local paper. I remember thinking what were the odds of a terrorist attack in new York on the same day the NYT interviews a famous terrorist?
The patriot act was too long and complex to have been written in the short time between 9/11 and when it was introduced.. Remember the anthrax used in the anthrax attacks cane from US bio-warfare labs.
The lack of any real investigation by the NYT tells me the top people there were part of the conspiracy.
Hi, Andrei,
Regarding your view of “Not only that, but the idea that whoever would have used 3 planes in NY would suddenly decide not to use one at the Pentagon makes no sense to me whatsoever.”
Well, there is a very simple explanation for that: there were NO airplanes. The NYC buildings were demolished by explosives and the Pentagon was hit by a missile. Why there were no airplanes? Watch this absolutely irrefutable analysis of how the airplanes were visually superimposed into the CNN, MSNBC and other presstitute video “reports” using CGI (and not too professionally either — one airplane “penetrated” the building through and through completely intact, you know, an aluminum nose penetrated 20 rows of 10-inch steel beams, and came out on the other side of the tower INTACT!!!):
Title: 911 – The Great American Psy Opera (Ace Baker 2012)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCoKYQFruqs
https://rumble.com/vmn37n-911-the-great-american-psy-opera-documentary-2012-ace-baker.html
Based on this CNN / MSNBC / presstitute captured “evidence” that Aluminum is a much more superior metal compared to Steel — they should stop making knifes, axes, and drill bits out of Steel and switch to Aluminum instead!!! The Official 911 story for the plebes proved Aluminum to be much-much stronger than even diamonds — 1 inch thick aluminum can easily cut through hundreds of inches of steel, as we all have “witnessed” on 911!!!
What is a fractal? ..”A fractal is a pattern that the laws of nature repeat at different scales…”
What it has to do with 9/11?
Well. In the autumn of 68 bce, some “Al Qeada” fellows of antiquity kidnapped two prominent roman senators, burned the port of Ostia and gave the middle finger the USA of these days. Within few months SPQR passed Lex Gabinia. Within few years Lex Gabinia produced Julius Caesar.
If before, the army was in the service of the state, from that period on, the state was to be in the service of the army. What came after is well known.
If judging from what they have found in Herculanium and Pompei, life continued to be nice for Civis Romanus. Not for long though…
After a prolonged period of illness and wanting to distraction, i turned to reading and watching recommend videos to understand what occurred on 9/11
I believe much of the plot has been uncovered by diligent researchers.
Firstly 9/11 was undoubtedly planned by traitors within US and foreign governments.
The plot was hidden under cover of numerous drills which were happening that day and which had also been practiced MANY times within the preceding 2 years.
Drills included procedures following a plane that has smashed into the Pentagon and also live-fly mock hijacking of passenger planes.
The planning involved duplicate flights taking off for each of the real flights at approximately 10 minutes apart, from same airport.
Transponder codes had been swapped to confuse ATC and FAA. These codes would be swapped or turned off again during flight leading to more confusion.
For example, Flight 175 was changed slightly to Flight 177.
These duplicate flight, containing no passengers, would actually be remotely flown DRONES – modified Boeings, and would be tracked by FAA and then flown into WTC/ buildings,
These “drones’ although devoid of passengers, would be staffed by pilots. That pilot would be someone hired as extra staff to participate in the drills that day “posing” as hijackers..People like Mohammed Atta who spoke to pilot Lynne Howland when she disembarked from the incoming Flight 11. She stated he was dressed in pilot- type shirt and slacks. It also explains why they were in the cockpit AT TAKEOFF.
Remember, these “hijackers” had been trained in military bases, facilitated in their pilot training by skirting rules, provided accommodation at FBI informants house and even given funds through CIA-friendly ISI chief. They were assets and probably genuinely believed that they were being asked to play this false role.
It also explains why the initial 5 people the FBI accused before swapping their names with 5 others, turned out to be pilots. In fact, even after substituting the 5 names, even some on the new list turned out alive and innocent and pilots!
Sometime in the flight, remote hijacking would occur, and although the Arab pilots aware of the double-cross by then it would be too late. The real plane, full of passengers, would have military personnel, maybe swarthy like Israelis, play hijackers, then land plane somewhere and dispatch passengers.
It is also suggested that on Flight 11 for example, the air- stewardesses were duped into believing they were part of a drill and read a script. It explains why there are 2 versions of Betty Ong’s recorded call and many discrepancies with Madeline Sweeney’s version.
Evidence of duplicate flights
1. Different wheels off times compared to AT control tower take off times. The former are automatically logged.
2. ACARS still showing uplinks after so called crashes.
Flight 93 ostensibly crashed at 10.03ET but ACARS still active at 10.11ET routed through Champaign ground station.
Flight 175 ostensibly crashed at 9.03 ET but ACARS still active at 9.23 ET routed through Pittsburgh ground station.
Flight 11 ostensibly crashed at 8.45 ET but ACARS still active at 8.50 ET in area around Buffalo.
3. Different boarding gates
4. Statement from Anthony Mazza
5. N- numbers showed planes newly brought into service
Of course to achieve this required involvement with a few working in NORAD, FAA, FBI,
Just a few of those in charge could pull this off – most employees thought anomalies were initially part of the drills.
But there were those who ensured Pentagon was slow to recognize issue and delayed launching fighters from Otis AFB or sent F-16 in wrong direction from Langley AFB so Flight 93 was not intercepted in time.
They even had interceptors put in a holding pattern over the Atlantic to allow Flight 175 to hit.
Phone-calls.
American Airlines had their seatback GTE Airphones disconnected in Spring 2001. So to enable phone calls to establish narrative, a PICOCELL was inserted ahead of time, which enabled cell phone calls eg From Barbara Olsen.
There’s much more..but the plane aspect is probably the hardest to crack for those just beginning to look into the events.
Just as an aside and an indication that wiring building with explosives is a plausible scenario, a BBC documentary a few years ago explained the saga of a Citibank building built in the late 70’s in NY. It had an innovative (ie unstable) structural design as one corner of the site abutted an old church, and the building almost oversailed it. Shortly after completion a Masters engineering student did a project on it which revealed it could potentially collapse in high wind’s. The study was mailed to the firm of engineers who designed the structure…and they concluded the study was correct. A remedial solution was designed – adding extra steel plates – and installed at a cost of $3-6m over a period of three months – required to beat the upcoming hurricane season. But the remedial project had to be kept quite so as not to create panic. The work was done in secret, at evenings and weekends. Imagine, a crew has to go in, remove internal plasterboard, weld/bolt steel plates, reinstate plasterboard, replaster, paint, tidy up. No one noticed! As luck would have it there was a newspaper strike on, so any possible leaks of info or speculation was suppressed. Meanwhile they also had to ascertain the population of the whole district just in case they did have to evacuate the area if the building could not be made safe in time. This was one under the guise of some sort of public survey. The Masters student didn’t find out the repurcussions of her study until twenty years later!
Re Pentagon: Here is video evidence? Obviously could be fake but there was no aeroplane evidence.
https://cairnsnews.org/2022/12/23/scud-missile-hits-pentagon-in-9-11/
Also no plane evidence at Shanksville other than an engine excavated deep from the tiny crater.
The matter of the elevator contract, an astonishing thing> https://aneta.org/911experiments_com/AceElevator/ They had full access…and an astonishing contract…which surprised that industry., a lot!
As to Shanksville, just my view, I am persuaded that the the “crash site” is fake…and that aircraft landed at AFB…from where phone calls went out…passengers believing it all part of an exercise. Then they were liquidated…
I have some experience with thermite. Yes, of course, obviously demolitions and an expert job, except for B#7 – there somebody left a wire loose.
Nobody mentioned Al Franken and the “Jew call” (The Jew Call by Al Franken, in his own words) https://youtu.be/byjlfHbh6AQ Inside job when people get advance warning…
Then there’s Gelatin… use Yandex.
Best! Thanks for all the links fellas! And especially thanks to Saker!
P
Don’t forget the dancing Israelis and the Black Eagle Trust.
On the hit into the Pentagon, my glaring ‘clue’ that the reality was not what was publicly-proclaimed was the lack of release of all the Pentagon parking-lot camera footage, as well as the FBI going around and confiscating the camera footage of every business with a view to that area (also not returned).
If there was nothing ‘anomalous’ seen by all those cameras, there is no reason not to have made that footage public, long ago. This absolutely screams of some form of evidence suppression…
While I would like to see the other videos that were taken at the time of the Pentagon impact released, I find it amazing that interested people who make these claims are unaware of what information is actually contained in the videos that have been released.
1) For example, using the two nearly adjacent parking gate cameras, that have a time separation of 0.136 seconds, they can be used to independently document the approaching planes speed at (about) 542 mph – and an elevation consistent with impacting the generator trailer with the right engine and the left engine gouging out a section of a retaining wall (I actually think the turbine blades “milled” the ‘gouge’ out). I was able to identify this speed by looking and spending lots of time wondering what information I could find in the video — one way or the other.
2) The shadow captured in the CITGO video shows the location as the plane passed overhead.
3) The Doubletree video captures the fireball rising upon impact that was captured in the parking gate cameras.
Based on my experience with this line of argument, no amount of video evidence would ever satisfy those who prefer their favorite story and find actual analysis irrelevant.
Chapter 10: Analysis of the CITGO Security Cameras
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BuWwycORl0
One of the security camera videos that was released is the camera at the CITGO gas station, between the Pentagon and the Navy Annex. The images are low resolution and taken at one frame per second, but there is a single frame that captures the shadow of the incoming plane as it passes just to the south of the station.
Chapter 11: Pentagon Security Camera Analysis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SunhDlCMJJc
Two closely spaced security cameras, recording at one frame per second, captured the plane as it crossed the lawn. These images have been attacked by some as having been Photoshopped to show the plane. This section evaluates the differences in the two videos and assesses their authenticity. The two videos were combined onto a single recording device, so the frames are necessarily staggered. Internal evidence is used to measure the time lag between the two sets of frames, and the resulting calibration is used to derive a measurement of the speed of the plane, independent of assumptions from any other sources. The resulting speed measurement is in good agreement with the radar and FDR data.
NOTE: Regarding the FDR data mentioned above, the analysis by Warren Stutt and David Chandler contains a final datapoint that records a maximum recordable acceleration/velocity of the tail section to the left. This is consistent with the sudden rotation caused by the right engine hitting the generator trailer and rotating the tail to the left– immediately before impact. This rotation displaced the tail in position so that it hit around columns 12 and 13.
On a final note, I greatly appreciate the information contained in thesaker.is. This is because, while i can figure out engineering details, I cannot figure of geopolitics because there are too many interrelated actors and need a guide to the world around me.
It’s fascinating how the 9/11 dissident community can’t agree on what actually happened.
– planes/no planes
– explosives/natural collapse after impact
Whoever organised the event did a good job in spreading confusion and dissent.
It doesn’t really matter though, as it was clearly an inside job, as are so many other ‘ terrorist’ events. I think they’ve got sloppier with cover ups over the years. Perhaps they’ve got away with it for so long they’ve become over confident?
In the meantime, those brave Ukies just need a few hundred more tanks etc and they’ll be at the gates of Moscow in no time at all.
US Crime Inc didn’t blow the Twin Towers or the Twin Pipelines. Spontaneous Combustion in both cases.
Russian, many other Intelligence Services-Private Dupes know it was a bad CIA Operation using their best proxies including David Copperfield who broke his magician’s MGM Grand Tour to assist with the 9/11 Illusion among other conjuring acts such as the Dancing Israelis.
All excellent comments. What I don’t understand is assuming it was a conspiracy in the classic sense, why haven’t, for example, Chinese or Russian Federation intelligence agencies respectively facilitated concrete proof of said conspiracy to the wider world? Or, put slightly diffrently, wouldn’t convincing factual revelation of such an unprecedented US auto-coup on 9/11 greatly accelerate the end of US imperialism worldwide and augur in the oh-so-vaunted age of multipolarity that China, Russia, Brazil, and many other important countries are ostensibly so keen to see materialize?
Hello, i becamse a 9-11 truther on September 11, 2001, on that same day Michael Rivero from the alternative news site http://www.whatreallyhappened.com wrote an article on that day called “Fake Terror: The road to dictatorship and war”. There is also on pdfdrive.com an article-book written by a Russian intellectual that claims that 9-11 was not done neither by Al Qaeda, nor Bush, that it was done by the Illuminati Order (global elites), his name is Dimitri Khalezov here is the PDF direct link of his 9-11 truth theory:
https://stgvisie.home.xs4all.nl/Dimitri_Khalezov_911thology.pdf
and
https://es.pdfdrive.com/the-third-truth-about-9-11pdf-e33499008.html
.
.
I believe in conspiracies and even in small conspiracies that do not kill people. For example many people are not aware that capitalist milk corporations put water in their milk they sell at grocery stores in order to make more money. And there is even a conspiracy by car dealers to lower the miles that the car has driven in order to make more money and sell used cars at higher prices. This is the way this evil world is, that’s why many food corporations have collapsed, like for example today’s Big Macs of Mcdonalds are a lot smallers. And the Sara Lee Pound Cakes are not made with real butter anymore
We have truth tables for gates in binary logic, and we call that ‘truth’ and ‘logic’. 1 plus 1 can equal 0.
John 8:31-32 (KJV)
31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, [then] are ye my disciples indeed; 32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
John 14:17 (KJV)
[Even] the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
Indeed the truther doctrine may be true, but knowing that truth is not necessarily knowing that same truth that makes us free, which is the very word and logic of God that makes us free.
1+1=0 in binary logic on 1 level but 1+1=10 if you can carry it beyond to see it at the next level, where binary 10 equals decimal 2.
Philippians 2:14-15 (KJV)
14 Do all things without murmurings and disputings: 15 That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;
The entire design of the shadow government and deep state is to hold it all down to murmuring and disputing, without faith, hope or charity.
Matthew 23:23 (KJV)
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier [matters] of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
Luke 11:42 (KJV)
But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
It’s certain that it’s a government without judgment, mercy and faith, or without judgment and the love of God, and that’s the truth.
Matthew 6:33 (KJV)
But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
Romans 14:17 (KJV)
For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.
With some truths we do not have much righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Ghost, because it’s all negative, but the corollary is all positive.