The American people put the Democrats back in power in Congress specifically to stop the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. What did they get in return? The “Surge”. Then they put Obama in power to stop the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What did they get since?
a) not a single anti-war Democrat in Obama’s cabinet
b) the foam-at-his-mouth Zionist extremist Rahm Emanuel as Obama’s Chief of Staff (see note at the bottom)
c) a huge escalation of the war in Afghanistan
d) an extension of the war into the Swat areas of Pakistan
e) an acceleration of the preparations to attack Iran
f) Gitmo trials are still going on, PATRIOT act still active, etc.
g) Dubya era war criminals are free from prosecution
h) Van Jones, the only person in Obama’s Administration who supported a new 9/11 investigation is fired
i) the plans to finally give the USA a civilized health care system are abandoned
One would imagine that with such a tally Barack Obama would be clearly seen for what he is: just another puppet for exactly the same elites who ran the Dubya puppet. But no, it turns out that the friggin Nobel Committee has given Barack “no we can’t” Obama the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize!
Now, it is quite true that the Nobel Prize has a, shall we say, rather “checkered” history and has been granted to such “humanitarians” as Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat, Le Duc Tho, and even Henry Kissinger (!). Interestingly, Ghandi – who was nominated five times – never got this prize. So it’s not the first time that this prize is awarded to bonafide war criminals, terrorists or imperial leaders.
Still, the news this morning leaves me seething with rage at the arrogant clowns who had the mind-blowing “political correctness” to give Obama the prize while he is running three imperial wars.
What can one answer to such triumphant brown-nosing, to such monumental hyprocrisy? Only one thing I suppose – that we shall never surrender to it. Never. The brilliant American singer David Rovics (whose music and art I will review here in the near future), puts it best:
I speak for many
When I say no one should have seven homes
While some don’t have any
Though I may find myself stranded in some strange place
With naught but a vapid stare
I remember the world and I know
We are everywhere
When I say the time for the rich, it will come
Let me count the ways
Victories or hints of the future
Havana, Caracas, Chiapas, Buenos Aires
How many people are wanting and waiting
And fighting for their share
They hide in their ivory towers
But we are everywhere
Religions and prisons and races
Borders and nations
FBI agents and congressmen
And corporate radio stations
They try to keep us apart, but we find each other
And the rulers are always aware
That they’re a tiny minority
And we are everywhere
With every bomb that they drop, every home they destroy
Every land they invade
Comes a new generation from under the rubble
Saying “we are not afraid”
They will pretend we are few
But with each child that a billion mothers bear
Comes the next demonstration
That we are everywhere.
The Saker
PS: Some trivia: did you know that in Hebrew Rahm (רעם) means “thunder” and Barack (ברק) means “lightning.” Some “weather forecast” for our poor planet….
I thought it was a radio spoof or something, was listening while in transit and laughed aloud. Mondo bizarro, the inmates run the asylum, the wolves guard the henhouse.
I know. I literally could not believe my eyes this morning. I did not expect these SOBs to give the prize to Cindy Sheehan or something, but Obama?!
Does sound like a joke, but somehow it feels more like a hard slap in the face of the peace movement, in particular to all those American who are REALLY trying to stop violence, exploitation and wars.
Quote – “Still, the news this morning leaves me seething with rage at the arrogant clowns who had the mind-blowing “political correctness” to give Obama the prize while he is running three imperial wars.”
You are deadly wrong. If the news the candidates’ names were to be presented to Nobel Committee up to the 1 of Feb is correct it means Mr Obama was only Two Week President and the whole “shocking event” about the Nobel Peace Prize was fixed earlier.
P2O2
@P2O2: and how does that make me wrong?
@Saker
When I read your text for the second time it came to my mind your text could be understand two ways. Firstly, you were talking about those who decided who would be awarded, and secondly, ypu spoke about those who control Mr Obama The Puppet.
I had thought you did choose the first option (about Nobel Prize Committee members). I don’t think they are “arrogant clowns” (albeit they are!) but I think they have participated in a broader “conspiracy plot”, namely to anoint Mr Obama with the Prize and simultaneously getting him ready in the eyes of public opinion, both domestic, and abroad, for future UN GenSek’s post or even the post of the first leader of the NWO Government.
Such voices were arisen here and there.
Regards
Actually, Lee Duc Tho had the sense to turn the prize down – he knew it would be sullied by the likes of Kissinger.
@anonymous#3: I did mean to call the Nobel Committee “arrogant clowns” and I did mean to say that in reality there is no such thing as the “Obama Administration” which, at any rate, could be more aptly called the “Emanuel Administration”. What I don’t believe in is a single, coordinated, worldwide conspiracy to do something with Obama the Puppet, nor do I see a world government any time soon. What I do see is a powerul empire with brown-nosing minions all over the planet trying to get its favors. What I do see is a clueless Europe totally unable to find any relevance to itself. What I also see is a European elite totally sold – body and soul – to what I call the “Imperial High Command” i.e., the folks who are Obama’s puppetteers: the anglo-zionist plutocracy in power in the USA.
But I have to say that the USraelian Empire is *already* over-extended, over-committed and over-indebted and that it cannot form the basis for any meaningful world government. Even its latest attempt at restoring Imperial dominion over Latin America (the coup in Honduras) is, I think, getting bogged down with each passing day.
Nor do I see any other candidates which could form the basis for a world government. Not China, not Russia, not Brazil and most definitely not any smaller countries.
What do we see today?
A core group of Echelon countries running NATO and Europe, while themselves being run by the Zionists. This group is definitely not on the rise. A counter-force is gradually coming together around the main SCO countries, Russia and China. Latin America could still go either way, but there are real indications of a loose alliance being formed by Venezuela, Cuba, Bolivia, Nicaragua and, possibly, a couple of others.
Too many actors, too many variables. I don’t see a world government coming out of all this.
Do you?
Cheers,
VS
PS: as for the post of UNSC I can assure you that it hold no power whatsoever.
We differ in one point – the role of the USA in the NWO. You said she is too weak now. I claim that it was the USA which had to be destroyed first to have a slightest possibility to create any NWO Gov, on UN basis for example.
You may be right with European elites intentions but with one remark – the weaker the U.S.o A., the stronger EU. The EU was founded on the premises to “be against America” (France, Germans!).
Any WORLD regulations coming from UN, be it climate CO2 trade, or forced vaccinations (thru pandemic scare) are the first signs of “something global”. Some are working hard and “officially” thru many private organizations to have those regulations to happen.
Mr Obama has come from noplace. Now we know he was educated by communist mentors and read books carrying communist agenda. Just as Clintons were readying for the post of the US President, the Bush Junior, so was Mr Obama. No doubt about this. What he said he would do, and what he’s doing in real substantiate any “conspiracy” remarks in this whole issue of Mr Obama Case.
Perhaps you see NWO Gov simillar to US Gov – consistent within and with well developed gov agencies. I see it in its first stages.
You probably did read what NATO was left for? Future NWO Gov armed forces. Anyone who believe in NWO in his earnest must take into consideration such forces. Building them from scratch would be extremely hard if not impossible. Taking over existing military structures was easy as we can see. The world must be accustomed to the new order first. Now we call it NATO forces, then we will read about World Armed Forces (WAF) for example. Impossible? No. just contrary. Does it belong to conspiracy theories? No, just contrary. Probability of the scenario is too high.
Russia and China are THE only forces left on the paths to NWO and which have to be crushed.
Russia MUST be the first to go (due to faith, resources, and nukes). Chinese are from another clay. China works patiently, darned patiently. She could take over NWO Gov with sheer economic and demographic volume in the last development stadium of NWO Gov. China buys land and resources in Africa, Australia, and South America. Guess what for? :)
But we may end up with two polar world – NWO and China. What then – I dunno. Just as you said, there are too many variables, even for the glass ball.
Regards
Let me add one issue to our discussion, the quote from Mr Obama speech cited in Times Online:
Barack Obama’s peace prize starts a fight
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6868905.ece
Quote – ““Let me be clear. I do not view it as recognition of my own accomplishments but rather as an affirmation of American leadership on behalf of aspirations held by people in all nations,” he said.”
Does it means that Mr Obama will continue Messrs Bush and Clinton’s policy through military/economic/”color revolution” intervention in every country the American President has decided did not comply with the “American democracy standards”? With all the evils it is full of?
Digress: I do recognize difference between sick and pervert “American democracy” (with rule of mobs) and true American Republic (with rule of the Law).
Regards (P2O2)
Hi,
Friendly FYI: ‘Barak’ means “blessing”, not lightning. Yes, there is a semitic root brq that is used for lightning, but the root of Barak’s name is brk. The q is a stronger sounding letter, whereas k is just the same as our k sound.