Please visit Andrei’s website: https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
and support him here: https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=60459185
Saker Message:
Please visit Andrei’s website: https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/
and support him here: https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=60459185
My life is now a tale of two Andreis. I am forever grateful. It will be passed down generation to generation in my family the stories, and documented evidence, of two fellow heroes in our lives.
People are always barking about how we are here because generation – fill blank – did nothing. Thanks for putting that lie to test. We are doing everything we can short of picking up arms. We are the way of the peaceful warrior. Blessing to both of my Andreis.
Excellent comment. I’m too old, too fucking blind, too disabled from my service crawling carrier decks. But I’d stand shoulder to shoulder with these folks, Andrei and Andrei and Larry if they’d have me. It’s not treason, it’s the right thing.
@ Andrei
I imagine you are going to love this!!!!!
https://ourfiniteworld.com/2022/08/23/why-no-politician-is-willing-to-tell-us-the-real-energy-story/
further here is two invoices for gas over two years
July 2021: EUR 120k
July 2022: EUR 979k
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/5467
Both your links are due to market manipulation. The first link is filled with graphs and statistic = lies.
Fact is we have unlimited abiotic gas and oil and the emptied reserves are slowly being filled naturally again.
The “fossil” oil is a prank from Rockefeller’s exploitation of the snob effect.
If that’s truly the case then why are we fracking it out of the ground, drilling into the oceans and boiling it out of the ground?
In any case we are using it faster than it can be replenished and costs are continually going up but not the wages.
Beyond that some interesting history from T. Boone Pickens, who had some interesting things to say way back in 2008:
“World crude oil production has topped out at 85 million barrels per day even as demand keeps climbing, helping to drive a stunning surge in prices, billionaire oil investor T. Boone Pickens said on Tuesday.
I do believe you have peaked out at 85 millions barrels per day globally, Mr. Pickens, who heads BP Capital hedge fund with more than US $4billion under management, said during testimony to the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
The United States alone has been using “21 million of the 85 million and producing about 7 of the 21, so if I could take just a minute on this point, the demand is about 86.4 million barrels a day, and when the demand is greater than the supply, the price has to go up until it kills demand,” Mr. Pickens told lawmakers.
US crude futures have risen by a third since the start of the year and more than sixfold since 2002 as surging demand from china and other developing nations outpaces new production.
Oil slipped on Tuesday, a day after touching a record high near US 140 a barrel, but remained above US 133 a barrel.
Mr. Pickens, who announced a US $2 billion investment in wind energy earlier this year, told lawmakers during a hearing on renewable electricity that he expected “the price of oil will go up further.” without alternatives, the cost of foreign oil will drain the United States of more resources, he said.”
This is correct. Oil and gas are not fossil fuels. When an oil well has been “depleted” there is still more than 80% of oil left but over time becomes so thick that it will not flow any more. There are technologies that can solve this problem but nobody seem to want them? Rockefeller’s prank is a well documented fraud, happened in Switzerland where the world was conned into believing that crude is a finite resource. Russians know this but would anyone listen to Russians? This is why they do not pour concrete into “depleted” wells unlike everyone else. Too long story and it it true that oil is plentiful.
“When an oil well has been “depleted” there is still more than 80% of oil left,”, where did you get this info from, Why do I have to go look up oil production because you spout random numbers. Please inform yourself, 30 to 35% is recovered just by drilling a well. Using water injection, simple brute force method, you get another ~5 to 50% of the 70% remaining, so best case ~75% oil is extracted, worst case ~30-35% oil is extracted.
@ Sam
My only question is are we still extracting after 14 years {2008} 85 million barrels of oil per day today? If not why?
You cant see it that way as the whole market is manipulated after excel sheets and finance . Its about control and profit, not peak and demand nor “available resources”.
From a Robert Hirsch….
As of 2018, it was unclear whether world crude oil production had peaked. After exhibiting steady growth since the 2009 recession, oil production has been roughly stable between 2015 and 2017, with 75.1 million barrels per day in 2015, 75.4 mbpd in 2016 and 74.7 mbpd in 2017
and further… https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/692
“World oil demand is expected to grow 50 percent by 2025.4 To meet that
demand, ever-larger volumes of oil will have to be produced. Since oil production
from individual reservoirs grows to a peak and then declines, new reservoirs
must be continually discovered and brought into production to compensate for
the depletion of older reservoirs. If large quantities of new oil are not discovered
and brought into production somewhere in the world, then world oil production
will no longer satisfy demand. That point is called the peaking of world
conventional oil production.
When world oil production peaks, there will still be large reserves remaining.
Peaking means that the rate of world oil production cannot increase; it also
means that production will thereafter decrease with time.”
https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/692/hirsch0502.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Beyond this I asked a director ‘Frank now retired’ of our gas company who worked in the Alberta Oilsands how many years left of oil extraction up there? His reply was about 25 years if that is nothing happens in the Middle East. If things go sideways there it will be the Alberta oilsands it is why all of the American Companies are up there.’
I also see firsthand the affordability issues that Gail talks about firsthand and i also heard from a director of our company that they would be happy to just break even.
Also oil companies can no longer be involved in competing against one another for market share. They are joining up as our did and we made money because of it. Now comes the reinvestments though?
Lastly, about abiotic and this will certainly come across as sounding quite crazy but it needs saying and even discussing.
Everyone talks about our planet being millions of years old. If like me one believes the Bible then a young earth is postulated yes because no way did the story of Adam and Eve come down to us from millions of years ago. The bigger more difficult issue though is Noah and the great flood. Such a global cataclysm must have dumped a great deal of Whooly Mammoths along with all the rest of the flesh and bone along with mixing in with it all of the fauna of the planet, trees and so much more into the crust of the earth where it got boiled by the heat turning it into a gooey mess? So maybe oil is neither abiotic or biotic but a mixture of it all along with the magma of the earth?
Just theory and bulldung? lol Can’t say for sure but given what i found and was given in fact, I know that the current story that climate change is a result of manmade global warming due to industrial pollution is bullcarp. Lies, all Lies!!!!!!!
The truth the real truth is quite different I’m afraid revolving around the pollution of sin. If you wish go here and read /book-review-andrei-martyanovs-the-real-revolution-in-military-affairs/#comment-729151
Right on! Have any wildcatters tried to create a model of oil and gas deposits based on that worldwide flood and the teeming life that was buried? I believe the continent was split then and the pieces set in motion. I believe that pent up energy is what God used to take out Sodom and Gomorrah and the five cities on the plain. Nothing like a volcano to prepare queers for their eternal roast.
There is also some evidence of atomic fission in Africa, natural “atomic bombs” where a critical mass was reached through geologic movement of Uranium deposits. I do not remember the details, read the article long ago, but hard radiation was discovered, I think it was the Congo where there is lots of mineral wealth already.
Are you sure about that or is it just a matter of not being able to pump all of it out in the first place?
Erdo Ataturk after talks with Ze und Guttersnipe has stated that Ze feels vulnerable, feels he’s being used, lied to.
Get The F**k Outta Here (GTFOH)! Once the US Deep State/CIA snare/own you then you’ll be bending over and touching your toes whenever they get a semi-erection . . . . . until you’re no longer of any use, you get discarded like a used sanitary towel. If lucky you keep your stolen loot, shuffle off somewhere and keep your head down OR disappeared, maybe your handlers feel that your coke habit loosens lips.
Personally I can’t see any statues in the future being erected for any of today’s current crop of political conmen/women, charlatans, B movie actors, however, if things go our way they’ll find infamy on the gallows.
Most inspiring Mr M
Typical behaviour for sociopaths.
Zelenskyy lie and exploit people 24/7 and hurt on his feelings when his funders do the same to him.
Thank you Andrei,
You give me the information I need to make good decisions. I can understand the situation with sanctions on the whole world. I don’t think UN leadership is insane I believe they are puppet of our nation the USA.
Did I understand Mr. Martyanov correctly when he said the Ukrainian Army was going to launch a counter attack using MRAPs? If this is true it is a very, very bad idea. They won’t get far, these are very vulnerable to all types of antitank missles. Hell, I’ll bet a .50 cal can take one of these out.
Turn the turret around, fly a white flag and drive straight to the Russian forces. This is the only chance of survival.
Greeks do not hate Russians. They are stuck with oligarchs that are greedy or traitors or both.
I personally deplore Anti-Russian sentiment as another form of ethnic prejudice or racism but there are studies about where it is most prevalent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Russian_sentiment
When it comes to outfits like the defunct Cambridge Analytica or other psyops groups, I’m sure they have all this kind of information on tap and are using it against Russia.
I would be curious to know who, or which groups handle western NATO psyops, but I am pretty sure the trolls come from somewhere. I for one believe in the climate science of AGW so Greta does not offend me.
I am pretty sure western gas and oil are players and they will profit by these rising prices.
I am ashamed to be in the country registered in second place (Portugal), the MSM and the American cinema have done their job well, in this corner of Europe people talk more about football than politics. If Russia opened the doors to colonize its extensive territory with the disaffected on this side, I believe that many would abandon their countries, I have more and more desire to do so even with almost 50 years
It’s true that such polls may only give us a superficial appreciation of some bias and may not correlate directly with some other words such as hate, or phobia, and sentiment may be the most appropriate word.
After all, if the main thing in life is football, how serious could our compatriots be about their hatred and fear?
Football in Russia is crashing and isolation can only hasten its decline
Jonathan Wilson
https://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2022/mar/26/football-in-russia-is-crashing-and-isolation-can-only-hasten-its-decline
Sports are a tool used to discredit Russia, with extreme prejudice.
But hatred and fear is what the war mongers want most, to sell arms, and win power and money.
Wikipedia indirectly references the Latana study, through this link. The author shows clear bias in favour of Ukraine.
Negative views of Russia mainly limited to western liberal democracies, poll shows
Annual global survey of attitudes to democracy finds many countries maintain positive views of Russia
Luke Harding
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/30/negative-views-of-russia-mainly-limited-to-western-liberal-democracies-poll-shows
The Latana study is here.
https://latana.com/democracy-perception-index-report-2022/
The mission statement of Latana goes like this:
“Latana
We’re here to help brands make better marketing decisions by delivering world-class, scalable insights.”
I don’t know what brands have to do with war, other than psyops, but we can’t get too serious about their rating system, in my view. Racial prejudice is not a matter of “branding” nor is democracy. Insofar as the numbers are informative, I will work with them, but democracy is overrated against divinity.
It’s better to be right than to always submit to the will of the majority. It’s better to be informed than to be dis-informed with the majority.
I don’t want to brand my Canadian compatriots as universally racist but they also are right up there in the poll on democracy, with Portugal, when it comes to Russia and Russians.
But Canada is a nice country environmentally and with lots of space.
Heat waves and drought are hitting Europe hard. That’s climate change in my view and we all have to work together to overcome it, and that includes Russia and China, which are also warmer than normal.
We haven’t seen anything yet and there’s no place to go to get away from a global problem. There’s likely a few places but in decades there will be gross changes and in a century it will be out of sight unless we deal with it now.
Putin is one of the few leaders who gets most of it but few people get him. He still expresses some doubt about the mechanisms of AGW but it’s a work in progress. He is too much smarter than them, except how much will that matter in a global crisis?
“ How fast the humankind is moving towards replacing hydrocarbons with alternative sources is a different question. According to expert data, global energy consumption will increase in the coming decades, and the ratio between hydrocarbons and renewable sources, such as nuclear power and hydropower, will remain about the same.
Today (whether it is good or bad, but this is the case) this relationship between different sources remains unchanged. The total volume is up. Let us not forget that Russia is a vast country with hydropower capabilities, and we are expanding and will continue to expand nuclear energy. Nuclear power accounts for only 16 percent of energy generation. In France, it is already more than 90 percent, and we have only 16. We have to get to at least 25. Our neighbours, Finland, are going to build as well. And so on. So, we have not missed anything.”
from
Plenary session of the International Arctic Forum
Vladimir Putin attended the plenary session of 5th International Arctic Forum The Arctic: Territory of Dialogue.
April 9, 2019
http://www.en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/60250
Elsewhere Putin explicitly acknowledges the warming arctic and the accelerated rate of warming in the arctic.
The cheapest energy is nuclear. Russia has made floating nuclear power stations anybody can buy and sail to their homeland and use.
But the Wall Street/London Cabal who control the oil/gas/windmill/sun/hydro/co2/clima market will not allow it as it disturbs their control and pockets.
But we can know this is the situation. That we have unlimited energy to our disposal, and that only financial and political forces obstruct our access to it.
I agree on nuclear. The fear of the European greens or greens in general contradicts the science. Climate science in general warns us of the impending disaster but the science of carbon free nuclear energy is there in practice and it’s there on the shelf already with the promise of abundant relatively GHG free energy. We need greens that can put 2 and 2 together on climate, nuclear energy and the science of both, to get a political movement go that contradicts the war mongering, arms trading and profiteering influences out of politics.
But most greens seem pretty dim to date. James Hansen and Michael Shellenberger see the light on nuclear energy.
“ Nuclear power has the smallest land footprint and lowest life-cycle carbon emissions of any energy source. It can generate electricity around the clock or as needed. It is also among the safest forms of energy on the planet. Indeed, Dr. Pushker Kharecha and I showed that as of ten years ago, nuclear power had saved 1.8 million lives by displacing polluting fossil fuels — a number that could be multiplied several-fold by midcentury. Nuclear power provides good-paying union jobs and tax revenue. It enables vibrant, thriving communities.
Tackling the climate crisis requires policies based on facts, not prejudice. Wind and solar power help with early decarbonization, where they can replace fossil fuels without need for large storage and transmission upgrades. However, systems overly dependent on intermittent, low-energy-density renewables — as California and Germany have proven — lead to skyrocketing electric rates, grid instability, and continued dependence on fossil fuels. Cost-optimized energy modeling reveals that nuclear power must ramp up for emissions to approach zero. In fact, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finds that nuclear generation in 2050 grows by two to six times 2010 levels for all four illustrative pathways consistent with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. Today’s policies need to reflect this awareness and initiate multi-decadal plans to achieve reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy systems.”
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/Documents/Hansen.2022.Commentary.NuclearPowerNewYork.AlbanyTimesUnion.pdf
Years ago, it was a revelation about the role that big oil played in economic imperialism and US wars. Things have not changed that much in my view. The attack on the Zaporhyzia plant was ordered to discredit nuclear safety, of oil and gas, by oil and gas and for oil and gas.
Greens are useful idiots paid by Wall Street. They are turncoats for a few bucks, with not one single sincere interest in the environment, our nature nor animals, only hypocrisy and do-gooder jobs doing the shitty work of forcing natives out from their land, destabilise and push governments away in favour of private investor banks.
Windmills kills a lot of birds and is the most state substituted and expensive energy form of them all.
Warren Buffet claim they are only here because a few left wing politicians romantic feelings, as windmills have no technical, economic, financial energy purpose.
Hard words, but I have never seen a Green with a professional straight attitude to their subject.
What is the “climate science of AGW”? Greta is obviously is a puppy petted on her empty little indoctrinated head.
“Global cooling”, “global warming”, and now “climate change”, if any, are 100% due to the sun. Mankind with all the industrial pollution and efforts to turn the entire planet into an eroded desert, have no measurable effect on global weather. God – Father, Son, and Holy Ghost – is in charge of the weather in spite of the massive efforts of governments to weaponize weather.
Because neither of the previous attempts – warming and cooling – created lasting hysteria and procrastination to government bureaucrats for salvation, the mantra was changed to “climate”. The goal is to distract people away from the disaster of the fiat currency collapse as the welfare and retirement ponzi schemes expire, the actuarial reality that was known from the beginning is to the point the systems are collapsing. Even the RINOs are staand completely outside the control of mankind.rting to admit that social security and socialized medicine are impossible burdens.
The problem is propaganda at which the west excels at. Wars are no longer won by purely military means, they’re won by indoctrinated populations cheering for more of it, or less and that’s dependent on the media. European industry and economies won’t collapse. If it even looks as if there will be damaging effects the current verbal onslaught will stop along with the weapons and financial aid to Ukraine and everyone will be friends again. Europe won’t let itself collapse because of the Ukraine.
Are you serious?
Propaganda never won a war. Europe is already in collapse. Damaging effects are accelerating globally and nobody is even talking about stopping anything.
This winter in Europe will be like the winter of 1945-46. The EU and NATO are over.
I’m very serious. We’ve just come out of a two year media manufactured covid hysteria, straight into one of ‘monsters’ and ‘Russian Nazis’ and the public are loving every minute of it. This will never get to 1945/6, the current political class wouldn’t survive the backlash. It’s not winter yet, but as it gets closer and the European populations realize the consequences, there will be a 180 degree turn in the current cheering for the Ukraine.
I presume this is sarcasm ?
“Europe” is sawing of the branch it is sitting on.
Of course if it survives impact with the ground, it will be possible to glue the brach back on the tree.
It’s questionable if it will work as good as before, the tree might spit it out like a parasite.
Agree, and it’s not just propaganda. It’s censorship, ghost bans and sophisticated algorithms to increase the degree of separation between proponents of peace and reconciliation. Favourable comments are repositioned in the information matrix so that they can only meet trolls and fools.
There’s no agreeing with them and the inquiring and open mind meets a wall of wartime propaganda histrionics devoid of reasonable or meaningful information, military or otherwise.
That’s a big reason why I appreciate this site. I can’t say it’s necessarily Antiwar but at least it allows reasonable commentators and articles.
But in such a world of analytical chaos and noise, there’s bound to be some seeping in. Like Dugin, as some have written, he was a philosopher as much as a protestor, and as much as we were allowed to disagree, it was stimulating and progressive, over all. War, murder and assassination are not so, so much.
The western SMO is more psyop than militarily predictive of the outcomes. Even when Russia wins, they intend to paint Russia as losing, and they won’t paint themselves as liars, so sometimes we have to.
Chris They are basing everything on their control over the MSM, and think they can brainwash the populations to regime changes, conformity and global control.
But they forgot twisted words and paper declarations have to pass the physical reality test.
But that’s the problem. Propaganda has become reality for the majority of western populations. Remember the cheering for more authoritarianism during the Covid lock downs? The fanaticism behind the climate extinction movement?
Currently, the next British Prime Minister may well be Liz Truss. She’s the one who encouraged British civilians to go and fight in Ukraine (she was later forced to backtrack on that) and now says she has no problem in a nuclear confrontation with Russia! The majority aren’t against this, they’re either apathetic, or cheering it on. That’s the power of propaganda.
Great visual map Andrei. It really shows quite starkly not only what the AFU are up against; quite frankly insurmountable odds but, how they have nothing, absolutely nothing with which to mount any sort of offensive let alone a counter offensive. A simple but really effective way of presenting the stark reality on the ground.
Андрей, as you are well aware, the lesser of two evils is all the ‘muricans ever get to choose from. They rarely get to vote FOR someone, but vote AGAINST the other candidate.
Most ordinary Europeans want good relations with Russia from reports I have both past and recently, its only certain elites there and their US minons who are revamping the age old agenda.
Andrei I think should have his own TV / Internet / Podcast show like Infowars – beamed to both Russia and the West (both in English and Russian language) commenting on world events.
Perhaps Fox News and Tucker Carlson would have him one the show giving his views on things too ?